Loading…
Retention and partitioning of 15N-labeled deposited N in a tropical plantation forest
The effects of deposited nitrogen (N) on forest ecosystems largely depend on the amount of N retained in the ecosystems and its partitioning among ecosystem pools. However, our understanding of the capacity of tropical plantations to retain deposited N is limited. To evaluate the retention of deposi...
Saved in:
Published in: | Biogeochemistry 2021-02, Vol.152 (2-3), p.237-251 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c164y-22ca2df9501dfd5a4a948769450a532bfcaa3181b1d9769b7b36059823e3e8183 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c164y-22ca2df9501dfd5a4a948769450a532bfcaa3181b1d9769b7b36059823e3e8183 |
container_end_page | 251 |
container_issue | 2-3 |
container_start_page | 237 |
container_title | Biogeochemistry |
container_volume | 152 |
creator | Gurmesa, Geshere Abdisa Mo, Jiangming Gundersen, Per Mao, Qinggong Fang, Yunting Zhu, Feifei Lu, Xiankai |
description | The effects of deposited nitrogen (N) on forest ecosystems largely depend on the amount of N retained in the ecosystems and its partitioning among ecosystem pools. However, our understanding of the capacity of tropical plantations to retain deposited N is limited. To evaluate the retention of deposited N in a human-disturbed pine plantation in southern China and compare the result with previous findings in an adjacent old-growth forest, we added
15
N-tracer monthly to the forest floor for one year and determined its recovery in ecosystem compartments four months after the last addition. We monitored
15
N recoveries in soil solution monthly to quantify leaching losses. The pine forest retained about 58 ± 5% of the
15
N-labeled deposited N, which is lower than that reported in the adjacent old-growth forest (72 ± 6%). Both forests experience chronic N deposition (recently measured at 51 kg N ha
−1
yr
−1
) and we attribute the difference in retention to effects of previous disturbance mainly understory and litter harvesting in the pine plantation. Only 3 kg N ha
−1
yr
−1
(5% of the
15
N-labeled deposited N) out of the measured total leaching (54 kg N ha
−1
yr
−1
) originated from deposited (and labeled) N from the measurement year, suggesting that N leaching is dominated by unlabeled N sources. Furthermore, results from our study and other similar
15
N labeling experiments together show similar patterns of total ecosystem retention of deposited N in tropical and temperate forests, but here we demonstrate a decreasing retention of N with increased N deposition in these forests. Our findings indicate that plantation forests that experience human-disturbance and chronic N deposition have lower N retention compared to old-growth forests, and thus elevated N inputs in such ecosystems can cause risk of hydrological N losses, soil acidification, and freshwater pollution. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10533-020-00750-y |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2491635760</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2491635760</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c164y-22ca2df9501dfd5a4a948769450a532bfcaa3181b1d9769b7b36059823e3e8183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoOI6-gKuA6-g5SZO2Sxm8wTCCOOAupE06dKhNTTqLvr1xKrhzdS78F_gIuUa4RYD8LiJIIRhwYOmUwKYTskCZCyZRfpySBaAqGJdKnJOLGPcAUOYgFmT75kbXj63vqektHUwY25-r7XfUNxTlhnWmcp2z1LrBx3ZM24a2SU7H4Ie2Nh0dOtOP5hjS-ODieEnOGtNFd_U7l2T7-PC-embr16eX1f2a1aiyiXFeG26bUgLaxkqTmTIrclVmEowUvGpqYwQWWKEt07vKK6FAlgUXTrgCC7EkN3PuEPzXIRXrvT-EPlVqnpWohMwVJBWfVXXwMQbX6CG0nyZMGkH_4NMzPp3w6SM-PSWTmE0xifudC3_R_7i-AVrecoQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2491635760</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Retention and partitioning of 15N-labeled deposited N in a tropical plantation forest</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Gurmesa, Geshere Abdisa ; Mo, Jiangming ; Gundersen, Per ; Mao, Qinggong ; Fang, Yunting ; Zhu, Feifei ; Lu, Xiankai</creator><creatorcontrib>Gurmesa, Geshere Abdisa ; Mo, Jiangming ; Gundersen, Per ; Mao, Qinggong ; Fang, Yunting ; Zhu, Feifei ; Lu, Xiankai</creatorcontrib><description>The effects of deposited nitrogen (N) on forest ecosystems largely depend on the amount of N retained in the ecosystems and its partitioning among ecosystem pools. However, our understanding of the capacity of tropical plantations to retain deposited N is limited. To evaluate the retention of deposited N in a human-disturbed pine plantation in southern China and compare the result with previous findings in an adjacent old-growth forest, we added
15
N-tracer monthly to the forest floor for one year and determined its recovery in ecosystem compartments four months after the last addition. We monitored
15
N recoveries in soil solution monthly to quantify leaching losses. The pine forest retained about 58 ± 5% of the
15
N-labeled deposited N, which is lower than that reported in the adjacent old-growth forest (72 ± 6%). Both forests experience chronic N deposition (recently measured at 51 kg N ha
−1
yr
−1
) and we attribute the difference in retention to effects of previous disturbance mainly understory and litter harvesting in the pine plantation. Only 3 kg N ha
−1
yr
−1
(5% of the
15
N-labeled deposited N) out of the measured total leaching (54 kg N ha
−1
yr
−1
) originated from deposited (and labeled) N from the measurement year, suggesting that N leaching is dominated by unlabeled N sources. Furthermore, results from our study and other similar
15
N labeling experiments together show similar patterns of total ecosystem retention of deposited N in tropical and temperate forests, but here we demonstrate a decreasing retention of N with increased N deposition in these forests. Our findings indicate that plantation forests that experience human-disturbance and chronic N deposition have lower N retention compared to old-growth forests, and thus elevated N inputs in such ecosystems can cause risk of hydrological N losses, soil acidification, and freshwater pollution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-2563</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-515X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10533-020-00750-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Acidic soils ; Acidification ; Agriculture ; Biogeosciences ; Coniferous forests ; Deposition ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Ecosystem recovery ; Ecosystems ; Environmental Chemistry ; Forest ecosystems ; Forest floor ; Forests ; Freshwater ; Freshwater pollution ; Growth ; Hydrology ; Inland water environment ; Leaching ; Life Sciences ; Nitrates ; Nitrogen isotopes ; Partitioning ; Pine ; Plantations ; Retention ; Soil ; Soil acidification ; Soil pollution ; Soil solution ; Soils ; Temperate forests ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; Tracers ; Tropical climate ; Understory</subject><ispartof>Biogeochemistry, 2021-02, Vol.152 (2-3), p.237-251</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c164y-22ca2df9501dfd5a4a948769450a532bfcaa3181b1d9769b7b36059823e3e8183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c164y-22ca2df9501dfd5a4a948769450a532bfcaa3181b1d9769b7b36059823e3e8183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gurmesa, Geshere Abdisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mo, Jiangming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gundersen, Per</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mao, Qinggong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Yunting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Feifei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Xiankai</creatorcontrib><title>Retention and partitioning of 15N-labeled deposited N in a tropical plantation forest</title><title>Biogeochemistry</title><addtitle>Biogeochemistry</addtitle><description>The effects of deposited nitrogen (N) on forest ecosystems largely depend on the amount of N retained in the ecosystems and its partitioning among ecosystem pools. However, our understanding of the capacity of tropical plantations to retain deposited N is limited. To evaluate the retention of deposited N in a human-disturbed pine plantation in southern China and compare the result with previous findings in an adjacent old-growth forest, we added
15
N-tracer monthly to the forest floor for one year and determined its recovery in ecosystem compartments four months after the last addition. We monitored
15
N recoveries in soil solution monthly to quantify leaching losses. The pine forest retained about 58 ± 5% of the
15
N-labeled deposited N, which is lower than that reported in the adjacent old-growth forest (72 ± 6%). Both forests experience chronic N deposition (recently measured at 51 kg N ha
−1
yr
−1
) and we attribute the difference in retention to effects of previous disturbance mainly understory and litter harvesting in the pine plantation. Only 3 kg N ha
−1
yr
−1
(5% of the
15
N-labeled deposited N) out of the measured total leaching (54 kg N ha
−1
yr
−1
) originated from deposited (and labeled) N from the measurement year, suggesting that N leaching is dominated by unlabeled N sources. Furthermore, results from our study and other similar
15
N labeling experiments together show similar patterns of total ecosystem retention of deposited N in tropical and temperate forests, but here we demonstrate a decreasing retention of N with increased N deposition in these forests. Our findings indicate that plantation forests that experience human-disturbance and chronic N deposition have lower N retention compared to old-growth forests, and thus elevated N inputs in such ecosystems can cause risk of hydrological N losses, soil acidification, and freshwater pollution.</description><subject>Acidic soils</subject><subject>Acidification</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Biogeosciences</subject><subject>Coniferous forests</subject><subject>Deposition</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecosystem recovery</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Forest ecosystems</subject><subject>Forest floor</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater pollution</subject><subject>Growth</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Inland water environment</subject><subject>Leaching</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Nitrates</subject><subject>Nitrogen isotopes</subject><subject>Partitioning</subject><subject>Pine</subject><subject>Plantations</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil acidification</subject><subject>Soil pollution</subject><subject>Soil solution</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Temperate forests</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>Tracers</subject><subject>Tropical climate</subject><subject>Understory</subject><issn>0168-2563</issn><issn>1573-515X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoOI6-gKuA6-g5SZO2Sxm8wTCCOOAupE06dKhNTTqLvr1xKrhzdS78F_gIuUa4RYD8LiJIIRhwYOmUwKYTskCZCyZRfpySBaAqGJdKnJOLGPcAUOYgFmT75kbXj63vqektHUwY25-r7XfUNxTlhnWmcp2z1LrBx3ZM24a2SU7H4Ie2Nh0dOtOP5hjS-ODieEnOGtNFd_U7l2T7-PC-embr16eX1f2a1aiyiXFeG26bUgLaxkqTmTIrclVmEowUvGpqYwQWWKEt07vKK6FAlgUXTrgCC7EkN3PuEPzXIRXrvT-EPlVqnpWohMwVJBWfVXXwMQbX6CG0nyZMGkH_4NMzPp3w6SM-PSWTmE0xifudC3_R_7i-AVrecoQ</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Gurmesa, Geshere Abdisa</creator><creator>Mo, Jiangming</creator><creator>Gundersen, Per</creator><creator>Mao, Qinggong</creator><creator>Fang, Yunting</creator><creator>Zhu, Feifei</creator><creator>Lu, Xiankai</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Retention and partitioning of 15N-labeled deposited N in a tropical plantation forest</title><author>Gurmesa, Geshere Abdisa ; Mo, Jiangming ; Gundersen, Per ; Mao, Qinggong ; Fang, Yunting ; Zhu, Feifei ; Lu, Xiankai</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c164y-22ca2df9501dfd5a4a948769450a532bfcaa3181b1d9769b7b36059823e3e8183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Acidic soils</topic><topic>Acidification</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Biogeosciences</topic><topic>Coniferous forests</topic><topic>Deposition</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecosystem recovery</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Forest ecosystems</topic><topic>Forest floor</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater pollution</topic><topic>Growth</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Inland water environment</topic><topic>Leaching</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Nitrates</topic><topic>Nitrogen isotopes</topic><topic>Partitioning</topic><topic>Pine</topic><topic>Plantations</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil acidification</topic><topic>Soil pollution</topic><topic>Soil solution</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Temperate forests</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>Tracers</topic><topic>Tropical climate</topic><topic>Understory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gurmesa, Geshere Abdisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mo, Jiangming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gundersen, Per</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mao, Qinggong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Yunting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Feifei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Xiankai</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biogeochemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gurmesa, Geshere Abdisa</au><au>Mo, Jiangming</au><au>Gundersen, Per</au><au>Mao, Qinggong</au><au>Fang, Yunting</au><au>Zhu, Feifei</au><au>Lu, Xiankai</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Retention and partitioning of 15N-labeled deposited N in a tropical plantation forest</atitle><jtitle>Biogeochemistry</jtitle><stitle>Biogeochemistry</stitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>152</volume><issue>2-3</issue><spage>237</spage><epage>251</epage><pages>237-251</pages><issn>0168-2563</issn><eissn>1573-515X</eissn><abstract>The effects of deposited nitrogen (N) on forest ecosystems largely depend on the amount of N retained in the ecosystems and its partitioning among ecosystem pools. However, our understanding of the capacity of tropical plantations to retain deposited N is limited. To evaluate the retention of deposited N in a human-disturbed pine plantation in southern China and compare the result with previous findings in an adjacent old-growth forest, we added
15
N-tracer monthly to the forest floor for one year and determined its recovery in ecosystem compartments four months after the last addition. We monitored
15
N recoveries in soil solution monthly to quantify leaching losses. The pine forest retained about 58 ± 5% of the
15
N-labeled deposited N, which is lower than that reported in the adjacent old-growth forest (72 ± 6%). Both forests experience chronic N deposition (recently measured at 51 kg N ha
−1
yr
−1
) and we attribute the difference in retention to effects of previous disturbance mainly understory and litter harvesting in the pine plantation. Only 3 kg N ha
−1
yr
−1
(5% of the
15
N-labeled deposited N) out of the measured total leaching (54 kg N ha
−1
yr
−1
) originated from deposited (and labeled) N from the measurement year, suggesting that N leaching is dominated by unlabeled N sources. Furthermore, results from our study and other similar
15
N labeling experiments together show similar patterns of total ecosystem retention of deposited N in tropical and temperate forests, but here we demonstrate a decreasing retention of N with increased N deposition in these forests. Our findings indicate that plantation forests that experience human-disturbance and chronic N deposition have lower N retention compared to old-growth forests, and thus elevated N inputs in such ecosystems can cause risk of hydrological N losses, soil acidification, and freshwater pollution.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10533-020-00750-y</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0168-2563 |
ispartof | Biogeochemistry, 2021-02, Vol.152 (2-3), p.237-251 |
issn | 0168-2563 1573-515X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2491635760 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Acidic soils Acidification Agriculture Biogeosciences Coniferous forests Deposition Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Ecosystem recovery Ecosystems Environmental Chemistry Forest ecosystems Forest floor Forests Freshwater Freshwater pollution Growth Hydrology Inland water environment Leaching Life Sciences Nitrates Nitrogen isotopes Partitioning Pine Plantations Retention Soil Soil acidification Soil pollution Soil solution Soils Temperate forests Terrestrial ecosystems Tracers Tropical climate Understory |
title | Retention and partitioning of 15N-labeled deposited N in a tropical plantation forest |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T14%3A37%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Retention%20and%20partitioning%20of%2015N-labeled%20deposited%20N%20in%20a%20tropical%20plantation%20forest&rft.jtitle=Biogeochemistry&rft.au=Gurmesa,%20Geshere%20Abdisa&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=152&rft.issue=2-3&rft.spage=237&rft.epage=251&rft.pages=237-251&rft.issn=0168-2563&rft.eissn=1573-515X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10533-020-00750-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2491635760%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c164y-22ca2df9501dfd5a4a948769450a532bfcaa3181b1d9769b7b36059823e3e8183%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2491635760&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |