Loading…

Retention and partitioning of 15N-labeled deposited N in a tropical plantation forest

The effects of deposited nitrogen (N) on forest ecosystems largely depend on the amount of N retained in the ecosystems and its partitioning among ecosystem pools. However, our understanding of the capacity of tropical plantations to retain deposited N is limited. To evaluate the retention of deposi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biogeochemistry 2021-02, Vol.152 (2-3), p.237-251
Main Authors: Gurmesa, Geshere Abdisa, Mo, Jiangming, Gundersen, Per, Mao, Qinggong, Fang, Yunting, Zhu, Feifei, Lu, Xiankai
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c164y-22ca2df9501dfd5a4a948769450a532bfcaa3181b1d9769b7b36059823e3e8183
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c164y-22ca2df9501dfd5a4a948769450a532bfcaa3181b1d9769b7b36059823e3e8183
container_end_page 251
container_issue 2-3
container_start_page 237
container_title Biogeochemistry
container_volume 152
creator Gurmesa, Geshere Abdisa
Mo, Jiangming
Gundersen, Per
Mao, Qinggong
Fang, Yunting
Zhu, Feifei
Lu, Xiankai
description The effects of deposited nitrogen (N) on forest ecosystems largely depend on the amount of N retained in the ecosystems and its partitioning among ecosystem pools. However, our understanding of the capacity of tropical plantations to retain deposited N is limited. To evaluate the retention of deposited N in a human-disturbed pine plantation in southern China and compare the result with previous findings in an adjacent old-growth forest, we added 15 N-tracer monthly to the forest floor for one year and determined its recovery in ecosystem compartments four months after the last addition. We monitored 15 N recoveries in soil solution monthly to quantify leaching losses. The pine forest retained about 58 ± 5% of the 15 N-labeled deposited N, which is lower than that reported in the adjacent old-growth forest (72 ± 6%). Both forests experience chronic N deposition (recently measured at 51 kg N ha −1  yr −1 ) and we attribute the difference in retention to effects of previous disturbance mainly understory and litter harvesting in the pine plantation. Only 3 kg N ha −1  yr −1 (5% of the 15 N-labeled deposited N) out of the measured total leaching (54 kg N ha −1  yr −1 ) originated from deposited (and labeled) N from the measurement year, suggesting that N leaching is dominated by unlabeled N sources. Furthermore, results from our study and other similar 15 N labeling experiments together show similar patterns of total ecosystem retention of deposited N in tropical and temperate forests, but here we demonstrate a decreasing retention of N with increased N deposition in these forests. Our findings indicate that plantation forests that experience human-disturbance and chronic N deposition have lower N retention compared to old-growth forests, and thus elevated N inputs in such ecosystems can cause risk of hydrological N losses, soil acidification, and freshwater pollution.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10533-020-00750-y
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2491635760</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2491635760</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c164y-22ca2df9501dfd5a4a948769450a532bfcaa3181b1d9769b7b36059823e3e8183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoOI6-gKuA6-g5SZO2Sxm8wTCCOOAupE06dKhNTTqLvr1xKrhzdS78F_gIuUa4RYD8LiJIIRhwYOmUwKYTskCZCyZRfpySBaAqGJdKnJOLGPcAUOYgFmT75kbXj63vqektHUwY25-r7XfUNxTlhnWmcp2z1LrBx3ZM24a2SU7H4Ie2Nh0dOtOP5hjS-ODieEnOGtNFd_U7l2T7-PC-embr16eX1f2a1aiyiXFeG26bUgLaxkqTmTIrclVmEowUvGpqYwQWWKEt07vKK6FAlgUXTrgCC7EkN3PuEPzXIRXrvT-EPlVqnpWohMwVJBWfVXXwMQbX6CG0nyZMGkH_4NMzPp3w6SM-PSWTmE0xifudC3_R_7i-AVrecoQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2491635760</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Retention and partitioning of 15N-labeled deposited N in a tropical plantation forest</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Gurmesa, Geshere Abdisa ; Mo, Jiangming ; Gundersen, Per ; Mao, Qinggong ; Fang, Yunting ; Zhu, Feifei ; Lu, Xiankai</creator><creatorcontrib>Gurmesa, Geshere Abdisa ; Mo, Jiangming ; Gundersen, Per ; Mao, Qinggong ; Fang, Yunting ; Zhu, Feifei ; Lu, Xiankai</creatorcontrib><description>The effects of deposited nitrogen (N) on forest ecosystems largely depend on the amount of N retained in the ecosystems and its partitioning among ecosystem pools. However, our understanding of the capacity of tropical plantations to retain deposited N is limited. To evaluate the retention of deposited N in a human-disturbed pine plantation in southern China and compare the result with previous findings in an adjacent old-growth forest, we added 15 N-tracer monthly to the forest floor for one year and determined its recovery in ecosystem compartments four months after the last addition. We monitored 15 N recoveries in soil solution monthly to quantify leaching losses. The pine forest retained about 58 ± 5% of the 15 N-labeled deposited N, which is lower than that reported in the adjacent old-growth forest (72 ± 6%). Both forests experience chronic N deposition (recently measured at 51 kg N ha −1  yr −1 ) and we attribute the difference in retention to effects of previous disturbance mainly understory and litter harvesting in the pine plantation. Only 3 kg N ha −1  yr −1 (5% of the 15 N-labeled deposited N) out of the measured total leaching (54 kg N ha −1  yr −1 ) originated from deposited (and labeled) N from the measurement year, suggesting that N leaching is dominated by unlabeled N sources. Furthermore, results from our study and other similar 15 N labeling experiments together show similar patterns of total ecosystem retention of deposited N in tropical and temperate forests, but here we demonstrate a decreasing retention of N with increased N deposition in these forests. Our findings indicate that plantation forests that experience human-disturbance and chronic N deposition have lower N retention compared to old-growth forests, and thus elevated N inputs in such ecosystems can cause risk of hydrological N losses, soil acidification, and freshwater pollution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-2563</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-515X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10533-020-00750-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Acidic soils ; Acidification ; Agriculture ; Biogeosciences ; Coniferous forests ; Deposition ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Ecosystem recovery ; Ecosystems ; Environmental Chemistry ; Forest ecosystems ; Forest floor ; Forests ; Freshwater ; Freshwater pollution ; Growth ; Hydrology ; Inland water environment ; Leaching ; Life Sciences ; Nitrates ; Nitrogen isotopes ; Partitioning ; Pine ; Plantations ; Retention ; Soil ; Soil acidification ; Soil pollution ; Soil solution ; Soils ; Temperate forests ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; Tracers ; Tropical climate ; Understory</subject><ispartof>Biogeochemistry, 2021-02, Vol.152 (2-3), p.237-251</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c164y-22ca2df9501dfd5a4a948769450a532bfcaa3181b1d9769b7b36059823e3e8183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c164y-22ca2df9501dfd5a4a948769450a532bfcaa3181b1d9769b7b36059823e3e8183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gurmesa, Geshere Abdisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mo, Jiangming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gundersen, Per</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mao, Qinggong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Yunting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Feifei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Xiankai</creatorcontrib><title>Retention and partitioning of 15N-labeled deposited N in a tropical plantation forest</title><title>Biogeochemistry</title><addtitle>Biogeochemistry</addtitle><description>The effects of deposited nitrogen (N) on forest ecosystems largely depend on the amount of N retained in the ecosystems and its partitioning among ecosystem pools. However, our understanding of the capacity of tropical plantations to retain deposited N is limited. To evaluate the retention of deposited N in a human-disturbed pine plantation in southern China and compare the result with previous findings in an adjacent old-growth forest, we added 15 N-tracer monthly to the forest floor for one year and determined its recovery in ecosystem compartments four months after the last addition. We monitored 15 N recoveries in soil solution monthly to quantify leaching losses. The pine forest retained about 58 ± 5% of the 15 N-labeled deposited N, which is lower than that reported in the adjacent old-growth forest (72 ± 6%). Both forests experience chronic N deposition (recently measured at 51 kg N ha −1  yr −1 ) and we attribute the difference in retention to effects of previous disturbance mainly understory and litter harvesting in the pine plantation. Only 3 kg N ha −1  yr −1 (5% of the 15 N-labeled deposited N) out of the measured total leaching (54 kg N ha −1  yr −1 ) originated from deposited (and labeled) N from the measurement year, suggesting that N leaching is dominated by unlabeled N sources. Furthermore, results from our study and other similar 15 N labeling experiments together show similar patterns of total ecosystem retention of deposited N in tropical and temperate forests, but here we demonstrate a decreasing retention of N with increased N deposition in these forests. Our findings indicate that plantation forests that experience human-disturbance and chronic N deposition have lower N retention compared to old-growth forests, and thus elevated N inputs in such ecosystems can cause risk of hydrological N losses, soil acidification, and freshwater pollution.</description><subject>Acidic soils</subject><subject>Acidification</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Biogeosciences</subject><subject>Coniferous forests</subject><subject>Deposition</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecosystem recovery</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Forest ecosystems</subject><subject>Forest floor</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater pollution</subject><subject>Growth</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Inland water environment</subject><subject>Leaching</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Nitrates</subject><subject>Nitrogen isotopes</subject><subject>Partitioning</subject><subject>Pine</subject><subject>Plantations</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil acidification</subject><subject>Soil pollution</subject><subject>Soil solution</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Temperate forests</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>Tracers</subject><subject>Tropical climate</subject><subject>Understory</subject><issn>0168-2563</issn><issn>1573-515X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoOI6-gKuA6-g5SZO2Sxm8wTCCOOAupE06dKhNTTqLvr1xKrhzdS78F_gIuUa4RYD8LiJIIRhwYOmUwKYTskCZCyZRfpySBaAqGJdKnJOLGPcAUOYgFmT75kbXj63vqektHUwY25-r7XfUNxTlhnWmcp2z1LrBx3ZM24a2SU7H4Ie2Nh0dOtOP5hjS-ODieEnOGtNFd_U7l2T7-PC-embr16eX1f2a1aiyiXFeG26bUgLaxkqTmTIrclVmEowUvGpqYwQWWKEt07vKK6FAlgUXTrgCC7EkN3PuEPzXIRXrvT-EPlVqnpWohMwVJBWfVXXwMQbX6CG0nyZMGkH_4NMzPp3w6SM-PSWTmE0xifudC3_R_7i-AVrecoQ</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Gurmesa, Geshere Abdisa</creator><creator>Mo, Jiangming</creator><creator>Gundersen, Per</creator><creator>Mao, Qinggong</creator><creator>Fang, Yunting</creator><creator>Zhu, Feifei</creator><creator>Lu, Xiankai</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Retention and partitioning of 15N-labeled deposited N in a tropical plantation forest</title><author>Gurmesa, Geshere Abdisa ; Mo, Jiangming ; Gundersen, Per ; Mao, Qinggong ; Fang, Yunting ; Zhu, Feifei ; Lu, Xiankai</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c164y-22ca2df9501dfd5a4a948769450a532bfcaa3181b1d9769b7b36059823e3e8183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Acidic soils</topic><topic>Acidification</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Biogeosciences</topic><topic>Coniferous forests</topic><topic>Deposition</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecosystem recovery</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Forest ecosystems</topic><topic>Forest floor</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater pollution</topic><topic>Growth</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Inland water environment</topic><topic>Leaching</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Nitrates</topic><topic>Nitrogen isotopes</topic><topic>Partitioning</topic><topic>Pine</topic><topic>Plantations</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil acidification</topic><topic>Soil pollution</topic><topic>Soil solution</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Temperate forests</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>Tracers</topic><topic>Tropical climate</topic><topic>Understory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gurmesa, Geshere Abdisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mo, Jiangming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gundersen, Per</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mao, Qinggong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Yunting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Feifei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Xiankai</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biogeochemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gurmesa, Geshere Abdisa</au><au>Mo, Jiangming</au><au>Gundersen, Per</au><au>Mao, Qinggong</au><au>Fang, Yunting</au><au>Zhu, Feifei</au><au>Lu, Xiankai</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Retention and partitioning of 15N-labeled deposited N in a tropical plantation forest</atitle><jtitle>Biogeochemistry</jtitle><stitle>Biogeochemistry</stitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>152</volume><issue>2-3</issue><spage>237</spage><epage>251</epage><pages>237-251</pages><issn>0168-2563</issn><eissn>1573-515X</eissn><abstract>The effects of deposited nitrogen (N) on forest ecosystems largely depend on the amount of N retained in the ecosystems and its partitioning among ecosystem pools. However, our understanding of the capacity of tropical plantations to retain deposited N is limited. To evaluate the retention of deposited N in a human-disturbed pine plantation in southern China and compare the result with previous findings in an adjacent old-growth forest, we added 15 N-tracer monthly to the forest floor for one year and determined its recovery in ecosystem compartments four months after the last addition. We monitored 15 N recoveries in soil solution monthly to quantify leaching losses. The pine forest retained about 58 ± 5% of the 15 N-labeled deposited N, which is lower than that reported in the adjacent old-growth forest (72 ± 6%). Both forests experience chronic N deposition (recently measured at 51 kg N ha −1  yr −1 ) and we attribute the difference in retention to effects of previous disturbance mainly understory and litter harvesting in the pine plantation. Only 3 kg N ha −1  yr −1 (5% of the 15 N-labeled deposited N) out of the measured total leaching (54 kg N ha −1  yr −1 ) originated from deposited (and labeled) N from the measurement year, suggesting that N leaching is dominated by unlabeled N sources. Furthermore, results from our study and other similar 15 N labeling experiments together show similar patterns of total ecosystem retention of deposited N in tropical and temperate forests, but here we demonstrate a decreasing retention of N with increased N deposition in these forests. Our findings indicate that plantation forests that experience human-disturbance and chronic N deposition have lower N retention compared to old-growth forests, and thus elevated N inputs in such ecosystems can cause risk of hydrological N losses, soil acidification, and freshwater pollution.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10533-020-00750-y</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0168-2563
ispartof Biogeochemistry, 2021-02, Vol.152 (2-3), p.237-251
issn 0168-2563
1573-515X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2491635760
source Springer Link
subjects Acidic soils
Acidification
Agriculture
Biogeosciences
Coniferous forests
Deposition
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Ecosystem recovery
Ecosystems
Environmental Chemistry
Forest ecosystems
Forest floor
Forests
Freshwater
Freshwater pollution
Growth
Hydrology
Inland water environment
Leaching
Life Sciences
Nitrates
Nitrogen isotopes
Partitioning
Pine
Plantations
Retention
Soil
Soil acidification
Soil pollution
Soil solution
Soils
Temperate forests
Terrestrial ecosystems
Tracers
Tropical climate
Understory
title Retention and partitioning of 15N-labeled deposited N in a tropical plantation forest
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T14%3A37%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Retention%20and%20partitioning%20of%2015N-labeled%20deposited%20N%20in%20a%20tropical%20plantation%20forest&rft.jtitle=Biogeochemistry&rft.au=Gurmesa,%20Geshere%20Abdisa&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=152&rft.issue=2-3&rft.spage=237&rft.epage=251&rft.pages=237-251&rft.issn=0168-2563&rft.eissn=1573-515X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10533-020-00750-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2491635760%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c164y-22ca2df9501dfd5a4a948769450a532bfcaa3181b1d9769b7b36059823e3e8183%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2491635760&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true