Effects of soil application of two different fipronil formulations on some soil-dwelling non-target arthropods

• Published in: International journal of tropical insect science 2021-03, Vol.41 (1), p.663-669
• Main Authors: Asad, Muhammad, Ahmed, Sohail, Khan, Rashad Rasool, Ali, Abid, Raza, Muhammad Fahad, Shabbir, Ammarah, Munir, Faisal, Abbas, Anam Noreen, Tariq, Mubashir
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Arthropoda; Arthropods; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Entomology; Fertility; Fipronil; Insecticides; Insects; Life Sciences; Mites; Original Research Article; Pesticides; Pitfall traps; Population; Soil fertility; Soil structure; Soils; Toxicity
• ISSN: 1742-7592; 1742-7584; 1742-7592
• DOI: 10.1007/s42690-020-00254-0

Soil arthropods, including soil insects and mites, play a significant role in the recycling of fertility material and maintenance of soil structure. This study was performed to determine the non-target effects of two different formulations of fipronil on four groups of soil-dwelling insects (collembola, earwig, staphylinids and ants) and one group of mites. The pitfall traps were installed to estimate the arthropod population. The population per trap was evaluated after 3, 6, 9 12, 15, 18 and 21 days after insecticides’ application. The population of soil-dwelling arthropods was significantly reduced in the case of fipronil 5% SC (soluble concentration) treated plots after 3 and 6 days of application. However, the fipronil 0.3 GR (granule) was more toxic at 9th and 12th day of application. The toxicity of fipronil was decreased with the passage of time but fipronil 0.3 GR remained toxic until 18 days in some cases. Hence, both formulations of fipronil reduced the population of non-target soil arthropods, but fipronil 5% SC was more toxic than fipronil 0.3 GR when compared with the untreated check (control plot). According to these results, the application of fipronil should be reduced and find an alternative way instead of this pesticide.