Loading…
Degradation Analysis of Utility-Scale PV Plants in Different Climate Zones
Accurate performance modeling of utility-scale PV plants is crucial for reducing the risk of investment, as well as improving operations and maintenance. In spite of much research, the precise rate at which PV plants degrade is still not well known. This article uses a well-known methodology for cal...
Saved in:
Published in: | IEEE journal of photovoltaics 2021-03, Vol.11 (2), p.513-518 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-2d350482fa38fc80eb209c5c093ac6009a599d3375344a98d0c4202fdfe3a1b73 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-2d350482fa38fc80eb209c5c093ac6009a599d3375344a98d0c4202fdfe3a1b73 |
container_end_page | 518 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 513 |
container_title | IEEE journal of photovoltaics |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Adler, Scott W. Wiig, Marie S. Skomedal, Asmund Haug, Halvard Marstein, Erik S. |
description | Accurate performance modeling of utility-scale PV plants is crucial for reducing the risk of investment, as well as improving operations and maintenance. In spite of much research, the precise rate at which PV plants degrade is still not well known. This article uses a well-known methodology for calculating degradation rates to assess the impact of climate on long-term performance. The RdTools analytic approach is used to perform a comparative case study of two utility-scale PV plants with the same setup and almost identical technology yet located in distinct climates. A significant difference is observed between the degradation rates of each park. The median of the nominal system degradation rate measured at the dc-side of the inverters in the hotter and more humid climate is -1.4%/yr, with 95% of the inverters between -1.5%/yr and -1.3%/yr, whereas in the temperate climate the median rate is -0.94%/yr, with 95% of the inverters between -1.0%/yr and -0.9%/yr. These results suggest that climate zones must be included when evaluating the long-term performance of PV plants. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2020.3043120 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_ieee_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2492861446</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>9305229</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2492861446</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-2d350482fa38fc80eb209c5c093ac6009a599d3375344a98d0c4202fdfe3a1b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEFPAjEQhRujiQT5BXpo4nlx2uku2yMBFQkJJAIHL03ptqZk3cW2Hvj3LgGdy8zhvcl7HyEPDIaMgXyar2bL9XI75MBhiCCQcbgiPc7yIkMBeP13Y8luySDGPXRTQF4UokfmU_sZdKWTbxs6bnR9jD7S1tFN8rVPx-zd6NrS1Zauat2kSH1Dp945G2yT6KT2XzpZ-tE2Nt6RG6fraAeX3Sebl-f1ZJYtlq9vk_EiM1zKlPEKcxAldxpLZ0qwOw7S5AYkalMASJ1LWSGOchRCy7ICI7purnIWNduNsE8ez38Pof3-sTGpffsTuuhRcSF5WTAhik4lzioT2hiDdeoQurDhqBioEzh1AadO4NQFXGe7P9u8tfbfIhFyziX-Ap0qaHw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2492861446</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Degradation Analysis of Utility-Scale PV Plants in Different Climate Zones</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals</source><creator>Adler, Scott W. ; Wiig, Marie S. ; Skomedal, Asmund ; Haug, Halvard ; Marstein, Erik S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Adler, Scott W. ; Wiig, Marie S. ; Skomedal, Asmund ; Haug, Halvard ; Marstein, Erik S.</creatorcontrib><description>Accurate performance modeling of utility-scale PV plants is crucial for reducing the risk of investment, as well as improving operations and maintenance. In spite of much research, the precise rate at which PV plants degrade is still not well known. This article uses a well-known methodology for calculating degradation rates to assess the impact of climate on long-term performance. The RdTools analytic approach is used to perform a comparative case study of two utility-scale PV plants with the same setup and almost identical technology yet located in distinct climates. A significant difference is observed between the degradation rates of each park. The median of the nominal system degradation rate measured at the dc-side of the inverters in the hotter and more humid climate is -1.4%/yr, with 95% of the inverters between -1.5%/yr and -1.3%/yr, whereas in the temperate climate the median rate is -0.94%/yr, with 95% of the inverters between -1.0%/yr and -0.9%/yr. These results suggest that climate zones must be included when evaluating the long-term performance of PV plants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2156-3381</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-3403</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2020.3043120</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJPEG8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Piscataway: IEEE</publisher><subject>Climate ; Climate models ; Degradation ; Inverters ; Meteorology ; Performance analysis ; Performance evaluation ; photovoltaic systems ; Production ; solar energy ; solar panels ; Temperature distribution ; Time series analysis</subject><ispartof>IEEE journal of photovoltaics, 2021-03, Vol.11 (2), p.513-518</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-2d350482fa38fc80eb209c5c093ac6009a599d3375344a98d0c4202fdfe3a1b73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-2d350482fa38fc80eb209c5c093ac6009a599d3375344a98d0c4202fdfe3a1b73</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4078-1916 ; 0000-0003-3007-4310 ; 0000-0002-5135-105X ; 0000-0001-7684-5518</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9305229$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,54796</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adler, Scott W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiig, Marie S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skomedal, Asmund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haug, Halvard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marstein, Erik S.</creatorcontrib><title>Degradation Analysis of Utility-Scale PV Plants in Different Climate Zones</title><title>IEEE journal of photovoltaics</title><addtitle>JPHOTOV</addtitle><description>Accurate performance modeling of utility-scale PV plants is crucial for reducing the risk of investment, as well as improving operations and maintenance. In spite of much research, the precise rate at which PV plants degrade is still not well known. This article uses a well-known methodology for calculating degradation rates to assess the impact of climate on long-term performance. The RdTools analytic approach is used to perform a comparative case study of two utility-scale PV plants with the same setup and almost identical technology yet located in distinct climates. A significant difference is observed between the degradation rates of each park. The median of the nominal system degradation rate measured at the dc-side of the inverters in the hotter and more humid climate is -1.4%/yr, with 95% of the inverters between -1.5%/yr and -1.3%/yr, whereas in the temperate climate the median rate is -0.94%/yr, with 95% of the inverters between -1.0%/yr and -0.9%/yr. These results suggest that climate zones must be included when evaluating the long-term performance of PV plants.</description><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Degradation</subject><subject>Inverters</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Performance analysis</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>photovoltaic systems</subject><subject>Production</subject><subject>solar energy</subject><subject>solar panels</subject><subject>Temperature distribution</subject><subject>Time series analysis</subject><issn>2156-3381</issn><issn>2156-3403</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kEFPAjEQhRujiQT5BXpo4nlx2uku2yMBFQkJJAIHL03ptqZk3cW2Hvj3LgGdy8zhvcl7HyEPDIaMgXyar2bL9XI75MBhiCCQcbgiPc7yIkMBeP13Y8luySDGPXRTQF4UokfmU_sZdKWTbxs6bnR9jD7S1tFN8rVPx-zd6NrS1Zauat2kSH1Dp945G2yT6KT2XzpZ-tE2Nt6RG6fraAeX3Sebl-f1ZJYtlq9vk_EiM1zKlPEKcxAldxpLZ0qwOw7S5AYkalMASJ1LWSGOchRCy7ICI7purnIWNduNsE8ez38Pof3-sTGpffsTuuhRcSF5WTAhik4lzioT2hiDdeoQurDhqBioEzh1AadO4NQFXGe7P9u8tfbfIhFyziX-Ap0qaHw</recordid><startdate>20210301</startdate><enddate>20210301</enddate><creator>Adler, Scott W.</creator><creator>Wiig, Marie S.</creator><creator>Skomedal, Asmund</creator><creator>Haug, Halvard</creator><creator>Marstein, Erik S.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4078-1916</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3007-4310</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5135-105X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7684-5518</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210301</creationdate><title>Degradation Analysis of Utility-Scale PV Plants in Different Climate Zones</title><author>Adler, Scott W. ; Wiig, Marie S. ; Skomedal, Asmund ; Haug, Halvard ; Marstein, Erik S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-2d350482fa38fc80eb209c5c093ac6009a599d3375344a98d0c4202fdfe3a1b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Degradation</topic><topic>Inverters</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Performance analysis</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>photovoltaic systems</topic><topic>Production</topic><topic>solar energy</topic><topic>solar panels</topic><topic>Temperature distribution</topic><topic>Time series analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adler, Scott W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiig, Marie S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skomedal, Asmund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haug, Halvard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marstein, Erik S.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) Online</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>IEEE journal of photovoltaics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adler, Scott W.</au><au>Wiig, Marie S.</au><au>Skomedal, Asmund</au><au>Haug, Halvard</au><au>Marstein, Erik S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Degradation Analysis of Utility-Scale PV Plants in Different Climate Zones</atitle><jtitle>IEEE journal of photovoltaics</jtitle><stitle>JPHOTOV</stitle><date>2021-03-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>513</spage><epage>518</epage><pages>513-518</pages><issn>2156-3381</issn><eissn>2156-3403</eissn><coden>IJPEG8</coden><abstract>Accurate performance modeling of utility-scale PV plants is crucial for reducing the risk of investment, as well as improving operations and maintenance. In spite of much research, the precise rate at which PV plants degrade is still not well known. This article uses a well-known methodology for calculating degradation rates to assess the impact of climate on long-term performance. The RdTools analytic approach is used to perform a comparative case study of two utility-scale PV plants with the same setup and almost identical technology yet located in distinct climates. A significant difference is observed between the degradation rates of each park. The median of the nominal system degradation rate measured at the dc-side of the inverters in the hotter and more humid climate is -1.4%/yr, with 95% of the inverters between -1.5%/yr and -1.3%/yr, whereas in the temperate climate the median rate is -0.94%/yr, with 95% of the inverters between -1.0%/yr and -0.9%/yr. These results suggest that climate zones must be included when evaluating the long-term performance of PV plants.</abstract><cop>Piscataway</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/JPHOTOV.2020.3043120</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4078-1916</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3007-4310</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5135-105X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7684-5518</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2156-3381 |
ispartof | IEEE journal of photovoltaics, 2021-03, Vol.11 (2), p.513-518 |
issn | 2156-3381 2156-3403 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2492861446 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals |
subjects | Climate Climate models Degradation Inverters Meteorology Performance analysis Performance evaluation photovoltaic systems Production solar energy solar panels Temperature distribution Time series analysis |
title | Degradation Analysis of Utility-Scale PV Plants in Different Climate Zones |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T09%3A36%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_ieee_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Degradation%20Analysis%20of%20Utility-Scale%20PV%20Plants%20in%20Different%20Climate%20Zones&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20journal%20of%20photovoltaics&rft.au=Adler,%20Scott%20W.&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=513&rft.epage=518&rft.pages=513-518&rft.issn=2156-3381&rft.eissn=2156-3403&rft.coden=IJPEG8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2020.3043120&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_ieee_%3E2492861446%3C/proquest_ieee_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-2d350482fa38fc80eb209c5c093ac6009a599d3375344a98d0c4202fdfe3a1b73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2492861446&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=9305229&rfr_iscdi=true |