Loading…

Degradation Analysis of Utility-Scale PV Plants in Different Climate Zones

Accurate performance modeling of utility-scale PV plants is crucial for reducing the risk of investment, as well as improving operations and maintenance. In spite of much research, the precise rate at which PV plants degrade is still not well known. This article uses a well-known methodology for cal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE journal of photovoltaics 2021-03, Vol.11 (2), p.513-518
Main Authors: Adler, Scott W., Wiig, Marie S., Skomedal, Asmund, Haug, Halvard, Marstein, Erik S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-2d350482fa38fc80eb209c5c093ac6009a599d3375344a98d0c4202fdfe3a1b73
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-2d350482fa38fc80eb209c5c093ac6009a599d3375344a98d0c4202fdfe3a1b73
container_end_page 518
container_issue 2
container_start_page 513
container_title IEEE journal of photovoltaics
container_volume 11
creator Adler, Scott W.
Wiig, Marie S.
Skomedal, Asmund
Haug, Halvard
Marstein, Erik S.
description Accurate performance modeling of utility-scale PV plants is crucial for reducing the risk of investment, as well as improving operations and maintenance. In spite of much research, the precise rate at which PV plants degrade is still not well known. This article uses a well-known methodology for calculating degradation rates to assess the impact of climate on long-term performance. The RdTools analytic approach is used to perform a comparative case study of two utility-scale PV plants with the same setup and almost identical technology yet located in distinct climates. A significant difference is observed between the degradation rates of each park. The median of the nominal system degradation rate measured at the dc-side of the inverters in the hotter and more humid climate is -1.4%/yr, with 95% of the inverters between -1.5%/yr and -1.3%/yr, whereas in the temperate climate the median rate is -0.94%/yr, with 95% of the inverters between -1.0%/yr and -0.9%/yr. These results suggest that climate zones must be included when evaluating the long-term performance of PV plants.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2020.3043120
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_ieee_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2492861446</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>9305229</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2492861446</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-2d350482fa38fc80eb209c5c093ac6009a599d3375344a98d0c4202fdfe3a1b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEFPAjEQhRujiQT5BXpo4nlx2uku2yMBFQkJJAIHL03ptqZk3cW2Hvj3LgGdy8zhvcl7HyEPDIaMgXyar2bL9XI75MBhiCCQcbgiPc7yIkMBeP13Y8luySDGPXRTQF4UokfmU_sZdKWTbxs6bnR9jD7S1tFN8rVPx-zd6NrS1Zauat2kSH1Dp945G2yT6KT2XzpZ-tE2Nt6RG6fraAeX3Sebl-f1ZJYtlq9vk_EiM1zKlPEKcxAldxpLZ0qwOw7S5AYkalMASJ1LWSGOchRCy7ICI7purnIWNduNsE8ez38Pof3-sTGpffsTuuhRcSF5WTAhik4lzioT2hiDdeoQurDhqBioEzh1AadO4NQFXGe7P9u8tfbfIhFyziX-Ap0qaHw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2492861446</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Degradation Analysis of Utility-Scale PV Plants in Different Climate Zones</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals</source><creator>Adler, Scott W. ; Wiig, Marie S. ; Skomedal, Asmund ; Haug, Halvard ; Marstein, Erik S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Adler, Scott W. ; Wiig, Marie S. ; Skomedal, Asmund ; Haug, Halvard ; Marstein, Erik S.</creatorcontrib><description>Accurate performance modeling of utility-scale PV plants is crucial for reducing the risk of investment, as well as improving operations and maintenance. In spite of much research, the precise rate at which PV plants degrade is still not well known. This article uses a well-known methodology for calculating degradation rates to assess the impact of climate on long-term performance. The RdTools analytic approach is used to perform a comparative case study of two utility-scale PV plants with the same setup and almost identical technology yet located in distinct climates. A significant difference is observed between the degradation rates of each park. The median of the nominal system degradation rate measured at the dc-side of the inverters in the hotter and more humid climate is -1.4%/yr, with 95% of the inverters between -1.5%/yr and -1.3%/yr, whereas in the temperate climate the median rate is -0.94%/yr, with 95% of the inverters between -1.0%/yr and -0.9%/yr. These results suggest that climate zones must be included when evaluating the long-term performance of PV plants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2156-3381</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-3403</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2020.3043120</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJPEG8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Piscataway: IEEE</publisher><subject>Climate ; Climate models ; Degradation ; Inverters ; Meteorology ; Performance analysis ; Performance evaluation ; photovoltaic systems ; Production ; solar energy ; solar panels ; Temperature distribution ; Time series analysis</subject><ispartof>IEEE journal of photovoltaics, 2021-03, Vol.11 (2), p.513-518</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-2d350482fa38fc80eb209c5c093ac6009a599d3375344a98d0c4202fdfe3a1b73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-2d350482fa38fc80eb209c5c093ac6009a599d3375344a98d0c4202fdfe3a1b73</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4078-1916 ; 0000-0003-3007-4310 ; 0000-0002-5135-105X ; 0000-0001-7684-5518</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9305229$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,54796</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adler, Scott W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiig, Marie S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skomedal, Asmund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haug, Halvard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marstein, Erik S.</creatorcontrib><title>Degradation Analysis of Utility-Scale PV Plants in Different Climate Zones</title><title>IEEE journal of photovoltaics</title><addtitle>JPHOTOV</addtitle><description>Accurate performance modeling of utility-scale PV plants is crucial for reducing the risk of investment, as well as improving operations and maintenance. In spite of much research, the precise rate at which PV plants degrade is still not well known. This article uses a well-known methodology for calculating degradation rates to assess the impact of climate on long-term performance. The RdTools analytic approach is used to perform a comparative case study of two utility-scale PV plants with the same setup and almost identical technology yet located in distinct climates. A significant difference is observed between the degradation rates of each park. The median of the nominal system degradation rate measured at the dc-side of the inverters in the hotter and more humid climate is -1.4%/yr, with 95% of the inverters between -1.5%/yr and -1.3%/yr, whereas in the temperate climate the median rate is -0.94%/yr, with 95% of the inverters between -1.0%/yr and -0.9%/yr. These results suggest that climate zones must be included when evaluating the long-term performance of PV plants.</description><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Degradation</subject><subject>Inverters</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Performance analysis</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>photovoltaic systems</subject><subject>Production</subject><subject>solar energy</subject><subject>solar panels</subject><subject>Temperature distribution</subject><subject>Time series analysis</subject><issn>2156-3381</issn><issn>2156-3403</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kEFPAjEQhRujiQT5BXpo4nlx2uku2yMBFQkJJAIHL03ptqZk3cW2Hvj3LgGdy8zhvcl7HyEPDIaMgXyar2bL9XI75MBhiCCQcbgiPc7yIkMBeP13Y8luySDGPXRTQF4UokfmU_sZdKWTbxs6bnR9jD7S1tFN8rVPx-zd6NrS1Zauat2kSH1Dp945G2yT6KT2XzpZ-tE2Nt6RG6fraAeX3Sebl-f1ZJYtlq9vk_EiM1zKlPEKcxAldxpLZ0qwOw7S5AYkalMASJ1LWSGOchRCy7ICI7purnIWNduNsE8ez38Pof3-sTGpffsTuuhRcSF5WTAhik4lzioT2hiDdeoQurDhqBioEzh1AadO4NQFXGe7P9u8tfbfIhFyziX-Ap0qaHw</recordid><startdate>20210301</startdate><enddate>20210301</enddate><creator>Adler, Scott W.</creator><creator>Wiig, Marie S.</creator><creator>Skomedal, Asmund</creator><creator>Haug, Halvard</creator><creator>Marstein, Erik S.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4078-1916</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3007-4310</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5135-105X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7684-5518</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210301</creationdate><title>Degradation Analysis of Utility-Scale PV Plants in Different Climate Zones</title><author>Adler, Scott W. ; Wiig, Marie S. ; Skomedal, Asmund ; Haug, Halvard ; Marstein, Erik S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-2d350482fa38fc80eb209c5c093ac6009a599d3375344a98d0c4202fdfe3a1b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Degradation</topic><topic>Inverters</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Performance analysis</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>photovoltaic systems</topic><topic>Production</topic><topic>solar energy</topic><topic>solar panels</topic><topic>Temperature distribution</topic><topic>Time series analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adler, Scott W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiig, Marie S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skomedal, Asmund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haug, Halvard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marstein, Erik S.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) Online</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>IEEE journal of photovoltaics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adler, Scott W.</au><au>Wiig, Marie S.</au><au>Skomedal, Asmund</au><au>Haug, Halvard</au><au>Marstein, Erik S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Degradation Analysis of Utility-Scale PV Plants in Different Climate Zones</atitle><jtitle>IEEE journal of photovoltaics</jtitle><stitle>JPHOTOV</stitle><date>2021-03-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>513</spage><epage>518</epage><pages>513-518</pages><issn>2156-3381</issn><eissn>2156-3403</eissn><coden>IJPEG8</coden><abstract>Accurate performance modeling of utility-scale PV plants is crucial for reducing the risk of investment, as well as improving operations and maintenance. In spite of much research, the precise rate at which PV plants degrade is still not well known. This article uses a well-known methodology for calculating degradation rates to assess the impact of climate on long-term performance. The RdTools analytic approach is used to perform a comparative case study of two utility-scale PV plants with the same setup and almost identical technology yet located in distinct climates. A significant difference is observed between the degradation rates of each park. The median of the nominal system degradation rate measured at the dc-side of the inverters in the hotter and more humid climate is -1.4%/yr, with 95% of the inverters between -1.5%/yr and -1.3%/yr, whereas in the temperate climate the median rate is -0.94%/yr, with 95% of the inverters between -1.0%/yr and -0.9%/yr. These results suggest that climate zones must be included when evaluating the long-term performance of PV plants.</abstract><cop>Piscataway</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/JPHOTOV.2020.3043120</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4078-1916</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3007-4310</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5135-105X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7684-5518</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2156-3381
ispartof IEEE journal of photovoltaics, 2021-03, Vol.11 (2), p.513-518
issn 2156-3381
2156-3403
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2492861446
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals
subjects Climate
Climate models
Degradation
Inverters
Meteorology
Performance analysis
Performance evaluation
photovoltaic systems
Production
solar energy
solar panels
Temperature distribution
Time series analysis
title Degradation Analysis of Utility-Scale PV Plants in Different Climate Zones
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T09%3A36%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_ieee_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Degradation%20Analysis%20of%20Utility-Scale%20PV%20Plants%20in%20Different%20Climate%20Zones&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20journal%20of%20photovoltaics&rft.au=Adler,%20Scott%20W.&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=513&rft.epage=518&rft.pages=513-518&rft.issn=2156-3381&rft.eissn=2156-3403&rft.coden=IJPEG8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2020.3043120&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_ieee_%3E2492861446%3C/proquest_ieee_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-2d350482fa38fc80eb209c5c093ac6009a599d3375344a98d0c4202fdfe3a1b73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2492861446&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=9305229&rfr_iscdi=true