Loading…

Regression Rate Model Predictions of an Axial-Injection End-Burning Hybrid Motor

This paper investigated the predictions of the axial-injection end-burning hybrid rocket motor regression rate model developed by Hitt and Frederick. Because axial-injection end-burning hybrid rocket motors follow a regression rate trend based on chamber pressure (like a solid rocket motor) instead...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of propulsion and power 2018-09, Vol.34 (5), p.1116-1123
Main Authors: Hitt, Matthew A, Frederick, Robert A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a313t-7bd34d1375c039a413cc7f07b0228ecbb1673040796639081e347f63acaed0a03
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a313t-7bd34d1375c039a413cc7f07b0228ecbb1673040796639081e347f63acaed0a03
container_end_page 1123
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1116
container_title Journal of propulsion and power
container_volume 34
creator Hitt, Matthew A
Frederick, Robert A
description This paper investigated the predictions of the axial-injection end-burning hybrid rocket motor regression rate model developed by Hitt and Frederick. Because axial-injection end-burning hybrid rocket motors follow a regression rate trend based on chamber pressure (like a solid rocket motor) instead of oxidizer mass flux (like a classical hybrid), it was expected that axial-injection end-burning hybrids would have additional regression rate trends similar to what is observed in solid rocket motors. As such, model predictions based on variations in chamber pressure, fuel grain temperature, oxidizer mass flow rate, and oxidizer pore size were investigated. The results of the modeling predicted that increases in the grain temperature increased the regression rate; but, increases in the oxidizer mass flow rate would decrease the regression rate. Increasing the oxidizer pore size was predicted to decrease the regression rate, with the effect increasing with chamber pressure as the flame became more diffusion limited. These results provide a better understanding of the axial-injection end-burning hybrid design, and thus better insight into where to focus further research.
doi_str_mv 10.2514/1.B36839
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_aiaa_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2493567826</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2493567826</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a313t-7bd34d1375c039a413cc7f07b0228ecbb1673040796639081e347f63acaed0a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEUxIMoWKvgRwiI4GVrsi-bP8e2VFuoWIqeQ3aTLSl1U5Mt2G_v6goeBE8Dw-_NGwaha0pGeUHZPR1NgEtQJ2hAC4AMpOCnaEAEkxnjhTxHFyltCaFccjFAq7XbRJeSDw1em9bhp2DdDq-is75qOzfhUGPT4PGHN7ts0Wzdt41njc0mh9j4ZoPnxzJ62522IV6is9rskrv60SF6fZi9TOfZ8vlxMR0vMwMU2kyUFpilIIqKgDKMQlWJmoiS5Ll0VVlSLoAwIhTnoIikDpioOZjKOEsMgSG66XP3MbwfXGr1NnR1upc6ZwoKLmTO_6WIVKqgOWUddddTVQwpRVfrffRvJh41JfprVU11v2qH3vao8cb8hv3hPgHc4nI3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2089951214</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Regression Rate Model Predictions of an Axial-Injection End-Burning Hybrid Motor</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hitt, Matthew A ; Frederick, Robert A</creator><creatorcontrib>Hitt, Matthew A ; Frederick, Robert A</creatorcontrib><description>This paper investigated the predictions of the axial-injection end-burning hybrid rocket motor regression rate model developed by Hitt and Frederick. Because axial-injection end-burning hybrid rocket motors follow a regression rate trend based on chamber pressure (like a solid rocket motor) instead of oxidizer mass flux (like a classical hybrid), it was expected that axial-injection end-burning hybrids would have additional regression rate trends similar to what is observed in solid rocket motors. As such, model predictions based on variations in chamber pressure, fuel grain temperature, oxidizer mass flow rate, and oxidizer pore size were investigated. The results of the modeling predicted that increases in the grain temperature increased the regression rate; but, increases in the oxidizer mass flow rate would decrease the regression rate. Increasing the oxidizer pore size was predicted to decrease the regression rate, with the effect increasing with chamber pressure as the flame became more diffusion limited. These results provide a better understanding of the axial-injection end-burning hybrid design, and thus better insight into where to focus further research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0748-4658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-3876</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2514/1.B36839</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</publisher><subject>Burning rate ; Chambers ; Mass flow rate ; Motors ; Oxidizing agents ; Pore size ; Porosity ; Predictions ; Pressure effects ; Regression models ; Rocket engines ; Rockets ; Solid propellant rocket engines</subject><ispartof>Journal of propulsion and power, 2018-09, Vol.34 (5), p.1116-1123</ispartof><rights>This material is declared a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at ; employ the ISSN (print) or (online) to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions .</rights><rights>This material is declared a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the ISSN 0748-4658 (print) or 1533-3876 (online) to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a313t-7bd34d1375c039a413cc7f07b0228ecbb1673040796639081e347f63acaed0a03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a313t-7bd34d1375c039a413cc7f07b0228ecbb1673040796639081e347f63acaed0a03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hitt, Matthew A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frederick, Robert A</creatorcontrib><title>Regression Rate Model Predictions of an Axial-Injection End-Burning Hybrid Motor</title><title>Journal of propulsion and power</title><description>This paper investigated the predictions of the axial-injection end-burning hybrid rocket motor regression rate model developed by Hitt and Frederick. Because axial-injection end-burning hybrid rocket motors follow a regression rate trend based on chamber pressure (like a solid rocket motor) instead of oxidizer mass flux (like a classical hybrid), it was expected that axial-injection end-burning hybrids would have additional regression rate trends similar to what is observed in solid rocket motors. As such, model predictions based on variations in chamber pressure, fuel grain temperature, oxidizer mass flow rate, and oxidizer pore size were investigated. The results of the modeling predicted that increases in the grain temperature increased the regression rate; but, increases in the oxidizer mass flow rate would decrease the regression rate. Increasing the oxidizer pore size was predicted to decrease the regression rate, with the effect increasing with chamber pressure as the flame became more diffusion limited. These results provide a better understanding of the axial-injection end-burning hybrid design, and thus better insight into where to focus further research.</description><subject>Burning rate</subject><subject>Chambers</subject><subject>Mass flow rate</subject><subject>Motors</subject><subject>Oxidizing agents</subject><subject>Pore size</subject><subject>Porosity</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Pressure effects</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Rocket engines</subject><subject>Rockets</subject><subject>Solid propellant rocket engines</subject><issn>0748-4658</issn><issn>1533-3876</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEUxIMoWKvgRwiI4GVrsi-bP8e2VFuoWIqeQ3aTLSl1U5Mt2G_v6goeBE8Dw-_NGwaha0pGeUHZPR1NgEtQJ2hAC4AMpOCnaEAEkxnjhTxHFyltCaFccjFAq7XbRJeSDw1em9bhp2DdDq-is75qOzfhUGPT4PGHN7ts0Wzdt41njc0mh9j4ZoPnxzJ62522IV6is9rskrv60SF6fZi9TOfZ8vlxMR0vMwMU2kyUFpilIIqKgDKMQlWJmoiS5Ll0VVlSLoAwIhTnoIikDpioOZjKOEsMgSG66XP3MbwfXGr1NnR1upc6ZwoKLmTO_6WIVKqgOWUddddTVQwpRVfrffRvJh41JfprVU11v2qH3vao8cb8hv3hPgHc4nI3</recordid><startdate>20180901</startdate><enddate>20180901</enddate><creator>Hitt, Matthew A</creator><creator>Frederick, Robert A</creator><general>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180901</creationdate><title>Regression Rate Model Predictions of an Axial-Injection End-Burning Hybrid Motor</title><author>Hitt, Matthew A ; Frederick, Robert A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a313t-7bd34d1375c039a413cc7f07b0228ecbb1673040796639081e347f63acaed0a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Burning rate</topic><topic>Chambers</topic><topic>Mass flow rate</topic><topic>Motors</topic><topic>Oxidizing agents</topic><topic>Pore size</topic><topic>Porosity</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Pressure effects</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Rocket engines</topic><topic>Rockets</topic><topic>Solid propellant rocket engines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hitt, Matthew A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frederick, Robert A</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of propulsion and power</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hitt, Matthew A</au><au>Frederick, Robert A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Regression Rate Model Predictions of an Axial-Injection End-Burning Hybrid Motor</atitle><jtitle>Journal of propulsion and power</jtitle><date>2018-09-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1116</spage><epage>1123</epage><pages>1116-1123</pages><issn>0748-4658</issn><eissn>1533-3876</eissn><abstract>This paper investigated the predictions of the axial-injection end-burning hybrid rocket motor regression rate model developed by Hitt and Frederick. Because axial-injection end-burning hybrid rocket motors follow a regression rate trend based on chamber pressure (like a solid rocket motor) instead of oxidizer mass flux (like a classical hybrid), it was expected that axial-injection end-burning hybrids would have additional regression rate trends similar to what is observed in solid rocket motors. As such, model predictions based on variations in chamber pressure, fuel grain temperature, oxidizer mass flow rate, and oxidizer pore size were investigated. The results of the modeling predicted that increases in the grain temperature increased the regression rate; but, increases in the oxidizer mass flow rate would decrease the regression rate. Increasing the oxidizer pore size was predicted to decrease the regression rate, with the effect increasing with chamber pressure as the flame became more diffusion limited. These results provide a better understanding of the axial-injection end-burning hybrid design, and thus better insight into where to focus further research.</abstract><cop>Reston</cop><pub>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</pub><doi>10.2514/1.B36839</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0748-4658
ispartof Journal of propulsion and power, 2018-09, Vol.34 (5), p.1116-1123
issn 0748-4658
1533-3876
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2493567826
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Burning rate
Chambers
Mass flow rate
Motors
Oxidizing agents
Pore size
Porosity
Predictions
Pressure effects
Regression models
Rocket engines
Rockets
Solid propellant rocket engines
title Regression Rate Model Predictions of an Axial-Injection End-Burning Hybrid Motor
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T17%3A13%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_aiaa_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Regression%20Rate%20Model%20Predictions%20of%20an%20Axial-Injection%20End-Burning%20Hybrid%20Motor&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20propulsion%20and%20power&rft.au=Hitt,%20Matthew%20A&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1116&rft.epage=1123&rft.pages=1116-1123&rft.issn=0748-4658&rft.eissn=1533-3876&rft_id=info:doi/10.2514/1.B36839&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_aiaa_%3E2493567826%3C/proquest_aiaa_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a313t-7bd34d1375c039a413cc7f07b0228ecbb1673040796639081e347f63acaed0a03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2089951214&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true