Loading…
Regression Rate Model Predictions of an Axial-Injection End-Burning Hybrid Motor
This paper investigated the predictions of the axial-injection end-burning hybrid rocket motor regression rate model developed by Hitt and Frederick. Because axial-injection end-burning hybrid rocket motors follow a regression rate trend based on chamber pressure (like a solid rocket motor) instead...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of propulsion and power 2018-09, Vol.34 (5), p.1116-1123 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a313t-7bd34d1375c039a413cc7f07b0228ecbb1673040796639081e347f63acaed0a03 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a313t-7bd34d1375c039a413cc7f07b0228ecbb1673040796639081e347f63acaed0a03 |
container_end_page | 1123 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1116 |
container_title | Journal of propulsion and power |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Hitt, Matthew A Frederick, Robert A |
description | This paper investigated the predictions of the axial-injection end-burning hybrid rocket motor regression rate model developed by Hitt and Frederick. Because axial-injection end-burning hybrid rocket motors follow a regression rate trend based on chamber pressure (like a solid rocket motor) instead of oxidizer mass flux (like a classical hybrid), it was expected that axial-injection end-burning hybrids would have additional regression rate trends similar to what is observed in solid rocket motors. As such, model predictions based on variations in chamber pressure, fuel grain temperature, oxidizer mass flow rate, and oxidizer pore size were investigated. The results of the modeling predicted that increases in the grain temperature increased the regression rate; but, increases in the oxidizer mass flow rate would decrease the regression rate. Increasing the oxidizer pore size was predicted to decrease the regression rate, with the effect increasing with chamber pressure as the flame became more diffusion limited. These results provide a better understanding of the axial-injection end-burning hybrid design, and thus better insight into where to focus further research. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2514/1.B36839 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_aiaa_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2493567826</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2493567826</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a313t-7bd34d1375c039a413cc7f07b0228ecbb1673040796639081e347f63acaed0a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEUxIMoWKvgRwiI4GVrsi-bP8e2VFuoWIqeQ3aTLSl1U5Mt2G_v6goeBE8Dw-_NGwaha0pGeUHZPR1NgEtQJ2hAC4AMpOCnaEAEkxnjhTxHFyltCaFccjFAq7XbRJeSDw1em9bhp2DdDq-is75qOzfhUGPT4PGHN7ts0Wzdt41njc0mh9j4ZoPnxzJ62522IV6is9rskrv60SF6fZi9TOfZ8vlxMR0vMwMU2kyUFpilIIqKgDKMQlWJmoiS5Ll0VVlSLoAwIhTnoIikDpioOZjKOEsMgSG66XP3MbwfXGr1NnR1upc6ZwoKLmTO_6WIVKqgOWUddddTVQwpRVfrffRvJh41JfprVU11v2qH3vao8cb8hv3hPgHc4nI3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2089951214</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Regression Rate Model Predictions of an Axial-Injection End-Burning Hybrid Motor</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hitt, Matthew A ; Frederick, Robert A</creator><creatorcontrib>Hitt, Matthew A ; Frederick, Robert A</creatorcontrib><description>This paper investigated the predictions of the axial-injection end-burning hybrid rocket motor regression rate model developed by Hitt and Frederick. Because axial-injection end-burning hybrid rocket motors follow a regression rate trend based on chamber pressure (like a solid rocket motor) instead of oxidizer mass flux (like a classical hybrid), it was expected that axial-injection end-burning hybrids would have additional regression rate trends similar to what is observed in solid rocket motors. As such, model predictions based on variations in chamber pressure, fuel grain temperature, oxidizer mass flow rate, and oxidizer pore size were investigated. The results of the modeling predicted that increases in the grain temperature increased the regression rate; but, increases in the oxidizer mass flow rate would decrease the regression rate. Increasing the oxidizer pore size was predicted to decrease the regression rate, with the effect increasing with chamber pressure as the flame became more diffusion limited. These results provide a better understanding of the axial-injection end-burning hybrid design, and thus better insight into where to focus further research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0748-4658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-3876</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2514/1.B36839</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</publisher><subject>Burning rate ; Chambers ; Mass flow rate ; Motors ; Oxidizing agents ; Pore size ; Porosity ; Predictions ; Pressure effects ; Regression models ; Rocket engines ; Rockets ; Solid propellant rocket engines</subject><ispartof>Journal of propulsion and power, 2018-09, Vol.34 (5), p.1116-1123</ispartof><rights>This material is declared a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at ; employ the ISSN (print) or (online) to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions .</rights><rights>This material is declared a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the ISSN 0748-4658 (print) or 1533-3876 (online) to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a313t-7bd34d1375c039a413cc7f07b0228ecbb1673040796639081e347f63acaed0a03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a313t-7bd34d1375c039a413cc7f07b0228ecbb1673040796639081e347f63acaed0a03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hitt, Matthew A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frederick, Robert A</creatorcontrib><title>Regression Rate Model Predictions of an Axial-Injection End-Burning Hybrid Motor</title><title>Journal of propulsion and power</title><description>This paper investigated the predictions of the axial-injection end-burning hybrid rocket motor regression rate model developed by Hitt and Frederick. Because axial-injection end-burning hybrid rocket motors follow a regression rate trend based on chamber pressure (like a solid rocket motor) instead of oxidizer mass flux (like a classical hybrid), it was expected that axial-injection end-burning hybrids would have additional regression rate trends similar to what is observed in solid rocket motors. As such, model predictions based on variations in chamber pressure, fuel grain temperature, oxidizer mass flow rate, and oxidizer pore size were investigated. The results of the modeling predicted that increases in the grain temperature increased the regression rate; but, increases in the oxidizer mass flow rate would decrease the regression rate. Increasing the oxidizer pore size was predicted to decrease the regression rate, with the effect increasing with chamber pressure as the flame became more diffusion limited. These results provide a better understanding of the axial-injection end-burning hybrid design, and thus better insight into where to focus further research.</description><subject>Burning rate</subject><subject>Chambers</subject><subject>Mass flow rate</subject><subject>Motors</subject><subject>Oxidizing agents</subject><subject>Pore size</subject><subject>Porosity</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Pressure effects</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Rocket engines</subject><subject>Rockets</subject><subject>Solid propellant rocket engines</subject><issn>0748-4658</issn><issn>1533-3876</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEUxIMoWKvgRwiI4GVrsi-bP8e2VFuoWIqeQ3aTLSl1U5Mt2G_v6goeBE8Dw-_NGwaha0pGeUHZPR1NgEtQJ2hAC4AMpOCnaEAEkxnjhTxHFyltCaFccjFAq7XbRJeSDw1em9bhp2DdDq-is75qOzfhUGPT4PGHN7ts0Wzdt41njc0mh9j4ZoPnxzJ62522IV6is9rskrv60SF6fZi9TOfZ8vlxMR0vMwMU2kyUFpilIIqKgDKMQlWJmoiS5Ll0VVlSLoAwIhTnoIikDpioOZjKOEsMgSG66XP3MbwfXGr1NnR1upc6ZwoKLmTO_6WIVKqgOWUddddTVQwpRVfrffRvJh41JfprVU11v2qH3vao8cb8hv3hPgHc4nI3</recordid><startdate>20180901</startdate><enddate>20180901</enddate><creator>Hitt, Matthew A</creator><creator>Frederick, Robert A</creator><general>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180901</creationdate><title>Regression Rate Model Predictions of an Axial-Injection End-Burning Hybrid Motor</title><author>Hitt, Matthew A ; Frederick, Robert A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a313t-7bd34d1375c039a413cc7f07b0228ecbb1673040796639081e347f63acaed0a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Burning rate</topic><topic>Chambers</topic><topic>Mass flow rate</topic><topic>Motors</topic><topic>Oxidizing agents</topic><topic>Pore size</topic><topic>Porosity</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Pressure effects</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Rocket engines</topic><topic>Rockets</topic><topic>Solid propellant rocket engines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hitt, Matthew A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frederick, Robert A</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of propulsion and power</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hitt, Matthew A</au><au>Frederick, Robert A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Regression Rate Model Predictions of an Axial-Injection End-Burning Hybrid Motor</atitle><jtitle>Journal of propulsion and power</jtitle><date>2018-09-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1116</spage><epage>1123</epage><pages>1116-1123</pages><issn>0748-4658</issn><eissn>1533-3876</eissn><abstract>This paper investigated the predictions of the axial-injection end-burning hybrid rocket motor regression rate model developed by Hitt and Frederick. Because axial-injection end-burning hybrid rocket motors follow a regression rate trend based on chamber pressure (like a solid rocket motor) instead of oxidizer mass flux (like a classical hybrid), it was expected that axial-injection end-burning hybrids would have additional regression rate trends similar to what is observed in solid rocket motors. As such, model predictions based on variations in chamber pressure, fuel grain temperature, oxidizer mass flow rate, and oxidizer pore size were investigated. The results of the modeling predicted that increases in the grain temperature increased the regression rate; but, increases in the oxidizer mass flow rate would decrease the regression rate. Increasing the oxidizer pore size was predicted to decrease the regression rate, with the effect increasing with chamber pressure as the flame became more diffusion limited. These results provide a better understanding of the axial-injection end-burning hybrid design, and thus better insight into where to focus further research.</abstract><cop>Reston</cop><pub>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</pub><doi>10.2514/1.B36839</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0748-4658 |
ispartof | Journal of propulsion and power, 2018-09, Vol.34 (5), p.1116-1123 |
issn | 0748-4658 1533-3876 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2493567826 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Burning rate Chambers Mass flow rate Motors Oxidizing agents Pore size Porosity Predictions Pressure effects Regression models Rocket engines Rockets Solid propellant rocket engines |
title | Regression Rate Model Predictions of an Axial-Injection End-Burning Hybrid Motor |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T17%3A13%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_aiaa_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Regression%20Rate%20Model%20Predictions%20of%20an%20Axial-Injection%20End-Burning%20Hybrid%20Motor&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20propulsion%20and%20power&rft.au=Hitt,%20Matthew%20A&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1116&rft.epage=1123&rft.pages=1116-1123&rft.issn=0748-4658&rft.eissn=1533-3876&rft_id=info:doi/10.2514/1.B36839&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_aiaa_%3E2493567826%3C/proquest_aiaa_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a313t-7bd34d1375c039a413cc7f07b0228ecbb1673040796639081e347f63acaed0a03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2089951214&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |