Loading…
Comparative analysis of academic scientists, social scientists and humanists' scholarly information seeking habits
The study aimed to investigate academic scientists, social scientists and humanists' scholarly use of information sources, self-reported digital literacy skills, use patterns of e-journals and differences in scholarly information seeking habits of academics at the University of the Punjab. The...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of academic librarianship 2021-01, Vol.47 (1), p.102297, Article 102297 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-a46f5086216cf9ce0ea2045ad3bd15f8b17e67e9c9fd604e690ccf964c756d33 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-a46f5086216cf9ce0ea2045ad3bd15f8b17e67e9c9fd604e690ccf964c756d33 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 102297 |
container_title | The Journal of academic librarianship |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Arshad, Alia Ameen, Kanwal |
description | The study aimed to investigate academic scientists, social scientists and humanists' scholarly use of information sources, self-reported digital literacy skills, use patterns of e-journals and differences in scholarly information seeking habits of academics at the University of the Punjab. The design of the study was quantitative, and survey method was employed to achieve objectives of the study. Self-administered questionnaire was distributed to 841 regular and contractual academics. The findings of the study showed that e-journals, discussion with colleagues and e-reports were frequently used by scientists and social scientists and occasionally used by humanists. Scientists and social scientists exhibited good digital literacy skills as compared to academic humanists. Significant variations were found among respondents of three disciplines in their digital literacy skills, scholarly use of information sources and use patterns of e-journals. The findings of the study provide insights into university librarians to plan training programs keeping in view disciplinary differences of academics e-journals use and their self-reported digital literacy skills. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102297 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2494406099</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0099133320301889</els_id><sourcerecordid>2494406099</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-a46f5086216cf9ce0ea2045ad3bd15f8b17e67e9c9fd604e690ccf964c756d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD9PwzAQxS0EEqXwDRgsMbCQYieOUy9IqOKfVImlu-XYZ-qQxMVOK_Xb4xAGJryc7-69J90PoWtKFpRQft8slFatqxc5ycdRnovqBM3oshIZFUKcohkhIv2LojhHFzE2JD2alzMUVr7bqaAGdwCsetUeo4vYW5wSDXRO46gd9IOLQ7zD0Wun2j-jZDF4u-9UP3a3abP1rQrtEbve-tClXN_jCPDp-g-8VbUb4iU6s6qNcPVb52jz_LRZvWbr95e31eM600XBhkwxbkuy5Dnl2goNBFROWKlMURta2mVNK-AVCC2s4YQBF0QnIWe6Krkpijm6mWJ3wX_tIQ6y8fuQLowyZ4IxwhOSpGKTSgcfYwArd8F1KhwlJXKEKxs5wZUjXDnBTbaHyQbpgIODIH-YaDAugB6k8e7_gG-ekobP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2494406099</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative analysis of academic scientists, social scientists and humanists' scholarly information seeking habits</title><source>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Arshad, Alia ; Ameen, Kanwal</creator><creatorcontrib>Arshad, Alia ; Ameen, Kanwal</creatorcontrib><description>The study aimed to investigate academic scientists, social scientists and humanists' scholarly use of information sources, self-reported digital literacy skills, use patterns of e-journals and differences in scholarly information seeking habits of academics at the University of the Punjab. The design of the study was quantitative, and survey method was employed to achieve objectives of the study. Self-administered questionnaire was distributed to 841 regular and contractual academics. The findings of the study showed that e-journals, discussion with colleagues and e-reports were frequently used by scientists and social scientists and occasionally used by humanists. Scientists and social scientists exhibited good digital literacy skills as compared to academic humanists. Significant variations were found among respondents of three disciplines in their digital literacy skills, scholarly use of information sources and use patterns of e-journals. The findings of the study provide insights into university librarians to plan training programs keeping in view disciplinary differences of academics e-journals use and their self-reported digital literacy skills.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0099-1333</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1999</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102297</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ann Arbor: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Academic libraries ; Academics ; Comparative analysis ; Digital literacy ; Electronic periodicals ; Humanists ; Information literacy ; Information Seeking ; Information seeking behavior ; Information Sources ; Librarians ; Periodicals ; Scholarly e-journals ; Scholarly information seeking habits ; Scholarly publishing ; Scientists ; Social Scientists</subject><ispartof>The Journal of academic librarianship, 2021-01, Vol.47 (1), p.102297, Article 102297</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jan 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-a46f5086216cf9ce0ea2045ad3bd15f8b17e67e9c9fd604e690ccf964c756d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-a46f5086216cf9ce0ea2045ad3bd15f8b17e67e9c9fd604e690ccf964c756d33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27898,27899,34109</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arshad, Alia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ameen, Kanwal</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative analysis of academic scientists, social scientists and humanists' scholarly information seeking habits</title><title>The Journal of academic librarianship</title><description>The study aimed to investigate academic scientists, social scientists and humanists' scholarly use of information sources, self-reported digital literacy skills, use patterns of e-journals and differences in scholarly information seeking habits of academics at the University of the Punjab. The design of the study was quantitative, and survey method was employed to achieve objectives of the study. Self-administered questionnaire was distributed to 841 regular and contractual academics. The findings of the study showed that e-journals, discussion with colleagues and e-reports were frequently used by scientists and social scientists and occasionally used by humanists. Scientists and social scientists exhibited good digital literacy skills as compared to academic humanists. Significant variations were found among respondents of three disciplines in their digital literacy skills, scholarly use of information sources and use patterns of e-journals. The findings of the study provide insights into university librarians to plan training programs keeping in view disciplinary differences of academics e-journals use and their self-reported digital literacy skills.</description><subject>Academic libraries</subject><subject>Academics</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Digital literacy</subject><subject>Electronic periodicals</subject><subject>Humanists</subject><subject>Information literacy</subject><subject>Information Seeking</subject><subject>Information seeking behavior</subject><subject>Information Sources</subject><subject>Librarians</subject><subject>Periodicals</subject><subject>Scholarly e-journals</subject><subject>Scholarly information seeking habits</subject><subject>Scholarly publishing</subject><subject>Scientists</subject><subject>Social Scientists</subject><issn>0099-1333</issn><issn>1879-1999</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>F2A</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD9PwzAQxS0EEqXwDRgsMbCQYieOUy9IqOKfVImlu-XYZ-qQxMVOK_Xb4xAGJryc7-69J90PoWtKFpRQft8slFatqxc5ycdRnovqBM3oshIZFUKcohkhIv2LojhHFzE2JD2alzMUVr7bqaAGdwCsetUeo4vYW5wSDXRO46gd9IOLQ7zD0Wun2j-jZDF4u-9UP3a3abP1rQrtEbve-tClXN_jCPDp-g-8VbUb4iU6s6qNcPVb52jz_LRZvWbr95e31eM600XBhkwxbkuy5Dnl2goNBFROWKlMURta2mVNK-AVCC2s4YQBF0QnIWe6Krkpijm6mWJ3wX_tIQ6y8fuQLowyZ4IxwhOSpGKTSgcfYwArd8F1KhwlJXKEKxs5wZUjXDnBTbaHyQbpgIODIH-YaDAugB6k8e7_gG-ekobP</recordid><startdate>202101</startdate><enddate>202101</enddate><creator>Arshad, Alia</creator><creator>Ameen, Kanwal</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202101</creationdate><title>Comparative analysis of academic scientists, social scientists and humanists' scholarly information seeking habits</title><author>Arshad, Alia ; Ameen, Kanwal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-a46f5086216cf9ce0ea2045ad3bd15f8b17e67e9c9fd604e690ccf964c756d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Academic libraries</topic><topic>Academics</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Digital literacy</topic><topic>Electronic periodicals</topic><topic>Humanists</topic><topic>Information literacy</topic><topic>Information Seeking</topic><topic>Information seeking behavior</topic><topic>Information Sources</topic><topic>Librarians</topic><topic>Periodicals</topic><topic>Scholarly e-journals</topic><topic>Scholarly information seeking habits</topic><topic>Scholarly publishing</topic><topic>Scientists</topic><topic>Social Scientists</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arshad, Alia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ameen, Kanwal</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of academic librarianship</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arshad, Alia</au><au>Ameen, Kanwal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative analysis of academic scientists, social scientists and humanists' scholarly information seeking habits</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of academic librarianship</jtitle><date>2021-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>102297</spage><pages>102297-</pages><artnum>102297</artnum><issn>0099-1333</issn><eissn>1879-1999</eissn><abstract>The study aimed to investigate academic scientists, social scientists and humanists' scholarly use of information sources, self-reported digital literacy skills, use patterns of e-journals and differences in scholarly information seeking habits of academics at the University of the Punjab. The design of the study was quantitative, and survey method was employed to achieve objectives of the study. Self-administered questionnaire was distributed to 841 regular and contractual academics. The findings of the study showed that e-journals, discussion with colleagues and e-reports were frequently used by scientists and social scientists and occasionally used by humanists. Scientists and social scientists exhibited good digital literacy skills as compared to academic humanists. Significant variations were found among respondents of three disciplines in their digital literacy skills, scholarly use of information sources and use patterns of e-journals. The findings of the study provide insights into university librarians to plan training programs keeping in view disciplinary differences of academics e-journals use and their self-reported digital literacy skills.</abstract><cop>Ann Arbor</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102297</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0099-1333 |
ispartof | The Journal of academic librarianship, 2021-01, Vol.47 (1), p.102297, Article 102297 |
issn | 0099-1333 1879-1999 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2494406099 |
source | Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA); ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Academic libraries Academics Comparative analysis Digital literacy Electronic periodicals Humanists Information literacy Information Seeking Information seeking behavior Information Sources Librarians Periodicals Scholarly e-journals Scholarly information seeking habits Scholarly publishing Scientists Social Scientists |
title | Comparative analysis of academic scientists, social scientists and humanists' scholarly information seeking habits |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-25T23%3A13%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20analysis%20of%20academic%20scientists,%20social%20scientists%20and%20humanists'%20scholarly%20information%20seeking%20habits&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20academic%20librarianship&rft.au=Arshad,%20Alia&rft.date=2021-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=102297&rft.pages=102297-&rft.artnum=102297&rft.issn=0099-1333&rft.eissn=1879-1999&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102297&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2494406099%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-a46f5086216cf9ce0ea2045ad3bd15f8b17e67e9c9fd604e690ccf964c756d33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2494406099&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |