Loading…

Comparative analysis of academic scientists, social scientists and humanists' scholarly information seeking habits

The study aimed to investigate academic scientists, social scientists and humanists' scholarly use of information sources, self-reported digital literacy skills, use patterns of e-journals and differences in scholarly information seeking habits of academics at the University of the Punjab. The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of academic librarianship 2021-01, Vol.47 (1), p.102297, Article 102297
Main Authors: Arshad, Alia, Ameen, Kanwal
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-a46f5086216cf9ce0ea2045ad3bd15f8b17e67e9c9fd604e690ccf964c756d33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-a46f5086216cf9ce0ea2045ad3bd15f8b17e67e9c9fd604e690ccf964c756d33
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 102297
container_title The Journal of academic librarianship
container_volume 47
creator Arshad, Alia
Ameen, Kanwal
description The study aimed to investigate academic scientists, social scientists and humanists' scholarly use of information sources, self-reported digital literacy skills, use patterns of e-journals and differences in scholarly information seeking habits of academics at the University of the Punjab. The design of the study was quantitative, and survey method was employed to achieve objectives of the study. Self-administered questionnaire was distributed to 841 regular and contractual academics. The findings of the study showed that e-journals, discussion with colleagues and e-reports were frequently used by scientists and social scientists and occasionally used by humanists. Scientists and social scientists exhibited good digital literacy skills as compared to academic humanists. Significant variations were found among respondents of three disciplines in their digital literacy skills, scholarly use of information sources and use patterns of e-journals. The findings of the study provide insights into university librarians to plan training programs keeping in view disciplinary differences of academics e-journals use and their self-reported digital literacy skills.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102297
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2494406099</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0099133320301889</els_id><sourcerecordid>2494406099</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-a46f5086216cf9ce0ea2045ad3bd15f8b17e67e9c9fd604e690ccf964c756d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD9PwzAQxS0EEqXwDRgsMbCQYieOUy9IqOKfVImlu-XYZ-qQxMVOK_Xb4xAGJryc7-69J90PoWtKFpRQft8slFatqxc5ycdRnovqBM3oshIZFUKcohkhIv2LojhHFzE2JD2alzMUVr7bqaAGdwCsetUeo4vYW5wSDXRO46gd9IOLQ7zD0Wun2j-jZDF4u-9UP3a3abP1rQrtEbve-tClXN_jCPDp-g-8VbUb4iU6s6qNcPVb52jz_LRZvWbr95e31eM600XBhkwxbkuy5Dnl2goNBFROWKlMURta2mVNK-AVCC2s4YQBF0QnIWe6Krkpijm6mWJ3wX_tIQ6y8fuQLowyZ4IxwhOSpGKTSgcfYwArd8F1KhwlJXKEKxs5wZUjXDnBTbaHyQbpgIODIH-YaDAugB6k8e7_gG-ekobP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2494406099</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative analysis of academic scientists, social scientists and humanists' scholarly information seeking habits</title><source>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Arshad, Alia ; Ameen, Kanwal</creator><creatorcontrib>Arshad, Alia ; Ameen, Kanwal</creatorcontrib><description>The study aimed to investigate academic scientists, social scientists and humanists' scholarly use of information sources, self-reported digital literacy skills, use patterns of e-journals and differences in scholarly information seeking habits of academics at the University of the Punjab. The design of the study was quantitative, and survey method was employed to achieve objectives of the study. Self-administered questionnaire was distributed to 841 regular and contractual academics. The findings of the study showed that e-journals, discussion with colleagues and e-reports were frequently used by scientists and social scientists and occasionally used by humanists. Scientists and social scientists exhibited good digital literacy skills as compared to academic humanists. Significant variations were found among respondents of three disciplines in their digital literacy skills, scholarly use of information sources and use patterns of e-journals. The findings of the study provide insights into university librarians to plan training programs keeping in view disciplinary differences of academics e-journals use and their self-reported digital literacy skills.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0099-1333</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1999</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102297</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ann Arbor: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Academic libraries ; Academics ; Comparative analysis ; Digital literacy ; Electronic periodicals ; Humanists ; Information literacy ; Information Seeking ; Information seeking behavior ; Information Sources ; Librarians ; Periodicals ; Scholarly e-journals ; Scholarly information seeking habits ; Scholarly publishing ; Scientists ; Social Scientists</subject><ispartof>The Journal of academic librarianship, 2021-01, Vol.47 (1), p.102297, Article 102297</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jan 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-a46f5086216cf9ce0ea2045ad3bd15f8b17e67e9c9fd604e690ccf964c756d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-a46f5086216cf9ce0ea2045ad3bd15f8b17e67e9c9fd604e690ccf964c756d33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27898,27899,34109</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arshad, Alia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ameen, Kanwal</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative analysis of academic scientists, social scientists and humanists' scholarly information seeking habits</title><title>The Journal of academic librarianship</title><description>The study aimed to investigate academic scientists, social scientists and humanists' scholarly use of information sources, self-reported digital literacy skills, use patterns of e-journals and differences in scholarly information seeking habits of academics at the University of the Punjab. The design of the study was quantitative, and survey method was employed to achieve objectives of the study. Self-administered questionnaire was distributed to 841 regular and contractual academics. The findings of the study showed that e-journals, discussion with colleagues and e-reports were frequently used by scientists and social scientists and occasionally used by humanists. Scientists and social scientists exhibited good digital literacy skills as compared to academic humanists. Significant variations were found among respondents of three disciplines in their digital literacy skills, scholarly use of information sources and use patterns of e-journals. The findings of the study provide insights into university librarians to plan training programs keeping in view disciplinary differences of academics e-journals use and their self-reported digital literacy skills.</description><subject>Academic libraries</subject><subject>Academics</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Digital literacy</subject><subject>Electronic periodicals</subject><subject>Humanists</subject><subject>Information literacy</subject><subject>Information Seeking</subject><subject>Information seeking behavior</subject><subject>Information Sources</subject><subject>Librarians</subject><subject>Periodicals</subject><subject>Scholarly e-journals</subject><subject>Scholarly information seeking habits</subject><subject>Scholarly publishing</subject><subject>Scientists</subject><subject>Social Scientists</subject><issn>0099-1333</issn><issn>1879-1999</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>F2A</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD9PwzAQxS0EEqXwDRgsMbCQYieOUy9IqOKfVImlu-XYZ-qQxMVOK_Xb4xAGJryc7-69J90PoWtKFpRQft8slFatqxc5ycdRnovqBM3oshIZFUKcohkhIv2LojhHFzE2JD2alzMUVr7bqaAGdwCsetUeo4vYW5wSDXRO46gd9IOLQ7zD0Wun2j-jZDF4u-9UP3a3abP1rQrtEbve-tClXN_jCPDp-g-8VbUb4iU6s6qNcPVb52jz_LRZvWbr95e31eM600XBhkwxbkuy5Dnl2goNBFROWKlMURta2mVNK-AVCC2s4YQBF0QnIWe6Krkpijm6mWJ3wX_tIQ6y8fuQLowyZ4IxwhOSpGKTSgcfYwArd8F1KhwlJXKEKxs5wZUjXDnBTbaHyQbpgIODIH-YaDAugB6k8e7_gG-ekobP</recordid><startdate>202101</startdate><enddate>202101</enddate><creator>Arshad, Alia</creator><creator>Ameen, Kanwal</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202101</creationdate><title>Comparative analysis of academic scientists, social scientists and humanists' scholarly information seeking habits</title><author>Arshad, Alia ; Ameen, Kanwal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-a46f5086216cf9ce0ea2045ad3bd15f8b17e67e9c9fd604e690ccf964c756d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Academic libraries</topic><topic>Academics</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Digital literacy</topic><topic>Electronic periodicals</topic><topic>Humanists</topic><topic>Information literacy</topic><topic>Information Seeking</topic><topic>Information seeking behavior</topic><topic>Information Sources</topic><topic>Librarians</topic><topic>Periodicals</topic><topic>Scholarly e-journals</topic><topic>Scholarly information seeking habits</topic><topic>Scholarly publishing</topic><topic>Scientists</topic><topic>Social Scientists</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arshad, Alia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ameen, Kanwal</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of academic librarianship</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arshad, Alia</au><au>Ameen, Kanwal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative analysis of academic scientists, social scientists and humanists' scholarly information seeking habits</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of academic librarianship</jtitle><date>2021-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>102297</spage><pages>102297-</pages><artnum>102297</artnum><issn>0099-1333</issn><eissn>1879-1999</eissn><abstract>The study aimed to investigate academic scientists, social scientists and humanists' scholarly use of information sources, self-reported digital literacy skills, use patterns of e-journals and differences in scholarly information seeking habits of academics at the University of the Punjab. The design of the study was quantitative, and survey method was employed to achieve objectives of the study. Self-administered questionnaire was distributed to 841 regular and contractual academics. The findings of the study showed that e-journals, discussion with colleagues and e-reports were frequently used by scientists and social scientists and occasionally used by humanists. Scientists and social scientists exhibited good digital literacy skills as compared to academic humanists. Significant variations were found among respondents of three disciplines in their digital literacy skills, scholarly use of information sources and use patterns of e-journals. The findings of the study provide insights into university librarians to plan training programs keeping in view disciplinary differences of academics e-journals use and their self-reported digital literacy skills.</abstract><cop>Ann Arbor</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102297</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0099-1333
ispartof The Journal of academic librarianship, 2021-01, Vol.47 (1), p.102297, Article 102297
issn 0099-1333
1879-1999
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2494406099
source Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA); ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Academic libraries
Academics
Comparative analysis
Digital literacy
Electronic periodicals
Humanists
Information literacy
Information Seeking
Information seeking behavior
Information Sources
Librarians
Periodicals
Scholarly e-journals
Scholarly information seeking habits
Scholarly publishing
Scientists
Social Scientists
title Comparative analysis of academic scientists, social scientists and humanists' scholarly information seeking habits
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-25T23%3A13%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20analysis%20of%20academic%20scientists,%20social%20scientists%20and%20humanists'%20scholarly%20information%20seeking%20habits&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20academic%20librarianship&rft.au=Arshad,%20Alia&rft.date=2021-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=102297&rft.pages=102297-&rft.artnum=102297&rft.issn=0099-1333&rft.eissn=1879-1999&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102297&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2494406099%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-a46f5086216cf9ce0ea2045ad3bd15f8b17e67e9c9fd604e690ccf964c756d33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2494406099&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true