Loading…
Software Piracy Research: A Cross-disciplinary Systematic Review
Few studies have synthesized accumulated scholarly knowledge on software piracy across the disciplines that study this phenomenon. We contribute to understanding the intellectual and social development on software piracy by performing a cross-disciplinary literature search. We used 17 research quest...
Saved in:
Published in: | Communications of the Association for Information Systems 2016-01, Vol.38, p.31 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 31 |
container_title | Communications of the Association for Information Systems |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Chavarria, Juan A Andoh-Baidoo, Francis Kofi Midha, Vishal Hughes, Jerald |
description | Few studies have synthesized accumulated scholarly knowledge on software piracy across the disciplines that study this phenomenon. We contribute to understanding the intellectual and social development on software piracy by performing a cross-disciplinary literature search. We used 17 research questions to address five specific areas of inquiry on software piracy research: 1) what makes up software piracy’s intellectual substance?, 2) do theoretical contributions on software piracy suggest a cross-disciplinary research community on the topic?, 3) what changes have occurred in software piracy research across the seven measured periods?, 4) what are the top IS journals’ publishing patterns on software piracy research?, and 5) who has contributed to software piracy research? To address these questions, we classified 179 software research studies. We found that: 1) over 50 percent of the studies focused on an individual level of analysis, 2) most papers examined software piracy in North America and Asia Pacific regions, although other regions also have major problems, and 3) the distribution of theoretical and methodological contributions show a pattern of leaning towards positivism. The findings point to several research opportunities including expanding research: 1) at organizational levels with particular emphasis on organizations’ role as consumers and or intermediaries, 2) in Latin America and Africa, which are areas with high incidence of software piracy, and 3) on approaches beyond positivism. |
doi_str_mv | 10.17705/1CAIS.03831 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2500511128</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2500511128</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-b5c8226bed26624adb2031ac304640b0394116b10723e2da3b75fb6bc6d3790e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjU9LwzAcQIMgOKc3P0DBc-fvT5O2nixF52CgWD2PJE0xY6416Rz99g709C6P94S4QVhgnoO8w7paNQvggvFMzFBSmTIWeCEuY9wCYCZLmomHpu_Gow4uefVB2yl5c9HpYD_vkyqpQx9j2vpo_bDzex2mpJni6L706O3J_PHueCXOO72L7vqfc_Hx9PheP6frl-WqrtbpgAWPqZG2IFLGtaQUZbo1BIzaMmQqAwNcZojKIOTEjlrNJpedUcaqlvMSHM_F7V93CP33wcVxs-0PYX9abkgCSESkgn8BELZIAA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2500511128</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Software Piracy Research: A Cross-disciplinary Systematic Review</title><source>ABI/INFORM Collection</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><creator>Chavarria, Juan A ; Andoh-Baidoo, Francis Kofi ; Midha, Vishal ; Hughes, Jerald</creator><creatorcontrib>Chavarria, Juan A ; Andoh-Baidoo, Francis Kofi ; Midha, Vishal ; Hughes, Jerald</creatorcontrib><description>Few studies have synthesized accumulated scholarly knowledge on software piracy across the disciplines that study this phenomenon. We contribute to understanding the intellectual and social development on software piracy by performing a cross-disciplinary literature search. We used 17 research questions to address five specific areas of inquiry on software piracy research: 1) what makes up software piracy’s intellectual substance?, 2) do theoretical contributions on software piracy suggest a cross-disciplinary research community on the topic?, 3) what changes have occurred in software piracy research across the seven measured periods?, 4) what are the top IS journals’ publishing patterns on software piracy research?, and 5) who has contributed to software piracy research? To address these questions, we classified 179 software research studies. We found that: 1) over 50 percent of the studies focused on an individual level of analysis, 2) most papers examined software piracy in North America and Asia Pacific regions, although other regions also have major problems, and 3) the distribution of theoretical and methodological contributions show a pattern of leaning towards positivism. The findings point to several research opportunities including expanding research: 1) at organizational levels with particular emphasis on organizations’ role as consumers and or intermediaries, 2) in Latin America and Africa, which are areas with high incidence of software piracy, and 3) on approaches beyond positivism.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1529-3181</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.17705/1CAIS.03831</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Atlanta: Association for Information Systems</publisher><subject>Alliances ; Interdisciplinary aspects ; Piracy ; Positivism ; Questions ; Software</subject><ispartof>Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2016-01, Vol.38, p.31</ispartof><rights>Copyright Association for Information Systems 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2500511128?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,11669,27905,27906,36041,44344</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chavarria, Juan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andoh-Baidoo, Francis Kofi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Midha, Vishal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Jerald</creatorcontrib><title>Software Piracy Research: A Cross-disciplinary Systematic Review</title><title>Communications of the Association for Information Systems</title><description>Few studies have synthesized accumulated scholarly knowledge on software piracy across the disciplines that study this phenomenon. We contribute to understanding the intellectual and social development on software piracy by performing a cross-disciplinary literature search. We used 17 research questions to address five specific areas of inquiry on software piracy research: 1) what makes up software piracy’s intellectual substance?, 2) do theoretical contributions on software piracy suggest a cross-disciplinary research community on the topic?, 3) what changes have occurred in software piracy research across the seven measured periods?, 4) what are the top IS journals’ publishing patterns on software piracy research?, and 5) who has contributed to software piracy research? To address these questions, we classified 179 software research studies. We found that: 1) over 50 percent of the studies focused on an individual level of analysis, 2) most papers examined software piracy in North America and Asia Pacific regions, although other regions also have major problems, and 3) the distribution of theoretical and methodological contributions show a pattern of leaning towards positivism. The findings point to several research opportunities including expanding research: 1) at organizational levels with particular emphasis on organizations’ role as consumers and or intermediaries, 2) in Latin America and Africa, which are areas with high incidence of software piracy, and 3) on approaches beyond positivism.</description><subject>Alliances</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary aspects</subject><subject>Piracy</subject><subject>Positivism</subject><subject>Questions</subject><subject>Software</subject><issn>1529-3181</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNotjU9LwzAcQIMgOKc3P0DBc-fvT5O2nixF52CgWD2PJE0xY6416Rz99g709C6P94S4QVhgnoO8w7paNQvggvFMzFBSmTIWeCEuY9wCYCZLmomHpu_Gow4uefVB2yl5c9HpYD_vkyqpQx9j2vpo_bDzex2mpJni6L706O3J_PHueCXOO72L7vqfc_Hx9PheP6frl-WqrtbpgAWPqZG2IFLGtaQUZbo1BIzaMmQqAwNcZojKIOTEjlrNJpedUcaqlvMSHM_F7V93CP33wcVxs-0PYX9abkgCSESkgn8BELZIAA</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Chavarria, Juan A</creator><creator>Andoh-Baidoo, Francis Kofi</creator><creator>Midha, Vishal</creator><creator>Hughes, Jerald</creator><general>Association for Information Systems</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Software Piracy Research: A Cross-disciplinary Systematic Review</title><author>Chavarria, Juan A ; Andoh-Baidoo, Francis Kofi ; Midha, Vishal ; Hughes, Jerald</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-b5c8226bed26624adb2031ac304640b0394116b10723e2da3b75fb6bc6d3790e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Alliances</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary aspects</topic><topic>Piracy</topic><topic>Positivism</topic><topic>Questions</topic><topic>Software</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chavarria, Juan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andoh-Baidoo, Francis Kofi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Midha, Vishal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Jerald</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI-INFORM Complete</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Communications of the Association for Information Systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chavarria, Juan A</au><au>Andoh-Baidoo, Francis Kofi</au><au>Midha, Vishal</au><au>Hughes, Jerald</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Software Piracy Research: A Cross-disciplinary Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>Communications of the Association for Information Systems</jtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>38</volume><spage>31</spage><pages>31-</pages><eissn>1529-3181</eissn><abstract>Few studies have synthesized accumulated scholarly knowledge on software piracy across the disciplines that study this phenomenon. We contribute to understanding the intellectual and social development on software piracy by performing a cross-disciplinary literature search. We used 17 research questions to address five specific areas of inquiry on software piracy research: 1) what makes up software piracy’s intellectual substance?, 2) do theoretical contributions on software piracy suggest a cross-disciplinary research community on the topic?, 3) what changes have occurred in software piracy research across the seven measured periods?, 4) what are the top IS journals’ publishing patterns on software piracy research?, and 5) who has contributed to software piracy research? To address these questions, we classified 179 software research studies. We found that: 1) over 50 percent of the studies focused on an individual level of analysis, 2) most papers examined software piracy in North America and Asia Pacific regions, although other regions also have major problems, and 3) the distribution of theoretical and methodological contributions show a pattern of leaning towards positivism. The findings point to several research opportunities including expanding research: 1) at organizational levels with particular emphasis on organizations’ role as consumers and or intermediaries, 2) in Latin America and Africa, which are areas with high incidence of software piracy, and 3) on approaches beyond positivism.</abstract><cop>Atlanta</cop><pub>Association for Information Systems</pub><doi>10.17705/1CAIS.03831</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 1529-3181 |
ispartof | Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2016-01, Vol.38, p.31 |
issn | 1529-3181 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2500511128 |
source | ABI/INFORM Collection; Business Source Ultimate |
subjects | Alliances Interdisciplinary aspects Piracy Positivism Questions Software |
title | Software Piracy Research: A Cross-disciplinary Systematic Review |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T05%3A31%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Software%20Piracy%20Research:%20A%20Cross-disciplinary%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=Communications%20of%20the%20Association%20for%20Information%20Systems&rft.au=Chavarria,%20Juan%20A&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=38&rft.spage=31&rft.pages=31-&rft.eissn=1529-3181&rft_id=info:doi/10.17705/1CAIS.03831&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2500511128%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-b5c8226bed26624adb2031ac304640b0394116b10723e2da3b75fb6bc6d3790e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2500511128&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |