Loading…

Consumer Rational (In)Attention to Favorable and Unfavorable Product Information, and Firm Information Design

The authors study how a consumer optimally allocates attention to favorable and unfavorable product-related information before making the purchase decision, when information processing is costly. They find that attention allocation depends on, among other factors, the consumer’s prior belief about w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of marketing research 2021-04, Vol.58 (2), p.343-362
Main Authors: Jerath, Kinshuk, Ren, Qitian
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-9ff0f0a3c042eb8f856b407963c6c1c1499ca6248a2f5d7103ac600b55f060463
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-9ff0f0a3c042eb8f856b407963c6c1c1499ca6248a2f5d7103ac600b55f060463
container_end_page 362
container_issue 2
container_start_page 343
container_title Journal of marketing research
container_volume 58
creator Jerath, Kinshuk
Ren, Qitian
description The authors study how a consumer optimally allocates attention to favorable and unfavorable product-related information before making the purchase decision, when information processing is costly. They find that attention allocation depends on, among other factors, the consumer’s prior belief about whether the product matches their needs and their unit information processing cost. A consumer processes both “confirmatory” and “disconfirmatory” information to their prior belief, but to different degrees under different conditions. In general, if the consumer has an extreme prior, or if the unit cost of processing information is high such that only a small amount of information is optimally processed, they process more confirmatory than disconfirmatory information; this offers a rational explanation for the phenomenon known as “confirmation bias.” The authors also find that a seller can benefit by influencing the consumer’s attention allocation by strategically choosing how much favorable and unfavorable information to make available for the consumer to process and by influencing the information processing cost, where the optimal strategy depends on the seller’s ability to adjust product price. Surprisingly, a seller has a lower incentive to suppress unfavorable information when the consumer has a worse prior belief about product fit. The authors illustrate their model with an application to information provision in product reviews.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0022243720977830
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2500886260</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0022243720977830</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2500886260</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-9ff0f0a3c042eb8f856b407963c6c1c1499ca6248a2f5d7103ac600b55f060463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UM9LwzAUDqLgnN49BrwoWH1J2qQ5jml1MFDEnUuaJaNjTWbSCv73tpuoCL7L43vfD3gfQucEbggR4haAUpoyQUEKkTM4QCOSpSIRRLJDNBroZOCP0UmMa-iHgBihZupd7BoT8Itqa-_UBl_O3NWkbY0bMG49LtS7D6raGKzcEi-c_cbPwS873eKZsz40u4DrnaioQ_P7iu9MrFfuFB1ZtYnm7GuP0aK4f50-JvOnh9l0Mk80k7JNpLVgQTENKTVVbvOMVykIyZnmmmiSSqkVp2muqM2WggBTmgNUWWaBQ8rZGF3sc7fBv3UmtuXad6F_LpY0A8hzTjn0KtirdPAxBmPLbagbFT5KAuVQavm31N6S7C1RrcxP6L_6T-vhdeA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2500886260</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Consumer Rational (In)Attention to Favorable and Unfavorable Product Information, and Firm Information Design</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Jerath, Kinshuk ; Ren, Qitian</creator><creatorcontrib>Jerath, Kinshuk ; Ren, Qitian</creatorcontrib><description>The authors study how a consumer optimally allocates attention to favorable and unfavorable product-related information before making the purchase decision, when information processing is costly. They find that attention allocation depends on, among other factors, the consumer’s prior belief about whether the product matches their needs and their unit information processing cost. A consumer processes both “confirmatory” and “disconfirmatory” information to their prior belief, but to different degrees under different conditions. In general, if the consumer has an extreme prior, or if the unit cost of processing information is high such that only a small amount of information is optimally processed, they process more confirmatory than disconfirmatory information; this offers a rational explanation for the phenomenon known as “confirmation bias.” The authors also find that a seller can benefit by influencing the consumer’s attention allocation by strategically choosing how much favorable and unfavorable information to make available for the consumer to process and by influencing the information processing cost, where the optimal strategy depends on the seller’s ability to adjust product price. Surprisingly, a seller has a lower incentive to suppress unfavorable information when the consumer has a worse prior belief about product fit. The authors illustrate their model with an application to information provision in product reviews.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2437</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-7193</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0022243720977830</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Buying ; Consumer behavior ; Decision making ; Information processing ; Marketing ; Product reviews</subject><ispartof>Journal of marketing research, 2021-04, Vol.58 (2), p.343-362</ispartof><rights>American Marketing Association 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-9ff0f0a3c042eb8f856b407963c6c1c1499ca6248a2f5d7103ac600b55f060463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-9ff0f0a3c042eb8f856b407963c6c1c1499ca6248a2f5d7103ac600b55f060463</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,79364</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jerath, Kinshuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Qitian</creatorcontrib><title>Consumer Rational (In)Attention to Favorable and Unfavorable Product Information, and Firm Information Design</title><title>Journal of marketing research</title><description>The authors study how a consumer optimally allocates attention to favorable and unfavorable product-related information before making the purchase decision, when information processing is costly. They find that attention allocation depends on, among other factors, the consumer’s prior belief about whether the product matches their needs and their unit information processing cost. A consumer processes both “confirmatory” and “disconfirmatory” information to their prior belief, but to different degrees under different conditions. In general, if the consumer has an extreme prior, or if the unit cost of processing information is high such that only a small amount of information is optimally processed, they process more confirmatory than disconfirmatory information; this offers a rational explanation for the phenomenon known as “confirmation bias.” The authors also find that a seller can benefit by influencing the consumer’s attention allocation by strategically choosing how much favorable and unfavorable information to make available for the consumer to process and by influencing the information processing cost, where the optimal strategy depends on the seller’s ability to adjust product price. Surprisingly, a seller has a lower incentive to suppress unfavorable information when the consumer has a worse prior belief about product fit. The authors illustrate their model with an application to information provision in product reviews.</description><subject>Buying</subject><subject>Consumer behavior</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Product reviews</subject><issn>0022-2437</issn><issn>1547-7193</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UM9LwzAUDqLgnN49BrwoWH1J2qQ5jml1MFDEnUuaJaNjTWbSCv73tpuoCL7L43vfD3gfQucEbggR4haAUpoyQUEKkTM4QCOSpSIRRLJDNBroZOCP0UmMa-iHgBihZupd7BoT8Itqa-_UBl_O3NWkbY0bMG49LtS7D6raGKzcEi-c_cbPwS873eKZsz40u4DrnaioQ_P7iu9MrFfuFB1ZtYnm7GuP0aK4f50-JvOnh9l0Mk80k7JNpLVgQTENKTVVbvOMVykIyZnmmmiSSqkVp2muqM2WggBTmgNUWWaBQ8rZGF3sc7fBv3UmtuXad6F_LpY0A8hzTjn0KtirdPAxBmPLbagbFT5KAuVQavm31N6S7C1RrcxP6L_6T-vhdeA</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>Jerath, Kinshuk</creator><creator>Ren, Qitian</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>Consumer Rational (In)Attention to Favorable and Unfavorable Product Information, and Firm Information Design</title><author>Jerath, Kinshuk ; Ren, Qitian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-9ff0f0a3c042eb8f856b407963c6c1c1499ca6248a2f5d7103ac600b55f060463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Buying</topic><topic>Consumer behavior</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Product reviews</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jerath, Kinshuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Qitian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of marketing research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jerath, Kinshuk</au><au>Ren, Qitian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Consumer Rational (In)Attention to Favorable and Unfavorable Product Information, and Firm Information Design</atitle><jtitle>Journal of marketing research</jtitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>343</spage><epage>362</epage><pages>343-362</pages><issn>0022-2437</issn><eissn>1547-7193</eissn><abstract>The authors study how a consumer optimally allocates attention to favorable and unfavorable product-related information before making the purchase decision, when information processing is costly. They find that attention allocation depends on, among other factors, the consumer’s prior belief about whether the product matches their needs and their unit information processing cost. A consumer processes both “confirmatory” and “disconfirmatory” information to their prior belief, but to different degrees under different conditions. In general, if the consumer has an extreme prior, or if the unit cost of processing information is high such that only a small amount of information is optimally processed, they process more confirmatory than disconfirmatory information; this offers a rational explanation for the phenomenon known as “confirmation bias.” The authors also find that a seller can benefit by influencing the consumer’s attention allocation by strategically choosing how much favorable and unfavorable information to make available for the consumer to process and by influencing the information processing cost, where the optimal strategy depends on the seller’s ability to adjust product price. Surprisingly, a seller has a lower incentive to suppress unfavorable information when the consumer has a worse prior belief about product fit. The authors illustrate their model with an application to information provision in product reviews.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0022243720977830</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2437
ispartof Journal of marketing research, 2021-04, Vol.58 (2), p.343-362
issn 0022-2437
1547-7193
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2500886260
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; Sage Journals Online
subjects Buying
Consumer behavior
Decision making
Information processing
Marketing
Product reviews
title Consumer Rational (In)Attention to Favorable and Unfavorable Product Information, and Firm Information Design
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T14%3A51%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Consumer%20Rational%20(In)Attention%20to%20Favorable%20and%20Unfavorable%20Product%20Information,%20and%20Firm%20Information%20Design&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20marketing%20research&rft.au=Jerath,%20Kinshuk&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=343&rft.epage=362&rft.pages=343-362&rft.issn=0022-2437&rft.eissn=1547-7193&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0022243720977830&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2500886260%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-9ff0f0a3c042eb8f856b407963c6c1c1499ca6248a2f5d7103ac600b55f060463%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2500886260&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0022243720977830&rfr_iscdi=true