Loading…
6ER-036 Deprescribing tools for the elderly: a systematic review
Background and importanceDeprescription is the revision of the therapeutic plan with the aim of simplifying it, taking into account the preferences of the patient, prognosis and the environment. This strategy acquires special relevance in elderly patients as they are exposed to numerous adverse effe...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice 2021-03, Vol.28 (Suppl 1), p.A172-A173 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | A173 |
container_issue | Suppl 1 |
container_start_page | A172 |
container_title | European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Mejias Trueba, M Rodríguez Perez, A Fernández Rubio, B Sánchez Fidalgo, S |
description | Background and importanceDeprescription is the revision of the therapeutic plan with the aim of simplifying it, taking into account the preferences of the patient, prognosis and the environment. This strategy acquires special relevance in elderly patients as they are exposed to numerous adverse effects and interactions.Aim and objectivesTo identify the deprescribing tools (DT) aimed at elderly patients available in the scientific literature and their main characteristics.Material and methodsA systematic search was conducted in PubMed and EMBASE for relevant literature published up to April 2020, applying the PRISMA method. The search strategy included terms for deprescribing, study population (aged OR elderly) and deprescribing strategies (tool OR process OR criteria OR algorithm). Inclusion criteria were: observational/experimental studies which created or developed a DT in elderly patients. Exclusion criteria were: studies where the DT was aimed at a specific medication, pharmacological group or pathology. Tools identified were analysed according to whether they were criterion/algorithm type.Results13/485 papers met the inclusion criteria, and 11 tools were identified: 5 ‘algorithm based tools’ and 6 ‘criterion based tools’ (2 of the articles developed the validation of 2 criterion based tools). All tools were aimed at elderly patients, with peculiarities regarding their design, population, setting of application and items that formed the tool.Algorithm based toolsThe methodology used for its development was not specified.Population: two of them focused specifically on patients with limited life expectancy.Settings of application: two algorithms were applied to institutionalised patients, one to hospitalised patients and the remaining two did not specify the scenario.Criterion based toolsFive used the Delphi method for their design and development.Population: one was focused on patients with multimorbidity or similar characteristics and two were aimed at patients with limited life expectancy.Settings of application: three tools were aimed at institutionalised patients, two other tools were aimed at all healthcare settings and the other one to outpatients.It is important to emphasise that most of the tools agreed on the pharmacological groups that were likely to be deprescribed (statins, antipsychotics, proton pump inhibitors and antidepressants).Conclusion and relevanceKnowing and being able to use DT aimed at hospitalised or multimorbidity patients coul |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/ejhpharm-2021-eahpconf.360 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_bmj_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2501192434</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2501192434</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1260-17ce330c4ffe237c234f24cad77a2a00a328006cfa0d574ec0671100d6cc15893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo90M1Kw0AUBeBBFCy17zDoOvXOT2Yad1rrDxQE0fUwmdwxKUkTZ1IlOze-qE9iS62rcxaHe-Ej5JzBlDGhLnFVdqUNTcKBswRt2bl27adCwREZcZA6yTIlj_97qk7JJMYqh1SIWSZFNiI3avGcgFA_X9-32AWMLlR5tX6jfdvWkfo20L5EinWBoR6uqKVxiD02tq8cDfhR4ecZOfG2jjj5yzF5vVu8zB-S5dP94_x6meSMK0iYdigEOOk9cqEdF9Jz6WyhteUWwAo-A1DOWyhSLdGB0owBFMo5ls4yMSYX-7tdaN83GHuzajdhvX1peAqMZVwKuV2l-1XerEwXqsaGwTAwOzFzEDM7MXMQM1sx8QuFYWNB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2501192434</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>6ER-036 Deprescribing tools for the elderly: a systematic review</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><creator>Mejias Trueba, M ; Rodríguez Perez, A ; Fernández Rubio, B ; Sánchez Fidalgo, S</creator><creatorcontrib>Mejias Trueba, M ; Rodríguez Perez, A ; Fernández Rubio, B ; Sánchez Fidalgo, S</creatorcontrib><description>Background and importanceDeprescription is the revision of the therapeutic plan with the aim of simplifying it, taking into account the preferences of the patient, prognosis and the environment. This strategy acquires special relevance in elderly patients as they are exposed to numerous adverse effects and interactions.Aim and objectivesTo identify the deprescribing tools (DT) aimed at elderly patients available in the scientific literature and their main characteristics.Material and methodsA systematic search was conducted in PubMed and EMBASE for relevant literature published up to April 2020, applying the PRISMA method. The search strategy included terms for deprescribing, study population (aged OR elderly) and deprescribing strategies (tool OR process OR criteria OR algorithm). Inclusion criteria were: observational/experimental studies which created or developed a DT in elderly patients. Exclusion criteria were: studies where the DT was aimed at a specific medication, pharmacological group or pathology. Tools identified were analysed according to whether they were criterion/algorithm type.Results13/485 papers met the inclusion criteria, and 11 tools were identified: 5 ‘algorithm based tools’ and 6 ‘criterion based tools’ (2 of the articles developed the validation of 2 criterion based tools). All tools were aimed at elderly patients, with peculiarities regarding their design, population, setting of application and items that formed the tool.Algorithm based toolsThe methodology used for its development was not specified.Population: two of them focused specifically on patients with limited life expectancy.Settings of application: two algorithms were applied to institutionalised patients, one to hospitalised patients and the remaining two did not specify the scenario.Criterion based toolsFive used the Delphi method for their design and development.Population: one was focused on patients with multimorbidity or similar characteristics and two were aimed at patients with limited life expectancy.Settings of application: three tools were aimed at institutionalised patients, two other tools were aimed at all healthcare settings and the other one to outpatients.It is important to emphasise that most of the tools agreed on the pharmacological groups that were likely to be deprescribed (statins, antipsychotics, proton pump inhibitors and antidepressants).Conclusion and relevanceKnowing and being able to use DT aimed at hospitalised or multimorbidity patients could be very useful for hospital pharmacists, allowing them to carry out this activity as part of their healthcare activity.References and/or acknowledgementsConflict of interestNo conflict of interest</description><identifier>ISSN: 2047-9956</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2047-9964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2021-eahpconf.360</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Conflicts of interest ; Institutionalization ; Life expectancy ; Population</subject><ispartof>European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice, 2021-03, Vol.28 (Suppl 1), p.A172-A173</ispartof><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><rights>2021 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mejias Trueba, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez Perez, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández Rubio, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez Fidalgo, S</creatorcontrib><title>6ER-036 Deprescribing tools for the elderly: a systematic review</title><title>European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice</title><description>Background and importanceDeprescription is the revision of the therapeutic plan with the aim of simplifying it, taking into account the preferences of the patient, prognosis and the environment. This strategy acquires special relevance in elderly patients as they are exposed to numerous adverse effects and interactions.Aim and objectivesTo identify the deprescribing tools (DT) aimed at elderly patients available in the scientific literature and their main characteristics.Material and methodsA systematic search was conducted in PubMed and EMBASE for relevant literature published up to April 2020, applying the PRISMA method. The search strategy included terms for deprescribing, study population (aged OR elderly) and deprescribing strategies (tool OR process OR criteria OR algorithm). Inclusion criteria were: observational/experimental studies which created or developed a DT in elderly patients. Exclusion criteria were: studies where the DT was aimed at a specific medication, pharmacological group or pathology. Tools identified were analysed according to whether they were criterion/algorithm type.Results13/485 papers met the inclusion criteria, and 11 tools were identified: 5 ‘algorithm based tools’ and 6 ‘criterion based tools’ (2 of the articles developed the validation of 2 criterion based tools). All tools were aimed at elderly patients, with peculiarities regarding their design, population, setting of application and items that formed the tool.Algorithm based toolsThe methodology used for its development was not specified.Population: two of them focused specifically on patients with limited life expectancy.Settings of application: two algorithms were applied to institutionalised patients, one to hospitalised patients and the remaining two did not specify the scenario.Criterion based toolsFive used the Delphi method for their design and development.Population: one was focused on patients with multimorbidity or similar characteristics and two were aimed at patients with limited life expectancy.Settings of application: three tools were aimed at institutionalised patients, two other tools were aimed at all healthcare settings and the other one to outpatients.It is important to emphasise that most of the tools agreed on the pharmacological groups that were likely to be deprescribed (statins, antipsychotics, proton pump inhibitors and antidepressants).Conclusion and relevanceKnowing and being able to use DT aimed at hospitalised or multimorbidity patients could be very useful for hospital pharmacists, allowing them to carry out this activity as part of their healthcare activity.References and/or acknowledgementsConflict of interestNo conflict of interest</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Conflicts of interest</subject><subject>Institutionalization</subject><subject>Life expectancy</subject><subject>Population</subject><issn>2047-9956</issn><issn>2047-9964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo90M1Kw0AUBeBBFCy17zDoOvXOT2Yad1rrDxQE0fUwmdwxKUkTZ1IlOze-qE9iS62rcxaHe-Ej5JzBlDGhLnFVdqUNTcKBswRt2bl27adCwREZcZA6yTIlj_97qk7JJMYqh1SIWSZFNiI3avGcgFA_X9-32AWMLlR5tX6jfdvWkfo20L5EinWBoR6uqKVxiD02tq8cDfhR4ecZOfG2jjj5yzF5vVu8zB-S5dP94_x6meSMK0iYdigEOOk9cqEdF9Jz6WyhteUWwAo-A1DOWyhSLdGB0owBFMo5ls4yMSYX-7tdaN83GHuzajdhvX1peAqMZVwKuV2l-1XerEwXqsaGwTAwOzFzEDM7MXMQM1sx8QuFYWNB</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>Mejias Trueba, M</creator><creator>Rodríguez Perez, A</creator><creator>Fernández Rubio, B</creator><creator>Sánchez Fidalgo, S</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>6ER-036 Deprescribing tools for the elderly: a systematic review</title><author>Mejias Trueba, M ; Rodríguez Perez, A ; Fernández Rubio, B ; Sánchez Fidalgo, S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1260-17ce330c4ffe237c234f24cad77a2a00a328006cfa0d574ec0671100d6cc15893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Conflicts of interest</topic><topic>Institutionalization</topic><topic>Life expectancy</topic><topic>Population</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mejias Trueba, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez Perez, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández Rubio, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez Fidalgo, S</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mejias Trueba, M</au><au>Rodríguez Perez, A</au><au>Fernández Rubio, B</au><au>Sánchez Fidalgo, S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>6ER-036 Deprescribing tools for the elderly: a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice</jtitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>A172</spage><epage>A173</epage><pages>A172-A173</pages><issn>2047-9956</issn><eissn>2047-9964</eissn><abstract>Background and importanceDeprescription is the revision of the therapeutic plan with the aim of simplifying it, taking into account the preferences of the patient, prognosis and the environment. This strategy acquires special relevance in elderly patients as they are exposed to numerous adverse effects and interactions.Aim and objectivesTo identify the deprescribing tools (DT) aimed at elderly patients available in the scientific literature and their main characteristics.Material and methodsA systematic search was conducted in PubMed and EMBASE for relevant literature published up to April 2020, applying the PRISMA method. The search strategy included terms for deprescribing, study population (aged OR elderly) and deprescribing strategies (tool OR process OR criteria OR algorithm). Inclusion criteria were: observational/experimental studies which created or developed a DT in elderly patients. Exclusion criteria were: studies where the DT was aimed at a specific medication, pharmacological group or pathology. Tools identified were analysed according to whether they were criterion/algorithm type.Results13/485 papers met the inclusion criteria, and 11 tools were identified: 5 ‘algorithm based tools’ and 6 ‘criterion based tools’ (2 of the articles developed the validation of 2 criterion based tools). All tools were aimed at elderly patients, with peculiarities regarding their design, population, setting of application and items that formed the tool.Algorithm based toolsThe methodology used for its development was not specified.Population: two of them focused specifically on patients with limited life expectancy.Settings of application: two algorithms were applied to institutionalised patients, one to hospitalised patients and the remaining two did not specify the scenario.Criterion based toolsFive used the Delphi method for their design and development.Population: one was focused on patients with multimorbidity or similar characteristics and two were aimed at patients with limited life expectancy.Settings of application: three tools were aimed at institutionalised patients, two other tools were aimed at all healthcare settings and the other one to outpatients.It is important to emphasise that most of the tools agreed on the pharmacological groups that were likely to be deprescribed (statins, antipsychotics, proton pump inhibitors and antidepressants).Conclusion and relevanceKnowing and being able to use DT aimed at hospitalised or multimorbidity patients could be very useful for hospital pharmacists, allowing them to carry out this activity as part of their healthcare activity.References and/or acknowledgementsConflict of interestNo conflict of interest</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><doi>10.1136/ejhpharm-2021-eahpconf.360</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2047-9956 |
ispartof | European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice, 2021-03, Vol.28 (Suppl 1), p.A172-A173 |
issn | 2047-9956 2047-9964 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2501192434 |
source | PubMed Central Free |
subjects | Algorithms Conflicts of interest Institutionalization Life expectancy Population |
title | 6ER-036 Deprescribing tools for the elderly: a systematic review |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T21%3A17%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_bmj_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=6ER-036%E2%80%85Deprescribing%20tools%20for%20the%20elderly:%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20hospital%20pharmacy.%20Science%20and%20practice&rft.au=Mejias%20Trueba,%20M&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=A172&rft.epage=A173&rft.pages=A172-A173&rft.issn=2047-9956&rft.eissn=2047-9964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2021-eahpconf.360&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_bmj_p%3E2501192434%3C/proquest_bmj_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1260-17ce330c4ffe237c234f24cad77a2a00a328006cfa0d574ec0671100d6cc15893%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2501192434&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |