Loading…
Benchmarking between two wearable inertial systems for gait analysis based on a different sensor placement using several statistical approaches
•Wearable inertial systems for gait analysis are spreading in clinical practice.•Opal and G-Walk Systems are based on a different sensor placement.•Validity and repeatability studies of measurement systems are of paramount importance.•Benchmarking analysis is fundamental for meta-analysis and multic...
Saved in:
Published in: | Measurement : journal of the International Measurement Confederation 2021-03, Vol.173, p.108642, Article 108642 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •Wearable inertial systems for gait analysis are spreading in clinical practice.•Opal and G-Walk Systems are based on a different sensor placement.•Validity and repeatability studies of measurement systems are of paramount importance.•Benchmarking analysis is fundamental for meta-analysis and multicenter studies.•Benchmarking was studied by Bland-Altman, Passing-Bablok regression, T-Test and ICC.
Despite the growing use of different wearable inertial systems for gait analysis in clinical setting, also based on a different sensor placement, there is still a lack of knowledge about the agreement between them and their repeatability. The purpose of this study is to investigate the agreement between two commercial wearable inertial systems for gait analysis: Opal and G-Walk Systems, and their repeatability. Fifty-three subjects, healthy and pathological, underwent a gait analysis session instrumented by both systems, seven spatiotemporal parameters were recorded. The study of agreement was carried out through Bland-Altman Analysis, Passing-Bablok regression and Paired t-test, the study of repeatability through the intra class correlation coefficient ICC(3,1). Study results showed a not perfect agreement between the two systems although they both showed good repeatability. This work underlines the importance to perform a study of agreement before using devices interchangeably or even as a replacement in order to have reliable measurements. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0263-2241 1873-412X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108642 |