Loading…

A critical review of the professional development literature for paraprofessionals supporting students with externalizing behavior disorders

The present paper serves as the first systematic review of the training, methodologies, and outcomes reported in the professional development (PD) literature for paraprofessionals working with students with or at risk for externalizing behavior disorders. A total of 16 investigations including 332 p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychology in the schools 2021-04, Vol.58 (4), p.742-763
Main Authors: Reddy, Linda A., Alperin, Alexander, Glover, Todd A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3231-3947a5eb4921af94705898ebcff3fd34b3f3ca88ead392443c3e6b4691f440433
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3231-3947a5eb4921af94705898ebcff3fd34b3f3ca88ead392443c3e6b4691f440433
container_end_page 763
container_issue 4
container_start_page 742
container_title Psychology in the schools
container_volume 58
creator Reddy, Linda A.
Alperin, Alexander
Glover, Todd A.
description The present paper serves as the first systematic review of the training, methodologies, and outcomes reported in the professional development (PD) literature for paraprofessionals working with students with or at risk for externalizing behavior disorders. A total of 16 investigations including 332 paraprofessionals and 852 children and adolescents were reviewed and coded on 44 variables across four dimensions (i.e., PD components, intervention components, methodologies used, and outcomes reported). Strengths of the literature were inclusion of multicomponent PD, training on implementation, paraprofessional characteristics, and inter‐rater reliability estimates. All studies reported paraprofessional and/or student outcomes; however, the details of PD components and interventions delivered varied. The majority of the studies used single‐case designs or descriptive case studies to evaluate effectiveness. Weaknesses were lack of inclusion and exclusion criteria, student characteristics, adult experiential learning methods, monitoring of implementation fidelity, and use of statistical testing. Implications for research and practice are offered.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pits.22381
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2501868356</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1287321</ericid><sourcerecordid>2501868356</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3231-3947a5eb4921af94705898ebcff3fd34b3f3ca88ead392443c3e6b4691f440433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouH5cvAsBb0I1yaTd9CjiJ4KCei5pO3Ej66Ym6a76G_zRplbEk6dheJ95GF5C9jg74oyJ487GcCQEKL5GJjwXLCsUm66TCWMAGTCVb5KtEJ4ZY9NSqAn5PKGNt9E2ek49Li2uqDM0zpB23hkMwbpFilpc4tx1L7iIdG4jeh17j9Q4Tzvt9V820NB3nfPRLp5oiH2bbgJd2Tij-JYuE2I_hqzGmV7aZGhtcL5FH3bIhkkC3P2Z2-Tx_Ozh9DK7ub24Oj25yRoQwDMo5VTnWMtScG3SwnJVKqwbY8C0IGsw0GilULdQCimhASxqWZTcSMkkwDY5GL3p79ceQ6yeXT88FiqRM64KBXmRqMORarwLwaOpOm9ftH-vOKuGtquh7eq77QTvjzB62_yCZ9dcqCmIIedjvrJzfP_HVN1dPdyPzi_SK5BE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2501868356</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A critical review of the professional development literature for paraprofessionals supporting students with externalizing behavior disorders</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Reddy, Linda A. ; Alperin, Alexander ; Glover, Todd A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Reddy, Linda A. ; Alperin, Alexander ; Glover, Todd A.</creatorcontrib><description>The present paper serves as the first systematic review of the training, methodologies, and outcomes reported in the professional development (PD) literature for paraprofessionals working with students with or at risk for externalizing behavior disorders. A total of 16 investigations including 332 paraprofessionals and 852 children and adolescents were reviewed and coded on 44 variables across four dimensions (i.e., PD components, intervention components, methodologies used, and outcomes reported). Strengths of the literature were inclusion of multicomponent PD, training on implementation, paraprofessional characteristics, and inter‐rater reliability estimates. All studies reported paraprofessional and/or student outcomes; however, the details of PD components and interventions delivered varied. The majority of the studies used single‐case designs or descriptive case studies to evaluate effectiveness. Weaknesses were lack of inclusion and exclusion criteria, student characteristics, adult experiential learning methods, monitoring of implementation fidelity, and use of statistical testing. Implications for research and practice are offered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-3085</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6807</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pits.22381</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley</publisher><subject>Behavior Disorders ; Educational Research ; Experiential learning ; externalizing behavior ; Externalizing behaviour ; Faculty Development ; Fidelity ; Intervention ; Job Training ; Outcomes of Education ; paraeducator ; paraprofessional ; Paraprofessional School Personnel ; Paraprofessionals ; Professional development ; Reliability ; Research Methodology ; Risk behavior ; Students with Disabilities ; Systematic review ; teacher aide ; Training Methods</subject><ispartof>Psychology in the schools, 2021-04, Vol.58 (4), p.742-763</ispartof><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3231-3947a5eb4921af94705898ebcff3fd34b3f3ca88ead392443c3e6b4691f440433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3231-3947a5eb4921af94705898ebcff3fd34b3f3ca88ead392443c3e6b4691f440433</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7100-8139 ; 0000-0002-5872-1076 ; 0000-0001-8314-2810</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1287321$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reddy, Linda A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alperin, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glover, Todd A.</creatorcontrib><title>A critical review of the professional development literature for paraprofessionals supporting students with externalizing behavior disorders</title><title>Psychology in the schools</title><description>The present paper serves as the first systematic review of the training, methodologies, and outcomes reported in the professional development (PD) literature for paraprofessionals working with students with or at risk for externalizing behavior disorders. A total of 16 investigations including 332 paraprofessionals and 852 children and adolescents were reviewed and coded on 44 variables across four dimensions (i.e., PD components, intervention components, methodologies used, and outcomes reported). Strengths of the literature were inclusion of multicomponent PD, training on implementation, paraprofessional characteristics, and inter‐rater reliability estimates. All studies reported paraprofessional and/or student outcomes; however, the details of PD components and interventions delivered varied. The majority of the studies used single‐case designs or descriptive case studies to evaluate effectiveness. Weaknesses were lack of inclusion and exclusion criteria, student characteristics, adult experiential learning methods, monitoring of implementation fidelity, and use of statistical testing. Implications for research and practice are offered.</description><subject>Behavior Disorders</subject><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>Experiential learning</subject><subject>externalizing behavior</subject><subject>Externalizing behaviour</subject><subject>Faculty Development</subject><subject>Fidelity</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Job Training</subject><subject>Outcomes of Education</subject><subject>paraeducator</subject><subject>paraprofessional</subject><subject>Paraprofessional School Personnel</subject><subject>Paraprofessionals</subject><subject>Professional development</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>Risk behavior</subject><subject>Students with Disabilities</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>teacher aide</subject><subject>Training Methods</subject><issn>0033-3085</issn><issn>1520-6807</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouH5cvAsBb0I1yaTd9CjiJ4KCei5pO3Ej66Ym6a76G_zRplbEk6dheJ95GF5C9jg74oyJ487GcCQEKL5GJjwXLCsUm66TCWMAGTCVb5KtEJ4ZY9NSqAn5PKGNt9E2ek49Li2uqDM0zpB23hkMwbpFilpc4tx1L7iIdG4jeh17j9Q4Tzvt9V820NB3nfPRLp5oiH2bbgJd2Tij-JYuE2I_hqzGmV7aZGhtcL5FH3bIhkkC3P2Z2-Tx_Ozh9DK7ub24Oj25yRoQwDMo5VTnWMtScG3SwnJVKqwbY8C0IGsw0GilULdQCimhASxqWZTcSMkkwDY5GL3p79ceQ6yeXT88FiqRM64KBXmRqMORarwLwaOpOm9ftH-vOKuGtquh7eq77QTvjzB62_yCZ9dcqCmIIedjvrJzfP_HVN1dPdyPzi_SK5BE</recordid><startdate>202104</startdate><enddate>202104</enddate><creator>Reddy, Linda A.</creator><creator>Alperin, Alexander</creator><creator>Glover, Todd A.</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7100-8139</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5872-1076</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8314-2810</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202104</creationdate><title>A critical review of the professional development literature for paraprofessionals supporting students with externalizing behavior disorders</title><author>Reddy, Linda A. ; Alperin, Alexander ; Glover, Todd A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3231-3947a5eb4921af94705898ebcff3fd34b3f3ca88ead392443c3e6b4691f440433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Behavior Disorders</topic><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>Experiential learning</topic><topic>externalizing behavior</topic><topic>Externalizing behaviour</topic><topic>Faculty Development</topic><topic>Fidelity</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Job Training</topic><topic>Outcomes of Education</topic><topic>paraeducator</topic><topic>paraprofessional</topic><topic>Paraprofessional School Personnel</topic><topic>Paraprofessionals</topic><topic>Professional development</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>Risk behavior</topic><topic>Students with Disabilities</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>teacher aide</topic><topic>Training Methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reddy, Linda A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alperin, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glover, Todd A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Psychology in the schools</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reddy, Linda A.</au><au>Alperin, Alexander</au><au>Glover, Todd A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1287321</ericid><atitle>A critical review of the professional development literature for paraprofessionals supporting students with externalizing behavior disorders</atitle><jtitle>Psychology in the schools</jtitle><date>2021-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>742</spage><epage>763</epage><pages>742-763</pages><issn>0033-3085</issn><eissn>1520-6807</eissn><abstract>The present paper serves as the first systematic review of the training, methodologies, and outcomes reported in the professional development (PD) literature for paraprofessionals working with students with or at risk for externalizing behavior disorders. A total of 16 investigations including 332 paraprofessionals and 852 children and adolescents were reviewed and coded on 44 variables across four dimensions (i.e., PD components, intervention components, methodologies used, and outcomes reported). Strengths of the literature were inclusion of multicomponent PD, training on implementation, paraprofessional characteristics, and inter‐rater reliability estimates. All studies reported paraprofessional and/or student outcomes; however, the details of PD components and interventions delivered varied. The majority of the studies used single‐case designs or descriptive case studies to evaluate effectiveness. Weaknesses were lack of inclusion and exclusion criteria, student characteristics, adult experiential learning methods, monitoring of implementation fidelity, and use of statistical testing. Implications for research and practice are offered.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1002/pits.22381</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7100-8139</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5872-1076</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8314-2810</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-3085
ispartof Psychology in the schools, 2021-04, Vol.58 (4), p.742-763
issn 0033-3085
1520-6807
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2501868356
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; ERIC
subjects Behavior Disorders
Educational Research
Experiential learning
externalizing behavior
Externalizing behaviour
Faculty Development
Fidelity
Intervention
Job Training
Outcomes of Education
paraeducator
paraprofessional
Paraprofessional School Personnel
Paraprofessionals
Professional development
Reliability
Research Methodology
Risk behavior
Students with Disabilities
Systematic review
teacher aide
Training Methods
title A critical review of the professional development literature for paraprofessionals supporting students with externalizing behavior disorders
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T04%3A43%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20critical%20review%20of%20the%20professional%20development%20literature%20for%20paraprofessionals%20supporting%20students%20with%20externalizing%20behavior%20disorders&rft.jtitle=Psychology%20in%20the%20schools&rft.au=Reddy,%20Linda%20A.&rft.date=2021-04&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=742&rft.epage=763&rft.pages=742-763&rft.issn=0033-3085&rft.eissn=1520-6807&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pits.22381&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2501868356%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3231-3947a5eb4921af94705898ebcff3fd34b3f3ca88ead392443c3e6b4691f440433%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2501868356&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1287321&rfr_iscdi=true