Loading…

Evaluation of feeding immunoglobulin-Y to Holstein feeder cattle for the control of liver abscesses & reduction of macrolide-resistant bacteria dissemination

Despite the regular use of macrolide-antibiotics in the diets of feedlot cattle, liver abscesses persist representing a financial burden to both pre- and post-mortem sectors of the beef industry. Alternative strategies, which simultaneously address liver infections and reduce the dissemination of an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of animal science 2020-11, Vol.98, p.10-10
Main Authors: Stotz, Miranda K, Murillo, Diego Casas, Henry, Darren D, Crossland, Whitney L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 10
container_issue
container_start_page 10
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 98
creator Stotz, Miranda K
Murillo, Diego Casas
Henry, Darren D
Crossland, Whitney L
description Despite the regular use of macrolide-antibiotics in the diets of feedlot cattle, liver abscesses persist representing a financial burden to both pre- and post-mortem sectors of the beef industry. Alternative strategies, which simultaneously address liver infections and reduce the dissemination of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, are needed. An immunoglobulin-Y (IGY) product, developed to target Fusobacterium necrophorum and Trueperella pyogenes, was evaluated for the control of liver abscesses and its effect on macrolide-resistant Enterococcus growth from feces. Sixty-four Holstein steers (Initial BW= 384± 13.5kg) consuming a finishing diet (90% concentrate) for 188 days (Final BW= 660± 42 kg) were used in a completely randomized design where steer was experimental unit and treatments included: TYL (Tylosin phosphate fed at 90mg/hd/day; n = 32) or IGY (fed at 2.5g/hd/day; n= 32). Feed intake was recorded daily and BW was recorded every 28 days until slaughter. After 150 d on treatment fecal samples were randomly obtained from each treatment group four times (n = 40) and cultured on bileesculine agar enriched with 8 µg/mL of erythromycin. Continuous variables of feedlot growth performance, carcass data and bacterial growth were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS with the fixed effect of treatment and random effects of steer or sampling day, respectively. Ordinal carcass data were analyzed using the FREQ procedure of SAS observing the CochranMantel-Haenszel value. Treatment did not affect DMI (P= 0.21), ADG (P = 0.50) or G:F (P = 0.36). Treatment neither affected hot carcass weight (P = 0.37) nor longissimus muscle area (P = 0.25). However, TYL resulted in greater back fat thickness than IGY (0.32 vs. 0.23 in.; P < 0.02) and consequently greater numerical yield grade (P < 0.02). Quality grade was not affected by treatment (P = 0.65). No treatment difference was observed for liver abscesses prevalence (TYL=63% vs. IGY=52%; P = 0.40) or severity (P = 0.23). There was a greater proportion of erythromycin-resistant Enterococcus growth for TYL than IGY (42.6 vs. 21.9%; P < 0.04). Specifically formulated IGY feed additives may be viable alternatives to antibiotics in feedlot cattle diets.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2501930584</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2501930584</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_25019305843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjk1OwzAQhS0EEqFwh5GQ2EWyE4zaNSrqAdiwqhxnUqZyPOAZ9zbclVDBntVbvO_9XJjG-c63vXvqL01jbefa9dp11-ZG5Git6_zGN-ZrewqpBiXOwBNMiCPlA9A818yHxENNlNs3UIYdJ1GkfIawQAyqCWHiAvqOEDlr4fTTkui0-GGQiCIo8AAFxxr_RuYQF5BGbAsKiYasMISoWCjASEtkpny-dGuuppAE7351Ze5ftq_Pu_aj8GdF0f2Ra8mLte-8dZve-vVj_z_qG5xbXbk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2501930584</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of feeding immunoglobulin-Y to Holstein feeder cattle for the control of liver abscesses &amp; reduction of macrolide-resistant bacteria dissemination</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Stotz, Miranda K ; Murillo, Diego Casas ; Henry, Darren D ; Crossland, Whitney L</creator><creatorcontrib>Stotz, Miranda K ; Murillo, Diego Casas ; Henry, Darren D ; Crossland, Whitney L</creatorcontrib><description>Despite the regular use of macrolide-antibiotics in the diets of feedlot cattle, liver abscesses persist representing a financial burden to both pre- and post-mortem sectors of the beef industry. Alternative strategies, which simultaneously address liver infections and reduce the dissemination of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, are needed. An immunoglobulin-Y (IGY) product, developed to target Fusobacterium necrophorum and Trueperella pyogenes, was evaluated for the control of liver abscesses and its effect on macrolide-resistant Enterococcus growth from feces. Sixty-four Holstein steers (Initial BW= 384± 13.5kg) consuming a finishing diet (90% concentrate) for 188 days (Final BW= 660± 42 kg) were used in a completely randomized design where steer was experimental unit and treatments included: TYL (Tylosin phosphate fed at 90mg/hd/day; n = 32) or IGY (fed at 2.5g/hd/day; n= 32). Feed intake was recorded daily and BW was recorded every 28 days until slaughter. After 150 d on treatment fecal samples were randomly obtained from each treatment group four times (n = 40) and cultured on bileesculine agar enriched with 8 µg/mL of erythromycin. Continuous variables of feedlot growth performance, carcass data and bacterial growth were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS with the fixed effect of treatment and random effects of steer or sampling day, respectively. Ordinal carcass data were analyzed using the FREQ procedure of SAS observing the CochranMantel-Haenszel value. Treatment did not affect DMI (P= 0.21), ADG (P = 0.50) or G:F (P = 0.36). Treatment neither affected hot carcass weight (P = 0.37) nor longissimus muscle area (P = 0.25). However, TYL resulted in greater back fat thickness than IGY (0.32 vs. 0.23 in.; P &lt; 0.02) and consequently greater numerical yield grade (P &lt; 0.02). Quality grade was not affected by treatment (P = 0.65). No treatment difference was observed for liver abscesses prevalence (TYL=63% vs. IGY=52%; P = 0.40) or severity (P = 0.23). There was a greater proportion of erythromycin-resistant Enterococcus growth for TYL than IGY (42.6 vs. 21.9%; P &lt; 0.04). Specifically formulated IGY feed additives may be viable alternatives to antibiotics in feedlot cattle diets.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Abscesses ; Antibiotic resistance ; Antibiotics ; Bacteria ; Beef cattle ; Carcasses ; Cattle ; Continuity (mathematics) ; Diet ; Enterococcus ; Erythromycin ; Feedlots ; Feeds ; Food additives ; Immunoglobulins ; Liver ; Muscles ; Quality ; Tylosin</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2020-11, Vol.98, p.10-10</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press Nov 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stotz, Miranda K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murillo, Diego Casas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, Darren D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crossland, Whitney L</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of feeding immunoglobulin-Y to Holstein feeder cattle for the control of liver abscesses &amp; reduction of macrolide-resistant bacteria dissemination</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>Despite the regular use of macrolide-antibiotics in the diets of feedlot cattle, liver abscesses persist representing a financial burden to both pre- and post-mortem sectors of the beef industry. Alternative strategies, which simultaneously address liver infections and reduce the dissemination of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, are needed. An immunoglobulin-Y (IGY) product, developed to target Fusobacterium necrophorum and Trueperella pyogenes, was evaluated for the control of liver abscesses and its effect on macrolide-resistant Enterococcus growth from feces. Sixty-four Holstein steers (Initial BW= 384± 13.5kg) consuming a finishing diet (90% concentrate) for 188 days (Final BW= 660± 42 kg) were used in a completely randomized design where steer was experimental unit and treatments included: TYL (Tylosin phosphate fed at 90mg/hd/day; n = 32) or IGY (fed at 2.5g/hd/day; n= 32). Feed intake was recorded daily and BW was recorded every 28 days until slaughter. After 150 d on treatment fecal samples were randomly obtained from each treatment group four times (n = 40) and cultured on bileesculine agar enriched with 8 µg/mL of erythromycin. Continuous variables of feedlot growth performance, carcass data and bacterial growth were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS with the fixed effect of treatment and random effects of steer or sampling day, respectively. Ordinal carcass data were analyzed using the FREQ procedure of SAS observing the CochranMantel-Haenszel value. Treatment did not affect DMI (P= 0.21), ADG (P = 0.50) or G:F (P = 0.36). Treatment neither affected hot carcass weight (P = 0.37) nor longissimus muscle area (P = 0.25). However, TYL resulted in greater back fat thickness than IGY (0.32 vs. 0.23 in.; P &lt; 0.02) and consequently greater numerical yield grade (P &lt; 0.02). Quality grade was not affected by treatment (P = 0.65). No treatment difference was observed for liver abscesses prevalence (TYL=63% vs. IGY=52%; P = 0.40) or severity (P = 0.23). There was a greater proportion of erythromycin-resistant Enterococcus growth for TYL than IGY (42.6 vs. 21.9%; P &lt; 0.04). Specifically formulated IGY feed additives may be viable alternatives to antibiotics in feedlot cattle diets.</description><subject>Abscesses</subject><subject>Antibiotic resistance</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Beef cattle</subject><subject>Carcasses</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Continuity (mathematics)</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Enterococcus</subject><subject>Erythromycin</subject><subject>Feedlots</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Food additives</subject><subject>Immunoglobulins</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Tylosin</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjk1OwzAQhS0EEqFwh5GQ2EWyE4zaNSrqAdiwqhxnUqZyPOAZ9zbclVDBntVbvO_9XJjG-c63vXvqL01jbefa9dp11-ZG5Git6_zGN-ZrewqpBiXOwBNMiCPlA9A818yHxENNlNs3UIYdJ1GkfIawQAyqCWHiAvqOEDlr4fTTkui0-GGQiCIo8AAFxxr_RuYQF5BGbAsKiYasMISoWCjASEtkpny-dGuuppAE7351Ze5ftq_Pu_aj8GdF0f2Ra8mLte-8dZve-vVj_z_qG5xbXbk</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Stotz, Miranda K</creator><creator>Murillo, Diego Casas</creator><creator>Henry, Darren D</creator><creator>Crossland, Whitney L</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Evaluation of feeding immunoglobulin-Y to Holstein feeder cattle for the control of liver abscesses &amp; reduction of macrolide-resistant bacteria dissemination</title><author>Stotz, Miranda K ; Murillo, Diego Casas ; Henry, Darren D ; Crossland, Whitney L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_25019305843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abscesses</topic><topic>Antibiotic resistance</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Beef cattle</topic><topic>Carcasses</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Continuity (mathematics)</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Enterococcus</topic><topic>Erythromycin</topic><topic>Feedlots</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Food additives</topic><topic>Immunoglobulins</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Tylosin</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stotz, Miranda K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murillo, Diego Casas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, Darren D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crossland, Whitney L</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stotz, Miranda K</au><au>Murillo, Diego Casas</au><au>Henry, Darren D</au><au>Crossland, Whitney L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of feeding immunoglobulin-Y to Holstein feeder cattle for the control of liver abscesses &amp; reduction of macrolide-resistant bacteria dissemination</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>98</volume><spage>10</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>10-10</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Despite the regular use of macrolide-antibiotics in the diets of feedlot cattle, liver abscesses persist representing a financial burden to both pre- and post-mortem sectors of the beef industry. Alternative strategies, which simultaneously address liver infections and reduce the dissemination of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, are needed. An immunoglobulin-Y (IGY) product, developed to target Fusobacterium necrophorum and Trueperella pyogenes, was evaluated for the control of liver abscesses and its effect on macrolide-resistant Enterococcus growth from feces. Sixty-four Holstein steers (Initial BW= 384± 13.5kg) consuming a finishing diet (90% concentrate) for 188 days (Final BW= 660± 42 kg) were used in a completely randomized design where steer was experimental unit and treatments included: TYL (Tylosin phosphate fed at 90mg/hd/day; n = 32) or IGY (fed at 2.5g/hd/day; n= 32). Feed intake was recorded daily and BW was recorded every 28 days until slaughter. After 150 d on treatment fecal samples were randomly obtained from each treatment group four times (n = 40) and cultured on bileesculine agar enriched with 8 µg/mL of erythromycin. Continuous variables of feedlot growth performance, carcass data and bacterial growth were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS with the fixed effect of treatment and random effects of steer or sampling day, respectively. Ordinal carcass data were analyzed using the FREQ procedure of SAS observing the CochranMantel-Haenszel value. Treatment did not affect DMI (P= 0.21), ADG (P = 0.50) or G:F (P = 0.36). Treatment neither affected hot carcass weight (P = 0.37) nor longissimus muscle area (P = 0.25). However, TYL resulted in greater back fat thickness than IGY (0.32 vs. 0.23 in.; P &lt; 0.02) and consequently greater numerical yield grade (P &lt; 0.02). Quality grade was not affected by treatment (P = 0.65). No treatment difference was observed for liver abscesses prevalence (TYL=63% vs. IGY=52%; P = 0.40) or severity (P = 0.23). There was a greater proportion of erythromycin-resistant Enterococcus growth for TYL than IGY (42.6 vs. 21.9%; P &lt; 0.04). Specifically formulated IGY feed additives may be viable alternatives to antibiotics in feedlot cattle diets.</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2020-11, Vol.98, p.10-10
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2501930584
source Oxford Journals Online; PubMed Central
subjects Abscesses
Antibiotic resistance
Antibiotics
Bacteria
Beef cattle
Carcasses
Cattle
Continuity (mathematics)
Diet
Enterococcus
Erythromycin
Feedlots
Feeds
Food additives
Immunoglobulins
Liver
Muscles
Quality
Tylosin
title Evaluation of feeding immunoglobulin-Y to Holstein feeder cattle for the control of liver abscesses & reduction of macrolide-resistant bacteria dissemination
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T14%3A38%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20feeding%20immunoglobulin-Y%20to%20Holstein%20feeder%20cattle%20for%20the%20control%20of%20liver%20abscesses%20&%20reduction%20of%20macrolide-resistant%20bacteria%20dissemination&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Stotz,%20Miranda%20K&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=98&rft.spage=10&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=10-10&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2501930584%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_25019305843%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2501930584&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true