Loading…

Binary disease prediction using tail quantiles of the distribution of continuous biomarkers

In the analysis of binary disease classification, single biomarkers might not have significant discriminating power and multiple biomarkers from a large set of biomarkers should be selected. Numerous approaches exist, but they merely work well for mean differences in biomarkers between cases and con...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:arXiv.org 2021-03
Main Authors: Paus, Michiel H J, Edwin R van den Heuvel, Meddens, Marc J M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Paus, Michiel H J
Edwin R van den Heuvel
Meddens, Marc J M
description In the analysis of binary disease classification, single biomarkers might not have significant discriminating power and multiple biomarkers from a large set of biomarkers should be selected. Numerous approaches exist, but they merely work well for mean differences in biomarkers between cases and controls. Biological processes are however much more heterogeneous, and differences could also occur in other distributional characteristics (e.g. variances, skewness). Many machine learning techniques are better capable of utilizing these higher order distributional differences, sometimes at cost of explainability. In this study we propose quantile based prediction (QBP), a binary classification method that is based on the selection of multiple continuous biomarkers. QBP generates a single score using the tails of the biomarker distributions for cases and controls. This single score can then be evaluated by ROC analysis to investigate its predictive power. The performance of QBP is compared to supervised learning methods using extensive simulation studies, and two case studies: major depression disorder and trisomy. Simultaneously, the classification performance of the existing techniques in relation to each other is assessed. The key strengths of QBP are the opportunity to select relevant biomarkers and the outstanding classification performance in the case biomarkers predominantly show variance differences between cases and controls. When only shifts in means were present in the biomarkers, QBP obtained an inferior performance. Lastly, QBP proved to be unbiased in case of absence of disease relevant biomarkers and outperformed the other methods on the MDD case study. More research is needed to further optimize QBP, since it has several opportunities to improve its performance. Here we wanted to introduce the principle of QBP and show its potential.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2504620190</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2504620190</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_25046201903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNykEOgjAQheHGxESi3KGJa5LSAupWo_EA7lyQAoMOYgudduHtReMBXL3k_d-MRVKpNNlmUi5YTNQJIWSxkXmuInbdo9HuxRsk0AR8cNBg7dEaHgjNjXuNPR-DNh57IG5b7u_w4d5hFb5w-mo7dRNsIF6hfWr3AEcrNm91TxD_dsnWp-PlcE4GZ8cA5MvOBmemVMpcZIUU6U6o_9QbCsdEJQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2504620190</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Binary disease prediction using tail quantiles of the distribution of continuous biomarkers</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Paus, Michiel H J ; Edwin R van den Heuvel ; Meddens, Marc J M</creator><creatorcontrib>Paus, Michiel H J ; Edwin R van den Heuvel ; Meddens, Marc J M</creatorcontrib><description>In the analysis of binary disease classification, single biomarkers might not have significant discriminating power and multiple biomarkers from a large set of biomarkers should be selected. Numerous approaches exist, but they merely work well for mean differences in biomarkers between cases and controls. Biological processes are however much more heterogeneous, and differences could also occur in other distributional characteristics (e.g. variances, skewness). Many machine learning techniques are better capable of utilizing these higher order distributional differences, sometimes at cost of explainability. In this study we propose quantile based prediction (QBP), a binary classification method that is based on the selection of multiple continuous biomarkers. QBP generates a single score using the tails of the biomarker distributions for cases and controls. This single score can then be evaluated by ROC analysis to investigate its predictive power. The performance of QBP is compared to supervised learning methods using extensive simulation studies, and two case studies: major depression disorder and trisomy. Simultaneously, the classification performance of the existing techniques in relation to each other is assessed. The key strengths of QBP are the opportunity to select relevant biomarkers and the outstanding classification performance in the case biomarkers predominantly show variance differences between cases and controls. When only shifts in means were present in the biomarkers, QBP obtained an inferior performance. Lastly, QBP proved to be unbiased in case of absence of disease relevant biomarkers and outperformed the other methods on the MDD case study. More research is needed to further optimize QBP, since it has several opportunities to improve its performance. Here we wanted to introduce the principle of QBP and show its potential.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Biological activity ; Biomarkers ; Classification ; Machine learning ; Performance prediction ; Quantiles</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2021-03</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2504620190?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>780,784,25753,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paus, Michiel H J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwin R van den Heuvel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meddens, Marc J M</creatorcontrib><title>Binary disease prediction using tail quantiles of the distribution of continuous biomarkers</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>In the analysis of binary disease classification, single biomarkers might not have significant discriminating power and multiple biomarkers from a large set of biomarkers should be selected. Numerous approaches exist, but they merely work well for mean differences in biomarkers between cases and controls. Biological processes are however much more heterogeneous, and differences could also occur in other distributional characteristics (e.g. variances, skewness). Many machine learning techniques are better capable of utilizing these higher order distributional differences, sometimes at cost of explainability. In this study we propose quantile based prediction (QBP), a binary classification method that is based on the selection of multiple continuous biomarkers. QBP generates a single score using the tails of the biomarker distributions for cases and controls. This single score can then be evaluated by ROC analysis to investigate its predictive power. The performance of QBP is compared to supervised learning methods using extensive simulation studies, and two case studies: major depression disorder and trisomy. Simultaneously, the classification performance of the existing techniques in relation to each other is assessed. The key strengths of QBP are the opportunity to select relevant biomarkers and the outstanding classification performance in the case biomarkers predominantly show variance differences between cases and controls. When only shifts in means were present in the biomarkers, QBP obtained an inferior performance. Lastly, QBP proved to be unbiased in case of absence of disease relevant biomarkers and outperformed the other methods on the MDD case study. More research is needed to further optimize QBP, since it has several opportunities to improve its performance. Here we wanted to introduce the principle of QBP and show its potential.</description><subject>Biological activity</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Performance prediction</subject><subject>Quantiles</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNykEOgjAQheHGxESi3KGJa5LSAupWo_EA7lyQAoMOYgudduHtReMBXL3k_d-MRVKpNNlmUi5YTNQJIWSxkXmuInbdo9HuxRsk0AR8cNBg7dEaHgjNjXuNPR-DNh57IG5b7u_w4d5hFb5w-mo7dRNsIF6hfWr3AEcrNm91TxD_dsnWp-PlcE4GZ8cA5MvOBmemVMpcZIUU6U6o_9QbCsdEJQ</recordid><startdate>20210323</startdate><enddate>20210323</enddate><creator>Paus, Michiel H J</creator><creator>Edwin R van den Heuvel</creator><creator>Meddens, Marc J M</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210323</creationdate><title>Binary disease prediction using tail quantiles of the distribution of continuous biomarkers</title><author>Paus, Michiel H J ; Edwin R van den Heuvel ; Meddens, Marc J M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_25046201903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biological activity</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Performance prediction</topic><topic>Quantiles</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paus, Michiel H J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwin R van den Heuvel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meddens, Marc J M</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paus, Michiel H J</au><au>Edwin R van den Heuvel</au><au>Meddens, Marc J M</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Binary disease prediction using tail quantiles of the distribution of continuous biomarkers</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2021-03-23</date><risdate>2021</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>In the analysis of binary disease classification, single biomarkers might not have significant discriminating power and multiple biomarkers from a large set of biomarkers should be selected. Numerous approaches exist, but they merely work well for mean differences in biomarkers between cases and controls. Biological processes are however much more heterogeneous, and differences could also occur in other distributional characteristics (e.g. variances, skewness). Many machine learning techniques are better capable of utilizing these higher order distributional differences, sometimes at cost of explainability. In this study we propose quantile based prediction (QBP), a binary classification method that is based on the selection of multiple continuous biomarkers. QBP generates a single score using the tails of the biomarker distributions for cases and controls. This single score can then be evaluated by ROC analysis to investigate its predictive power. The performance of QBP is compared to supervised learning methods using extensive simulation studies, and two case studies: major depression disorder and trisomy. Simultaneously, the classification performance of the existing techniques in relation to each other is assessed. The key strengths of QBP are the opportunity to select relevant biomarkers and the outstanding classification performance in the case biomarkers predominantly show variance differences between cases and controls. When only shifts in means were present in the biomarkers, QBP obtained an inferior performance. Lastly, QBP proved to be unbiased in case of absence of disease relevant biomarkers and outperformed the other methods on the MDD case study. More research is needed to further optimize QBP, since it has several opportunities to improve its performance. Here we wanted to introduce the principle of QBP and show its potential.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2021-03
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2504620190
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Biological activity
Biomarkers
Classification
Machine learning
Performance prediction
Quantiles
title Binary disease prediction using tail quantiles of the distribution of continuous biomarkers
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T04%3A32%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Binary%20disease%20prediction%20using%20tail%20quantiles%20of%20the%20distribution%20of%20continuous%20biomarkers&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Paus,%20Michiel%20H%20J&rft.date=2021-03-23&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2504620190%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_25046201903%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2504620190&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true