Loading…

A framework for verifying Dynamic Probabilistic Risk Assessment models

•Development of a framework that allows to verify the simulator model for Dynamic PRA.•Use of graphical method (statechart) combined with formal method.•A general framework that can be extended to different DPRA methods and tools.•Application to i) performance assessment of an heated room using PyCA...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Reliability engineering & system safety 2020-11, Vol.203, p.107099, Article 107099
Main Authors: Picoco, Claudia, Rychkov, Valentin, Aldemir, Tunc
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-55d804dc254daed634b1f804dc4121dc3037ac1a02091f6dffcc3cfd952d5d613
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-55d804dc254daed634b1f804dc4121dc3037ac1a02091f6dffcc3cfd952d5d613
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 107099
container_title Reliability engineering & system safety
container_volume 203
creator Picoco, Claudia
Rychkov, Valentin
Aldemir, Tunc
description •Development of a framework that allows to verify the simulator model for Dynamic PRA.•Use of graphical method (statechart) combined with formal method.•A general framework that can be extended to different DPRA methods and tools.•Application to i) performance assessment of an heated room using PyCATSHOO and, ii) a dynamic event tree using RAVEN-MAAP5. Recent development of more powerful computational and technological resources has led to significant improvements in the utilization of dynamic methodologies for the Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) of nuclear power plants. These methodologies integrate deterministic and probabilistic analyses and are generally referred to as Dynamic PRA (DPRA) methods. DPRA is performed through the generation and simulation of possibly thousands of different accident scenarios. To ensure the quality and the correctness of the results, DPRA models should be verified. Since DPRA generates large amount of data, a visual inspection of results to verify the correctness of the model used is neither practical nor reliable. As one of the steps for DPRA analysis, a framework is proposed to systematically explore the DPRA model prior to its simulation using statecharts which provide a graphical notation for describing dynamic aspects of system behavior. The application of the framework is illustrated using two case studies: (i) performance assessment of a heated room using the PyCATSHOO DPRA tool, and, (ii) DPRA performed with RAVEN-MAAP5-EDF codes for loss of off-site power as the initiating event in a pressurized water reactor.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107099
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2505418132</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0951832020306001</els_id><sourcerecordid>2505418132</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-55d804dc254daed634b1f804dc4121dc3037ac1a02091f6dffcc3cfd952d5d613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLw0AUhQdRsFb_gKsB16nzyCQZcFOqVaGgiK6H6Txk0iZT76SV_nsT49rV5R7OuZfzIXRNyYwSWtzWM3ApzRhhg1ASKU_QhFalzEjFi1M0IVLQrOKMnKOLlGpCSC5FOUHLOfagG_cdYYN9BHxwEPwxtJ_4_tjqJhj8CnGt12EbUtdvbyFt8Dyl_l3j2g430bptukRnXm-Tu_qbU_SxfHhfPGWrl8fnxXyVGc6qLhPCViS3honcamcLnq-p_1Vyyqg1nPBSG6r7GpL6wnpvDDfeSsGssAXlU3Qz3t1B_Nq71Kk67qHtXyomiMhpRTnrXWx0GYgpgfNqB6HRcFSUqIGXqtXASw281MirD92Nob6OOwQHKpngWuNsAGc6ZWP4L_4DFo50Aw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2505418132</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A framework for verifying Dynamic Probabilistic Risk Assessment models</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Picoco, Claudia ; Rychkov, Valentin ; Aldemir, Tunc</creator><creatorcontrib>Picoco, Claudia ; Rychkov, Valentin ; Aldemir, Tunc</creatorcontrib><description>•Development of a framework that allows to verify the simulator model for Dynamic PRA.•Use of graphical method (statechart) combined with formal method.•A general framework that can be extended to different DPRA methods and tools.•Application to i) performance assessment of an heated room using PyCATSHOO and, ii) a dynamic event tree using RAVEN-MAAP5. Recent development of more powerful computational and technological resources has led to significant improvements in the utilization of dynamic methodologies for the Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) of nuclear power plants. These methodologies integrate deterministic and probabilistic analyses and are generally referred to as Dynamic PRA (DPRA) methods. DPRA is performed through the generation and simulation of possibly thousands of different accident scenarios. To ensure the quality and the correctness of the results, DPRA models should be verified. Since DPRA generates large amount of data, a visual inspection of results to verify the correctness of the model used is neither practical nor reliable. As one of the steps for DPRA analysis, a framework is proposed to systematically explore the DPRA model prior to its simulation using statecharts which provide a graphical notation for describing dynamic aspects of system behavior. The application of the framework is illustrated using two case studies: (i) performance assessment of a heated room using the PyCATSHOO DPRA tool, and, (ii) DPRA performed with RAVEN-MAAP5-EDF codes for loss of off-site power as the initiating event in a pressurized water reactor.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0951-8320</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0836</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107099</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Barking: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Computer applications ; Dynamic Event Tree (DET) ; Dynamic Probabilistic Risk Assessment (DPRA) ; Inspection ; Nuclear electric power generation ; Nuclear energy ; Nuclear power plants ; Performance assessment ; Pressurized water reactors ; Probabilistic risk assessment ; Reliability engineering ; Risk assessment ; Simulation ; Statechart ; Thermal-Hydraulic model ; Verification ; YAKINDU StateChart Tools</subject><ispartof>Reliability engineering &amp; system safety, 2020-11, Vol.203, p.107099, Article 107099</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Nov 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-55d804dc254daed634b1f804dc4121dc3037ac1a02091f6dffcc3cfd952d5d613</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-55d804dc254daed634b1f804dc4121dc3037ac1a02091f6dffcc3cfd952d5d613</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Picoco, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rychkov, Valentin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aldemir, Tunc</creatorcontrib><title>A framework for verifying Dynamic Probabilistic Risk Assessment models</title><title>Reliability engineering &amp; system safety</title><description>•Development of a framework that allows to verify the simulator model for Dynamic PRA.•Use of graphical method (statechart) combined with formal method.•A general framework that can be extended to different DPRA methods and tools.•Application to i) performance assessment of an heated room using PyCATSHOO and, ii) a dynamic event tree using RAVEN-MAAP5. Recent development of more powerful computational and technological resources has led to significant improvements in the utilization of dynamic methodologies for the Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) of nuclear power plants. These methodologies integrate deterministic and probabilistic analyses and are generally referred to as Dynamic PRA (DPRA) methods. DPRA is performed through the generation and simulation of possibly thousands of different accident scenarios. To ensure the quality and the correctness of the results, DPRA models should be verified. Since DPRA generates large amount of data, a visual inspection of results to verify the correctness of the model used is neither practical nor reliable. As one of the steps for DPRA analysis, a framework is proposed to systematically explore the DPRA model prior to its simulation using statecharts which provide a graphical notation for describing dynamic aspects of system behavior. The application of the framework is illustrated using two case studies: (i) performance assessment of a heated room using the PyCATSHOO DPRA tool, and, (ii) DPRA performed with RAVEN-MAAP5-EDF codes for loss of off-site power as the initiating event in a pressurized water reactor.</description><subject>Computer applications</subject><subject>Dynamic Event Tree (DET)</subject><subject>Dynamic Probabilistic Risk Assessment (DPRA)</subject><subject>Inspection</subject><subject>Nuclear electric power generation</subject><subject>Nuclear energy</subject><subject>Nuclear power plants</subject><subject>Performance assessment</subject><subject>Pressurized water reactors</subject><subject>Probabilistic risk assessment</subject><subject>Reliability engineering</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Statechart</subject><subject>Thermal-Hydraulic model</subject><subject>Verification</subject><subject>YAKINDU StateChart Tools</subject><issn>0951-8320</issn><issn>1879-0836</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLw0AUhQdRsFb_gKsB16nzyCQZcFOqVaGgiK6H6Txk0iZT76SV_nsT49rV5R7OuZfzIXRNyYwSWtzWM3ApzRhhg1ASKU_QhFalzEjFi1M0IVLQrOKMnKOLlGpCSC5FOUHLOfagG_cdYYN9BHxwEPwxtJ_4_tjqJhj8CnGt12EbUtdvbyFt8Dyl_l3j2g430bptukRnXm-Tu_qbU_SxfHhfPGWrl8fnxXyVGc6qLhPCViS3honcamcLnq-p_1Vyyqg1nPBSG6r7GpL6wnpvDDfeSsGssAXlU3Qz3t1B_Nq71Kk67qHtXyomiMhpRTnrXWx0GYgpgfNqB6HRcFSUqIGXqtXASw281MirD92Nob6OOwQHKpngWuNsAGc6ZWP4L_4DFo50Aw</recordid><startdate>202011</startdate><enddate>202011</enddate><creator>Picoco, Claudia</creator><creator>Rychkov, Valentin</creator><creator>Aldemir, Tunc</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202011</creationdate><title>A framework for verifying Dynamic Probabilistic Risk Assessment models</title><author>Picoco, Claudia ; Rychkov, Valentin ; Aldemir, Tunc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-55d804dc254daed634b1f804dc4121dc3037ac1a02091f6dffcc3cfd952d5d613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Computer applications</topic><topic>Dynamic Event Tree (DET)</topic><topic>Dynamic Probabilistic Risk Assessment (DPRA)</topic><topic>Inspection</topic><topic>Nuclear electric power generation</topic><topic>Nuclear energy</topic><topic>Nuclear power plants</topic><topic>Performance assessment</topic><topic>Pressurized water reactors</topic><topic>Probabilistic risk assessment</topic><topic>Reliability engineering</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Statechart</topic><topic>Thermal-Hydraulic model</topic><topic>Verification</topic><topic>YAKINDU StateChart Tools</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Picoco, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rychkov, Valentin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aldemir, Tunc</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Reliability engineering &amp; system safety</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Picoco, Claudia</au><au>Rychkov, Valentin</au><au>Aldemir, Tunc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A framework for verifying Dynamic Probabilistic Risk Assessment models</atitle><jtitle>Reliability engineering &amp; system safety</jtitle><date>2020-11</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>203</volume><spage>107099</spage><pages>107099-</pages><artnum>107099</artnum><issn>0951-8320</issn><eissn>1879-0836</eissn><abstract>•Development of a framework that allows to verify the simulator model for Dynamic PRA.•Use of graphical method (statechart) combined with formal method.•A general framework that can be extended to different DPRA methods and tools.•Application to i) performance assessment of an heated room using PyCATSHOO and, ii) a dynamic event tree using RAVEN-MAAP5. Recent development of more powerful computational and technological resources has led to significant improvements in the utilization of dynamic methodologies for the Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) of nuclear power plants. These methodologies integrate deterministic and probabilistic analyses and are generally referred to as Dynamic PRA (DPRA) methods. DPRA is performed through the generation and simulation of possibly thousands of different accident scenarios. To ensure the quality and the correctness of the results, DPRA models should be verified. Since DPRA generates large amount of data, a visual inspection of results to verify the correctness of the model used is neither practical nor reliable. As one of the steps for DPRA analysis, a framework is proposed to systematically explore the DPRA model prior to its simulation using statecharts which provide a graphical notation for describing dynamic aspects of system behavior. The application of the framework is illustrated using two case studies: (i) performance assessment of a heated room using the PyCATSHOO DPRA tool, and, (ii) DPRA performed with RAVEN-MAAP5-EDF codes for loss of off-site power as the initiating event in a pressurized water reactor.</abstract><cop>Barking</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ress.2020.107099</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0951-8320
ispartof Reliability engineering & system safety, 2020-11, Vol.203, p.107099, Article 107099
issn 0951-8320
1879-0836
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2505418132
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Computer applications
Dynamic Event Tree (DET)
Dynamic Probabilistic Risk Assessment (DPRA)
Inspection
Nuclear electric power generation
Nuclear energy
Nuclear power plants
Performance assessment
Pressurized water reactors
Probabilistic risk assessment
Reliability engineering
Risk assessment
Simulation
Statechart
Thermal-Hydraulic model
Verification
YAKINDU StateChart Tools
title A framework for verifying Dynamic Probabilistic Risk Assessment models
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T03%3A55%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20framework%20for%20verifying%20Dynamic%20Probabilistic%20Risk%20Assessment%20models&rft.jtitle=Reliability%20engineering%20&%20system%20safety&rft.au=Picoco,%20Claudia&rft.date=2020-11&rft.volume=203&rft.spage=107099&rft.pages=107099-&rft.artnum=107099&rft.issn=0951-8320&rft.eissn=1879-0836&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107099&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2505418132%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-55d804dc254daed634b1f804dc4121dc3037ac1a02091f6dffcc3cfd952d5d613%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2505418132&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true