Loading…
Comparison of blast mitigation performance between water layers and water droplets
An experimental investigation was conducted to compare the blast mitigation performances of water layers, whose mass ratios to an explosive were m W / m E = 12.2 , 44.5 , and 107.2 , with water droplets surrounding the explosive. The blast waveforms were measured using pressure transducers, and the...
Saved in:
Published in: | Shock waves 2021, Vol.31 (1), p.89-94 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-eefdf71ceb08e81d437ff31433399297b82d8e8d8b91c9f8f79a7248cfdd9d523 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-eefdf71ceb08e81d437ff31433399297b82d8e8d8b91c9f8f79a7248cfdd9d523 |
container_end_page | 94 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 89 |
container_title | Shock waves |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Tamba, T. Sugiyama, Y. Ohtani, K. Wakabayashi, K. |
description | An experimental investigation was conducted to compare the blast mitigation performances of water layers, whose mass ratios to an explosive were
m
W
/
m
E
=
12.2
,
44.5
,
and
107.2
, with water droplets surrounding the explosive. The blast waveforms were measured using pressure transducers, and the motion of the water layer was recorded using a high-speed camera. When
m
W
/
m
E
was equivalent between the water layer and water droplets, the water layer exhibited less mitigation of the peak overpressure and positive impulse than the water droplets. The results demonstrated high efficiency of the water droplets in blast mitigation and the existence of an optimal apparent density of the water barrier. The velocities of the water layers determined using high-speed photography agreed with the prediction model of the barrier material accelerated by explosion. It suggested that the primary cause of the blast overpressure mitigation by the water layer was the allocation of the explosion energy into the kinetic energy of the water. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00193-021-00990-3 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2505718166</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2505718166</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-eefdf71ceb08e81d437ff31433399297b82d8e8d8b91c9f8f79a7248cfdd9d523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AVcB19E82kmylMEXDAii65A2N0OHtqlJhmH-vdEK7lxdOPc7514OQteM3jJK5V2ilGlBKGeEUq0pESdowSrBCWe1OEULqoUijCt5ji5S2hVcrqRcoLd1GCYbuxRGHDxuepsyHrrcbW3uijZB9CEOdmwBN5APACM-2AwR9_YIMWE7ul_BxTD1kNMlOvO2T3D1O5fo4_Hhff1MNq9PL-v7DWkrXmUC4J2XrIWGKlDMVUJ6L8rPQmjNtWwUd2XhVKNZq73yUlvJK9V657SruViimzl3iuFzDymbXdjHsZw0vKa1ZIqtVoXiM9XGkFIEb6bYDTYeDaPmuzszd2dKd-anOyOKScymVOBxC_Ev-h_XF1EBct8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2505718166</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of blast mitigation performance between water layers and water droplets</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Tamba, T. ; Sugiyama, Y. ; Ohtani, K. ; Wakabayashi, K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tamba, T. ; Sugiyama, Y. ; Ohtani, K. ; Wakabayashi, K.</creatorcontrib><description>An experimental investigation was conducted to compare the blast mitigation performances of water layers, whose mass ratios to an explosive were
m
W
/
m
E
=
12.2
,
44.5
,
and
107.2
, with water droplets surrounding the explosive. The blast waveforms were measured using pressure transducers, and the motion of the water layer was recorded using a high-speed camera. When
m
W
/
m
E
was equivalent between the water layer and water droplets, the water layer exhibited less mitigation of the peak overpressure and positive impulse than the water droplets. The results demonstrated high efficiency of the water droplets in blast mitigation and the existence of an optimal apparent density of the water barrier. The velocities of the water layers determined using high-speed photography agreed with the prediction model of the barrier material accelerated by explosion. It suggested that the primary cause of the blast overpressure mitigation by the water layer was the allocation of the explosion energy into the kinetic energy of the water.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0938-1287</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2153</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00193-021-00990-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Acoustics ; Blasting (explosive) ; Bulk density ; Condensed Matter Physics ; Droplets ; Engineering ; Engineering Fluid Dynamics ; Engineering Thermodynamics ; Explosions ; Fluid- and Aerodynamics ; Heat and Mass Transfer ; High speed cameras ; High speed photography ; Kinetic energy ; Mass ratios ; Overpressure ; Prediction models ; Technical Note ; Thermodynamics ; Transducers ; Water drops ; Waveforms</subject><ispartof>Shock waves, 2021, Vol.31 (1), p.89-94</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-eefdf71ceb08e81d437ff31433399297b82d8e8d8b91c9f8f79a7248cfdd9d523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-eefdf71ceb08e81d437ff31433399297b82d8e8d8b91c9f8f79a7248cfdd9d523</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9367-8942 ; 0000-0002-2806-2022 ; 0000-0002-5648-0977 ; 0000-0003-2432-861X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tamba, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugiyama, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohtani, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wakabayashi, K.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of blast mitigation performance between water layers and water droplets</title><title>Shock waves</title><addtitle>Shock Waves</addtitle><description>An experimental investigation was conducted to compare the blast mitigation performances of water layers, whose mass ratios to an explosive were
m
W
/
m
E
=
12.2
,
44.5
,
and
107.2
, with water droplets surrounding the explosive. The blast waveforms were measured using pressure transducers, and the motion of the water layer was recorded using a high-speed camera. When
m
W
/
m
E
was equivalent between the water layer and water droplets, the water layer exhibited less mitigation of the peak overpressure and positive impulse than the water droplets. The results demonstrated high efficiency of the water droplets in blast mitigation and the existence of an optimal apparent density of the water barrier. The velocities of the water layers determined using high-speed photography agreed with the prediction model of the barrier material accelerated by explosion. It suggested that the primary cause of the blast overpressure mitigation by the water layer was the allocation of the explosion energy into the kinetic energy of the water.</description><subject>Acoustics</subject><subject>Blasting (explosive)</subject><subject>Bulk density</subject><subject>Condensed Matter Physics</subject><subject>Droplets</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering Fluid Dynamics</subject><subject>Engineering Thermodynamics</subject><subject>Explosions</subject><subject>Fluid- and Aerodynamics</subject><subject>Heat and Mass Transfer</subject><subject>High speed cameras</subject><subject>High speed photography</subject><subject>Kinetic energy</subject><subject>Mass ratios</subject><subject>Overpressure</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Technical Note</subject><subject>Thermodynamics</subject><subject>Transducers</subject><subject>Water drops</subject><subject>Waveforms</subject><issn>0938-1287</issn><issn>1432-2153</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AVcB19E82kmylMEXDAii65A2N0OHtqlJhmH-vdEK7lxdOPc7514OQteM3jJK5V2ilGlBKGeEUq0pESdowSrBCWe1OEULqoUijCt5ji5S2hVcrqRcoLd1GCYbuxRGHDxuepsyHrrcbW3uijZB9CEOdmwBN5APACM-2AwR9_YIMWE7ul_BxTD1kNMlOvO2T3D1O5fo4_Hhff1MNq9PL-v7DWkrXmUC4J2XrIWGKlDMVUJ6L8rPQmjNtWwUd2XhVKNZq73yUlvJK9V657SruViimzl3iuFzDymbXdjHsZw0vKa1ZIqtVoXiM9XGkFIEb6bYDTYeDaPmuzszd2dKd-anOyOKScymVOBxC_Ev-h_XF1EBct8</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Tamba, T.</creator><creator>Sugiyama, Y.</creator><creator>Ohtani, K.</creator><creator>Wakabayashi, K.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9367-8942</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2806-2022</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5648-0977</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2432-861X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Comparison of blast mitigation performance between water layers and water droplets</title><author>Tamba, T. ; Sugiyama, Y. ; Ohtani, K. ; Wakabayashi, K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-eefdf71ceb08e81d437ff31433399297b82d8e8d8b91c9f8f79a7248cfdd9d523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Acoustics</topic><topic>Blasting (explosive)</topic><topic>Bulk density</topic><topic>Condensed Matter Physics</topic><topic>Droplets</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering Fluid Dynamics</topic><topic>Engineering Thermodynamics</topic><topic>Explosions</topic><topic>Fluid- and Aerodynamics</topic><topic>Heat and Mass Transfer</topic><topic>High speed cameras</topic><topic>High speed photography</topic><topic>Kinetic energy</topic><topic>Mass ratios</topic><topic>Overpressure</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Technical Note</topic><topic>Thermodynamics</topic><topic>Transducers</topic><topic>Water drops</topic><topic>Waveforms</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tamba, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugiyama, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohtani, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wakabayashi, K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Shock waves</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tamba, T.</au><au>Sugiyama, Y.</au><au>Ohtani, K.</au><au>Wakabayashi, K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of blast mitigation performance between water layers and water droplets</atitle><jtitle>Shock waves</jtitle><stitle>Shock Waves</stitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>89</spage><epage>94</epage><pages>89-94</pages><issn>0938-1287</issn><eissn>1432-2153</eissn><abstract>An experimental investigation was conducted to compare the blast mitigation performances of water layers, whose mass ratios to an explosive were
m
W
/
m
E
=
12.2
,
44.5
,
and
107.2
, with water droplets surrounding the explosive. The blast waveforms were measured using pressure transducers, and the motion of the water layer was recorded using a high-speed camera. When
m
W
/
m
E
was equivalent between the water layer and water droplets, the water layer exhibited less mitigation of the peak overpressure and positive impulse than the water droplets. The results demonstrated high efficiency of the water droplets in blast mitigation and the existence of an optimal apparent density of the water barrier. The velocities of the water layers determined using high-speed photography agreed with the prediction model of the barrier material accelerated by explosion. It suggested that the primary cause of the blast overpressure mitigation by the water layer was the allocation of the explosion energy into the kinetic energy of the water.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00193-021-00990-3</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9367-8942</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2806-2022</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5648-0977</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2432-861X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0938-1287 |
ispartof | Shock waves, 2021, Vol.31 (1), p.89-94 |
issn | 0938-1287 1432-2153 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2505718166 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Acoustics Blasting (explosive) Bulk density Condensed Matter Physics Droplets Engineering Engineering Fluid Dynamics Engineering Thermodynamics Explosions Fluid- and Aerodynamics Heat and Mass Transfer High speed cameras High speed photography Kinetic energy Mass ratios Overpressure Prediction models Technical Note Thermodynamics Transducers Water drops Waveforms |
title | Comparison of blast mitigation performance between water layers and water droplets |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T17%3A32%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20blast%20mitigation%20performance%20between%20water%20layers%20and%20water%20droplets&rft.jtitle=Shock%20waves&rft.au=Tamba,%20T.&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=94&rft.pages=89-94&rft.issn=0938-1287&rft.eissn=1432-2153&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00193-021-00990-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2505718166%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-eefdf71ceb08e81d437ff31433399297b82d8e8d8b91c9f8f79a7248cfdd9d523%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2505718166&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |