Loading…

Comparison of blast mitigation performance between water layers and water droplets

An experimental investigation was conducted to compare the blast mitigation performances of water layers, whose mass ratios to an explosive were m W / m E = 12.2 , 44.5 , and 107.2 , with water droplets surrounding the explosive. The blast waveforms were measured using pressure transducers, and the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Shock waves 2021, Vol.31 (1), p.89-94
Main Authors: Tamba, T., Sugiyama, Y., Ohtani, K., Wakabayashi, K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-eefdf71ceb08e81d437ff31433399297b82d8e8d8b91c9f8f79a7248cfdd9d523
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-eefdf71ceb08e81d437ff31433399297b82d8e8d8b91c9f8f79a7248cfdd9d523
container_end_page 94
container_issue 1
container_start_page 89
container_title Shock waves
container_volume 31
creator Tamba, T.
Sugiyama, Y.
Ohtani, K.
Wakabayashi, K.
description An experimental investigation was conducted to compare the blast mitigation performances of water layers, whose mass ratios to an explosive were m W / m E = 12.2 , 44.5 , and 107.2 , with water droplets surrounding the explosive. The blast waveforms were measured using pressure transducers, and the motion of the water layer was recorded using a high-speed camera. When m W / m E was equivalent between the water layer and water droplets, the water layer exhibited less mitigation of the peak overpressure and positive impulse than the water droplets. The results demonstrated high efficiency of the water droplets in blast mitigation and the existence of an optimal apparent density of the water barrier. The velocities of the water layers determined using high-speed photography agreed with the prediction model of the barrier material accelerated by explosion. It suggested that the primary cause of the blast overpressure mitigation by the water layer was the allocation of the explosion energy into the kinetic energy of the water.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00193-021-00990-3
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2505718166</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2505718166</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-eefdf71ceb08e81d437ff31433399297b82d8e8d8b91c9f8f79a7248cfdd9d523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AVcB19E82kmylMEXDAii65A2N0OHtqlJhmH-vdEK7lxdOPc7514OQteM3jJK5V2ilGlBKGeEUq0pESdowSrBCWe1OEULqoUijCt5ji5S2hVcrqRcoLd1GCYbuxRGHDxuepsyHrrcbW3uijZB9CEOdmwBN5APACM-2AwR9_YIMWE7ul_BxTD1kNMlOvO2T3D1O5fo4_Hhff1MNq9PL-v7DWkrXmUC4J2XrIWGKlDMVUJ6L8rPQmjNtWwUd2XhVKNZq73yUlvJK9V657SruViimzl3iuFzDymbXdjHsZw0vKa1ZIqtVoXiM9XGkFIEb6bYDTYeDaPmuzszd2dKd-anOyOKScymVOBxC_Ev-h_XF1EBct8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2505718166</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of blast mitigation performance between water layers and water droplets</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Tamba, T. ; Sugiyama, Y. ; Ohtani, K. ; Wakabayashi, K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tamba, T. ; Sugiyama, Y. ; Ohtani, K. ; Wakabayashi, K.</creatorcontrib><description>An experimental investigation was conducted to compare the blast mitigation performances of water layers, whose mass ratios to an explosive were m W / m E = 12.2 , 44.5 , and 107.2 , with water droplets surrounding the explosive. The blast waveforms were measured using pressure transducers, and the motion of the water layer was recorded using a high-speed camera. When m W / m E was equivalent between the water layer and water droplets, the water layer exhibited less mitigation of the peak overpressure and positive impulse than the water droplets. The results demonstrated high efficiency of the water droplets in blast mitigation and the existence of an optimal apparent density of the water barrier. The velocities of the water layers determined using high-speed photography agreed with the prediction model of the barrier material accelerated by explosion. It suggested that the primary cause of the blast overpressure mitigation by the water layer was the allocation of the explosion energy into the kinetic energy of the water.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0938-1287</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2153</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00193-021-00990-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Acoustics ; Blasting (explosive) ; Bulk density ; Condensed Matter Physics ; Droplets ; Engineering ; Engineering Fluid Dynamics ; Engineering Thermodynamics ; Explosions ; Fluid- and Aerodynamics ; Heat and Mass Transfer ; High speed cameras ; High speed photography ; Kinetic energy ; Mass ratios ; Overpressure ; Prediction models ; Technical Note ; Thermodynamics ; Transducers ; Water drops ; Waveforms</subject><ispartof>Shock waves, 2021, Vol.31 (1), p.89-94</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-eefdf71ceb08e81d437ff31433399297b82d8e8d8b91c9f8f79a7248cfdd9d523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-eefdf71ceb08e81d437ff31433399297b82d8e8d8b91c9f8f79a7248cfdd9d523</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9367-8942 ; 0000-0002-2806-2022 ; 0000-0002-5648-0977 ; 0000-0003-2432-861X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tamba, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugiyama, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohtani, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wakabayashi, K.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of blast mitigation performance between water layers and water droplets</title><title>Shock waves</title><addtitle>Shock Waves</addtitle><description>An experimental investigation was conducted to compare the blast mitigation performances of water layers, whose mass ratios to an explosive were m W / m E = 12.2 , 44.5 , and 107.2 , with water droplets surrounding the explosive. The blast waveforms were measured using pressure transducers, and the motion of the water layer was recorded using a high-speed camera. When m W / m E was equivalent between the water layer and water droplets, the water layer exhibited less mitigation of the peak overpressure and positive impulse than the water droplets. The results demonstrated high efficiency of the water droplets in blast mitigation and the existence of an optimal apparent density of the water barrier. The velocities of the water layers determined using high-speed photography agreed with the prediction model of the barrier material accelerated by explosion. It suggested that the primary cause of the blast overpressure mitigation by the water layer was the allocation of the explosion energy into the kinetic energy of the water.</description><subject>Acoustics</subject><subject>Blasting (explosive)</subject><subject>Bulk density</subject><subject>Condensed Matter Physics</subject><subject>Droplets</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering Fluid Dynamics</subject><subject>Engineering Thermodynamics</subject><subject>Explosions</subject><subject>Fluid- and Aerodynamics</subject><subject>Heat and Mass Transfer</subject><subject>High speed cameras</subject><subject>High speed photography</subject><subject>Kinetic energy</subject><subject>Mass ratios</subject><subject>Overpressure</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Technical Note</subject><subject>Thermodynamics</subject><subject>Transducers</subject><subject>Water drops</subject><subject>Waveforms</subject><issn>0938-1287</issn><issn>1432-2153</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AVcB19E82kmylMEXDAii65A2N0OHtqlJhmH-vdEK7lxdOPc7514OQteM3jJK5V2ilGlBKGeEUq0pESdowSrBCWe1OEULqoUijCt5ji5S2hVcrqRcoLd1GCYbuxRGHDxuepsyHrrcbW3uijZB9CEOdmwBN5APACM-2AwR9_YIMWE7ul_BxTD1kNMlOvO2T3D1O5fo4_Hhff1MNq9PL-v7DWkrXmUC4J2XrIWGKlDMVUJ6L8rPQmjNtWwUd2XhVKNZq73yUlvJK9V657SruViimzl3iuFzDymbXdjHsZw0vKa1ZIqtVoXiM9XGkFIEb6bYDTYeDaPmuzszd2dKd-anOyOKScymVOBxC_Ev-h_XF1EBct8</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Tamba, T.</creator><creator>Sugiyama, Y.</creator><creator>Ohtani, K.</creator><creator>Wakabayashi, K.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9367-8942</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2806-2022</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5648-0977</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2432-861X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Comparison of blast mitigation performance between water layers and water droplets</title><author>Tamba, T. ; Sugiyama, Y. ; Ohtani, K. ; Wakabayashi, K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-eefdf71ceb08e81d437ff31433399297b82d8e8d8b91c9f8f79a7248cfdd9d523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Acoustics</topic><topic>Blasting (explosive)</topic><topic>Bulk density</topic><topic>Condensed Matter Physics</topic><topic>Droplets</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering Fluid Dynamics</topic><topic>Engineering Thermodynamics</topic><topic>Explosions</topic><topic>Fluid- and Aerodynamics</topic><topic>Heat and Mass Transfer</topic><topic>High speed cameras</topic><topic>High speed photography</topic><topic>Kinetic energy</topic><topic>Mass ratios</topic><topic>Overpressure</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Technical Note</topic><topic>Thermodynamics</topic><topic>Transducers</topic><topic>Water drops</topic><topic>Waveforms</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tamba, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugiyama, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohtani, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wakabayashi, K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Shock waves</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tamba, T.</au><au>Sugiyama, Y.</au><au>Ohtani, K.</au><au>Wakabayashi, K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of blast mitigation performance between water layers and water droplets</atitle><jtitle>Shock waves</jtitle><stitle>Shock Waves</stitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>89</spage><epage>94</epage><pages>89-94</pages><issn>0938-1287</issn><eissn>1432-2153</eissn><abstract>An experimental investigation was conducted to compare the blast mitigation performances of water layers, whose mass ratios to an explosive were m W / m E = 12.2 , 44.5 , and 107.2 , with water droplets surrounding the explosive. The blast waveforms were measured using pressure transducers, and the motion of the water layer was recorded using a high-speed camera. When m W / m E was equivalent between the water layer and water droplets, the water layer exhibited less mitigation of the peak overpressure and positive impulse than the water droplets. The results demonstrated high efficiency of the water droplets in blast mitigation and the existence of an optimal apparent density of the water barrier. The velocities of the water layers determined using high-speed photography agreed with the prediction model of the barrier material accelerated by explosion. It suggested that the primary cause of the blast overpressure mitigation by the water layer was the allocation of the explosion energy into the kinetic energy of the water.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00193-021-00990-3</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9367-8942</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2806-2022</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5648-0977</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2432-861X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0938-1287
ispartof Shock waves, 2021, Vol.31 (1), p.89-94
issn 0938-1287
1432-2153
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2505718166
source Springer Link
subjects Acoustics
Blasting (explosive)
Bulk density
Condensed Matter Physics
Droplets
Engineering
Engineering Fluid Dynamics
Engineering Thermodynamics
Explosions
Fluid- and Aerodynamics
Heat and Mass Transfer
High speed cameras
High speed photography
Kinetic energy
Mass ratios
Overpressure
Prediction models
Technical Note
Thermodynamics
Transducers
Water drops
Waveforms
title Comparison of blast mitigation performance between water layers and water droplets
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T17%3A32%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20blast%20mitigation%20performance%20between%20water%20layers%20and%20water%20droplets&rft.jtitle=Shock%20waves&rft.au=Tamba,%20T.&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=94&rft.pages=89-94&rft.issn=0938-1287&rft.eissn=1432-2153&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00193-021-00990-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2505718166%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-eefdf71ceb08e81d437ff31433399297b82d8e8d8b91c9f8f79a7248cfdd9d523%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2505718166&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true