Reed bed vegetation structure and plant species diversity depend on management type and the time period since last management

• Published in: Applied vegetation science 2021-01, Vol.24 (1), p.n/a
• Main Authors: Andersen, Line Holm, Nummi, Petri, Bahrndorff, Simon, Pertoldi, Cino, Trøjelsgaard, Kristian, Lauridsen, Torben Linding, Rafn, Jeppe, Frederiksen, Cecilie Majgaard Skak, Kristjansen, Mads Prengel, Bruhn, Dan, Rosario Acosta, Alicia Teresa
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aquatic plants; Biodiversity; Flowers & plants; habitat structure; Habitats; harvest; Management; mowing; Multivariate analysis; Phragmites australis; Plant communities; plant community; Plant diversity; Plant populations; Plant species; Principal components analysis; Questions; Reed beds; reed swamp; Species diversity; Species richness; succession; Variance analysis; Vegetation
• ISSN: 1402-2001; 1654-109X
• DOI: 10.1111/avsc.12531

Question Reed beds, dominated by common reed (Phragmites australis), have high ecological value. Several studies have examined the differences between managed and unmanaged reed beds without taking into account the time passed since the last management. In this paper, we seek to answer the question: how does the time passed since last management and the management method itself affect the plant community and the habitat structure of reed beds? Location “De Østlige Vejler,” Northern Jutland, Denmark. Methods We examined four reed bed treatments — beds either cut or harvested during the year of the study (0‐year‐old reed beds) and reed beds harvested 3 and 25 years ago, respectively. The reed bed plant communities and the reed bed habitat structure were determined in May and August. We tested the data for overall between‐treatment differences (multivariate analysis of variance [MANOVA] and principal components analysis [PCA]) and specific differences in the plant community and habitat structure (Kruskal–Wallis). Results The plant community differed significantly between the four reed beds according to treatment, and each reed bed exhibited unique species. Species richness was significantly higher in the recently harvested reed beds (0 and 3 years since harvest) compared with the 25‐year‐old reed beds. Harvest sparked reed rejuvenation and increased the growth of new reeds. The 3‐year‐old reed bed had a habitat structure that equally resembled that of the newly harvested (e.g., similar green reed shoot density) and the 25‐year‐old reed beds (e.g., similar height). Cutting, as opposed to harvesting, created a plant community adapted to less light availability. Conclusions To secure most plant species and most variation in habitat structure, reed beds should contain a mosaic of differently aged and differently managed patches. Previous studies have disagreed on the effect of management on plant species diversity, which could be explained either by different reed bed age or different sampling periods. Both management method as well as time since last management, reed bed age, impact reed bed vegetation diversity by creating distinct plant communities. Reed bed habitat structure is also affected with reed bed rejuvenation decreasing with increasing reed bed age. The results show the importance of considering reed bed age in management, optimally aiming for a mosaic of ages.