The case for extending measures of democracy in the world “Beneath”, “Above”, and “Outside” the national level

• Published in: Political geography 2020-11, Vol.83, p.102276, Article 102276
• Main Authors: Gagnon, Jean-Paul, Fleuss, Dannica
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Data quality; Democracy; Governance; Horizontal separation; Measuring democracy; Schools; Social association; Spatial theory; Stratification; Vertical stratification; Workplaces
• ISSN: 0962-6298; 1873-5096
• DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102276

This article applies spatial theory, or the view that phenomena are distributed in space, to democracy. This analysis demonstrates that plural (two or more) democratic practices are evident in three spatial categories: (1) vertical stratification (i.e. at different levels of governance), (2) horizontal separation (i.e. among different agents operating at each level of governance), and (3) social association (i.e. in workplaces, families, schools). This finding, that plural democratic practices are demonstrated by agents operating at multiple levels of governance and in various non- or quasi-governmental associations prompts us to argue that measures of democracy in the world should be extended to spaces “beneath”, “above”, and “outside” the national level – presently the dominant locus for regular batteries that test the quality and extent of democratic practices globally. However, global data on the quality and extent of democracy at these other levels needs to be built before such an extension can happen.