Stereotype Threat and Its Problems: Theory Misspecification in Research, Consequences, and Remedies

Despite the explosive growth in stereotype threat (ST) research over the decades, a substantive amount of variability in ST effects still cannot be explained by extant research. While some attribute this unexplained heterogeneity to yet unidentified ST mechanisms, we explored an alternate hypothesis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of advanced academics 2021-05, Vol.32 (2), p.231-264
Main Authors: Picho-Kiroga, Katherine, Turnbull, Ashley, Rodriguez-Leahy, Ariel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adolescents
Adults
Age Differences
Children
Cultural Influences
Elementary Secondary Education
Females
Geographic Regions
Higher Education
Inferences
Mathematics
Mathematics education
Meta-analysis
Power Structure
Research Methodology
Sciences
Sex Stereotypes
Social Psychology
STEM Education
Stereotypes
Theories
Women
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Despite the explosive growth in stereotype threat (ST) research over the decades, a substantive amount of variability in ST effects still cannot be explained by extant research. While some attribute this unexplained heterogeneity to yet unidentified ST mechanisms, we explored an alternate hypothesis that ST theory is often misspecified in experimental research design, which introduces experimental noise (and hence variability) in stereotype threat effects unlikely to be explained by extant moderators. This study used multilevel meta-analysis to examine the impact of ST misspecification in research design on ST outcomes. Results revealed that ST effects were artificially inflated in studies that failed to include essential conditions necessary for its occurrence. Because most studies in the meta-analysis had either excluded or partially included these conditions, findings from this study suggest that ST effects on women’s performance might be smaller than previously reported in primary and secondary (meta-analytic) studies.
ISSN:1932-202X
2162-9536
DOI:10.1177/1932202X20986161