Loading…

A submaximal treadmill test to predict critical speed

We assessed the reliability and validity of a 10-min submaximal treadmill test (T10) to predict critical speed (CS). Forty-two runners completed a familiarization trial plus two experimental trials (T10 test and T10 retest). Reliability between the T10 test and T10 retest was assessed using coeffici...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of sports sciences 2021-04, Vol.39 (8), p.835-844
Main Authors: Follador, Lucio, de Borba, Edilson Fernando, Neto, Armando Luiz Bomfim, da Silva, Sergio Gregorio
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-57efe2d3911340f8605f969d559e856836862c93fb2e168c9e786c0073b068513
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-57efe2d3911340f8605f969d559e856836862c93fb2e168c9e786c0073b068513
container_end_page 844
container_issue 8
container_start_page 835
container_title Journal of sports sciences
container_volume 39
creator Follador, Lucio
de Borba, Edilson Fernando
Neto, Armando Luiz Bomfim
da Silva, Sergio Gregorio
description We assessed the reliability and validity of a 10-min submaximal treadmill test (T10) to predict critical speed (CS). Forty-two runners completed a familiarization trial plus two experimental trials (T10 test and T10 retest). Reliability between the T10 test and T10 retest was assessed using coefficient of variation (CoV), limits of agreement (LoA) and intraclass correlation (ICC). For validity, the speed from the T10 retest was compared with the CS determined from 3 runs on separate days on a running track over 1200, 2400, and 3600 m (field test). Reliability between the T10 test and T10 retest showed a CoV of 3.4%, LoA of 0.05 ± 0.39 m.s −1 , and an ICC of 0.93. Validity showed that speed (m.s −1 ) (T10 retest: 3.86 ± 0.51; field test: 3.88 ± 0.55) did not differ between trials. The T10 retest was highly correlated with the field test, r = 0.93, and the standard error for the estimate of CS using the T10 retest was 0.06 m.s −1 , and the LoA was 0.02 ± 0.40 m.s −1 . A submaximal 10-min treadmill test (T10) provides a practical and accessible method to estimate CS.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/02640414.2020.1847504
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2514989998</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2461000162</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-57efe2d3911340f8605f969d559e856836862c93fb2e168c9e786c0073b068513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEQgIMotlZ_grLgxcvWyXOTm1J8QcGLgreQZrOwZXdTk120_94sbT148DTD8M3rQ-gSwxyDhFsgggHDbE6ApJJkBQd2hKaYCZEzVnwco-nI5CM0QWcxrgEwwxyfogmlWIEgMEX8PovDqjXfdWuarA_OlG3dpMzFPut9tgmurG2f2VD3tU1I3DhXnqOTyjTRXezjDL0_PrwtnvPl69PL4n6ZW6pYn_PCVY6UVGFMGVRSAK-UUCXnykkuJBVSEKtotSIOC2mVK6SwAAVdgZAc0xm62c3dBP85pJN0W0frmsZ0zg9REyYwpLcESej1H3Tth9Cl6zThmCmplJKJ4jvKBh9jcJXehPR52GoMevSqD1716FXvvaa-q_30JMuVv10HkQm42wF1V_nQmi8fmlL3Ztv4UAXT2Tpq-v-OH4F0g3c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2514989998</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A submaximal treadmill test to predict critical speed</title><source>EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus with Full Text</source><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Follador, Lucio ; de Borba, Edilson Fernando ; Neto, Armando Luiz Bomfim ; da Silva, Sergio Gregorio</creator><creatorcontrib>Follador, Lucio ; de Borba, Edilson Fernando ; Neto, Armando Luiz Bomfim ; da Silva, Sergio Gregorio</creatorcontrib><description>We assessed the reliability and validity of a 10-min submaximal treadmill test (T10) to predict critical speed (CS). Forty-two runners completed a familiarization trial plus two experimental trials (T10 test and T10 retest). Reliability between the T10 test and T10 retest was assessed using coefficient of variation (CoV), limits of agreement (LoA) and intraclass correlation (ICC). For validity, the speed from the T10 retest was compared with the CS determined from 3 runs on separate days on a running track over 1200, 2400, and 3600 m (field test). Reliability between the T10 test and T10 retest showed a CoV of 3.4%, LoA of 0.05 ± 0.39 m.s −1 , and an ICC of 0.93. Validity showed that speed (m.s −1 ) (T10 retest: 3.86 ± 0.51; field test: 3.88 ± 0.55) did not differ between trials. The T10 retest was highly correlated with the field test, r = 0.93, and the standard error for the estimate of CS using the T10 retest was 0.06 m.s −1 , and the LoA was 0.02 ± 0.40 m.s −1 . A submaximal 10-min treadmill test (T10) provides a practical and accessible method to estimate CS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-0414</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-447X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1847504</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33190620</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Routledge</publisher><subject>Adult ; endurance ; Exercise intensity ; Exercise intensity domains ; Exercise Test ; Female ; Fitness equipment ; Humans ; Male ; metabolic steady state ; Oxygen Consumption ; Reproducibility of Results ; running ; Running - physiology ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Journal of sports sciences, 2021-04, Vol.39 (8), p.835-844</ispartof><rights>2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2020</rights><rights>2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-57efe2d3911340f8605f969d559e856836862c93fb2e168c9e786c0073b068513</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-57efe2d3911340f8605f969d559e856836862c93fb2e168c9e786c0073b068513</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0714-1338 ; 0000-0001-9215-4274 ; 0000-0002-9399-1098</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33190620$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Follador, Lucio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Borba, Edilson Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neto, Armando Luiz Bomfim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva, Sergio Gregorio</creatorcontrib><title>A submaximal treadmill test to predict critical speed</title><title>Journal of sports sciences</title><addtitle>J Sports Sci</addtitle><description>We assessed the reliability and validity of a 10-min submaximal treadmill test (T10) to predict critical speed (CS). Forty-two runners completed a familiarization trial plus two experimental trials (T10 test and T10 retest). Reliability between the T10 test and T10 retest was assessed using coefficient of variation (CoV), limits of agreement (LoA) and intraclass correlation (ICC). For validity, the speed from the T10 retest was compared with the CS determined from 3 runs on separate days on a running track over 1200, 2400, and 3600 m (field test). Reliability between the T10 test and T10 retest showed a CoV of 3.4%, LoA of 0.05 ± 0.39 m.s −1 , and an ICC of 0.93. Validity showed that speed (m.s −1 ) (T10 retest: 3.86 ± 0.51; field test: 3.88 ± 0.55) did not differ between trials. The T10 retest was highly correlated with the field test, r = 0.93, and the standard error for the estimate of CS using the T10 retest was 0.06 m.s −1 , and the LoA was 0.02 ± 0.40 m.s −1 . A submaximal 10-min treadmill test (T10) provides a practical and accessible method to estimate CS.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>endurance</subject><subject>Exercise intensity</subject><subject>Exercise intensity domains</subject><subject>Exercise Test</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fitness equipment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>metabolic steady state</subject><subject>Oxygen Consumption</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>running</subject><subject>Running - physiology</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0264-0414</issn><issn>1466-447X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEQgIMotlZ_grLgxcvWyXOTm1J8QcGLgreQZrOwZXdTk120_94sbT148DTD8M3rQ-gSwxyDhFsgggHDbE6ApJJkBQd2hKaYCZEzVnwco-nI5CM0QWcxrgEwwxyfogmlWIEgMEX8PovDqjXfdWuarA_OlG3dpMzFPut9tgmurG2f2VD3tU1I3DhXnqOTyjTRXezjDL0_PrwtnvPl69PL4n6ZW6pYn_PCVY6UVGFMGVRSAK-UUCXnykkuJBVSEKtotSIOC2mVK6SwAAVdgZAc0xm62c3dBP85pJN0W0frmsZ0zg9REyYwpLcESej1H3Tth9Cl6zThmCmplJKJ4jvKBh9jcJXehPR52GoMevSqD1716FXvvaa-q_30JMuVv10HkQm42wF1V_nQmi8fmlL3Ztv4UAXT2Tpq-v-OH4F0g3c</recordid><startdate>20210418</startdate><enddate>20210418</enddate><creator>Follador, Lucio</creator><creator>de Borba, Edilson Fernando</creator><creator>Neto, Armando Luiz Bomfim</creator><creator>da Silva, Sergio Gregorio</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0714-1338</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9215-4274</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9399-1098</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210418</creationdate><title>A submaximal treadmill test to predict critical speed</title><author>Follador, Lucio ; de Borba, Edilson Fernando ; Neto, Armando Luiz Bomfim ; da Silva, Sergio Gregorio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-57efe2d3911340f8605f969d559e856836862c93fb2e168c9e786c0073b068513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>endurance</topic><topic>Exercise intensity</topic><topic>Exercise intensity domains</topic><topic>Exercise Test</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fitness equipment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>metabolic steady state</topic><topic>Oxygen Consumption</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>running</topic><topic>Running - physiology</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Follador, Lucio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Borba, Edilson Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neto, Armando Luiz Bomfim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva, Sergio Gregorio</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of sports sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Follador, Lucio</au><au>de Borba, Edilson Fernando</au><au>Neto, Armando Luiz Bomfim</au><au>da Silva, Sergio Gregorio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A submaximal treadmill test to predict critical speed</atitle><jtitle>Journal of sports sciences</jtitle><addtitle>J Sports Sci</addtitle><date>2021-04-18</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>835</spage><epage>844</epage><pages>835-844</pages><issn>0264-0414</issn><eissn>1466-447X</eissn><abstract>We assessed the reliability and validity of a 10-min submaximal treadmill test (T10) to predict critical speed (CS). Forty-two runners completed a familiarization trial plus two experimental trials (T10 test and T10 retest). Reliability between the T10 test and T10 retest was assessed using coefficient of variation (CoV), limits of agreement (LoA) and intraclass correlation (ICC). For validity, the speed from the T10 retest was compared with the CS determined from 3 runs on separate days on a running track over 1200, 2400, and 3600 m (field test). Reliability between the T10 test and T10 retest showed a CoV of 3.4%, LoA of 0.05 ± 0.39 m.s −1 , and an ICC of 0.93. Validity showed that speed (m.s −1 ) (T10 retest: 3.86 ± 0.51; field test: 3.88 ± 0.55) did not differ between trials. The T10 retest was highly correlated with the field test, r = 0.93, and the standard error for the estimate of CS using the T10 retest was 0.06 m.s −1 , and the LoA was 0.02 ± 0.40 m.s −1 . A submaximal 10-min treadmill test (T10) provides a practical and accessible method to estimate CS.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><pmid>33190620</pmid><doi>10.1080/02640414.2020.1847504</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0714-1338</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9215-4274</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9399-1098</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0264-0414
ispartof Journal of sports sciences, 2021-04, Vol.39 (8), p.835-844
issn 0264-0414
1466-447X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2514989998
source EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus with Full Text; Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection
subjects Adult
endurance
Exercise intensity
Exercise intensity domains
Exercise Test
Female
Fitness equipment
Humans
Male
metabolic steady state
Oxygen Consumption
Reproducibility of Results
running
Running - physiology
Validity
title A submaximal treadmill test to predict critical speed
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T08%3A23%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20submaximal%20treadmill%20test%20to%20predict%20critical%20speed&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20sports%20sciences&rft.au=Follador,%20Lucio&rft.date=2021-04-18&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=835&rft.epage=844&rft.pages=835-844&rft.issn=0264-0414&rft.eissn=1466-447X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02640414.2020.1847504&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2461000162%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-57efe2d3911340f8605f969d559e856836862c93fb2e168c9e786c0073b068513%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2514989998&rft_id=info:pmid/33190620&rfr_iscdi=true