Loading…
A submaximal treadmill test to predict critical speed
We assessed the reliability and validity of a 10-min submaximal treadmill test (T10) to predict critical speed (CS). Forty-two runners completed a familiarization trial plus two experimental trials (T10 test and T10 retest). Reliability between the T10 test and T10 retest was assessed using coeffici...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of sports sciences 2021-04, Vol.39 (8), p.835-844 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-57efe2d3911340f8605f969d559e856836862c93fb2e168c9e786c0073b068513 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-57efe2d3911340f8605f969d559e856836862c93fb2e168c9e786c0073b068513 |
container_end_page | 844 |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 835 |
container_title | Journal of sports sciences |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Follador, Lucio de Borba, Edilson Fernando Neto, Armando Luiz Bomfim da Silva, Sergio Gregorio |
description | We assessed the reliability and validity of a 10-min submaximal treadmill test (T10) to predict critical speed (CS). Forty-two runners completed a familiarization trial plus two experimental trials (T10 test and T10 retest). Reliability between the T10 test and T10 retest was assessed using coefficient of variation (CoV), limits of agreement (LoA) and intraclass correlation (ICC). For validity, the speed from the T10 retest was compared with the CS determined from 3 runs on separate days on a running track over 1200, 2400, and 3600 m (field test). Reliability between the T10 test and T10 retest showed a CoV of 3.4%, LoA of 0.05 ± 0.39 m.s
−1
, and an ICC of 0.93. Validity showed that speed (m.s
−1
) (T10 retest: 3.86 ± 0.51; field test: 3.88 ± 0.55) did not differ between trials. The T10 retest was highly correlated with the field test, r = 0.93, and the standard error for the estimate of CS using the T10 retest was 0.06 m.s
−1
, and the LoA was 0.02 ± 0.40 m.s
−1
. A submaximal 10-min treadmill test (T10) provides a practical and accessible method to estimate CS. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/02640414.2020.1847504 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2514989998</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2461000162</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-57efe2d3911340f8605f969d559e856836862c93fb2e168c9e786c0073b068513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEQgIMotlZ_grLgxcvWyXOTm1J8QcGLgreQZrOwZXdTk120_94sbT148DTD8M3rQ-gSwxyDhFsgggHDbE6ApJJkBQd2hKaYCZEzVnwco-nI5CM0QWcxrgEwwxyfogmlWIEgMEX8PovDqjXfdWuarA_OlG3dpMzFPut9tgmurG2f2VD3tU1I3DhXnqOTyjTRXezjDL0_PrwtnvPl69PL4n6ZW6pYn_PCVY6UVGFMGVRSAK-UUCXnykkuJBVSEKtotSIOC2mVK6SwAAVdgZAc0xm62c3dBP85pJN0W0frmsZ0zg9REyYwpLcESej1H3Tth9Cl6zThmCmplJKJ4jvKBh9jcJXehPR52GoMevSqD1716FXvvaa-q_30JMuVv10HkQm42wF1V_nQmi8fmlL3Ztv4UAXT2Tpq-v-OH4F0g3c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2514989998</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A submaximal treadmill test to predict critical speed</title><source>EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus with Full Text</source><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Follador, Lucio ; de Borba, Edilson Fernando ; Neto, Armando Luiz Bomfim ; da Silva, Sergio Gregorio</creator><creatorcontrib>Follador, Lucio ; de Borba, Edilson Fernando ; Neto, Armando Luiz Bomfim ; da Silva, Sergio Gregorio</creatorcontrib><description>We assessed the reliability and validity of a 10-min submaximal treadmill test (T10) to predict critical speed (CS). Forty-two runners completed a familiarization trial plus two experimental trials (T10 test and T10 retest). Reliability between the T10 test and T10 retest was assessed using coefficient of variation (CoV), limits of agreement (LoA) and intraclass correlation (ICC). For validity, the speed from the T10 retest was compared with the CS determined from 3 runs on separate days on a running track over 1200, 2400, and 3600 m (field test). Reliability between the T10 test and T10 retest showed a CoV of 3.4%, LoA of 0.05 ± 0.39 m.s
−1
, and an ICC of 0.93. Validity showed that speed (m.s
−1
) (T10 retest: 3.86 ± 0.51; field test: 3.88 ± 0.55) did not differ between trials. The T10 retest was highly correlated with the field test, r = 0.93, and the standard error for the estimate of CS using the T10 retest was 0.06 m.s
−1
, and the LoA was 0.02 ± 0.40 m.s
−1
. A submaximal 10-min treadmill test (T10) provides a practical and accessible method to estimate CS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-0414</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-447X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1847504</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33190620</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Routledge</publisher><subject>Adult ; endurance ; Exercise intensity ; Exercise intensity domains ; Exercise Test ; Female ; Fitness equipment ; Humans ; Male ; metabolic steady state ; Oxygen Consumption ; Reproducibility of Results ; running ; Running - physiology ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Journal of sports sciences, 2021-04, Vol.39 (8), p.835-844</ispartof><rights>2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2020</rights><rights>2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-57efe2d3911340f8605f969d559e856836862c93fb2e168c9e786c0073b068513</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-57efe2d3911340f8605f969d559e856836862c93fb2e168c9e786c0073b068513</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0714-1338 ; 0000-0001-9215-4274 ; 0000-0002-9399-1098</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33190620$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Follador, Lucio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Borba, Edilson Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neto, Armando Luiz Bomfim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva, Sergio Gregorio</creatorcontrib><title>A submaximal treadmill test to predict critical speed</title><title>Journal of sports sciences</title><addtitle>J Sports Sci</addtitle><description>We assessed the reliability and validity of a 10-min submaximal treadmill test (T10) to predict critical speed (CS). Forty-two runners completed a familiarization trial plus two experimental trials (T10 test and T10 retest). Reliability between the T10 test and T10 retest was assessed using coefficient of variation (CoV), limits of agreement (LoA) and intraclass correlation (ICC). For validity, the speed from the T10 retest was compared with the CS determined from 3 runs on separate days on a running track over 1200, 2400, and 3600 m (field test). Reliability between the T10 test and T10 retest showed a CoV of 3.4%, LoA of 0.05 ± 0.39 m.s
−1
, and an ICC of 0.93. Validity showed that speed (m.s
−1
) (T10 retest: 3.86 ± 0.51; field test: 3.88 ± 0.55) did not differ between trials. The T10 retest was highly correlated with the field test, r = 0.93, and the standard error for the estimate of CS using the T10 retest was 0.06 m.s
−1
, and the LoA was 0.02 ± 0.40 m.s
−1
. A submaximal 10-min treadmill test (T10) provides a practical and accessible method to estimate CS.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>endurance</subject><subject>Exercise intensity</subject><subject>Exercise intensity domains</subject><subject>Exercise Test</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fitness equipment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>metabolic steady state</subject><subject>Oxygen Consumption</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>running</subject><subject>Running - physiology</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0264-0414</issn><issn>1466-447X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEQgIMotlZ_grLgxcvWyXOTm1J8QcGLgreQZrOwZXdTk120_94sbT148DTD8M3rQ-gSwxyDhFsgggHDbE6ApJJkBQd2hKaYCZEzVnwco-nI5CM0QWcxrgEwwxyfogmlWIEgMEX8PovDqjXfdWuarA_OlG3dpMzFPut9tgmurG2f2VD3tU1I3DhXnqOTyjTRXezjDL0_PrwtnvPl69PL4n6ZW6pYn_PCVY6UVGFMGVRSAK-UUCXnykkuJBVSEKtotSIOC2mVK6SwAAVdgZAc0xm62c3dBP85pJN0W0frmsZ0zg9REyYwpLcESej1H3Tth9Cl6zThmCmplJKJ4jvKBh9jcJXehPR52GoMevSqD1716FXvvaa-q_30JMuVv10HkQm42wF1V_nQmi8fmlL3Ztv4UAXT2Tpq-v-OH4F0g3c</recordid><startdate>20210418</startdate><enddate>20210418</enddate><creator>Follador, Lucio</creator><creator>de Borba, Edilson Fernando</creator><creator>Neto, Armando Luiz Bomfim</creator><creator>da Silva, Sergio Gregorio</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0714-1338</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9215-4274</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9399-1098</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210418</creationdate><title>A submaximal treadmill test to predict critical speed</title><author>Follador, Lucio ; de Borba, Edilson Fernando ; Neto, Armando Luiz Bomfim ; da Silva, Sergio Gregorio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-57efe2d3911340f8605f969d559e856836862c93fb2e168c9e786c0073b068513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>endurance</topic><topic>Exercise intensity</topic><topic>Exercise intensity domains</topic><topic>Exercise Test</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fitness equipment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>metabolic steady state</topic><topic>Oxygen Consumption</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>running</topic><topic>Running - physiology</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Follador, Lucio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Borba, Edilson Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neto, Armando Luiz Bomfim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva, Sergio Gregorio</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of sports sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Follador, Lucio</au><au>de Borba, Edilson Fernando</au><au>Neto, Armando Luiz Bomfim</au><au>da Silva, Sergio Gregorio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A submaximal treadmill test to predict critical speed</atitle><jtitle>Journal of sports sciences</jtitle><addtitle>J Sports Sci</addtitle><date>2021-04-18</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>835</spage><epage>844</epage><pages>835-844</pages><issn>0264-0414</issn><eissn>1466-447X</eissn><abstract>We assessed the reliability and validity of a 10-min submaximal treadmill test (T10) to predict critical speed (CS). Forty-two runners completed a familiarization trial plus two experimental trials (T10 test and T10 retest). Reliability between the T10 test and T10 retest was assessed using coefficient of variation (CoV), limits of agreement (LoA) and intraclass correlation (ICC). For validity, the speed from the T10 retest was compared with the CS determined from 3 runs on separate days on a running track over 1200, 2400, and 3600 m (field test). Reliability between the T10 test and T10 retest showed a CoV of 3.4%, LoA of 0.05 ± 0.39 m.s
−1
, and an ICC of 0.93. Validity showed that speed (m.s
−1
) (T10 retest: 3.86 ± 0.51; field test: 3.88 ± 0.55) did not differ between trials. The T10 retest was highly correlated with the field test, r = 0.93, and the standard error for the estimate of CS using the T10 retest was 0.06 m.s
−1
, and the LoA was 0.02 ± 0.40 m.s
−1
. A submaximal 10-min treadmill test (T10) provides a practical and accessible method to estimate CS.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><pmid>33190620</pmid><doi>10.1080/02640414.2020.1847504</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0714-1338</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9215-4274</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9399-1098</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0264-0414 |
ispartof | Journal of sports sciences, 2021-04, Vol.39 (8), p.835-844 |
issn | 0264-0414 1466-447X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2514989998 |
source | EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus with Full Text; Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection |
subjects | Adult endurance Exercise intensity Exercise intensity domains Exercise Test Female Fitness equipment Humans Male metabolic steady state Oxygen Consumption Reproducibility of Results running Running - physiology Validity |
title | A submaximal treadmill test to predict critical speed |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T08%3A23%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20submaximal%20treadmill%20test%20to%20predict%20critical%20speed&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20sports%20sciences&rft.au=Follador,%20Lucio&rft.date=2021-04-18&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=835&rft.epage=844&rft.pages=835-844&rft.issn=0264-0414&rft.eissn=1466-447X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02640414.2020.1847504&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2461000162%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-57efe2d3911340f8605f969d559e856836862c93fb2e168c9e786c0073b068513%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2514989998&rft_id=info:pmid/33190620&rfr_iscdi=true |