Loading…
Short‐Term Guideline Values for Chlorine in Freshwaters
The current Australian and New Zealand default guideline value of 3 µg Cl/L for total residual chlorine in freshwaters is largely based on acute data converted to chronic data using a default acute to chronic ratio of 10, without consideration of chlorine decomposition. Given the rapid decomposition...
Saved in:
Published in: | Environmental toxicology and chemistry 2021-05, Vol.40 (5), p.1341-1352 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-e4d3b03ca854b689c6cacb41c5868147425b31c0a4de6ed1afdcf64daab58d553 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-e4d3b03ca854b689c6cacb41c5868147425b31c0a4de6ed1afdcf64daab58d553 |
container_end_page | 1352 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1341 |
container_title | Environmental toxicology and chemistry |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Batley, Graeme E. Adams, Merrin S. Simpson, Stuart L. |
description | The current Australian and New Zealand default guideline value of 3 µg Cl/L for total residual chlorine in freshwaters is largely based on acute data converted to chronic data using a default acute to chronic ratio of 10, without consideration of chlorine decomposition. Given the rapid decomposition of chlorine, initially as hypochlorite and then as chloramine, it is appropriate to consider a guideline value based on short‐term (acute) toxicity rather than one based on longer‐term chronic data, as has been recommended for chlorine in marine waters. The literature on the fate of chlorine in drinking water discharged to freshwaters and on the ecotoxicity of total residual chlorine has been reviewed, and on the basis of this, revised default guideline values were derived for both hypochlorite and chloramine in freshwater using a species sensitivity distribution of toxicity data. The values for 95% species protection were 7 and 9 µg Cl/L as total residual chlorine, respectively. The former would apply to any total residual chlorine‐containing effluent, but in the case of drinking water where dechlorination has been undertaken, the chloramine‐based default guideline value is likely to be more appropriate. Both are likely to be conservative because they were largely based on toxicity testing under continuous flow‐through conditions. They will apply at the edge of the mixing zone, and the variable receiving water concentration at this point might best be determined from a time‐weighted average total residual chlorine concentration. Environ Toxicol Chem 2021;40:1341–1352. © 2021 SETAC |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/etc.4984 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2516724816</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2516724816</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-e4d3b03ca854b689c6cacb41c5868147425b31c0a4de6ed1afdcf64daab58d553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFKAzEQQIMotlbBL5AFL162JptJNjlKaatQ8GD1GrJJlm7ZdmuyS-nNT_Ab_RJTW715Ghgeb4aH0DXBQ4Jxdu9aMwQp4AT1CWNZKjgRp6iPc4rTPOOihy5CWGJMuJTyHPUoBc4ykH0kXxaNb78-PufOr5JpV1lXV2uXvOm6cyEpG5-MFnXj97tqnUy8C4utbp0Pl-is1HVwV8c5QK-T8Xz0mM6ep0-jh1lqAOeQOrC0wNRowaDgQhputCmAGCa4IJBDxgpKDNZgHXeW6NKakoPVumDCMkYH6Pbg3fjmPf7UqmXT-XU8qTJGeJ6BIDxSdwfK-CYE70q18dVK-50iWO0bqdhI7RtF9OYo7IqVs3_gb5QIpAdgW9Vu969IReZH-A1bZXBB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2516724816</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Short‐Term Guideline Values for Chlorine in Freshwaters</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Batley, Graeme E. ; Adams, Merrin S. ; Simpson, Stuart L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Batley, Graeme E. ; Adams, Merrin S. ; Simpson, Stuart L.</creatorcontrib><description>The current Australian and New Zealand default guideline value of 3 µg Cl/L for total residual chlorine in freshwaters is largely based on acute data converted to chronic data using a default acute to chronic ratio of 10, without consideration of chlorine decomposition. Given the rapid decomposition of chlorine, initially as hypochlorite and then as chloramine, it is appropriate to consider a guideline value based on short‐term (acute) toxicity rather than one based on longer‐term chronic data, as has been recommended for chlorine in marine waters. The literature on the fate of chlorine in drinking water discharged to freshwaters and on the ecotoxicity of total residual chlorine has been reviewed, and on the basis of this, revised default guideline values were derived for both hypochlorite and chloramine in freshwater using a species sensitivity distribution of toxicity data. The values for 95% species protection were 7 and 9 µg Cl/L as total residual chlorine, respectively. The former would apply to any total residual chlorine‐containing effluent, but in the case of drinking water where dechlorination has been undertaken, the chloramine‐based default guideline value is likely to be more appropriate. Both are likely to be conservative because they were largely based on toxicity testing under continuous flow‐through conditions. They will apply at the edge of the mixing zone, and the variable receiving water concentration at this point might best be determined from a time‐weighted average total residual chlorine concentration. Environ Toxicol Chem 2021;40:1341–1352. © 2021 SETAC</description><identifier>ISSN: 0730-7268</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-8618</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/etc.4984</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33465249</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Chlorine ; Continuous flow ; Dechlorination ; Decomposition ; Drinking water ; Ecotoxicity ; Fresh water ; Geographical distribution ; Protected species ; Receiving waters ; Residual chlorine ; Short‐term guideline value ; Total residual chlorine ; Toxicity testing</subject><ispartof>Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2021-05, Vol.40 (5), p.1341-1352</ispartof><rights>2021 SETAC</rights><rights>2021 SETAC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-e4d3b03ca854b689c6cacb41c5868147425b31c0a4de6ed1afdcf64daab58d553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-e4d3b03ca854b689c6cacb41c5868147425b31c0a4de6ed1afdcf64daab58d553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33465249$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Batley, Graeme E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Merrin S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Stuart L.</creatorcontrib><title>Short‐Term Guideline Values for Chlorine in Freshwaters</title><title>Environmental toxicology and chemistry</title><addtitle>Environ Toxicol Chem</addtitle><description>The current Australian and New Zealand default guideline value of 3 µg Cl/L for total residual chlorine in freshwaters is largely based on acute data converted to chronic data using a default acute to chronic ratio of 10, without consideration of chlorine decomposition. Given the rapid decomposition of chlorine, initially as hypochlorite and then as chloramine, it is appropriate to consider a guideline value based on short‐term (acute) toxicity rather than one based on longer‐term chronic data, as has been recommended for chlorine in marine waters. The literature on the fate of chlorine in drinking water discharged to freshwaters and on the ecotoxicity of total residual chlorine has been reviewed, and on the basis of this, revised default guideline values were derived for both hypochlorite and chloramine in freshwater using a species sensitivity distribution of toxicity data. The values for 95% species protection were 7 and 9 µg Cl/L as total residual chlorine, respectively. The former would apply to any total residual chlorine‐containing effluent, but in the case of drinking water where dechlorination has been undertaken, the chloramine‐based default guideline value is likely to be more appropriate. Both are likely to be conservative because they were largely based on toxicity testing under continuous flow‐through conditions. They will apply at the edge of the mixing zone, and the variable receiving water concentration at this point might best be determined from a time‐weighted average total residual chlorine concentration. Environ Toxicol Chem 2021;40:1341–1352. © 2021 SETAC</description><subject>Chlorine</subject><subject>Continuous flow</subject><subject>Dechlorination</subject><subject>Decomposition</subject><subject>Drinking water</subject><subject>Ecotoxicity</subject><subject>Fresh water</subject><subject>Geographical distribution</subject><subject>Protected species</subject><subject>Receiving waters</subject><subject>Residual chlorine</subject><subject>Short‐term guideline value</subject><subject>Total residual chlorine</subject><subject>Toxicity testing</subject><issn>0730-7268</issn><issn>1552-8618</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMFKAzEQQIMotlbBL5AFL162JptJNjlKaatQ8GD1GrJJlm7ZdmuyS-nNT_Ab_RJTW715Ghgeb4aH0DXBQ4Jxdu9aMwQp4AT1CWNZKjgRp6iPc4rTPOOihy5CWGJMuJTyHPUoBc4ykH0kXxaNb78-PufOr5JpV1lXV2uXvOm6cyEpG5-MFnXj97tqnUy8C4utbp0Pl-is1HVwV8c5QK-T8Xz0mM6ep0-jh1lqAOeQOrC0wNRowaDgQhputCmAGCa4IJBDxgpKDNZgHXeW6NKakoPVumDCMkYH6Pbg3fjmPf7UqmXT-XU8qTJGeJ6BIDxSdwfK-CYE70q18dVK-50iWO0bqdhI7RtF9OYo7IqVs3_gb5QIpAdgW9Vu969IReZH-A1bZXBB</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Batley, Graeme E.</creator><creator>Adams, Merrin S.</creator><creator>Simpson, Stuart L.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>Short‐Term Guideline Values for Chlorine in Freshwaters</title><author>Batley, Graeme E. ; Adams, Merrin S. ; Simpson, Stuart L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-e4d3b03ca854b689c6cacb41c5868147425b31c0a4de6ed1afdcf64daab58d553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Chlorine</topic><topic>Continuous flow</topic><topic>Dechlorination</topic><topic>Decomposition</topic><topic>Drinking water</topic><topic>Ecotoxicity</topic><topic>Fresh water</topic><topic>Geographical distribution</topic><topic>Protected species</topic><topic>Receiving waters</topic><topic>Residual chlorine</topic><topic>Short‐term guideline value</topic><topic>Total residual chlorine</topic><topic>Toxicity testing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Batley, Graeme E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Merrin S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Stuart L.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental toxicology and chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Batley, Graeme E.</au><au>Adams, Merrin S.</au><au>Simpson, Stuart L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Short‐Term Guideline Values for Chlorine in Freshwaters</atitle><jtitle>Environmental toxicology and chemistry</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Toxicol Chem</addtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1341</spage><epage>1352</epage><pages>1341-1352</pages><issn>0730-7268</issn><eissn>1552-8618</eissn><abstract>The current Australian and New Zealand default guideline value of 3 µg Cl/L for total residual chlorine in freshwaters is largely based on acute data converted to chronic data using a default acute to chronic ratio of 10, without consideration of chlorine decomposition. Given the rapid decomposition of chlorine, initially as hypochlorite and then as chloramine, it is appropriate to consider a guideline value based on short‐term (acute) toxicity rather than one based on longer‐term chronic data, as has been recommended for chlorine in marine waters. The literature on the fate of chlorine in drinking water discharged to freshwaters and on the ecotoxicity of total residual chlorine has been reviewed, and on the basis of this, revised default guideline values were derived for both hypochlorite and chloramine in freshwater using a species sensitivity distribution of toxicity data. The values for 95% species protection were 7 and 9 µg Cl/L as total residual chlorine, respectively. The former would apply to any total residual chlorine‐containing effluent, but in the case of drinking water where dechlorination has been undertaken, the chloramine‐based default guideline value is likely to be more appropriate. Both are likely to be conservative because they were largely based on toxicity testing under continuous flow‐through conditions. They will apply at the edge of the mixing zone, and the variable receiving water concentration at this point might best be determined from a time‐weighted average total residual chlorine concentration. Environ Toxicol Chem 2021;40:1341–1352. © 2021 SETAC</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>33465249</pmid><doi>10.1002/etc.4984</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0730-7268 |
ispartof | Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2021-05, Vol.40 (5), p.1341-1352 |
issn | 0730-7268 1552-8618 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2516724816 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Chlorine Continuous flow Dechlorination Decomposition Drinking water Ecotoxicity Fresh water Geographical distribution Protected species Receiving waters Residual chlorine Short‐term guideline value Total residual chlorine Toxicity testing |
title | Short‐Term Guideline Values for Chlorine in Freshwaters |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T01%3A39%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Short%E2%80%90Term%20Guideline%20Values%20for%20Chlorine%20in%20Freshwaters&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20toxicology%20and%20chemistry&rft.au=Batley,%20Graeme%20E.&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1341&rft.epage=1352&rft.pages=1341-1352&rft.issn=0730-7268&rft.eissn=1552-8618&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/etc.4984&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2516724816%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-e4d3b03ca854b689c6cacb41c5868147425b31c0a4de6ed1afdcf64daab58d553%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2516724816&rft_id=info:pmid/33465249&rfr_iscdi=true |