Loading…

Safety Science directions: The journal

After briefly reviewing literature on safety science as a disciplinary domain, the paper analyses safety science topics from four years of the journal (2017–2020), revealing the numerous topics and domains represented. This analysis revealed a strong weighting towards transport (particularly road),...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Safety science 2021-03, Vol.135, p.105127, Article 105127
Main Author: Glendon, A. Ian
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-e9c38c907e480fe15eb0171ec5c8e452ab21615d483778ad1d197d0a8bf102903
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-e9c38c907e480fe15eb0171ec5c8e452ab21615d483778ad1d197d0a8bf102903
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 105127
container_title Safety science
container_volume 135
creator Glendon, A. Ian
description After briefly reviewing literature on safety science as a disciplinary domain, the paper analyses safety science topics from four years of the journal (2017–2020), revealing the numerous topics and domains represented. This analysis revealed a strong weighting towards transport (particularly road), with the list of other industry sectors headed by construction. Numerous risk types and intervention methods were identified in the sample of nearly 1400 papers, as well as diverse human and managerial strategies and multiple theoretical approaches to the study of safety. An authorship breakdown revealed that authors from 69 countries had contributed to Safety Science papers during this 4-year period. Many national ratings were strongly correlated with Safety Science authorship when standardized by country population size and a logarithmic transformation. A multivariate analysis found that two key authorship predictors were country mean income and degree of press freedom. Building on the journal’s existing diverse topic range and international authorship distribution, particularly for collaborative ventures, possible ways forward for the journal included: increasing the number of journal offerings to represent different safety domains, fostering further international collaborations, mandating policy implications of published papers, and generating a preprint paper offering. Future directions for the journal could be explored within an iterative process involving Editorial Board members and other relevant parties.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105127
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2519039324</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0925753520305245</els_id><sourcerecordid>2519039324</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-e9c38c907e480fe15eb0171ec5c8e452ab21615d483778ad1d197d0a8bf102903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfwNOC4G3XmWTTJOJFSv0DBQ-t55BmZzFL7dZkK_Tbu8v27GlgeO_x3o-xW4QCAWcPTZGSDwUHPjwkcnXGJqiVyRFKfs4mYLjMlRTykl2l1AAAihlO2P3K1dQds5UPtPOUVSGS70K7S4_Z-ouypj3Endtes4vabRPdnO6Ufb4s1vO3fPnx-j5_XuZecN3lZLzQ3oCiUkNNKGkDqJC89JpKyd2G4wxlVWqhlHYVVmhUBU5vagRuQEzZ3Zi7j-3PgVJnTwWS5RJ7gRG87FV8VPnYphSptvsYvl08WgQ78LCNHXjYgYcdefSmp9FEff_fQNGmcfM42VZt-M_-B6GmZnw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2519039324</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safety Science directions: The journal</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Glendon, A. Ian</creator><creatorcontrib>Glendon, A. Ian</creatorcontrib><description>After briefly reviewing literature on safety science as a disciplinary domain, the paper analyses safety science topics from four years of the journal (2017–2020), revealing the numerous topics and domains represented. This analysis revealed a strong weighting towards transport (particularly road), with the list of other industry sectors headed by construction. Numerous risk types and intervention methods were identified in the sample of nearly 1400 papers, as well as diverse human and managerial strategies and multiple theoretical approaches to the study of safety. An authorship breakdown revealed that authors from 69 countries had contributed to Safety Science papers during this 4-year period. Many national ratings were strongly correlated with Safety Science authorship when standardized by country population size and a logarithmic transformation. A multivariate analysis found that two key authorship predictors were country mean income and degree of press freedom. Building on the journal’s existing diverse topic range and international authorship distribution, particularly for collaborative ventures, possible ways forward for the journal included: increasing the number of journal offerings to represent different safety domains, fostering further international collaborations, mandating policy implications of published papers, and generating a preprint paper offering. Future directions for the journal could be explored within an iterative process involving Editorial Board members and other relevant parties.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0925-7535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1042</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105127</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Authoring ; Bibliometrics ; Construction ; Disciplinary domain ; Domains ; Global indices ; International science ; Multivariate analysis ; Occupational safety ; Paper authorship ; Population number ; Safety ; Safety management ; Scientific collaboration</subject><ispartof>Safety science, 2021-03, Vol.135, p.105127, Article 105127</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Mar 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-e9c38c907e480fe15eb0171ec5c8e452ab21615d483778ad1d197d0a8bf102903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-e9c38c907e480fe15eb0171ec5c8e452ab21615d483778ad1d197d0a8bf102903</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Glendon, A. Ian</creatorcontrib><title>Safety Science directions: The journal</title><title>Safety science</title><description>After briefly reviewing literature on safety science as a disciplinary domain, the paper analyses safety science topics from four years of the journal (2017–2020), revealing the numerous topics and domains represented. This analysis revealed a strong weighting towards transport (particularly road), with the list of other industry sectors headed by construction. Numerous risk types and intervention methods were identified in the sample of nearly 1400 papers, as well as diverse human and managerial strategies and multiple theoretical approaches to the study of safety. An authorship breakdown revealed that authors from 69 countries had contributed to Safety Science papers during this 4-year period. Many national ratings were strongly correlated with Safety Science authorship when standardized by country population size and a logarithmic transformation. A multivariate analysis found that two key authorship predictors were country mean income and degree of press freedom. Building on the journal’s existing diverse topic range and international authorship distribution, particularly for collaborative ventures, possible ways forward for the journal included: increasing the number of journal offerings to represent different safety domains, fostering further international collaborations, mandating policy implications of published papers, and generating a preprint paper offering. Future directions for the journal could be explored within an iterative process involving Editorial Board members and other relevant parties.</description><subject>Authoring</subject><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Disciplinary domain</subject><subject>Domains</subject><subject>Global indices</subject><subject>International science</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Occupational safety</subject><subject>Paper authorship</subject><subject>Population number</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Safety management</subject><subject>Scientific collaboration</subject><issn>0925-7535</issn><issn>1879-1042</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfwNOC4G3XmWTTJOJFSv0DBQ-t55BmZzFL7dZkK_Tbu8v27GlgeO_x3o-xW4QCAWcPTZGSDwUHPjwkcnXGJqiVyRFKfs4mYLjMlRTykl2l1AAAihlO2P3K1dQds5UPtPOUVSGS70K7S4_Z-ouypj3Endtes4vabRPdnO6Ufb4s1vO3fPnx-j5_XuZecN3lZLzQ3oCiUkNNKGkDqJC89JpKyd2G4wxlVWqhlHYVVmhUBU5vagRuQEzZ3Zi7j-3PgVJnTwWS5RJ7gRG87FV8VPnYphSptvsYvl08WgQ78LCNHXjYgYcdefSmp9FEff_fQNGmcfM42VZt-M_-B6GmZnw</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>Glendon, A. Ian</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>Safety Science directions: The journal</title><author>Glendon, A. Ian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-e9c38c907e480fe15eb0171ec5c8e452ab21615d483778ad1d197d0a8bf102903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Authoring</topic><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Disciplinary domain</topic><topic>Domains</topic><topic>Global indices</topic><topic>International science</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Occupational safety</topic><topic>Paper authorship</topic><topic>Population number</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Safety management</topic><topic>Scientific collaboration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Glendon, A. Ian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Safety science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Glendon, A. Ian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safety Science directions: The journal</atitle><jtitle>Safety science</jtitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>135</volume><spage>105127</spage><pages>105127-</pages><artnum>105127</artnum><issn>0925-7535</issn><eissn>1879-1042</eissn><abstract>After briefly reviewing literature on safety science as a disciplinary domain, the paper analyses safety science topics from four years of the journal (2017–2020), revealing the numerous topics and domains represented. This analysis revealed a strong weighting towards transport (particularly road), with the list of other industry sectors headed by construction. Numerous risk types and intervention methods were identified in the sample of nearly 1400 papers, as well as diverse human and managerial strategies and multiple theoretical approaches to the study of safety. An authorship breakdown revealed that authors from 69 countries had contributed to Safety Science papers during this 4-year period. Many national ratings were strongly correlated with Safety Science authorship when standardized by country population size and a logarithmic transformation. A multivariate analysis found that two key authorship predictors were country mean income and degree of press freedom. Building on the journal’s existing diverse topic range and international authorship distribution, particularly for collaborative ventures, possible ways forward for the journal included: increasing the number of journal offerings to represent different safety domains, fostering further international collaborations, mandating policy implications of published papers, and generating a preprint paper offering. Future directions for the journal could be explored within an iterative process involving Editorial Board members and other relevant parties.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105127</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0925-7535
ispartof Safety science, 2021-03, Vol.135, p.105127, Article 105127
issn 0925-7535
1879-1042
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2519039324
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Authoring
Bibliometrics
Construction
Disciplinary domain
Domains
Global indices
International science
Multivariate analysis
Occupational safety
Paper authorship
Population number
Safety
Safety management
Scientific collaboration
title Safety Science directions: The journal
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T02%3A28%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety%20Science%20directions:%20The%20journal&rft.jtitle=Safety%20science&rft.au=Glendon,%20A.%20Ian&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=135&rft.spage=105127&rft.pages=105127-&rft.artnum=105127&rft.issn=0925-7535&rft.eissn=1879-1042&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105127&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2519039324%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-e9c38c907e480fe15eb0171ec5c8e452ab21615d483778ad1d197d0a8bf102903%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2519039324&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true