Loading…
Tailoring properties of polylactic acid/rubber/kenaf biocomposites: Effects of type of rubber and kenaf loading
Polylactic acid (PLA) biocomposites were prepared by melt blending in an internal mixer with various types of rubber. The rubber was 90/10 wt% and was mixed before the addition of kenaf fiber (0 to 20 phr). Natural rubber (NR), nitrile butadiene rubber (NBR), and styrene butadiene rubber (SBR) were...
Saved in:
Published in: | Bioresources 2020-08, Vol.15 (3), p.5679-5695 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-9e3062b31c49e85fffbebdc65e893be9846051b36ff145fa1a3747bae3f9ff823 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 5695 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 5679 |
container_title | Bioresources |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Alias, Nur Fazreen Ismail, Hanafi Ku Ishak, Ku Marsilla |
description | Polylactic acid (PLA) biocomposites were prepared by melt blending in an internal mixer with various types of rubber. The rubber was 90/10 wt% and was mixed before the addition of kenaf fiber (0 to 20 phr). Natural rubber (NR), nitrile butadiene rubber (NBR), and styrene butadiene rubber (SBR) were used. The effects of different types of rubber and kenaf loading were investigated based on processing torque, water absorption, mechanical properties, and fractured surface morphology. A similar trend in processing torque was observed throughout the composition of biocomposites. The stabilization torque was highest for the biocomposite with NR, followed by SBR and NBR. Water absorption increased as the kenaf loading increased. The polarity of NBR and SBR contributed to higher water absorption in the biocomposites compared to the NR. The strain-induced crystallization phenomenon and higher green strength of NR contributed to the highest tensile strength, elongation at break, and impact strength of the biocomposite compared to the NBR and SBR toughened PLA/kenaf biocomposite. More plastic deformation and less fiber pullout were observed in the fractured surface morphology. However, by increasing the kenaf loading, the mechanical properties decreased for all biocomposites, which was due to poor interfacial adhesion and agglomeration. |
doi_str_mv | 10.15376/biores.15.3.5679-5695 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2519827485</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2519827485</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-9e3062b31c49e85fffbebdc65e893be9846051b36ff145fa1a3747bae3f9ff823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwCsgS57R2HDsxN1TxJ1XiUs6W7ewil7QOdnro25M2HDjtjjSzo_0IuedswaWo1dKFmCCPYiEWUtW6kErLCzLjWrCi5KW6_Ldfk5uct4xVjeBsRuLGhi6msP-ifYo9pCFAphFpH7tjZ_0QPLU-tMt0cA7S8hv2FunY6OOujzkMkB_pMyL44Rwbjj2c5mSndt_SKdJF244tt-QKbZfh7m_OyefL82b1Vqw_Xt9XT-vCC8GHQoNgqnSC-0pDIxHRgWu9ktBo4UA3lWKSO6EQeSXRcivqqnYWBGrEphRz8jDdHb_6OUAezDYe0n6sNKXkuinrqpGjS00un2LOCdD0KexsOhrOzBmumeCOwghzgmtOcMUvrudxjg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2519827485</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tailoring properties of polylactic acid/rubber/kenaf biocomposites: Effects of type of rubber and kenaf loading</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Alias, Nur Fazreen ; Ismail, Hanafi ; Ku Ishak, Ku Marsilla</creator><creatorcontrib>Alias, Nur Fazreen ; Ismail, Hanafi ; Ku Ishak, Ku Marsilla</creatorcontrib><description>Polylactic acid (PLA) biocomposites were prepared by melt blending in an internal mixer with various types of rubber. The rubber was 90/10 wt% and was mixed before the addition of kenaf fiber (0 to 20 phr). Natural rubber (NR), nitrile butadiene rubber (NBR), and styrene butadiene rubber (SBR) were used. The effects of different types of rubber and kenaf loading were investigated based on processing torque, water absorption, mechanical properties, and fractured surface morphology. A similar trend in processing torque was observed throughout the composition of biocomposites. The stabilization torque was highest for the biocomposite with NR, followed by SBR and NBR. Water absorption increased as the kenaf loading increased. The polarity of NBR and SBR contributed to higher water absorption in the biocomposites compared to the NR. The strain-induced crystallization phenomenon and higher green strength of NR contributed to the highest tensile strength, elongation at break, and impact strength of the biocomposite compared to the NBR and SBR toughened PLA/kenaf biocomposite. More plastic deformation and less fiber pullout were observed in the fractured surface morphology. However, by increasing the kenaf loading, the mechanical properties decreased for all biocomposites, which was due to poor interfacial adhesion and agglomeration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1930-2126</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-2126</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15376/biores.15.3.5679-5695</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Raleigh: North Carolina State University</publisher><subject>Absorption ; Biomedical materials ; Butadiene ; Composite materials ; Crystallization ; Elongation ; Emulsion polymerization ; Fiber pullout ; Green strength ; Impact strength ; Kenaf ; Mechanical properties ; Melt blending ; Molecular weight ; Morphology ; Natural rubber ; Nitrile rubber ; Particle size ; Plastic deformation ; Plastics ; Polarity ; Polyesters ; Polylactic acid ; Polymers ; Rubber ; Styrene ; Surface chemistry ; Tensile strength ; Torque ; Viscosity ; Water absorption</subject><ispartof>Bioresources, 2020-08, Vol.15 (3), p.5679-5695</ispartof><rights>2020. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms available at https://bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu/about-the-journal/editorial-policies</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-9e3062b31c49e85fffbebdc65e893be9846051b36ff145fa1a3747bae3f9ff823</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2519827485/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2519827485?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,74998</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alias, Nur Fazreen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ismail, Hanafi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ku Ishak, Ku Marsilla</creatorcontrib><title>Tailoring properties of polylactic acid/rubber/kenaf biocomposites: Effects of type of rubber and kenaf loading</title><title>Bioresources</title><description>Polylactic acid (PLA) biocomposites were prepared by melt blending in an internal mixer with various types of rubber. The rubber was 90/10 wt% and was mixed before the addition of kenaf fiber (0 to 20 phr). Natural rubber (NR), nitrile butadiene rubber (NBR), and styrene butadiene rubber (SBR) were used. The effects of different types of rubber and kenaf loading were investigated based on processing torque, water absorption, mechanical properties, and fractured surface morphology. A similar trend in processing torque was observed throughout the composition of biocomposites. The stabilization torque was highest for the biocomposite with NR, followed by SBR and NBR. Water absorption increased as the kenaf loading increased. The polarity of NBR and SBR contributed to higher water absorption in the biocomposites compared to the NR. The strain-induced crystallization phenomenon and higher green strength of NR contributed to the highest tensile strength, elongation at break, and impact strength of the biocomposite compared to the NBR and SBR toughened PLA/kenaf biocomposite. More plastic deformation and less fiber pullout were observed in the fractured surface morphology. However, by increasing the kenaf loading, the mechanical properties decreased for all biocomposites, which was due to poor interfacial adhesion and agglomeration.</description><subject>Absorption</subject><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Butadiene</subject><subject>Composite materials</subject><subject>Crystallization</subject><subject>Elongation</subject><subject>Emulsion polymerization</subject><subject>Fiber pullout</subject><subject>Green strength</subject><subject>Impact strength</subject><subject>Kenaf</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Melt blending</subject><subject>Molecular weight</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Natural rubber</subject><subject>Nitrile rubber</subject><subject>Particle size</subject><subject>Plastic deformation</subject><subject>Plastics</subject><subject>Polarity</subject><subject>Polyesters</subject><subject>Polylactic acid</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Rubber</subject><subject>Styrene</subject><subject>Surface chemistry</subject><subject>Tensile strength</subject><subject>Torque</subject><subject>Viscosity</subject><subject>Water absorption</subject><issn>1930-2126</issn><issn>1930-2126</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwCsgS57R2HDsxN1TxJ1XiUs6W7ewil7QOdnro25M2HDjtjjSzo_0IuedswaWo1dKFmCCPYiEWUtW6kErLCzLjWrCi5KW6_Ldfk5uct4xVjeBsRuLGhi6msP-ifYo9pCFAphFpH7tjZ_0QPLU-tMt0cA7S8hv2FunY6OOujzkMkB_pMyL44Rwbjj2c5mSndt_SKdJF244tt-QKbZfh7m_OyefL82b1Vqw_Xt9XT-vCC8GHQoNgqnSC-0pDIxHRgWu9ktBo4UA3lWKSO6EQeSXRcivqqnYWBGrEphRz8jDdHb_6OUAezDYe0n6sNKXkuinrqpGjS00un2LOCdD0KexsOhrOzBmumeCOwghzgmtOcMUvrudxjg</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Alias, Nur Fazreen</creator><creator>Ismail, Hanafi</creator><creator>Ku Ishak, Ku Marsilla</creator><general>North Carolina State University</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>Tailoring properties of polylactic acid/rubber/kenaf biocomposites: Effects of type of rubber and kenaf loading</title><author>Alias, Nur Fazreen ; Ismail, Hanafi ; Ku Ishak, Ku Marsilla</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-9e3062b31c49e85fffbebdc65e893be9846051b36ff145fa1a3747bae3f9ff823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Absorption</topic><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Butadiene</topic><topic>Composite materials</topic><topic>Crystallization</topic><topic>Elongation</topic><topic>Emulsion polymerization</topic><topic>Fiber pullout</topic><topic>Green strength</topic><topic>Impact strength</topic><topic>Kenaf</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Melt blending</topic><topic>Molecular weight</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Natural rubber</topic><topic>Nitrile rubber</topic><topic>Particle size</topic><topic>Plastic deformation</topic><topic>Plastics</topic><topic>Polarity</topic><topic>Polyesters</topic><topic>Polylactic acid</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Rubber</topic><topic>Styrene</topic><topic>Surface chemistry</topic><topic>Tensile strength</topic><topic>Torque</topic><topic>Viscosity</topic><topic>Water absorption</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alias, Nur Fazreen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ismail, Hanafi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ku Ishak, Ku Marsilla</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Bioresources</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alias, Nur Fazreen</au><au>Ismail, Hanafi</au><au>Ku Ishak, Ku Marsilla</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tailoring properties of polylactic acid/rubber/kenaf biocomposites: Effects of type of rubber and kenaf loading</atitle><jtitle>Bioresources</jtitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>5679</spage><epage>5695</epage><pages>5679-5695</pages><issn>1930-2126</issn><eissn>1930-2126</eissn><abstract>Polylactic acid (PLA) biocomposites were prepared by melt blending in an internal mixer with various types of rubber. The rubber was 90/10 wt% and was mixed before the addition of kenaf fiber (0 to 20 phr). Natural rubber (NR), nitrile butadiene rubber (NBR), and styrene butadiene rubber (SBR) were used. The effects of different types of rubber and kenaf loading were investigated based on processing torque, water absorption, mechanical properties, and fractured surface morphology. A similar trend in processing torque was observed throughout the composition of biocomposites. The stabilization torque was highest for the biocomposite with NR, followed by SBR and NBR. Water absorption increased as the kenaf loading increased. The polarity of NBR and SBR contributed to higher water absorption in the biocomposites compared to the NR. The strain-induced crystallization phenomenon and higher green strength of NR contributed to the highest tensile strength, elongation at break, and impact strength of the biocomposite compared to the NBR and SBR toughened PLA/kenaf biocomposite. More plastic deformation and less fiber pullout were observed in the fractured surface morphology. However, by increasing the kenaf loading, the mechanical properties decreased for all biocomposites, which was due to poor interfacial adhesion and agglomeration.</abstract><cop>Raleigh</cop><pub>North Carolina State University</pub><doi>10.15376/biores.15.3.5679-5695</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1930-2126 |
ispartof | Bioresources, 2020-08, Vol.15 (3), p.5679-5695 |
issn | 1930-2126 1930-2126 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2519827485 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3) |
subjects | Absorption Biomedical materials Butadiene Composite materials Crystallization Elongation Emulsion polymerization Fiber pullout Green strength Impact strength Kenaf Mechanical properties Melt blending Molecular weight Morphology Natural rubber Nitrile rubber Particle size Plastic deformation Plastics Polarity Polyesters Polylactic acid Polymers Rubber Styrene Surface chemistry Tensile strength Torque Viscosity Water absorption |
title | Tailoring properties of polylactic acid/rubber/kenaf biocomposites: Effects of type of rubber and kenaf loading |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T21%3A45%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tailoring%20properties%20of%20polylactic%20acid/rubber/kenaf%20biocomposites:%20Effects%20of%20type%20of%20rubber%20and%20kenaf%20loading&rft.jtitle=Bioresources&rft.au=Alias,%20Nur%20Fazreen&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=5679&rft.epage=5695&rft.pages=5679-5695&rft.issn=1930-2126&rft.eissn=1930-2126&rft_id=info:doi/10.15376/biores.15.3.5679-5695&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2519827485%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-9e3062b31c49e85fffbebdc65e893be9846051b36ff145fa1a3747bae3f9ff823%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2519827485&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |