Loading…

Tailoring properties of polylactic acid/rubber/kenaf biocomposites: Effects of type of rubber and kenaf loading

Polylactic acid (PLA) biocomposites were prepared by melt blending in an internal mixer with various types of rubber. The rubber was 90/10 wt% and was mixed before the addition of kenaf fiber (0 to 20 phr). Natural rubber (NR), nitrile butadiene rubber (NBR), and styrene butadiene rubber (SBR) were...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Bioresources 2020-08, Vol.15 (3), p.5679-5695
Main Authors: Alias, Nur Fazreen, Ismail, Hanafi, Ku Ishak, Ku Marsilla
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-9e3062b31c49e85fffbebdc65e893be9846051b36ff145fa1a3747bae3f9ff823
cites
container_end_page 5695
container_issue 3
container_start_page 5679
container_title Bioresources
container_volume 15
creator Alias, Nur Fazreen
Ismail, Hanafi
Ku Ishak, Ku Marsilla
description Polylactic acid (PLA) biocomposites were prepared by melt blending in an internal mixer with various types of rubber. The rubber was 90/10 wt% and was mixed before the addition of kenaf fiber (0 to 20 phr). Natural rubber (NR), nitrile butadiene rubber (NBR), and styrene butadiene rubber (SBR) were used. The effects of different types of rubber and kenaf loading were investigated based on processing torque, water absorption, mechanical properties, and fractured surface morphology. A similar trend in processing torque was observed throughout the composition of biocomposites. The stabilization torque was highest for the biocomposite with NR, followed by SBR and NBR. Water absorption increased as the kenaf loading increased. The polarity of NBR and SBR contributed to higher water absorption in the biocomposites compared to the NR. The strain-induced crystallization phenomenon and higher green strength of NR contributed to the highest tensile strength, elongation at break, and impact strength of the biocomposite compared to the NBR and SBR toughened PLA/kenaf biocomposite. More plastic deformation and less fiber pullout were observed in the fractured surface morphology. However, by increasing the kenaf loading, the mechanical properties decreased for all biocomposites, which was due to poor interfacial adhesion and agglomeration.
doi_str_mv 10.15376/biores.15.3.5679-5695
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2519827485</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2519827485</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-9e3062b31c49e85fffbebdc65e893be9846051b36ff145fa1a3747bae3f9ff823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwCsgS57R2HDsxN1TxJ1XiUs6W7ewil7QOdnro25M2HDjtjjSzo_0IuedswaWo1dKFmCCPYiEWUtW6kErLCzLjWrCi5KW6_Ldfk5uct4xVjeBsRuLGhi6msP-ifYo9pCFAphFpH7tjZ_0QPLU-tMt0cA7S8hv2FunY6OOujzkMkB_pMyL44Rwbjj2c5mSndt_SKdJF244tt-QKbZfh7m_OyefL82b1Vqw_Xt9XT-vCC8GHQoNgqnSC-0pDIxHRgWu9ktBo4UA3lWKSO6EQeSXRcivqqnYWBGrEphRz8jDdHb_6OUAezDYe0n6sNKXkuinrqpGjS00un2LOCdD0KexsOhrOzBmumeCOwghzgmtOcMUvrudxjg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2519827485</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tailoring properties of polylactic acid/rubber/kenaf biocomposites: Effects of type of rubber and kenaf loading</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Alias, Nur Fazreen ; Ismail, Hanafi ; Ku Ishak, Ku Marsilla</creator><creatorcontrib>Alias, Nur Fazreen ; Ismail, Hanafi ; Ku Ishak, Ku Marsilla</creatorcontrib><description>Polylactic acid (PLA) biocomposites were prepared by melt blending in an internal mixer with various types of rubber. The rubber was 90/10 wt% and was mixed before the addition of kenaf fiber (0 to 20 phr). Natural rubber (NR), nitrile butadiene rubber (NBR), and styrene butadiene rubber (SBR) were used. The effects of different types of rubber and kenaf loading were investigated based on processing torque, water absorption, mechanical properties, and fractured surface morphology. A similar trend in processing torque was observed throughout the composition of biocomposites. The stabilization torque was highest for the biocomposite with NR, followed by SBR and NBR. Water absorption increased as the kenaf loading increased. The polarity of NBR and SBR contributed to higher water absorption in the biocomposites compared to the NR. The strain-induced crystallization phenomenon and higher green strength of NR contributed to the highest tensile strength, elongation at break, and impact strength of the biocomposite compared to the NBR and SBR toughened PLA/kenaf biocomposite. More plastic deformation and less fiber pullout were observed in the fractured surface morphology. However, by increasing the kenaf loading, the mechanical properties decreased for all biocomposites, which was due to poor interfacial adhesion and agglomeration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1930-2126</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-2126</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15376/biores.15.3.5679-5695</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Raleigh: North Carolina State University</publisher><subject>Absorption ; Biomedical materials ; Butadiene ; Composite materials ; Crystallization ; Elongation ; Emulsion polymerization ; Fiber pullout ; Green strength ; Impact strength ; Kenaf ; Mechanical properties ; Melt blending ; Molecular weight ; Morphology ; Natural rubber ; Nitrile rubber ; Particle size ; Plastic deformation ; Plastics ; Polarity ; Polyesters ; Polylactic acid ; Polymers ; Rubber ; Styrene ; Surface chemistry ; Tensile strength ; Torque ; Viscosity ; Water absorption</subject><ispartof>Bioresources, 2020-08, Vol.15 (3), p.5679-5695</ispartof><rights>2020. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms available at https://bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu/about-the-journal/editorial-policies</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-9e3062b31c49e85fffbebdc65e893be9846051b36ff145fa1a3747bae3f9ff823</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2519827485/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2519827485?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,74998</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alias, Nur Fazreen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ismail, Hanafi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ku Ishak, Ku Marsilla</creatorcontrib><title>Tailoring properties of polylactic acid/rubber/kenaf biocomposites: Effects of type of rubber and kenaf loading</title><title>Bioresources</title><description>Polylactic acid (PLA) biocomposites were prepared by melt blending in an internal mixer with various types of rubber. The rubber was 90/10 wt% and was mixed before the addition of kenaf fiber (0 to 20 phr). Natural rubber (NR), nitrile butadiene rubber (NBR), and styrene butadiene rubber (SBR) were used. The effects of different types of rubber and kenaf loading were investigated based on processing torque, water absorption, mechanical properties, and fractured surface morphology. A similar trend in processing torque was observed throughout the composition of biocomposites. The stabilization torque was highest for the biocomposite with NR, followed by SBR and NBR. Water absorption increased as the kenaf loading increased. The polarity of NBR and SBR contributed to higher water absorption in the biocomposites compared to the NR. The strain-induced crystallization phenomenon and higher green strength of NR contributed to the highest tensile strength, elongation at break, and impact strength of the biocomposite compared to the NBR and SBR toughened PLA/kenaf biocomposite. More plastic deformation and less fiber pullout were observed in the fractured surface morphology. However, by increasing the kenaf loading, the mechanical properties decreased for all biocomposites, which was due to poor interfacial adhesion and agglomeration.</description><subject>Absorption</subject><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Butadiene</subject><subject>Composite materials</subject><subject>Crystallization</subject><subject>Elongation</subject><subject>Emulsion polymerization</subject><subject>Fiber pullout</subject><subject>Green strength</subject><subject>Impact strength</subject><subject>Kenaf</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Melt blending</subject><subject>Molecular weight</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Natural rubber</subject><subject>Nitrile rubber</subject><subject>Particle size</subject><subject>Plastic deformation</subject><subject>Plastics</subject><subject>Polarity</subject><subject>Polyesters</subject><subject>Polylactic acid</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Rubber</subject><subject>Styrene</subject><subject>Surface chemistry</subject><subject>Tensile strength</subject><subject>Torque</subject><subject>Viscosity</subject><subject>Water absorption</subject><issn>1930-2126</issn><issn>1930-2126</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwCsgS57R2HDsxN1TxJ1XiUs6W7ewil7QOdnro25M2HDjtjjSzo_0IuedswaWo1dKFmCCPYiEWUtW6kErLCzLjWrCi5KW6_Ldfk5uct4xVjeBsRuLGhi6msP-ifYo9pCFAphFpH7tjZ_0QPLU-tMt0cA7S8hv2FunY6OOujzkMkB_pMyL44Rwbjj2c5mSndt_SKdJF244tt-QKbZfh7m_OyefL82b1Vqw_Xt9XT-vCC8GHQoNgqnSC-0pDIxHRgWu9ktBo4UA3lWKSO6EQeSXRcivqqnYWBGrEphRz8jDdHb_6OUAezDYe0n6sNKXkuinrqpGjS00un2LOCdD0KexsOhrOzBmumeCOwghzgmtOcMUvrudxjg</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Alias, Nur Fazreen</creator><creator>Ismail, Hanafi</creator><creator>Ku Ishak, Ku Marsilla</creator><general>North Carolina State University</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>Tailoring properties of polylactic acid/rubber/kenaf biocomposites: Effects of type of rubber and kenaf loading</title><author>Alias, Nur Fazreen ; Ismail, Hanafi ; Ku Ishak, Ku Marsilla</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-9e3062b31c49e85fffbebdc65e893be9846051b36ff145fa1a3747bae3f9ff823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Absorption</topic><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Butadiene</topic><topic>Composite materials</topic><topic>Crystallization</topic><topic>Elongation</topic><topic>Emulsion polymerization</topic><topic>Fiber pullout</topic><topic>Green strength</topic><topic>Impact strength</topic><topic>Kenaf</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Melt blending</topic><topic>Molecular weight</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Natural rubber</topic><topic>Nitrile rubber</topic><topic>Particle size</topic><topic>Plastic deformation</topic><topic>Plastics</topic><topic>Polarity</topic><topic>Polyesters</topic><topic>Polylactic acid</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Rubber</topic><topic>Styrene</topic><topic>Surface chemistry</topic><topic>Tensile strength</topic><topic>Torque</topic><topic>Viscosity</topic><topic>Water absorption</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alias, Nur Fazreen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ismail, Hanafi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ku Ishak, Ku Marsilla</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Bioresources</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alias, Nur Fazreen</au><au>Ismail, Hanafi</au><au>Ku Ishak, Ku Marsilla</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tailoring properties of polylactic acid/rubber/kenaf biocomposites: Effects of type of rubber and kenaf loading</atitle><jtitle>Bioresources</jtitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>5679</spage><epage>5695</epage><pages>5679-5695</pages><issn>1930-2126</issn><eissn>1930-2126</eissn><abstract>Polylactic acid (PLA) biocomposites were prepared by melt blending in an internal mixer with various types of rubber. The rubber was 90/10 wt% and was mixed before the addition of kenaf fiber (0 to 20 phr). Natural rubber (NR), nitrile butadiene rubber (NBR), and styrene butadiene rubber (SBR) were used. The effects of different types of rubber and kenaf loading were investigated based on processing torque, water absorption, mechanical properties, and fractured surface morphology. A similar trend in processing torque was observed throughout the composition of biocomposites. The stabilization torque was highest for the biocomposite with NR, followed by SBR and NBR. Water absorption increased as the kenaf loading increased. The polarity of NBR and SBR contributed to higher water absorption in the biocomposites compared to the NR. The strain-induced crystallization phenomenon and higher green strength of NR contributed to the highest tensile strength, elongation at break, and impact strength of the biocomposite compared to the NBR and SBR toughened PLA/kenaf biocomposite. More plastic deformation and less fiber pullout were observed in the fractured surface morphology. However, by increasing the kenaf loading, the mechanical properties decreased for all biocomposites, which was due to poor interfacial adhesion and agglomeration.</abstract><cop>Raleigh</cop><pub>North Carolina State University</pub><doi>10.15376/biores.15.3.5679-5695</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1930-2126
ispartof Bioresources, 2020-08, Vol.15 (3), p.5679-5695
issn 1930-2126
1930-2126
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2519827485
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)
subjects Absorption
Biomedical materials
Butadiene
Composite materials
Crystallization
Elongation
Emulsion polymerization
Fiber pullout
Green strength
Impact strength
Kenaf
Mechanical properties
Melt blending
Molecular weight
Morphology
Natural rubber
Nitrile rubber
Particle size
Plastic deformation
Plastics
Polarity
Polyesters
Polylactic acid
Polymers
Rubber
Styrene
Surface chemistry
Tensile strength
Torque
Viscosity
Water absorption
title Tailoring properties of polylactic acid/rubber/kenaf biocomposites: Effects of type of rubber and kenaf loading
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T21%3A45%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tailoring%20properties%20of%20polylactic%20acid/rubber/kenaf%20biocomposites:%20Effects%20of%20type%20of%20rubber%20and%20kenaf%20loading&rft.jtitle=Bioresources&rft.au=Alias,%20Nur%20Fazreen&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=5679&rft.epage=5695&rft.pages=5679-5695&rft.issn=1930-2126&rft.eissn=1930-2126&rft_id=info:doi/10.15376/biores.15.3.5679-5695&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2519827485%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-9e3062b31c49e85fffbebdc65e893be9846051b36ff145fa1a3747bae3f9ff823%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2519827485&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true