Bond strength of a universal adhesive system to bovine vs. human primary teeth

To compare the bond strength of a universal adhesive system to bovine primary and human primary enamel and dentin. Flat enamel and dentin surfaces from 28 sound human primary molars and 28 bovine primary incisors were bonded with Scotchbond Universal Adhesive applied in etch-and-rinse and self-etch...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of adhesion and adhesives 2021-06, Vol.107, p.102862, Article 102862
Main Authors: Fröhlich, Tatiana Tambara, Lenzi, Tathiane Larissa, Soares, Fabio Zovico Maxnuck, Rocha, Rachel de Oliveira
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adhesives
B – Dentin
B – Enamel
Bond strength
Bonding strength
Bovine teeth
C – Micro-shear
Calcium
Composite materials
Dentin
Enamel
Failure analysis
Failure modes
Primary teeth
Substrates
Teeth
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To compare the bond strength of a universal adhesive system to bovine primary and human primary enamel and dentin. Flat enamel and dentin surfaces from 28 sound human primary molars and 28 bovine primary incisors were bonded with Scotchbond Universal Adhesive applied in etch-and-rinse and self-etch mode (n = 7). Composite resin cylinders (0.72 mm2) were built on the adhesive area. The specimens were submitted to a microshear bond strength test, and the bond failure mode was evaluated. Bond strength data (MPa) were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) was carried out to identify the levels of calcium and phosphorus in each type of teeth. Higher bond strength values were found to bovine primary enamel compared to human enamel (p = 0.04). No statistically significant differences were found between bovine and human primary dentin (p = 0.09). The universal adhesive applied in self-etch mode to enamel resulted in lower bond strength values (p 
ISSN:0143-7496
1879-0127
DOI:10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.102862