Loading…
When Fact-Checking and ‘BBC Standards’ Are Helpless: ‘Fake Newsworthy Event’ Manipulation and the Reaction of the ‘High-Quality Media’ on It
Fact-checking and journalists professional standards usually are considered to be the best fail-safe against manipulations in media. However, we found that newsmakers are able to manipulate even the audience of so-called ‘high-quality media’ who practice all mentioned approaches. To prove this we ha...
Saved in:
Published in: | Sustainability 2021-01, Vol.13 (2), p.573 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-70a1c3a94ba14400a443732c01e361195c16a5ab22fa49d4cea51ffa8f02d07d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-70a1c3a94ba14400a443732c01e361195c16a5ab22fa49d4cea51ffa8f02d07d3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 573 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Zakharchenko, Artem Peráček, Tomáš Fedushko, Solomiia Syerov, Yuriy Trach, Olha |
description | Fact-checking and journalists professional standards usually are considered to be the best fail-safe against manipulations in media. However, we found that newsmakers are able to manipulate even the audience of so-called ‘high-quality media’ who practice all mentioned approaches. To prove this we have refined the concept of ‘pseudo-event’, introduced by D.J. Boorstin, by defining the term ‘fake newsworthy event’ as an event created by newsmakers, that is high-profile and attractive for media, but the only or particular aim of these actions is an agenda-setting, and this aim is not obvious from the origin of the action. Namely, the member of parliament may file some bill realizing that it cannot be adopted and trying just to shape the public opinion. Or some person may claim against a celebrity or businessman having no chance to win at trial. On the example of Ukrainian ‘high-quality media’ we showed that journalists usually do not take into account whether some topics are launched just for manipulating agenda-setting. To prove that we gathered the data about publications focused on such topics in Ukrainian ‘high-quality media’, we provided their discourse analysis, and compared the result with experts’ evaluations of ‘media quality’ and ‘artificiality rate’ of the topic. We have not found correlations between ‘artificiality’ of the topic and the number of publications. Recommendations were elaborated for the media workers if they want to avoid this type of manipulation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su13020573 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2524981180</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2524981180</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-70a1c3a94ba14400a443732c01e361195c16a5ab22fa49d4cea51ffa8f02d07d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctOwlAQhk-MJhJl4xOcxJ1J9dx6cwcNCAlovMVlM7SntFDbes6phB2Pga_Hk9iCia6czcw_-eb_F4PQBSXXnPvkRteUE0Zslx-hDiMutSixyfGf-RR1tV6QpjinPnU6aPuWygIPITJWkMpomRVzDEWMd5ttvx_gZ9MIULHebb5wT0k8knmVS61vW2IIS4nv5UqvSmXSNR58ysK05BSKrKpzMFlZ7O1MKvGTbFLaRZnsdWMwyuap9VhDnpk1nso4g_a6QcbmHJ0kkGvZ_eln6HU4eAlG1uThbhz0JlbEGTeWS4BGHHwxAyoEISAEdzmLCJXcodS3I-qADTPGEhB-LCIJNk0S8BLCYuLG_AxdHnwrVX7UUptwUdaqaCJDZjPhe5R65F9KuK5gjse9hro6UJEqtVYyCSuVvYNah5SE7YvC3xfxb6pBh2s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2477426838</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>When Fact-Checking and ‘BBC Standards’ Are Helpless: ‘Fake Newsworthy Event’ Manipulation and the Reaction of the ‘High-Quality Media’ on It</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Zakharchenko, Artem ; Peráček, Tomáš ; Fedushko, Solomiia ; Syerov, Yuriy ; Trach, Olha</creator><creatorcontrib>Zakharchenko, Artem ; Peráček, Tomáš ; Fedushko, Solomiia ; Syerov, Yuriy ; Trach, Olha</creatorcontrib><description>Fact-checking and journalists professional standards usually are considered to be the best fail-safe against manipulations in media. However, we found that newsmakers are able to manipulate even the audience of so-called ‘high-quality media’ who practice all mentioned approaches. To prove this we have refined the concept of ‘pseudo-event’, introduced by D.J. Boorstin, by defining the term ‘fake newsworthy event’ as an event created by newsmakers, that is high-profile and attractive for media, but the only or particular aim of these actions is an agenda-setting, and this aim is not obvious from the origin of the action. Namely, the member of parliament may file some bill realizing that it cannot be adopted and trying just to shape the public opinion. Or some person may claim against a celebrity or businessman having no chance to win at trial. On the example of Ukrainian ‘high-quality media’ we showed that journalists usually do not take into account whether some topics are launched just for manipulating agenda-setting. To prove that we gathered the data about publications focused on such topics in Ukrainian ‘high-quality media’, we provided their discourse analysis, and compared the result with experts’ evaluations of ‘media quality’ and ‘artificiality rate’ of the topic. We have not found correlations between ‘artificiality’ of the topic and the number of publications. Recommendations were elaborated for the media workers if they want to avoid this type of manipulation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su13020573</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Audiences ; Bias ; Documents ; Election results ; Negative campaigning ; Political activism ; Presidential elections ; Public opinion ; Small & medium sized enterprises-SME ; Social networks ; Society ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2021-01, Vol.13 (2), p.573</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-70a1c3a94ba14400a443732c01e361195c16a5ab22fa49d4cea51ffa8f02d07d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-70a1c3a94ba14400a443732c01e361195c16a5ab22fa49d4cea51ffa8f02d07d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7548-5856 ; 0000-0002-5293-4791 ; 0000-0002-3498-5640 ; 0000-0002-3877-8403</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2477426838/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2477426838?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25752,27923,27924,37011,38515,43894,44589,74283,74997</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zakharchenko, Artem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peráček, Tomáš</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fedushko, Solomiia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syerov, Yuriy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trach, Olha</creatorcontrib><title>When Fact-Checking and ‘BBC Standards’ Are Helpless: ‘Fake Newsworthy Event’ Manipulation and the Reaction of the ‘High-Quality Media’ on It</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>Fact-checking and journalists professional standards usually are considered to be the best fail-safe against manipulations in media. However, we found that newsmakers are able to manipulate even the audience of so-called ‘high-quality media’ who practice all mentioned approaches. To prove this we have refined the concept of ‘pseudo-event’, introduced by D.J. Boorstin, by defining the term ‘fake newsworthy event’ as an event created by newsmakers, that is high-profile and attractive for media, but the only or particular aim of these actions is an agenda-setting, and this aim is not obvious from the origin of the action. Namely, the member of parliament may file some bill realizing that it cannot be adopted and trying just to shape the public opinion. Or some person may claim against a celebrity or businessman having no chance to win at trial. On the example of Ukrainian ‘high-quality media’ we showed that journalists usually do not take into account whether some topics are launched just for manipulating agenda-setting. To prove that we gathered the data about publications focused on such topics in Ukrainian ‘high-quality media’, we provided their discourse analysis, and compared the result with experts’ evaluations of ‘media quality’ and ‘artificiality rate’ of the topic. We have not found correlations between ‘artificiality’ of the topic and the number of publications. Recommendations were elaborated for the media workers if they want to avoid this type of manipulation.</description><subject>Audiences</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Documents</subject><subject>Election results</subject><subject>Negative campaigning</subject><subject>Political activism</subject><subject>Presidential elections</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Small & medium sized enterprises-SME</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctOwlAQhk-MJhJl4xOcxJ1J9dx6cwcNCAlovMVlM7SntFDbes6phB2Pga_Hk9iCia6czcw_-eb_F4PQBSXXnPvkRteUE0Zslx-hDiMutSixyfGf-RR1tV6QpjinPnU6aPuWygIPITJWkMpomRVzDEWMd5ttvx_gZ9MIULHebb5wT0k8knmVS61vW2IIS4nv5UqvSmXSNR58ysK05BSKrKpzMFlZ7O1MKvGTbFLaRZnsdWMwyuap9VhDnpk1nso4g_a6QcbmHJ0kkGvZ_eln6HU4eAlG1uThbhz0JlbEGTeWS4BGHHwxAyoEISAEdzmLCJXcodS3I-qADTPGEhB-LCIJNk0S8BLCYuLG_AxdHnwrVX7UUptwUdaqaCJDZjPhe5R65F9KuK5gjse9hro6UJEqtVYyCSuVvYNah5SE7YvC3xfxb6pBh2s</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Zakharchenko, Artem</creator><creator>Peráček, Tomáš</creator><creator>Fedushko, Solomiia</creator><creator>Syerov, Yuriy</creator><creator>Trach, Olha</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7548-5856</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5293-4791</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3498-5640</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3877-8403</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>When Fact-Checking and ‘BBC Standards’ Are Helpless: ‘Fake Newsworthy Event’ Manipulation and the Reaction of the ‘High-Quality Media’ on It</title><author>Zakharchenko, Artem ; Peráček, Tomáš ; Fedushko, Solomiia ; Syerov, Yuriy ; Trach, Olha</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-70a1c3a94ba14400a443732c01e361195c16a5ab22fa49d4cea51ffa8f02d07d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Audiences</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Documents</topic><topic>Election results</topic><topic>Negative campaigning</topic><topic>Political activism</topic><topic>Presidential elections</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Small & medium sized enterprises-SME</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zakharchenko, Artem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peráček, Tomáš</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fedushko, Solomiia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syerov, Yuriy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trach, Olha</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zakharchenko, Artem</au><au>Peráček, Tomáš</au><au>Fedushko, Solomiia</au><au>Syerov, Yuriy</au><au>Trach, Olha</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>When Fact-Checking and ‘BBC Standards’ Are Helpless: ‘Fake Newsworthy Event’ Manipulation and the Reaction of the ‘High-Quality Media’ on It</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>573</spage><pages>573-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Fact-checking and journalists professional standards usually are considered to be the best fail-safe against manipulations in media. However, we found that newsmakers are able to manipulate even the audience of so-called ‘high-quality media’ who practice all mentioned approaches. To prove this we have refined the concept of ‘pseudo-event’, introduced by D.J. Boorstin, by defining the term ‘fake newsworthy event’ as an event created by newsmakers, that is high-profile and attractive for media, but the only or particular aim of these actions is an agenda-setting, and this aim is not obvious from the origin of the action. Namely, the member of parliament may file some bill realizing that it cannot be adopted and trying just to shape the public opinion. Or some person may claim against a celebrity or businessman having no chance to win at trial. On the example of Ukrainian ‘high-quality media’ we showed that journalists usually do not take into account whether some topics are launched just for manipulating agenda-setting. To prove that we gathered the data about publications focused on such topics in Ukrainian ‘high-quality media’, we provided their discourse analysis, and compared the result with experts’ evaluations of ‘media quality’ and ‘artificiality rate’ of the topic. We have not found correlations between ‘artificiality’ of the topic and the number of publications. Recommendations were elaborated for the media workers if they want to avoid this type of manipulation.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su13020573</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7548-5856</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5293-4791</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3498-5640</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3877-8403</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2021-01, Vol.13 (2), p.573 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2524981180 |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); Coronavirus Research Database |
subjects | Audiences Bias Documents Election results Negative campaigning Political activism Presidential elections Public opinion Small & medium sized enterprises-SME Social networks Society Sustainability |
title | When Fact-Checking and ‘BBC Standards’ Are Helpless: ‘Fake Newsworthy Event’ Manipulation and the Reaction of the ‘High-Quality Media’ on It |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T05%3A49%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=When%20Fact-Checking%20and%20%E2%80%98BBC%20Standards%E2%80%99%20Are%20Helpless:%20%E2%80%98Fake%20Newsworthy%20Event%E2%80%99%20Manipulation%20and%20the%20Reaction%20of%20the%20%E2%80%98High-Quality%20Media%E2%80%99%20on%20It&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Zakharchenko,%20Artem&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=573&rft.pages=573-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su13020573&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2524981180%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-70a1c3a94ba14400a443732c01e361195c16a5ab22fa49d4cea51ffa8f02d07d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2477426838&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |