Common knowledge? Business intellectuals, BRIC and the production of knowledge across global finance and international relations

This article engages with the debate about how we come to know IR the way that we do. It seeks to contribute to this research agenda in two related ways. Firstly, it highlights the influence that a previously neglected circuit of practice has on the co-constituted knowledge relationship between glob...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of international relations and development 2021-06, Vol.24 (2), p.333-355
Main Authors: Aris, Stephen, Snetkov, Aglaya
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Area Studies
Boundaries
Business
Circuits
Common sense
Cultural capital
Development Studies
Economic crisis
Finance
Governance
Intellectuals
International finance
International Relations
Knowledge
Original Article
Political Science and International Relations
Political Science and International Studies
Production
Science and technology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article engages with the debate about how we come to know IR the way that we do. It seeks to contribute to this research agenda in two related ways. Firstly, it highlights the influence that a previously neglected circuit of practice has on the co-constituted knowledge relationship between global finance (GF) and International Relations (IR): the business intellectuals of cultural circuits of capital (CCC). Secondly, it argues that the science and technology studies’ concept of boundary objects is invaluable in accounting for both how IR’s ‘constitutive’ theorising is influenced by other circuits of practice and the co-constituted nature of ‘the international’ as an object of investigation. To exemplify both arguments, and how they relate to one another, the article traces the co-constituted operation of the concept of ‘BRIC’ (Brazil, Russia, India and China). Following the global financial crisis in 2007/2008, CCC popularised the concept of ‘BRIC’, which then came to operate as a boundary object between IR and GF and in the process impacted on how IR knows ‘rising powers’ and ‘global governance’. Thus, the functionality of BRIC as a boundary object served to provide business intellectuals with constitutive influence on how IR knows its object of study.
ISSN:1408-6980
1581-1980
DOI:10.1057/s41268-020-00193-w