Loading…
Can self-training identify suspicious ugly duckling lesions?
One commonly used clinical approach towards detecting melanomas recognises the existence of Ugly Duckling nevi, or skin lesions which look different from the other lesions on the same patient. An automatic method of detecting and analysing these lesions would help to standardize studies, compared wi...
Saved in:
Published in: | arXiv.org 2021-05 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | arXiv.org |
container_volume | |
creator | Mohseni, Mohammadreza Yap, Jordan Yolland, William Koochek, Arash Atkins, M Stella |
description | One commonly used clinical approach towards detecting melanomas recognises the existence of Ugly Duckling nevi, or skin lesions which look different from the other lesions on the same patient. An automatic method of detecting and analysing these lesions would help to standardize studies, compared with manual screening methods. However, it is difficult to obtain expertly-labelled images for ugly duckling lesions. We therefore propose to use self-supervised machine learning to automatically detect outlier lesions. We first automatically detect and extract all the lesions from a wide-field skin image, and calculate an embedding for each detected lesion in a patient image, based on automatically identified features. These embeddings are then used to calculate the L2 distances as a way to measure dissimilarity. Using this deep learning method, Ugly Ducklings are identified as outliers which should deserve more attention from the examining physician. We evaluate through comparison with dermatologists, and achieve a sensitivity rate of 72.1% and diagnostic accuracy of 94.2% on the held-out test set. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2528651026</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2528651026</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_25286510263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjUEKwjAQAIMgWLR_CHgutBtTexA8FMUHeC-lTcrWsKnd5NDfW8EHeJrDDMxGJKBUkVUngJ1Imcc8z6E8g9YqEZe6JcnG2SzMLRLSILE3FNAukiNP2KGPLOPgFtnH7uW-hTOMnvh6EFvbOjbpj3txvN-e9SObZv-OhkMz-jjTqhrQUJW6WMfqv-oDdw84EQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2528651026</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can self-training identify suspicious ugly duckling lesions?</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Mohseni, Mohammadreza ; Yap, Jordan ; Yolland, William ; Koochek, Arash ; Atkins, M Stella</creator><creatorcontrib>Mohseni, Mohammadreza ; Yap, Jordan ; Yolland, William ; Koochek, Arash ; Atkins, M Stella</creatorcontrib><description>One commonly used clinical approach towards detecting melanomas recognises the existence of Ugly Duckling nevi, or skin lesions which look different from the other lesions on the same patient. An automatic method of detecting and analysing these lesions would help to standardize studies, compared with manual screening methods. However, it is difficult to obtain expertly-labelled images for ugly duckling lesions. We therefore propose to use self-supervised machine learning to automatically detect outlier lesions. We first automatically detect and extract all the lesions from a wide-field skin image, and calculate an embedding for each detected lesion in a patient image, based on automatically identified features. These embeddings are then used to calculate the L2 distances as a way to measure dissimilarity. Using this deep learning method, Ugly Ducklings are identified as outliers which should deserve more attention from the examining physician. We evaluate through comparison with dermatologists, and achieve a sensitivity rate of 72.1% and diagnostic accuracy of 94.2% on the held-out test set.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Data analysis ; Lesions ; Machine learning ; Mathematical analysis ; Outliers (statistics)</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2021-05</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2528651026?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>780,784,25753,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mohseni, Mohammadreza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yap, Jordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yolland, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koochek, Arash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atkins, M Stella</creatorcontrib><title>Can self-training identify suspicious ugly duckling lesions?</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>One commonly used clinical approach towards detecting melanomas recognises the existence of Ugly Duckling nevi, or skin lesions which look different from the other lesions on the same patient. An automatic method of detecting and analysing these lesions would help to standardize studies, compared with manual screening methods. However, it is difficult to obtain expertly-labelled images for ugly duckling lesions. We therefore propose to use self-supervised machine learning to automatically detect outlier lesions. We first automatically detect and extract all the lesions from a wide-field skin image, and calculate an embedding for each detected lesion in a patient image, based on automatically identified features. These embeddings are then used to calculate the L2 distances as a way to measure dissimilarity. Using this deep learning method, Ugly Ducklings are identified as outliers which should deserve more attention from the examining physician. We evaluate through comparison with dermatologists, and achieve a sensitivity rate of 72.1% and diagnostic accuracy of 94.2% on the held-out test set.</description><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Outliers (statistics)</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjUEKwjAQAIMgWLR_CHgutBtTexA8FMUHeC-lTcrWsKnd5NDfW8EHeJrDDMxGJKBUkVUngJ1Imcc8z6E8g9YqEZe6JcnG2SzMLRLSILE3FNAukiNP2KGPLOPgFtnH7uW-hTOMnvh6EFvbOjbpj3txvN-e9SObZv-OhkMz-jjTqhrQUJW6WMfqv-oDdw84EQ</recordid><startdate>20210515</startdate><enddate>20210515</enddate><creator>Mohseni, Mohammadreza</creator><creator>Yap, Jordan</creator><creator>Yolland, William</creator><creator>Koochek, Arash</creator><creator>Atkins, M Stella</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210515</creationdate><title>Can self-training identify suspicious ugly duckling lesions?</title><author>Mohseni, Mohammadreza ; Yap, Jordan ; Yolland, William ; Koochek, Arash ; Atkins, M Stella</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_25286510263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Outliers (statistics)</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mohseni, Mohammadreza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yap, Jordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yolland, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koochek, Arash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atkins, M Stella</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mohseni, Mohammadreza</au><au>Yap, Jordan</au><au>Yolland, William</au><au>Koochek, Arash</au><au>Atkins, M Stella</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Can self-training identify suspicious ugly duckling lesions?</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2021-05-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>One commonly used clinical approach towards detecting melanomas recognises the existence of Ugly Duckling nevi, or skin lesions which look different from the other lesions on the same patient. An automatic method of detecting and analysing these lesions would help to standardize studies, compared with manual screening methods. However, it is difficult to obtain expertly-labelled images for ugly duckling lesions. We therefore propose to use self-supervised machine learning to automatically detect outlier lesions. We first automatically detect and extract all the lesions from a wide-field skin image, and calculate an embedding for each detected lesion in a patient image, based on automatically identified features. These embeddings are then used to calculate the L2 distances as a way to measure dissimilarity. Using this deep learning method, Ugly Ducklings are identified as outliers which should deserve more attention from the examining physician. We evaluate through comparison with dermatologists, and achieve a sensitivity rate of 72.1% and diagnostic accuracy of 94.2% on the held-out test set.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
ispartof | arXiv.org, 2021-05 |
issn | 2331-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2528651026 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Data analysis Lesions Machine learning Mathematical analysis Outliers (statistics) |
title | Can self-training identify suspicious ugly duckling lesions? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T22%3A41%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Can%20self-training%20identify%20suspicious%20ugly%20duckling%20lesions?&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Mohseni,%20Mohammadreza&rft.date=2021-05-15&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2528651026%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_25286510263%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2528651026&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |