Loading…

Integrating a GIS-Based Multi-Influence Factors Model with Hydro-Geophysical Exploration for Groundwater Potential and Hydrogeological Assessment: A Case Study in the Karak Watershed, Northern Pakistan

The optimization of groundwater conditioning factors (GCFs), the evaluation of groundwater potential (GWpot), the hydrogeological characterization of aquifer geoelectrical properties and borehole lithological information are of great significance in the complex decision-making processes of groundwat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Water (Basel) 2021-05, Vol.13 (9), p.1255
Main Authors: Khan, Umair, Faheem, Haris, Jiang, Zhengwen, Wajid, Muhammad, Younas, Muhammad, Zhang, Baoyi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-ea66dfc1fca94bb982568b75283d9c6b5630380b6c21cc5dea3d93dd686f78ed3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-ea66dfc1fca94bb982568b75283d9c6b5630380b6c21cc5dea3d93dd686f78ed3
container_end_page
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1255
container_title Water (Basel)
container_volume 13
creator Khan, Umair
Faheem, Haris
Jiang, Zhengwen
Wajid, Muhammad
Younas, Muhammad
Zhang, Baoyi
description The optimization of groundwater conditioning factors (GCFs), the evaluation of groundwater potential (GWpot), the hydrogeological characterization of aquifer geoelectrical properties and borehole lithological information are of great significance in the complex decision-making processes of groundwater resource management (GRM). In this study, the regional GWpot of the Karak watershed in Northern Pakistan was first evaluated by means of the multi-influence factors (MIFs) model of optimized GCFs through geoprocessing tools in geographical information system (GIS). The distribution of petrophysical properties indicated by the measured resistivity fluctuations was then generated to locally verify the GWpot, and to analyze the hydrogeological and geoelectrical characteristics of aquifers. According to the weighted overlay analysis of MIFs, GWpot map was zoned into low, medium, high and very high areas, covering 9.7% (72.3 km2), 52.4% (1307.7 km2), 31.3% (913.4 km2), and 6.6% (44.8 km2) of the study area. The GWpot accuracy sequentially depends on the classification criteria, the mean rating score, and the weights assigned to GCFs. The most influential factors are geology, lineament density, and land use/land cover followed by drainage density, slope, soil type, rainfall, elevation, and groundwater level fluctuations. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the confusion matrix, and Kappa (K) analysis show satisfactory and consistent results and expected performances (the area under the curve value 68%, confusion matrix 68%, Kappa (K) analysis 65%). The electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and vertical electrical sounding (VES) data interpretations reveals five regional hydrological layers (i.e., coarse gravel and sand, silty sand mixed lithology, clayey sand/fine sand, fine sand/gravel, and clayey basement). The preliminary interpretation of ERT results highlights the complexity of the hydrogeological strata and reveals that GWpot is structurally and proximately constrained in the clayey sand and silicate aquifers (sandstone), which is of significance for the determination of drilling sites, expansion of drinking water supply and irrigation in the future. Moreover, quantifying the spatial distribution of aquifer hydrogeological characteristics (such as reflection coefficient, isopach, and resistivity mapping) based on Olayinka’s basic standards, indirectly and locally verify the performance of the MIF model and ultimately determine new locations f
doi_str_mv 10.3390/w13091255
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2530130827</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A791329271</galeid><sourcerecordid>A791329271</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-ea66dfc1fca94bb982568b75283d9c6b5630380b6c21cc5dea3d93dd686f78ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUdtuEzEQXSGQqEof-IOReEJiiy978fIWojaNaKFSQTyuvPZ443ZjB9urkE_kr3AIQsw8zOjonDMjnaJ4Tckl5x15v6ecdJTV9bPijJGWl1VV0ef_7S-LixgfSa6qE6ImZ8WvtUs4BpmsG0HCav1QfpQRNdzNU7Ll2plpRqcQrqVKPkS48xon2Nu0gZuDDr5cod9tDtEqOcHVz93kj2begfEBVsHPTu9lwgD3PqFLNrOk0yftiH7y4x_lIkaMcZsZH2ABy_wCPKRZH8A6SBuETzLIJ_h-dIob1O_gsw8ZDw7u5ZONSbpXxQsjp4gXf-d58e366uvyprz9slovF7el4pymEmXTaKOoUbKrhqETrG7E0NZMcN2pZqgbTrggQ6MYVarWKDPOtW5EY1qBmp8Xb06-u-B_zBhT_-jn4PLJntWc5AgEazPr8sQa5YS9dcanIFVujVurvENjM75oO8pZx1qaBW9PAhV8jAFNvwt2K8Ohp6Q_ptv_S5f_BmlVmik</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2530130827</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Integrating a GIS-Based Multi-Influence Factors Model with Hydro-Geophysical Exploration for Groundwater Potential and Hydrogeological Assessment: A Case Study in the Karak Watershed, Northern Pakistan</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Khan, Umair ; Faheem, Haris ; Jiang, Zhengwen ; Wajid, Muhammad ; Younas, Muhammad ; Zhang, Baoyi</creator><creatorcontrib>Khan, Umair ; Faheem, Haris ; Jiang, Zhengwen ; Wajid, Muhammad ; Younas, Muhammad ; Zhang, Baoyi</creatorcontrib><description>The optimization of groundwater conditioning factors (GCFs), the evaluation of groundwater potential (GWpot), the hydrogeological characterization of aquifer geoelectrical properties and borehole lithological information are of great significance in the complex decision-making processes of groundwater resource management (GRM). In this study, the regional GWpot of the Karak watershed in Northern Pakistan was first evaluated by means of the multi-influence factors (MIFs) model of optimized GCFs through geoprocessing tools in geographical information system (GIS). The distribution of petrophysical properties indicated by the measured resistivity fluctuations was then generated to locally verify the GWpot, and to analyze the hydrogeological and geoelectrical characteristics of aquifers. According to the weighted overlay analysis of MIFs, GWpot map was zoned into low, medium, high and very high areas, covering 9.7% (72.3 km2), 52.4% (1307.7 km2), 31.3% (913.4 km2), and 6.6% (44.8 km2) of the study area. The GWpot accuracy sequentially depends on the classification criteria, the mean rating score, and the weights assigned to GCFs. The most influential factors are geology, lineament density, and land use/land cover followed by drainage density, slope, soil type, rainfall, elevation, and groundwater level fluctuations. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the confusion matrix, and Kappa (K) analysis show satisfactory and consistent results and expected performances (the area under the curve value 68%, confusion matrix 68%, Kappa (K) analysis 65%). The electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and vertical electrical sounding (VES) data interpretations reveals five regional hydrological layers (i.e., coarse gravel and sand, silty sand mixed lithology, clayey sand/fine sand, fine sand/gravel, and clayey basement). The preliminary interpretation of ERT results highlights the complexity of the hydrogeological strata and reveals that GWpot is structurally and proximately constrained in the clayey sand and silicate aquifers (sandstone), which is of significance for the determination of drilling sites, expansion of drinking water supply and irrigation in the future. Moreover, quantifying the spatial distribution of aquifer hydrogeological characteristics (such as reflection coefficient, isopach, and resistivity mapping) based on Olayinka’s basic standards, indirectly and locally verify the performance of the MIF model and ultimately determine new locations for groundwater exploitation. The combined methods of regional GWpot mapping and hydrogeological characterization, through the geospatial MIFs model and aquifer geoelectrical interpretation, respectively, facilitate decision-makers for sustainable GRM not only in the Karak watershed but also in other similar areas worldwide.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/w13091255</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Aquifers ; Boreholes ; Case studies ; Climatic changes ; Decision making ; Drainage density ; Drilling ; Drinking water ; Electrical resistivity ; Elevation ; Environmental impact ; Feasibility studies ; Fluctuations ; Geoelectricity ; Geographic information systems ; Geology ; Geophysical exploration ; Geophysical methods ; Geospatial data ; Gravel ; Groundwater ; Groundwater levels ; Groundwater management ; Groundwater potential ; Hydrogeology ; Hydrologic data ; Hydrology ; Irrigation water ; Land cover ; Land use ; Lithology ; Management ; Mapping ; Methods ; Optimization ; Precipitation ; Prospecting ; Rainfall ; Reflectance ; Resource management ; Sand ; Sandstone ; Seasons ; Sediments ; Soil density ; Soil erosion ; Spatial distribution ; Stratigraphy ; Surface water ; Water ; Water shortages ; Water supply ; Water, Underground ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Water (Basel), 2021-05, Vol.13 (9), p.1255</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-ea66dfc1fca94bb982568b75283d9c6b5630380b6c21cc5dea3d93dd686f78ed3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-ea66dfc1fca94bb982568b75283d9c6b5630380b6c21cc5dea3d93dd686f78ed3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6075-9359 ; 0009-0001-6989-2639 ; 0000-0001-6963-9396</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2530130827/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2530130827?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25752,27923,27924,37011,44589,74997</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khan, Umair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faheem, Haris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Zhengwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wajid, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Younas, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Baoyi</creatorcontrib><title>Integrating a GIS-Based Multi-Influence Factors Model with Hydro-Geophysical Exploration for Groundwater Potential and Hydrogeological Assessment: A Case Study in the Karak Watershed, Northern Pakistan</title><title>Water (Basel)</title><description>The optimization of groundwater conditioning factors (GCFs), the evaluation of groundwater potential (GWpot), the hydrogeological characterization of aquifer geoelectrical properties and borehole lithological information are of great significance in the complex decision-making processes of groundwater resource management (GRM). In this study, the regional GWpot of the Karak watershed in Northern Pakistan was first evaluated by means of the multi-influence factors (MIFs) model of optimized GCFs through geoprocessing tools in geographical information system (GIS). The distribution of petrophysical properties indicated by the measured resistivity fluctuations was then generated to locally verify the GWpot, and to analyze the hydrogeological and geoelectrical characteristics of aquifers. According to the weighted overlay analysis of MIFs, GWpot map was zoned into low, medium, high and very high areas, covering 9.7% (72.3 km2), 52.4% (1307.7 km2), 31.3% (913.4 km2), and 6.6% (44.8 km2) of the study area. The GWpot accuracy sequentially depends on the classification criteria, the mean rating score, and the weights assigned to GCFs. The most influential factors are geology, lineament density, and land use/land cover followed by drainage density, slope, soil type, rainfall, elevation, and groundwater level fluctuations. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the confusion matrix, and Kappa (K) analysis show satisfactory and consistent results and expected performances (the area under the curve value 68%, confusion matrix 68%, Kappa (K) analysis 65%). The electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and vertical electrical sounding (VES) data interpretations reveals five regional hydrological layers (i.e., coarse gravel and sand, silty sand mixed lithology, clayey sand/fine sand, fine sand/gravel, and clayey basement). The preliminary interpretation of ERT results highlights the complexity of the hydrogeological strata and reveals that GWpot is structurally and proximately constrained in the clayey sand and silicate aquifers (sandstone), which is of significance for the determination of drilling sites, expansion of drinking water supply and irrigation in the future. Moreover, quantifying the spatial distribution of aquifer hydrogeological characteristics (such as reflection coefficient, isopach, and resistivity mapping) based on Olayinka’s basic standards, indirectly and locally verify the performance of the MIF model and ultimately determine new locations for groundwater exploitation. The combined methods of regional GWpot mapping and hydrogeological characterization, through the geospatial MIFs model and aquifer geoelectrical interpretation, respectively, facilitate decision-makers for sustainable GRM not only in the Karak watershed but also in other similar areas worldwide.</description><subject>Aquifers</subject><subject>Boreholes</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Climatic changes</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Drainage density</subject><subject>Drilling</subject><subject>Drinking water</subject><subject>Electrical resistivity</subject><subject>Elevation</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Feasibility studies</subject><subject>Fluctuations</subject><subject>Geoelectricity</subject><subject>Geographic information systems</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Geophysical exploration</subject><subject>Geophysical methods</subject><subject>Geospatial data</subject><subject>Gravel</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Groundwater levels</subject><subject>Groundwater management</subject><subject>Groundwater potential</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Hydrologic data</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Irrigation water</subject><subject>Land cover</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Lithology</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Mapping</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Prospecting</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Reflectance</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>Sand</subject><subject>Sandstone</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Soil density</subject><subject>Soil erosion</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>Stratigraphy</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water shortages</subject><subject>Water supply</subject><subject>Water, Underground</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>2073-4441</issn><issn>2073-4441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUdtuEzEQXSGQqEof-IOReEJiiy978fIWojaNaKFSQTyuvPZ443ZjB9urkE_kr3AIQsw8zOjonDMjnaJ4Tckl5x15v6ecdJTV9bPijJGWl1VV0ef_7S-LixgfSa6qE6ImZ8WvtUs4BpmsG0HCav1QfpQRNdzNU7Ll2plpRqcQrqVKPkS48xon2Nu0gZuDDr5cod9tDtEqOcHVz93kj2begfEBVsHPTu9lwgD3PqFLNrOk0yftiH7y4x_lIkaMcZsZH2ABy_wCPKRZH8A6SBuETzLIJ_h-dIob1O_gsw8ZDw7u5ZONSbpXxQsjp4gXf-d58e366uvyprz9slovF7el4pymEmXTaKOoUbKrhqETrG7E0NZMcN2pZqgbTrggQ6MYVarWKDPOtW5EY1qBmp8Xb06-u-B_zBhT_-jn4PLJntWc5AgEazPr8sQa5YS9dcanIFVujVurvENjM75oO8pZx1qaBW9PAhV8jAFNvwt2K8Ohp6Q_ptv_S5f_BmlVmik</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Khan, Umair</creator><creator>Faheem, Haris</creator><creator>Jiang, Zhengwen</creator><creator>Wajid, Muhammad</creator><creator>Younas, Muhammad</creator><creator>Zhang, Baoyi</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6075-9359</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6989-2639</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6963-9396</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>Integrating a GIS-Based Multi-Influence Factors Model with Hydro-Geophysical Exploration for Groundwater Potential and Hydrogeological Assessment: A Case Study in the Karak Watershed, Northern Pakistan</title><author>Khan, Umair ; Faheem, Haris ; Jiang, Zhengwen ; Wajid, Muhammad ; Younas, Muhammad ; Zhang, Baoyi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-ea66dfc1fca94bb982568b75283d9c6b5630380b6c21cc5dea3d93dd686f78ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aquifers</topic><topic>Boreholes</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Climatic changes</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Drainage density</topic><topic>Drilling</topic><topic>Drinking water</topic><topic>Electrical resistivity</topic><topic>Elevation</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Feasibility studies</topic><topic>Fluctuations</topic><topic>Geoelectricity</topic><topic>Geographic information systems</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Geophysical exploration</topic><topic>Geophysical methods</topic><topic>Geospatial data</topic><topic>Gravel</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Groundwater levels</topic><topic>Groundwater management</topic><topic>Groundwater potential</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Hydrologic data</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Irrigation water</topic><topic>Land cover</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Lithology</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Mapping</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Prospecting</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Reflectance</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>Sand</topic><topic>Sandstone</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Soil density</topic><topic>Soil erosion</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>Stratigraphy</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water shortages</topic><topic>Water supply</topic><topic>Water, Underground</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khan, Umair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faheem, Haris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Zhengwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wajid, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Younas, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Baoyi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khan, Umair</au><au>Faheem, Haris</au><au>Jiang, Zhengwen</au><au>Wajid, Muhammad</au><au>Younas, Muhammad</au><au>Zhang, Baoyi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Integrating a GIS-Based Multi-Influence Factors Model with Hydro-Geophysical Exploration for Groundwater Potential and Hydrogeological Assessment: A Case Study in the Karak Watershed, Northern Pakistan</atitle><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1255</spage><pages>1255-</pages><issn>2073-4441</issn><eissn>2073-4441</eissn><abstract>The optimization of groundwater conditioning factors (GCFs), the evaluation of groundwater potential (GWpot), the hydrogeological characterization of aquifer geoelectrical properties and borehole lithological information are of great significance in the complex decision-making processes of groundwater resource management (GRM). In this study, the regional GWpot of the Karak watershed in Northern Pakistan was first evaluated by means of the multi-influence factors (MIFs) model of optimized GCFs through geoprocessing tools in geographical information system (GIS). The distribution of petrophysical properties indicated by the measured resistivity fluctuations was then generated to locally verify the GWpot, and to analyze the hydrogeological and geoelectrical characteristics of aquifers. According to the weighted overlay analysis of MIFs, GWpot map was zoned into low, medium, high and very high areas, covering 9.7% (72.3 km2), 52.4% (1307.7 km2), 31.3% (913.4 km2), and 6.6% (44.8 km2) of the study area. The GWpot accuracy sequentially depends on the classification criteria, the mean rating score, and the weights assigned to GCFs. The most influential factors are geology, lineament density, and land use/land cover followed by drainage density, slope, soil type, rainfall, elevation, and groundwater level fluctuations. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the confusion matrix, and Kappa (K) analysis show satisfactory and consistent results and expected performances (the area under the curve value 68%, confusion matrix 68%, Kappa (K) analysis 65%). The electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and vertical electrical sounding (VES) data interpretations reveals five regional hydrological layers (i.e., coarse gravel and sand, silty sand mixed lithology, clayey sand/fine sand, fine sand/gravel, and clayey basement). The preliminary interpretation of ERT results highlights the complexity of the hydrogeological strata and reveals that GWpot is structurally and proximately constrained in the clayey sand and silicate aquifers (sandstone), which is of significance for the determination of drilling sites, expansion of drinking water supply and irrigation in the future. Moreover, quantifying the spatial distribution of aquifer hydrogeological characteristics (such as reflection coefficient, isopach, and resistivity mapping) based on Olayinka’s basic standards, indirectly and locally verify the performance of the MIF model and ultimately determine new locations for groundwater exploitation. The combined methods of regional GWpot mapping and hydrogeological characterization, through the geospatial MIFs model and aquifer geoelectrical interpretation, respectively, facilitate decision-makers for sustainable GRM not only in the Karak watershed but also in other similar areas worldwide.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/w13091255</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6075-9359</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6989-2639</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6963-9396</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2073-4441
ispartof Water (Basel), 2021-05, Vol.13 (9), p.1255
issn 2073-4441
2073-4441
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2530130827
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)
subjects Aquifers
Boreholes
Case studies
Climatic changes
Decision making
Drainage density
Drilling
Drinking water
Electrical resistivity
Elevation
Environmental impact
Feasibility studies
Fluctuations
Geoelectricity
Geographic information systems
Geology
Geophysical exploration
Geophysical methods
Geospatial data
Gravel
Groundwater
Groundwater levels
Groundwater management
Groundwater potential
Hydrogeology
Hydrologic data
Hydrology
Irrigation water
Land cover
Land use
Lithology
Management
Mapping
Methods
Optimization
Precipitation
Prospecting
Rainfall
Reflectance
Resource management
Sand
Sandstone
Seasons
Sediments
Soil density
Soil erosion
Spatial distribution
Stratigraphy
Surface water
Water
Water shortages
Water supply
Water, Underground
Watersheds
title Integrating a GIS-Based Multi-Influence Factors Model with Hydro-Geophysical Exploration for Groundwater Potential and Hydrogeological Assessment: A Case Study in the Karak Watershed, Northern Pakistan
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T10%3A39%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Integrating%20a%20GIS-Based%20Multi-Influence%20Factors%20Model%20with%20Hydro-Geophysical%20Exploration%20for%20Groundwater%20Potential%20and%20Hydrogeological%20Assessment:%20A%20Case%20Study%20in%20the%20Karak%20Watershed,%20Northern%20Pakistan&rft.jtitle=Water%20(Basel)&rft.au=Khan,%20Umair&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1255&rft.pages=1255-&rft.issn=2073-4441&rft.eissn=2073-4441&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/w13091255&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA791329271%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-ea66dfc1fca94bb982568b75283d9c6b5630380b6c21cc5dea3d93dd686f78ed3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2530130827&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A791329271&rfr_iscdi=true