Localized Water Quality Improvement in the Choptank Estuary, a Tributary of Chesapeake Bay

• Published in: Estuaries and coasts 2021-07, Vol.44 (5), p.1274-1293
• Main Authors: Fisher, Thomas R., Fox, Rebecca J., Gustafson, Anne B., Koontz, Erika, Lepori-Bui, Michelle, Lewis, James
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Agricultural industry; Agricultural management; Agricultural wastes; Agriculture; Atmospheric pollution deposition; Brackishwater environment; Chlorophyll; Chlorophyll a; Coastal Sciences; Deposition; Dissolved oxygen; Earth and Environmental Science; Ecology; Emissions; Environment; Environmental degradation; Environmental Management; Estuaries; Estuarine dynamics; Freshwater & Marine Ecology; Human wastes; Industrial pollution; Investment; Mineral nutrients; Nutrient loss; Nutrient pollution; Pollution control; Quality control; Quality improvement; Stations; Surface water; Tributaries; Wastewater treatment; Wastewater treatment plants; Water and Health; Water pollution; Water quality; Water treatment
• ISSN: 1559-2723; 1559-2731
• DOI: 10.1007/s12237-020-00872-4

Chesapeake Bay has a long history of nutrient pollution resulting in degraded water quality. However, we report improvements in chlorophyll a in surface waters and dissolved oxygen in bottom waters at one of three estuarine stations in the Choptank tributary of Chesapeake Bay. We updated a previous nutrient budget for the estuary constructed for reference year 1998 using rates of atmospheric deposition, inputs of watershed diffuse sources (primarily agriculture), and discharges of point sources (primarily human waste) for reference year 2017. Parallel trends suggest that improvements in water quality at the one station were likely due to 20% reductions in direct atmospheric deposition on the estuary’s surface and 78–95% reductions in wastewater N and P due to installation of tertiary treatment. The agricultural sector, the dominant source of N and P, appeared to provide little contribution to improved water quality during this period. Although efforts to reduce nutrient losses from agriculture are common throughout the Choptank basin, widespread reductions from agricultural diffuse sources could make large contributions to improved water quality at all stations in the estuary. The response in the Choptank is similar to those observed elsewhere in the USA, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand due to improved wastewater treatment. Similar to our findings, the upper Potomac River of Chesapeake Bay saw improvements driven by reductions in atmospheric deposition. Unfortunately, few studies elsewhere have shown improvements in water quality due to agricultural management. The data presented here indicate that public and industrial investments in reductions of atmospheric emissions and upgrades to wastewater treatment plants have improved estuarine water quality in the Choptank.