Seeing Isn’t Always Believing: Gender, Academic STEM, and Women Scientists’ Perceptions of Career Opportunities

• Published in: Gender & society 2021-06, Vol.35 (3), p.422-448
• Main Authors: Bird, Sharon R., Rhoton, Laura A.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Bias; Career opportunities; College faculty; Gender; Higher education; Inequality; Mathematics; Meritocracy; Perceptions; Science and technology; White people; Women; Work organization; Workforce; Working women
• ISSN: 0891-2432; 1552-3977
• DOI: 10.1177/08912432211008814

Studies about women’s underrepresentation in the U.S. science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) academic workforce have flourished in the past decade. Much of this research focuses on institutionalized gender barriers and implicit biases, consistent with theorizing about how work organizations disproportionately benefit men, white people, and other systemically advantaged groups. But to what extent do faculty most likely disadvantaged by systematic inequities actually perceive “barriers” to equity in the context of their own work lives? What might the repercussions associated with variation in perceptions about inequity be, especially within institutions of higher education actively pursuing equity agendas under such programs as the National Science Foundation’s ADVANCE program? Using interview data from 53 STEM women faculty working at a university that received a 5-year NSF ADVANCE IT award, we examine the range of views held among women scientists about the extent to which opportunity and success are a function of meritocratic versus nonmeritocratic processes. Findings show that almost a third of participants held the view that opportunities and advancement are primarily a function of meritocratic processes. We discuss implications of these findings for broader institutional efforts to reduce inequities in academic STEM.