Simultaneous Calibration of Hydrologic Model Structure and Parameters Using a Blended Model

The advent of hydrological modeling frameworks that support multiple model structures using the same software enables both model structure and model parameters to be calibrated and assessed. To date, the identification of optimal model structure has typically been performed manually. Here, a continu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Water resources research 2021-05, Vol.57 (5), p.n/a
Main Authors: Chlumsky, Robert, Mai, Juliane, Craig, James R., Tolson, Bryan A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Algorithms
blended model
Calibration
Catchment area
Catchment models
Computer applications
Fluxes
hydrologic modeling
Hydrologic models
Hydrology
Mathematical models
model calibration
model structure
Optimization
Parameter identification
Parameters
Permutations
Search algorithms
Structures
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The advent of hydrological modeling frameworks that support multiple model structures using the same software enables both model structure and model parameters to be calibrated and assessed. To date, the identification of optimal model structure has typically been performed manually. Here, a continuous (rather than discrete) treatment of model structure is used, which enables simultaneous automatic calibration of model structure and parameters using a conventional real‐valued decision variable optimization algorithm (the dynamically dimensioned search algorithm, DDS). The method, referred to herein as blended model structure calibration (BMSC), relies upon the calculation of each hydrologic flux (e.g., for infiltration) as a weighted average of fluxes generated from multiple process algorithm options. This method is applied to 12 lumped MOPEX catchment models and compared to the calibration of 108 fixed model structures, representing all possible permutations of fixed model structures with the given process options in this study. The BMSC method consistently identified near‐optimal model structure (as evaluated using average model rank performance) at significantly lower computational cost than calibrating the collective of fixed structure models. The BMSC method also provides a useful tool in identifying dominant processes and model structures in catchments. Key Points Model structure and parameters may be calibrated simultaneously using the blended model structure calibration (BMSC) method The BMSC method consistently identified near‐optimal model structures at significantly lower computational cost than fixed structures This method may also be useful in identifying dominant processes and model structures in catchments
ISSN:0043-1397
1944-7973
DOI:10.1029/2020WR029229