Loading…
Judging informal learning interventions: a vignette study
Purpose Informal learning is seen as the most important way to acquire and develop the skills and competencies required for work. The Dutch Defence organisation (DDO) aims to use the opportunities for development of employees that informal learning offers better and is looking for suitable intervent...
Saved in:
Published in: | The journal of workplace learning 2020-02, Vol.32 (1), p.1-15 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-b195c09af8767173e92ca126804ba6f8ecbc42cd0949ebc06888afd81a7697993 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-b195c09af8767173e92ca126804ba6f8ecbc42cd0949ebc06888afd81a7697993 |
container_end_page | 15 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | The journal of workplace learning |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Pennings, Helena Josefina Maria Bottenheft, Charelle Van de Boer-Visschedijk, Gillian C Stubbé, Hester Elisabeth |
description | Purpose
Informal learning is seen as the most important way to acquire and develop the skills and competencies required for work. The Dutch Defence organisation (DDO) aims to use the opportunities for development of employees that informal learning offers better and is looking for suitable interventions. Four possible interventions to improve informal learning were developed, based on factors that influence informal learning. The purpose of this paper is to assess how Dutch Military personnel rate these interventions and to gather their opinions and preferences per intervention.
Design/methodology/approach
A total of 96 employees completed an online mixed-method vignette study. In the questionnaire, the four interventions were introduced by a visualisation in the form of a “comic strip” (vignette), and respondents’ perceptions were measured with multiple choice and open-ended questions.
Findings
Respondents clearly indicated a preference for two of the four interventions, i.e. informal mentorship and safe learning environment. They provided numerous advantages and disadvantages per intervention. They also indicated that all four interventions could be used throughout the entire Dutch Defence Organisation.
Research limitations/implications
The results contribute to a thoughtful design of interventions that can be used in practice; also, the interventions can be improved based on the advantages, disadvantages and suggestions formulated by the respondents in this vignette study.
Originality/value
The designs of interventions are studied in a systematic way by the target population before they are actually developed and implemented. In addition, the use of “comic strips” and visualisations in vignette studies is quite original. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/JWL-02-2019-0027 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2533404160</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2533404160</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-b195c09af8767173e92ca126804ba6f8ecbc42cd0949ebc06888afd81a7697993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1LxDAQhoMouK7ePRY8x50kbT68yeLXsuBF8RjSNC1d2nRN0oX993apF8G5zDC8zww8CN0SuCcE5GrztcVAMQWiMAAVZ2hBRCGxkIU6n2bGOS445ZfoKsYdTKWkXCC1Gaum9U3W-noIvemyzpng501y4eB8agcfHzKTHdrGu5RcFtNYHa_RRW266G5--xJ9Pj99rF_x9v3lbf24xZYRknBJVGFBmVoKLohgTlFrCOUS8tLwWjpb2pzaClSuXGmBSylNXUliBFdCKbZEd_PdfRi-RxeT3g1j8NNLTQvGcsgJhykFc8qGIcbgar0PbW_CURPQJ0F6EqSB6pMgfRI0IasZcb0Lpqv-I_4oZT_oTWYs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2533404160</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Judging informal learning interventions: a vignette study</title><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><source>Library & Information Science Collection</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Pennings, Helena Josefina Maria ; Bottenheft, Charelle ; Van de Boer-Visschedijk, Gillian C ; Stubbé, Hester Elisabeth</creator><creatorcontrib>Pennings, Helena Josefina Maria ; Bottenheft, Charelle ; Van de Boer-Visschedijk, Gillian C ; Stubbé, Hester Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Informal learning is seen as the most important way to acquire and develop the skills and competencies required for work. The Dutch Defence organisation (DDO) aims to use the opportunities for development of employees that informal learning offers better and is looking for suitable interventions. Four possible interventions to improve informal learning were developed, based on factors that influence informal learning. The purpose of this paper is to assess how Dutch Military personnel rate these interventions and to gather their opinions and preferences per intervention.
Design/methodology/approach
A total of 96 employees completed an online mixed-method vignette study. In the questionnaire, the four interventions were introduced by a visualisation in the form of a “comic strip” (vignette), and respondents’ perceptions were measured with multiple choice and open-ended questions.
Findings
Respondents clearly indicated a preference for two of the four interventions, i.e. informal mentorship and safe learning environment. They provided numerous advantages and disadvantages per intervention. They also indicated that all four interventions could be used throughout the entire Dutch Defence Organisation.
Research limitations/implications
The results contribute to a thoughtful design of interventions that can be used in practice; also, the interventions can be improved based on the advantages, disadvantages and suggestions formulated by the respondents in this vignette study.
Originality/value
The designs of interventions are studied in a systematic way by the target population before they are actually developed and implemented. In addition, the use of “comic strips” and visualisations in vignette studies is quite original.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1366-5626</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7859</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/JWL-02-2019-0027</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Employees ; Experiential Learning ; Incidental Learning ; Independent study ; Informal education ; Intervention ; Learning activities ; Learning Processes ; Lifelong learning ; Military personnel ; Mixed methods research ; Questionnaires ; Social interaction</subject><ispartof>The journal of workplace learning, 2020-02, Vol.32 (1), p.1-15</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-b195c09af8767173e92ca126804ba6f8ecbc42cd0949ebc06888afd81a7697993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-b195c09af8767173e92ca126804ba6f8ecbc42cd0949ebc06888afd81a7697993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2533404160?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,21378,21381,21394,27924,27925,33611,33877,33906,36060,43733,43880,43892,44363</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pennings, Helena Josefina Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bottenheft, Charelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van de Boer-Visschedijk, Gillian C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stubbé, Hester Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><title>Judging informal learning interventions: a vignette study</title><title>The journal of workplace learning</title><description>Purpose
Informal learning is seen as the most important way to acquire and develop the skills and competencies required for work. The Dutch Defence organisation (DDO) aims to use the opportunities for development of employees that informal learning offers better and is looking for suitable interventions. Four possible interventions to improve informal learning were developed, based on factors that influence informal learning. The purpose of this paper is to assess how Dutch Military personnel rate these interventions and to gather their opinions and preferences per intervention.
Design/methodology/approach
A total of 96 employees completed an online mixed-method vignette study. In the questionnaire, the four interventions were introduced by a visualisation in the form of a “comic strip” (vignette), and respondents’ perceptions were measured with multiple choice and open-ended questions.
Findings
Respondents clearly indicated a preference for two of the four interventions, i.e. informal mentorship and safe learning environment. They provided numerous advantages and disadvantages per intervention. They also indicated that all four interventions could be used throughout the entire Dutch Defence Organisation.
Research limitations/implications
The results contribute to a thoughtful design of interventions that can be used in practice; also, the interventions can be improved based on the advantages, disadvantages and suggestions formulated by the respondents in this vignette study.
Originality/value
The designs of interventions are studied in a systematic way by the target population before they are actually developed and implemented. In addition, the use of “comic strips” and visualisations in vignette studies is quite original.</description><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Experiential Learning</subject><subject>Incidental Learning</subject><subject>Independent study</subject><subject>Informal education</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Learning activities</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Lifelong learning</subject><subject>Military personnel</subject><subject>Mixed methods research</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><issn>1366-5626</issn><issn>1758-7859</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>CNYFK</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M1O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE1LxDAQhoMouK7ePRY8x50kbT68yeLXsuBF8RjSNC1d2nRN0oX993apF8G5zDC8zww8CN0SuCcE5GrztcVAMQWiMAAVZ2hBRCGxkIU6n2bGOS445ZfoKsYdTKWkXCC1Gaum9U3W-noIvemyzpng501y4eB8agcfHzKTHdrGu5RcFtNYHa_RRW266G5--xJ9Pj99rF_x9v3lbf24xZYRknBJVGFBmVoKLohgTlFrCOUS8tLwWjpb2pzaClSuXGmBSylNXUliBFdCKbZEd_PdfRi-RxeT3g1j8NNLTQvGcsgJhykFc8qGIcbgar0PbW_CURPQJ0F6EqSB6pMgfRI0IasZcb0Lpqv-I_4oZT_oTWYs</recordid><startdate>20200204</startdate><enddate>20200204</enddate><creator>Pennings, Helena Josefina Maria</creator><creator>Bottenheft, Charelle</creator><creator>Van de Boer-Visschedijk, Gillian C</creator><creator>Stubbé, Hester Elisabeth</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200204</creationdate><title>Judging informal learning interventions: a vignette study</title><author>Pennings, Helena Josefina Maria ; Bottenheft, Charelle ; Van de Boer-Visschedijk, Gillian C ; Stubbé, Hester Elisabeth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-b195c09af8767173e92ca126804ba6f8ecbc42cd0949ebc06888afd81a7697993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Experiential Learning</topic><topic>Incidental Learning</topic><topic>Independent study</topic><topic>Informal education</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Learning activities</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Lifelong learning</topic><topic>Military personnel</topic><topic>Mixed methods research</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pennings, Helena Josefina Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bottenheft, Charelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van de Boer-Visschedijk, Gillian C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stubbé, Hester Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The journal of workplace learning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pennings, Helena Josefina Maria</au><au>Bottenheft, Charelle</au><au>Van de Boer-Visschedijk, Gillian C</au><au>Stubbé, Hester Elisabeth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Judging informal learning interventions: a vignette study</atitle><jtitle>The journal of workplace learning</jtitle><date>2020-02-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>15</epage><pages>1-15</pages><issn>1366-5626</issn><eissn>1758-7859</eissn><abstract>Purpose
Informal learning is seen as the most important way to acquire and develop the skills and competencies required for work. The Dutch Defence organisation (DDO) aims to use the opportunities for development of employees that informal learning offers better and is looking for suitable interventions. Four possible interventions to improve informal learning were developed, based on factors that influence informal learning. The purpose of this paper is to assess how Dutch Military personnel rate these interventions and to gather their opinions and preferences per intervention.
Design/methodology/approach
A total of 96 employees completed an online mixed-method vignette study. In the questionnaire, the four interventions were introduced by a visualisation in the form of a “comic strip” (vignette), and respondents’ perceptions were measured with multiple choice and open-ended questions.
Findings
Respondents clearly indicated a preference for two of the four interventions, i.e. informal mentorship and safe learning environment. They provided numerous advantages and disadvantages per intervention. They also indicated that all four interventions could be used throughout the entire Dutch Defence Organisation.
Research limitations/implications
The results contribute to a thoughtful design of interventions that can be used in practice; also, the interventions can be improved based on the advantages, disadvantages and suggestions formulated by the respondents in this vignette study.
Originality/value
The designs of interventions are studied in a systematic way by the target population before they are actually developed and implemented. In addition, the use of “comic strips” and visualisations in vignette studies is quite original.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/JWL-02-2019-0027</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1366-5626 |
ispartof | The journal of workplace learning, 2020-02, Vol.32 (1), p.1-15 |
issn | 1366-5626 1758-7859 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2533404160 |
source | ABI/INFORM global; Social Science Premium Collection; Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list); Library & Information Science Collection; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Education Collection |
subjects | Employees Experiential Learning Incidental Learning Independent study Informal education Intervention Learning activities Learning Processes Lifelong learning Military personnel Mixed methods research Questionnaires Social interaction |
title | Judging informal learning interventions: a vignette study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T04%3A33%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Judging%20informal%20learning%20interventions:%20a%20vignette%20study&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20workplace%20learning&rft.au=Pennings,%20Helena%20Josefina%20Maria&rft.date=2020-02-04&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=15&rft.pages=1-15&rft.issn=1366-5626&rft.eissn=1758-7859&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/JWL-02-2019-0027&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2533404160%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-b195c09af8767173e92ca126804ba6f8ecbc42cd0949ebc06888afd81a7697993%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2533404160&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |