Loading…

Complicating or simplifying? Investigating the mixed impacts of online product information on consumers’ purchase decisions

Purpose Prior literature indicates conflicting effects of online product information, which may complicate or simplify consumer purchase decisions. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to investigate how different online product information (i.e. the choice set size and the popularity information...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Internet research 2020-02, Vol.30 (1), p.263-287
Main Authors: Yu, Yan, Liu, Ben Qianqian, Hao, Jin-Xing, Wang, Chuanqi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-2095c6de56b2701d2004f7cb91294b6aaa9917ab4c605c6b65e4825007634903
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-2095c6de56b2701d2004f7cb91294b6aaa9917ab4c605c6b65e4825007634903
container_end_page 287
container_issue 1
container_start_page 263
container_title Internet research
container_volume 30
creator Yu, Yan
Liu, Ben Qianqian
Hao, Jin-Xing
Wang, Chuanqi
description Purpose Prior literature indicates conflicting effects of online product information, which may complicate or simplify consumer purchase decisions. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to investigate how different online product information (i.e. the choice set size and the popularity information and its presentation) affect consumers’ decision making and the related market outcomes. Design/methodology/approach This research relies on information-processing theories and social learning theory. By stepwise conducting two 2×2 within-subject factorial design experiments, this research examines the effects of the choice set size, product popularity information and product presentation on consumers’ decision making and the aggregated market outcomes. Findings The results show that product popularity information led consumers to either simplify or complicate their decision strategy, depending on the size of the choice sets. Additionally, presenting products by their popularity in descending order resulted in consumers making decisions with a larger decision bias. The results also show that the presence of product popularity was more likely to forge a “superstar” structure in a large market. Practical implications The research suggests that e-retailers and e-marketplace operators should carefully utilize product popularity information. Multiple mechanisms that shape different shopping environments with different orders are necessary to create a long-tailed market structure. Originality/value This study found the mixed effects of product popularity information when it is presented in different environments (i.e. the large/small choice set and the sorted/randomized product presentation). The overuse of popularity information may induce consumers’ decision bias.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/INTR-05-2018-0247
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2533933042</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2533933042</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-2095c6de56b2701d2004f7cb91294b6aaa9917ab4c605c6b65e4825007634903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkctKAzEUhoMoWC8P4C7gevTkOs1KpHgpFAXpPmQyGZvSmdRkRnQh-Bq-nk9ihroRXIXD-f6T8_8HoTMCF4TA9HL-sHwqQBQUyLQAyss9NKEgeCGkKPfRhICUBaWcHaKjlNYAQJTiE_QxC-12463pffeMQ8TJj3XznssrPO9eXer9867brxxu_ZurcWaM7RMODQ7dxncOb2OoB9tj3zUhtpkPXW5hG7o0tC6m788vvB2iXZnkcO2sT5lIJ-igMZvkTn_fY7S8vVnO7ovF4918dr0oLCO8z6aUsLJ2Qla0BFJTAN6UtlKEKl5JY4xSpDQVtxIyWEnh-JQKgFIyroAdo_Pd2Lzly5Ad6XUYYpd_1FQwphgDTjNFdpSNIaXoGr2NvjXxXRPQY8h6DFmD0GPIegw5a2Cncdmk2dT_Sv7chf0AlmSA6A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2533933042</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Complicating or simplifying? Investigating the mixed impacts of online product information on consumers’ purchase decisions</title><source>ABI/INFORM Collection</source><source>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><source>Library &amp; Information Science Collection</source><source>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Yu, Yan ; Liu, Ben Qianqian ; Hao, Jin-Xing ; Wang, Chuanqi</creator><creatorcontrib>Yu, Yan ; Liu, Ben Qianqian ; Hao, Jin-Xing ; Wang, Chuanqi</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Prior literature indicates conflicting effects of online product information, which may complicate or simplify consumer purchase decisions. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to investigate how different online product information (i.e. the choice set size and the popularity information and its presentation) affect consumers’ decision making and the related market outcomes. Design/methodology/approach This research relies on information-processing theories and social learning theory. By stepwise conducting two 2×2 within-subject factorial design experiments, this research examines the effects of the choice set size, product popularity information and product presentation on consumers’ decision making and the aggregated market outcomes. Findings The results show that product popularity information led consumers to either simplify or complicate their decision strategy, depending on the size of the choice sets. Additionally, presenting products by their popularity in descending order resulted in consumers making decisions with a larger decision bias. The results also show that the presence of product popularity was more likely to forge a “superstar” structure in a large market. Practical implications The research suggests that e-retailers and e-marketplace operators should carefully utilize product popularity information. Multiple mechanisms that shape different shopping environments with different orders are necessary to create a long-tailed market structure. Originality/value This study found the mixed effects of product popularity information when it is presented in different environments (i.e. the large/small choice set and the sorted/randomized product presentation). The overuse of popularity information may induce consumers’ decision bias.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1066-2243</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2054-5657</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/INTR-05-2018-0247</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Bias ; Cognitive Ability ; Cognitive load ; Consumers ; Decision making ; Electronic commerce ; Environment ; Expected values ; Factorial design ; Information processing ; Learning ; Learning Theories ; Learning theory ; Literature Reviews ; Merchandise Information ; Peer Acceptance ; Preferences ; Product information ; Rationality ; Shopping ; Socialization</subject><ispartof>Internet research, 2020-02, Vol.30 (1), p.263-287</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-2095c6de56b2701d2004f7cb91294b6aaa9917ab4c605c6b65e4825007634903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-2095c6de56b2701d2004f7cb91294b6aaa9917ab4c605c6b65e4825007634903</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2533933042?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,21378,21381,21394,27305,27924,27925,33611,33877,33906,34135,36060,43733,43880,43892,44363</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yu, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ben Qianqian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, Jin-Xing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chuanqi</creatorcontrib><title>Complicating or simplifying? Investigating the mixed impacts of online product information on consumers’ purchase decisions</title><title>Internet research</title><description>Purpose Prior literature indicates conflicting effects of online product information, which may complicate or simplify consumer purchase decisions. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to investigate how different online product information (i.e. the choice set size and the popularity information and its presentation) affect consumers’ decision making and the related market outcomes. Design/methodology/approach This research relies on information-processing theories and social learning theory. By stepwise conducting two 2×2 within-subject factorial design experiments, this research examines the effects of the choice set size, product popularity information and product presentation on consumers’ decision making and the aggregated market outcomes. Findings The results show that product popularity information led consumers to either simplify or complicate their decision strategy, depending on the size of the choice sets. Additionally, presenting products by their popularity in descending order resulted in consumers making decisions with a larger decision bias. The results also show that the presence of product popularity was more likely to forge a “superstar” structure in a large market. Practical implications The research suggests that e-retailers and e-marketplace operators should carefully utilize product popularity information. Multiple mechanisms that shape different shopping environments with different orders are necessary to create a long-tailed market structure. Originality/value This study found the mixed effects of product popularity information when it is presented in different environments (i.e. the large/small choice set and the sorted/randomized product presentation). The overuse of popularity information may induce consumers’ decision bias.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Cognitive Ability</subject><subject>Cognitive load</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Electronic commerce</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Expected values</subject><subject>Factorial design</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Theories</subject><subject>Learning theory</subject><subject>Literature Reviews</subject><subject>Merchandise Information</subject><subject>Peer Acceptance</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Product information</subject><subject>Rationality</subject><subject>Shopping</subject><subject>Socialization</subject><issn>1066-2243</issn><issn>2054-5657</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>CNYFK</sourceid><sourceid>F2A</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M1O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkctKAzEUhoMoWC8P4C7gevTkOs1KpHgpFAXpPmQyGZvSmdRkRnQh-Bq-nk9ihroRXIXD-f6T8_8HoTMCF4TA9HL-sHwqQBQUyLQAyss9NKEgeCGkKPfRhICUBaWcHaKjlNYAQJTiE_QxC-12463pffeMQ8TJj3XznssrPO9eXer9867brxxu_ZurcWaM7RMODQ7dxncOb2OoB9tj3zUhtpkPXW5hG7o0tC6m788vvB2iXZnkcO2sT5lIJ-igMZvkTn_fY7S8vVnO7ovF4918dr0oLCO8z6aUsLJ2Qla0BFJTAN6UtlKEKl5JY4xSpDQVtxIyWEnh-JQKgFIyroAdo_Pd2Lzly5Ad6XUYYpd_1FQwphgDTjNFdpSNIaXoGr2NvjXxXRPQY8h6DFmD0GPIegw5a2Cncdmk2dT_Sv7chf0AlmSA6A</recordid><startdate>20200203</startdate><enddate>20200203</enddate><creator>Yu, Yan</creator><creator>Liu, Ben Qianqian</creator><creator>Hao, Jin-Xing</creator><creator>Wang, Chuanqi</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200203</creationdate><title>Complicating or simplifying? Investigating the mixed impacts of online product information on consumers’ purchase decisions</title><author>Yu, Yan ; Liu, Ben Qianqian ; Hao, Jin-Xing ; Wang, Chuanqi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-2095c6de56b2701d2004f7cb91294b6aaa9917ab4c605c6b65e4825007634903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Cognitive Ability</topic><topic>Cognitive load</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Electronic commerce</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Expected values</topic><topic>Factorial design</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Theories</topic><topic>Learning theory</topic><topic>Literature Reviews</topic><topic>Merchandise Information</topic><topic>Peer Acceptance</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Product information</topic><topic>Rationality</topic><topic>Shopping</topic><topic>Socialization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yu, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ben Qianqian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, Jin-Xing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chuanqi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Internet research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yu, Yan</au><au>Liu, Ben Qianqian</au><au>Hao, Jin-Xing</au><au>Wang, Chuanqi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Complicating or simplifying? Investigating the mixed impacts of online product information on consumers’ purchase decisions</atitle><jtitle>Internet research</jtitle><date>2020-02-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>263</spage><epage>287</epage><pages>263-287</pages><issn>1066-2243</issn><eissn>2054-5657</eissn><abstract>Purpose Prior literature indicates conflicting effects of online product information, which may complicate or simplify consumer purchase decisions. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to investigate how different online product information (i.e. the choice set size and the popularity information and its presentation) affect consumers’ decision making and the related market outcomes. Design/methodology/approach This research relies on information-processing theories and social learning theory. By stepwise conducting two 2×2 within-subject factorial design experiments, this research examines the effects of the choice set size, product popularity information and product presentation on consumers’ decision making and the aggregated market outcomes. Findings The results show that product popularity information led consumers to either simplify or complicate their decision strategy, depending on the size of the choice sets. Additionally, presenting products by their popularity in descending order resulted in consumers making decisions with a larger decision bias. The results also show that the presence of product popularity was more likely to forge a “superstar” structure in a large market. Practical implications The research suggests that e-retailers and e-marketplace operators should carefully utilize product popularity information. Multiple mechanisms that shape different shopping environments with different orders are necessary to create a long-tailed market structure. Originality/value This study found the mixed effects of product popularity information when it is presented in different environments (i.e. the large/small choice set and the sorted/randomized product presentation). The overuse of popularity information may induce consumers’ decision bias.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/INTR-05-2018-0247</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1066-2243
ispartof Internet research, 2020-02, Vol.30 (1), p.263-287
issn 1066-2243
2054-5657
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2533933042
source ABI/INFORM Collection; Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA); Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list); Library & Information Science Collection; ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection; Education Collection
subjects Accuracy
Bias
Cognitive Ability
Cognitive load
Consumers
Decision making
Electronic commerce
Environment
Expected values
Factorial design
Information processing
Learning
Learning Theories
Learning theory
Literature Reviews
Merchandise Information
Peer Acceptance
Preferences
Product information
Rationality
Shopping
Socialization
title Complicating or simplifying? Investigating the mixed impacts of online product information on consumers’ purchase decisions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T05%3A22%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Complicating%20or%20simplifying?%20Investigating%20the%20mixed%20impacts%20of%20online%20product%20information%20on%20consumers%E2%80%99%20purchase%20decisions&rft.jtitle=Internet%20research&rft.au=Yu,%20Yan&rft.date=2020-02-03&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=263&rft.epage=287&rft.pages=263-287&rft.issn=1066-2243&rft.eissn=2054-5657&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/INTR-05-2018-0247&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2533933042%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-2095c6de56b2701d2004f7cb91294b6aaa9917ab4c605c6b65e4825007634903%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2533933042&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true