Loading…
Application of machine learning algorithms for the evaluation of seismic soil liquefaction potential
This study investigates the performance of four machine learning (ML) algorithms to evaluate the earthquake-induced liquefaction potential of soil based on the cone penetration test field case history records using the Bayesian belief network (BBN) learning software Netica. The BBN structures that w...
Saved in:
Published in: | Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering 2021-04, Vol.15 (2), p.490-505 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-9564f88662eb216984b30b6e7d48b9cb8fc84dc3337a1dddd87830edfbdec2743 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-9564f88662eb216984b30b6e7d48b9cb8fc84dc3337a1dddd87830edfbdec2743 |
container_end_page | 505 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 490 |
container_title | Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | AHMAD, Mahmood TANG, Xiao-Wei QIU, Jiang-Nan AHMAD, Feezan GU, Wen-Jing |
description | This study investigates the performance of four machine learning (ML) algorithms to evaluate the earthquake-induced liquefaction potential of soil based on the cone penetration test field case history records using the Bayesian belief network (BBN) learning software Netica. The BBN structures that were developed by ML algorithms-K2, hill climbing (HC), tree augmented naive (TAN) Bayes, and Tabu search were adopted to perform parameter learning in Netica, thereby fixing the BBN models. The performance measure indexes, namely, overall accuracy ( OA), precision, recall, F-measure, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, were used to evaluate the training and testing BBN models' performance and highlight the capability of the K2 and TAN Bayes models over the Tabu search and HC models. The sensitivity analysis results showed that the cone tip resistance and vertical effective stress are the most sensitive factors, whereas the mean grain size is the least sensitive factor in the prediction of seismic soil liquefaction potential. The results of this study can provide theoretical support for researchers in selecting appropriate ML algorithms and improving the predictive performance of seismic soil liquefaction potential models. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11709-020-0669-5 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2535299924</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2535299924</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-9564f88662eb216984b30b6e7d48b9cb8fc84dc3337a1dddd87830edfbdec2743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhosoOOZ-gHcBr6snST-SyzH8goE3eh3S9KTN6JqadIL_3s7KvFtuEsj7vOfwJMkthXsKUD5ESkuQKTBIoShkml8kCwYyT1mWycvTm8N1sopxBwAUSg6CL5J6PQydM3p0vifekr02reuRdKhD7_qG6K7xwY3tPhLrAxlbJPilu8OJiOji3hkSvetI5z4PaLX5_Rz8iP3odHeTXFndRVz93cvk4-nxffOSbt-eXzfrbWp4kY-pzIvMClEUDCtGCymyikNVYFlnopKmEtaIrDac81LTejqiFBywtlWNhpUZXyZ3c-8Q_LRHHNXOH0I_jVQs5zmTUrJjis4pE3yMAa0agtvr8K0oqKNPNftUk0919KnyiWEzE6ds32D4bz4HiRlqXdNiwHoIGKOywU9WMJxDfwAZpYvs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2535299924</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Application of machine learning algorithms for the evaluation of seismic soil liquefaction potential</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>AHMAD, Mahmood ; TANG, Xiao-Wei ; QIU, Jiang-Nan ; AHMAD, Feezan ; GU, Wen-Jing</creator><creatorcontrib>AHMAD, Mahmood ; TANG, Xiao-Wei ; QIU, Jiang-Nan ; AHMAD, Feezan ; GU, Wen-Jing</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigates the performance of four machine learning (ML) algorithms to evaluate the earthquake-induced liquefaction potential of soil based on the cone penetration test field case history records using the Bayesian belief network (BBN) learning software Netica. The BBN structures that were developed by ML algorithms-K2, hill climbing (HC), tree augmented naive (TAN) Bayes, and Tabu search were adopted to perform parameter learning in Netica, thereby fixing the BBN models. The performance measure indexes, namely, overall accuracy ( OA), precision, recall, F-measure, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, were used to evaluate the training and testing BBN models' performance and highlight the capability of the K2 and TAN Bayes models over the Tabu search and HC models. The sensitivity analysis results showed that the cone tip resistance and vertical effective stress are the most sensitive factors, whereas the mean grain size is the least sensitive factor in the prediction of seismic soil liquefaction potential. The results of this study can provide theoretical support for researchers in selecting appropriate ML algorithms and improving the predictive performance of seismic soil liquefaction potential models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2095-2430</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2095-2449</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11709-020-0669-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Beijing: Higher Education Press</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Bayesian analysis ; Bayesian belief network ; Belief networks ; Cities ; Civil Engineering ; cone penetration test ; Cone penetration tests ; Countries ; Earthquakes ; Engineering ; Grain size ; Learning algorithms ; Liquefaction ; Machine learning ; Mathematical models ; parameter learning ; Performance indices ; Performance prediction ; Regions ; Research Article ; Seismic activity ; Seismic response ; seismic soil liquefaction ; Sensitivity analysis ; Soil investigations ; Soils ; structural learning ; Tabu search ; Training evaluation</subject><ispartof>Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2021-04, Vol.15 (2), p.490-505</ispartof><rights>Copyright reserved, 2021, Higher Education Press</rights><rights>Higher Education Press 2021</rights><rights>Higher Education Press 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-9564f88662eb216984b30b6e7d48b9cb8fc84dc3337a1dddd87830edfbdec2743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-9564f88662eb216984b30b6e7d48b9cb8fc84dc3337a1dddd87830edfbdec2743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>AHMAD, Mahmood</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TANG, Xiao-Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>QIU, Jiang-Nan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AHMAD, Feezan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GU, Wen-Jing</creatorcontrib><title>Application of machine learning algorithms for the evaluation of seismic soil liquefaction potential</title><title>Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering</title><addtitle>Front. Struct. Civ. Eng</addtitle><description>This study investigates the performance of four machine learning (ML) algorithms to evaluate the earthquake-induced liquefaction potential of soil based on the cone penetration test field case history records using the Bayesian belief network (BBN) learning software Netica. The BBN structures that were developed by ML algorithms-K2, hill climbing (HC), tree augmented naive (TAN) Bayes, and Tabu search were adopted to perform parameter learning in Netica, thereby fixing the BBN models. The performance measure indexes, namely, overall accuracy ( OA), precision, recall, F-measure, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, were used to evaluate the training and testing BBN models' performance and highlight the capability of the K2 and TAN Bayes models over the Tabu search and HC models. The sensitivity analysis results showed that the cone tip resistance and vertical effective stress are the most sensitive factors, whereas the mean grain size is the least sensitive factor in the prediction of seismic soil liquefaction potential. The results of this study can provide theoretical support for researchers in selecting appropriate ML algorithms and improving the predictive performance of seismic soil liquefaction potential models.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Bayesian belief network</subject><subject>Belief networks</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>cone penetration test</subject><subject>Cone penetration tests</subject><subject>Countries</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Grain size</subject><subject>Learning algorithms</subject><subject>Liquefaction</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>parameter learning</subject><subject>Performance indices</subject><subject>Performance prediction</subject><subject>Regions</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic response</subject><subject>seismic soil liquefaction</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Soil investigations</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>structural learning</subject><subject>Tabu search</subject><subject>Training evaluation</subject><issn>2095-2430</issn><issn>2095-2449</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhosoOOZ-gHcBr6snST-SyzH8goE3eh3S9KTN6JqadIL_3s7KvFtuEsj7vOfwJMkthXsKUD5ESkuQKTBIoShkml8kCwYyT1mWycvTm8N1sopxBwAUSg6CL5J6PQydM3p0vifekr02reuRdKhD7_qG6K7xwY3tPhLrAxlbJPilu8OJiOji3hkSvetI5z4PaLX5_Rz8iP3odHeTXFndRVz93cvk4-nxffOSbt-eXzfrbWp4kY-pzIvMClEUDCtGCymyikNVYFlnopKmEtaIrDac81LTejqiFBywtlWNhpUZXyZ3c-8Q_LRHHNXOH0I_jVQs5zmTUrJjis4pE3yMAa0agtvr8K0oqKNPNftUk0919KnyiWEzE6ds32D4bz4HiRlqXdNiwHoIGKOywU9WMJxDfwAZpYvs</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>AHMAD, Mahmood</creator><creator>TANG, Xiao-Wei</creator><creator>QIU, Jiang-Nan</creator><creator>AHMAD, Feezan</creator><creator>GU, Wen-Jing</creator><general>Higher Education Press</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>Application of machine learning algorithms for the evaluation of seismic soil liquefaction potential</title><author>AHMAD, Mahmood ; TANG, Xiao-Wei ; QIU, Jiang-Nan ; AHMAD, Feezan ; GU, Wen-Jing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-9564f88662eb216984b30b6e7d48b9cb8fc84dc3337a1dddd87830edfbdec2743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Bayesian belief network</topic><topic>Belief networks</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>cone penetration test</topic><topic>Cone penetration tests</topic><topic>Countries</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Grain size</topic><topic>Learning algorithms</topic><topic>Liquefaction</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>parameter learning</topic><topic>Performance indices</topic><topic>Performance prediction</topic><topic>Regions</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic response</topic><topic>seismic soil liquefaction</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Soil investigations</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>structural learning</topic><topic>Tabu search</topic><topic>Training evaluation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>AHMAD, Mahmood</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TANG, Xiao-Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>QIU, Jiang-Nan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AHMAD, Feezan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GU, Wen-Jing</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>AHMAD, Mahmood</au><au>TANG, Xiao-Wei</au><au>QIU, Jiang-Nan</au><au>AHMAD, Feezan</au><au>GU, Wen-Jing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Application of machine learning algorithms for the evaluation of seismic soil liquefaction potential</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering</jtitle><stitle>Front. Struct. Civ. Eng</stitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>490</spage><epage>505</epage><pages>490-505</pages><issn>2095-2430</issn><eissn>2095-2449</eissn><abstract>This study investigates the performance of four machine learning (ML) algorithms to evaluate the earthquake-induced liquefaction potential of soil based on the cone penetration test field case history records using the Bayesian belief network (BBN) learning software Netica. The BBN structures that were developed by ML algorithms-K2, hill climbing (HC), tree augmented naive (TAN) Bayes, and Tabu search were adopted to perform parameter learning in Netica, thereby fixing the BBN models. The performance measure indexes, namely, overall accuracy ( OA), precision, recall, F-measure, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, were used to evaluate the training and testing BBN models' performance and highlight the capability of the K2 and TAN Bayes models over the Tabu search and HC models. The sensitivity analysis results showed that the cone tip resistance and vertical effective stress are the most sensitive factors, whereas the mean grain size is the least sensitive factor in the prediction of seismic soil liquefaction potential. The results of this study can provide theoretical support for researchers in selecting appropriate ML algorithms and improving the predictive performance of seismic soil liquefaction potential models.</abstract><cop>Beijing</cop><pub>Higher Education Press</pub><doi>10.1007/s11709-020-0669-5</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2095-2430 |
ispartof | Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2021-04, Vol.15 (2), p.490-505 |
issn | 2095-2430 2095-2449 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2535299924 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Algorithms Bayesian analysis Bayesian belief network Belief networks Cities Civil Engineering cone penetration test Cone penetration tests Countries Earthquakes Engineering Grain size Learning algorithms Liquefaction Machine learning Mathematical models parameter learning Performance indices Performance prediction Regions Research Article Seismic activity Seismic response seismic soil liquefaction Sensitivity analysis Soil investigations Soils structural learning Tabu search Training evaluation |
title | Application of machine learning algorithms for the evaluation of seismic soil liquefaction potential |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T04%3A27%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Application%20of%20machine%20learning%20algorithms%20for%20the%20evaluation%20of%20seismic%20soil%20liquefaction%20potential&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20of%20Structural%20and%20Civil%20Engineering&rft.au=AHMAD,%20Mahmood&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=490&rft.epage=505&rft.pages=490-505&rft.issn=2095-2430&rft.eissn=2095-2449&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11709-020-0669-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2535299924%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-9564f88662eb216984b30b6e7d48b9cb8fc84dc3337a1dddd87830edfbdec2743%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2535299924&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |