Loading…

Pull Factors and Migration Preferences: Evidence from the Middle East and North Africa

Which national characteristics do voluntary migrants prioritize when considering destinations? Although this question is salient for policymakers, extant studies face challenges when seeking to identify how various pull factors shape destination preferences. Surveys of migrants are typically conduct...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The International migration review 2021-06, Vol.55 (2), p.431-459
Main Authors: Ferwerda, Jeremy, Gest, Justin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-98b48ae67ec91ae58220f5d23a02191a831564fd839a0290a9b86521ce7cf4ab3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-98b48ae67ec91ae58220f5d23a02191a831564fd839a0290a9b86521ce7cf4ab3
container_end_page 459
container_issue 2
container_start_page 431
container_title The International migration review
container_volume 55
creator Ferwerda, Jeremy
Gest, Justin
description Which national characteristics do voluntary migrants prioritize when considering destinations? Although this question is salient for policymakers, extant studies face challenges when seeking to identify how various pull factors shape destination preferences. Surveys of migrants are typically conducted after they arrive, introducing selection bias and post-hoc reasoning. Moreover, desirable national characteristics tend to co-vary, implying that observed relationships with migration flows may be confounded. In this article, we identify the destination preferences of prospective migrants by drawing on a sample of 8,500 respondents from five sending states across the Middle East and North Africa. Prospective migrants completed a series of conjoint survey tasks in which they chose between two destinations with randomly varying characteristics. The results reveal a clear hierarchy of preferences, with prospective migrants placing the greatest priority on liberal democratic governance and employment prospects. The availability of welfare benefits acted as a secondary consideration, while geographic distance and co-ethnic stock did not strongly predict initial destination preferences. While the rank order of these considerations remains consistent across national samples, our results suggest that respondents from different economic and political backgrounds vary in how they navigate potential tradeoffs between national characteristics. These findings address post-arrival bias in extant studies by revealing prospective migrants’ preferences before they interact with the opportunity structures that facilitate and restrict entry into desirable destinations.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0197918320949825
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2535767748</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0197918320949825</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2535767748</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-98b48ae67ec91ae58220f5d23a02191a831564fd839a0290a9b86521ce7cf4ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UEtLAzEQDqJgrd49Bjyv5rHZSbyV0qpQtQf1uqTZpN2y3a1JKvjvzbqCIDiXGb7XMIPQJSXXlALcEKpAUckZUbmSTByhEYUcMuCgjtGop7OeP0VnIWxJKgA-Qm_LQ9PguTax8wHrtsKP9drrWHctXnrrrLetseEWzz7qqh-x890Ox41NwqpqLJ7pEL-NT52PGzxxvjb6HJ043QR78dPH6HU-e5neZ4vnu4fpZJEZTlTMlFzlUtsCrFFUWyEZI05UjGvCaEIkp6LIXSW5SogiWq1kIRg1FozL9YqP0dWQu_fd-8GGWG67g2_TypIJLqAAyGVSkUFlfBdCuqrc-3qn_WdJSdl_r_z7vWTJBkvQa_sb-q_-C0IjbUs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2535767748</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pull Factors and Migration Preferences: Evidence from the Middle East and North Africa</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Ferwerda, Jeremy ; Gest, Justin</creator><creatorcontrib>Ferwerda, Jeremy ; Gest, Justin</creatorcontrib><description>Which national characteristics do voluntary migrants prioritize when considering destinations? Although this question is salient for policymakers, extant studies face challenges when seeking to identify how various pull factors shape destination preferences. Surveys of migrants are typically conducted after they arrive, introducing selection bias and post-hoc reasoning. Moreover, desirable national characteristics tend to co-vary, implying that observed relationships with migration flows may be confounded. In this article, we identify the destination preferences of prospective migrants by drawing on a sample of 8,500 respondents from five sending states across the Middle East and North Africa. Prospective migrants completed a series of conjoint survey tasks in which they chose between two destinations with randomly varying characteristics. The results reveal a clear hierarchy of preferences, with prospective migrants placing the greatest priority on liberal democratic governance and employment prospects. The availability of welfare benefits acted as a secondary consideration, while geographic distance and co-ethnic stock did not strongly predict initial destination preferences. While the rank order of these considerations remains consistent across national samples, our results suggest that respondents from different economic and political backgrounds vary in how they navigate potential tradeoffs between national characteristics. These findings address post-arrival bias in extant studies by revealing prospective migrants’ preferences before they interact with the opportunity structures that facilitate and restrict entry into desirable destinations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0197-9183</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-7379</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0197918320949825</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Benefits ; Bias ; Destinations ; Employment ; Geographic mobility ; Governance ; Migrants ; Migration ; National identity ; Opportunity structures ; Policy making ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Preferences ; Prospects ; Respondents ; Selection bias ; Welfare benefits</subject><ispartof>The International migration review, 2021-06, Vol.55 (2), p.431-459</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-98b48ae67ec91ae58220f5d23a02191a831564fd839a0290a9b86521ce7cf4ab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-98b48ae67ec91ae58220f5d23a02191a831564fd839a0290a9b86521ce7cf4ab3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5066-4935</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925,30999,33223,33774,79364</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ferwerda, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gest, Justin</creatorcontrib><title>Pull Factors and Migration Preferences: Evidence from the Middle East and North Africa</title><title>The International migration review</title><description>Which national characteristics do voluntary migrants prioritize when considering destinations? Although this question is salient for policymakers, extant studies face challenges when seeking to identify how various pull factors shape destination preferences. Surveys of migrants are typically conducted after they arrive, introducing selection bias and post-hoc reasoning. Moreover, desirable national characteristics tend to co-vary, implying that observed relationships with migration flows may be confounded. In this article, we identify the destination preferences of prospective migrants by drawing on a sample of 8,500 respondents from five sending states across the Middle East and North Africa. Prospective migrants completed a series of conjoint survey tasks in which they chose between two destinations with randomly varying characteristics. The results reveal a clear hierarchy of preferences, with prospective migrants placing the greatest priority on liberal democratic governance and employment prospects. The availability of welfare benefits acted as a secondary consideration, while geographic distance and co-ethnic stock did not strongly predict initial destination preferences. While the rank order of these considerations remains consistent across national samples, our results suggest that respondents from different economic and political backgrounds vary in how they navigate potential tradeoffs between national characteristics. These findings address post-arrival bias in extant studies by revealing prospective migrants’ preferences before they interact with the opportunity structures that facilitate and restrict entry into desirable destinations.</description><subject>Benefits</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Destinations</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Geographic mobility</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Migrants</subject><subject>Migration</subject><subject>National identity</subject><subject>Opportunity structures</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Prospects</subject><subject>Respondents</subject><subject>Selection bias</subject><subject>Welfare benefits</subject><issn>0197-9183</issn><issn>1747-7379</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UEtLAzEQDqJgrd49Bjyv5rHZSbyV0qpQtQf1uqTZpN2y3a1JKvjvzbqCIDiXGb7XMIPQJSXXlALcEKpAUckZUbmSTByhEYUcMuCgjtGop7OeP0VnIWxJKgA-Qm_LQ9PguTax8wHrtsKP9drrWHctXnrrrLetseEWzz7qqh-x890Ox41NwqpqLJ7pEL-NT52PGzxxvjb6HJ043QR78dPH6HU-e5neZ4vnu4fpZJEZTlTMlFzlUtsCrFFUWyEZI05UjGvCaEIkp6LIXSW5SogiWq1kIRg1FozL9YqP0dWQu_fd-8GGWG67g2_TypIJLqAAyGVSkUFlfBdCuqrc-3qn_WdJSdl_r_z7vWTJBkvQa_sb-q_-C0IjbUs</recordid><startdate>202106</startdate><enddate>202106</enddate><creator>Ferwerda, Jeremy</creator><creator>Gest, Justin</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5066-4935</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202106</creationdate><title>Pull Factors and Migration Preferences: Evidence from the Middle East and North Africa</title><author>Ferwerda, Jeremy ; Gest, Justin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-98b48ae67ec91ae58220f5d23a02191a831564fd839a0290a9b86521ce7cf4ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Benefits</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Destinations</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Geographic mobility</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Migrants</topic><topic>Migration</topic><topic>National identity</topic><topic>Opportunity structures</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Prospects</topic><topic>Respondents</topic><topic>Selection bias</topic><topic>Welfare benefits</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ferwerda, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gest, Justin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The International migration review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ferwerda, Jeremy</au><au>Gest, Justin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pull Factors and Migration Preferences: Evidence from the Middle East and North Africa</atitle><jtitle>The International migration review</jtitle><date>2021-06</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>431</spage><epage>459</epage><pages>431-459</pages><issn>0197-9183</issn><eissn>1747-7379</eissn><abstract>Which national characteristics do voluntary migrants prioritize when considering destinations? Although this question is salient for policymakers, extant studies face challenges when seeking to identify how various pull factors shape destination preferences. Surveys of migrants are typically conducted after they arrive, introducing selection bias and post-hoc reasoning. Moreover, desirable national characteristics tend to co-vary, implying that observed relationships with migration flows may be confounded. In this article, we identify the destination preferences of prospective migrants by drawing on a sample of 8,500 respondents from five sending states across the Middle East and North Africa. Prospective migrants completed a series of conjoint survey tasks in which they chose between two destinations with randomly varying characteristics. The results reveal a clear hierarchy of preferences, with prospective migrants placing the greatest priority on liberal democratic governance and employment prospects. The availability of welfare benefits acted as a secondary consideration, while geographic distance and co-ethnic stock did not strongly predict initial destination preferences. While the rank order of these considerations remains consistent across national samples, our results suggest that respondents from different economic and political backgrounds vary in how they navigate potential tradeoffs between national characteristics. These findings address post-arrival bias in extant studies by revealing prospective migrants’ preferences before they interact with the opportunity structures that facilitate and restrict entry into desirable destinations.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0197918320949825</doi><tpages>29</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5066-4935</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0197-9183
ispartof The International migration review, 2021-06, Vol.55 (2), p.431-459
issn 0197-9183
1747-7379
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2535767748
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; SAGE
subjects Benefits
Bias
Destinations
Employment
Geographic mobility
Governance
Migrants
Migration
National identity
Opportunity structures
Policy making
Polls & surveys
Preferences
Prospects
Respondents
Selection bias
Welfare benefits
title Pull Factors and Migration Preferences: Evidence from the Middle East and North Africa
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T14%3A45%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pull%20Factors%20and%20Migration%20Preferences:%20Evidence%20from%20the%20Middle%20East%20and%20North%20Africa&rft.jtitle=The%20International%20migration%20review&rft.au=Ferwerda,%20Jeremy&rft.date=2021-06&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=431&rft.epage=459&rft.pages=431-459&rft.issn=0197-9183&rft.eissn=1747-7379&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0197918320949825&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2535767748%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-98b48ae67ec91ae58220f5d23a02191a831564fd839a0290a9b86521ce7cf4ab3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2535767748&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0197918320949825&rfr_iscdi=true