Loading…
Pull Factors and Migration Preferences: Evidence from the Middle East and North Africa
Which national characteristics do voluntary migrants prioritize when considering destinations? Although this question is salient for policymakers, extant studies face challenges when seeking to identify how various pull factors shape destination preferences. Surveys of migrants are typically conduct...
Saved in:
Published in: | The International migration review 2021-06, Vol.55 (2), p.431-459 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-98b48ae67ec91ae58220f5d23a02191a831564fd839a0290a9b86521ce7cf4ab3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-98b48ae67ec91ae58220f5d23a02191a831564fd839a0290a9b86521ce7cf4ab3 |
container_end_page | 459 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 431 |
container_title | The International migration review |
container_volume | 55 |
creator | Ferwerda, Jeremy Gest, Justin |
description | Which national characteristics do voluntary migrants prioritize when considering destinations? Although this question is salient for policymakers, extant studies face challenges when seeking to identify how various pull factors shape destination preferences. Surveys of migrants are typically conducted after they arrive, introducing selection bias and post-hoc reasoning. Moreover, desirable national characteristics tend to co-vary, implying that observed relationships with migration flows may be confounded. In this article, we identify the destination preferences of prospective migrants by drawing on a sample of 8,500 respondents from five sending states across the Middle East and North Africa. Prospective migrants completed a series of conjoint survey tasks in which they chose between two destinations with randomly varying characteristics. The results reveal a clear hierarchy of preferences, with prospective migrants placing the greatest priority on liberal democratic governance and employment prospects. The availability of welfare benefits acted as a secondary consideration, while geographic distance and co-ethnic stock did not strongly predict initial destination preferences. While the rank order of these considerations remains consistent across national samples, our results suggest that respondents from different economic and political backgrounds vary in how they navigate potential tradeoffs between national characteristics. These findings address post-arrival bias in extant studies by revealing prospective migrants’ preferences before they interact with the opportunity structures that facilitate and restrict entry into desirable destinations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0197918320949825 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2535767748</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0197918320949825</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2535767748</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-98b48ae67ec91ae58220f5d23a02191a831564fd839a0290a9b86521ce7cf4ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UEtLAzEQDqJgrd49Bjyv5rHZSbyV0qpQtQf1uqTZpN2y3a1JKvjvzbqCIDiXGb7XMIPQJSXXlALcEKpAUckZUbmSTByhEYUcMuCgjtGop7OeP0VnIWxJKgA-Qm_LQ9PguTax8wHrtsKP9drrWHctXnrrrLetseEWzz7qqh-x890Ox41NwqpqLJ7pEL-NT52PGzxxvjb6HJ043QR78dPH6HU-e5neZ4vnu4fpZJEZTlTMlFzlUtsCrFFUWyEZI05UjGvCaEIkp6LIXSW5SogiWq1kIRg1FozL9YqP0dWQu_fd-8GGWG67g2_TypIJLqAAyGVSkUFlfBdCuqrc-3qn_WdJSdl_r_z7vWTJBkvQa_sb-q_-C0IjbUs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2535767748</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pull Factors and Migration Preferences: Evidence from the Middle East and North Africa</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Ferwerda, Jeremy ; Gest, Justin</creator><creatorcontrib>Ferwerda, Jeremy ; Gest, Justin</creatorcontrib><description>Which national characteristics do voluntary migrants prioritize when considering destinations? Although this question is salient for policymakers, extant studies face challenges when seeking to identify how various pull factors shape destination preferences. Surveys of migrants are typically conducted after they arrive, introducing selection bias and post-hoc reasoning. Moreover, desirable national characteristics tend to co-vary, implying that observed relationships with migration flows may be confounded. In this article, we identify the destination preferences of prospective migrants by drawing on a sample of 8,500 respondents from five sending states across the Middle East and North Africa. Prospective migrants completed a series of conjoint survey tasks in which they chose between two destinations with randomly varying characteristics. The results reveal a clear hierarchy of preferences, with prospective migrants placing the greatest priority on liberal democratic governance and employment prospects. The availability of welfare benefits acted as a secondary consideration, while geographic distance and co-ethnic stock did not strongly predict initial destination preferences. While the rank order of these considerations remains consistent across national samples, our results suggest that respondents from different economic and political backgrounds vary in how they navigate potential tradeoffs between national characteristics. These findings address post-arrival bias in extant studies by revealing prospective migrants’ preferences before they interact with the opportunity structures that facilitate and restrict entry into desirable destinations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0197-9183</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-7379</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0197918320949825</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Benefits ; Bias ; Destinations ; Employment ; Geographic mobility ; Governance ; Migrants ; Migration ; National identity ; Opportunity structures ; Policy making ; Polls & surveys ; Preferences ; Prospects ; Respondents ; Selection bias ; Welfare benefits</subject><ispartof>The International migration review, 2021-06, Vol.55 (2), p.431-459</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-98b48ae67ec91ae58220f5d23a02191a831564fd839a0290a9b86521ce7cf4ab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-98b48ae67ec91ae58220f5d23a02191a831564fd839a0290a9b86521ce7cf4ab3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5066-4935</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925,30999,33223,33774,79364</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ferwerda, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gest, Justin</creatorcontrib><title>Pull Factors and Migration Preferences: Evidence from the Middle East and North Africa</title><title>The International migration review</title><description>Which national characteristics do voluntary migrants prioritize when considering destinations? Although this question is salient for policymakers, extant studies face challenges when seeking to identify how various pull factors shape destination preferences. Surveys of migrants are typically conducted after they arrive, introducing selection bias and post-hoc reasoning. Moreover, desirable national characteristics tend to co-vary, implying that observed relationships with migration flows may be confounded. In this article, we identify the destination preferences of prospective migrants by drawing on a sample of 8,500 respondents from five sending states across the Middle East and North Africa. Prospective migrants completed a series of conjoint survey tasks in which they chose between two destinations with randomly varying characteristics. The results reveal a clear hierarchy of preferences, with prospective migrants placing the greatest priority on liberal democratic governance and employment prospects. The availability of welfare benefits acted as a secondary consideration, while geographic distance and co-ethnic stock did not strongly predict initial destination preferences. While the rank order of these considerations remains consistent across national samples, our results suggest that respondents from different economic and political backgrounds vary in how they navigate potential tradeoffs between national characteristics. These findings address post-arrival bias in extant studies by revealing prospective migrants’ preferences before they interact with the opportunity structures that facilitate and restrict entry into desirable destinations.</description><subject>Benefits</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Destinations</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Geographic mobility</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Migrants</subject><subject>Migration</subject><subject>National identity</subject><subject>Opportunity structures</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Prospects</subject><subject>Respondents</subject><subject>Selection bias</subject><subject>Welfare benefits</subject><issn>0197-9183</issn><issn>1747-7379</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UEtLAzEQDqJgrd49Bjyv5rHZSbyV0qpQtQf1uqTZpN2y3a1JKvjvzbqCIDiXGb7XMIPQJSXXlALcEKpAUckZUbmSTByhEYUcMuCgjtGop7OeP0VnIWxJKgA-Qm_LQ9PguTax8wHrtsKP9drrWHctXnrrrLetseEWzz7qqh-x890Ox41NwqpqLJ7pEL-NT52PGzxxvjb6HJ043QR78dPH6HU-e5neZ4vnu4fpZJEZTlTMlFzlUtsCrFFUWyEZI05UjGvCaEIkp6LIXSW5SogiWq1kIRg1FozL9YqP0dWQu_fd-8GGWG67g2_TypIJLqAAyGVSkUFlfBdCuqrc-3qn_WdJSdl_r_z7vWTJBkvQa_sb-q_-C0IjbUs</recordid><startdate>202106</startdate><enddate>202106</enddate><creator>Ferwerda, Jeremy</creator><creator>Gest, Justin</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5066-4935</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202106</creationdate><title>Pull Factors and Migration Preferences: Evidence from the Middle East and North Africa</title><author>Ferwerda, Jeremy ; Gest, Justin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-98b48ae67ec91ae58220f5d23a02191a831564fd839a0290a9b86521ce7cf4ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Benefits</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Destinations</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Geographic mobility</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Migrants</topic><topic>Migration</topic><topic>National identity</topic><topic>Opportunity structures</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Prospects</topic><topic>Respondents</topic><topic>Selection bias</topic><topic>Welfare benefits</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ferwerda, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gest, Justin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The International migration review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ferwerda, Jeremy</au><au>Gest, Justin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pull Factors and Migration Preferences: Evidence from the Middle East and North Africa</atitle><jtitle>The International migration review</jtitle><date>2021-06</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>431</spage><epage>459</epage><pages>431-459</pages><issn>0197-9183</issn><eissn>1747-7379</eissn><abstract>Which national characteristics do voluntary migrants prioritize when considering destinations? Although this question is salient for policymakers, extant studies face challenges when seeking to identify how various pull factors shape destination preferences. Surveys of migrants are typically conducted after they arrive, introducing selection bias and post-hoc reasoning. Moreover, desirable national characteristics tend to co-vary, implying that observed relationships with migration flows may be confounded. In this article, we identify the destination preferences of prospective migrants by drawing on a sample of 8,500 respondents from five sending states across the Middle East and North Africa. Prospective migrants completed a series of conjoint survey tasks in which they chose between two destinations with randomly varying characteristics. The results reveal a clear hierarchy of preferences, with prospective migrants placing the greatest priority on liberal democratic governance and employment prospects. The availability of welfare benefits acted as a secondary consideration, while geographic distance and co-ethnic stock did not strongly predict initial destination preferences. While the rank order of these considerations remains consistent across national samples, our results suggest that respondents from different economic and political backgrounds vary in how they navigate potential tradeoffs between national characteristics. These findings address post-arrival bias in extant studies by revealing prospective migrants’ preferences before they interact with the opportunity structures that facilitate and restrict entry into desirable destinations.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0197918320949825</doi><tpages>29</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5066-4935</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0197-9183 |
ispartof | The International migration review, 2021-06, Vol.55 (2), p.431-459 |
issn | 0197-9183 1747-7379 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2535767748 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; SAGE |
subjects | Benefits Bias Destinations Employment Geographic mobility Governance Migrants Migration National identity Opportunity structures Policy making Polls & surveys Preferences Prospects Respondents Selection bias Welfare benefits |
title | Pull Factors and Migration Preferences: Evidence from the Middle East and North Africa |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T14%3A45%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pull%20Factors%20and%20Migration%20Preferences:%20Evidence%20from%20the%20Middle%20East%20and%20North%20Africa&rft.jtitle=The%20International%20migration%20review&rft.au=Ferwerda,%20Jeremy&rft.date=2021-06&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=431&rft.epage=459&rft.pages=431-459&rft.issn=0197-9183&rft.eissn=1747-7379&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0197918320949825&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2535767748%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-98b48ae67ec91ae58220f5d23a02191a831564fd839a0290a9b86521ce7cf4ab3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2535767748&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0197918320949825&rfr_iscdi=true |