Participation in Citizen Science: Insights from the CONECT-e Case Study

Citizen science (CS) is growing quickly, given its potential to enhance knowledge coproduction by diverse participants, generating large and global data sets. However, uneven participation in CS is still an important concern. This work aims to understand (1) participation dynamics in CS and (2) how...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Science, technology, & human values technology, & human values, 2021-07, Vol.46 (4), p.755-788
Main Authors: Benyei, Petra, Pardo-de-Santayana, Manuel, Aceituno-Mata, Laura, Calvet-Mir, Laura, Carrascosa-García, María, Rivera-Ferre, Marta, Perdomo-Molina, Antonio, Reyes-García, Victoria
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Access to information
Activity patterns
Barriers
Citizens
Communications technology
Data
Ecosystems
Illegitimacy
Information dissemination
Information technology
Participation
Qualitative analysis
Teams
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Citizen science (CS) is growing quickly, given its potential to enhance knowledge coproduction by diverse participants, generating large and global data sets. However, uneven participation in CS is still an important concern. This work aims to understand (1) participation dynamics in CS and (2) how they are shaped by participation barriers and drivers. We do so by examining participation in CONECT-e, a CS project that uses a wiki-like platform to document traditional ecological knowledge. More precisely, we analyze quantitative data on participants’ profile and activity patterns and qualitative data on barriers and drivers of participation. Our findings suggest that overcoming the education, age, and residence participation barriers is challenging even in cocreated CS projects. This is potentially due to issues of perceived self-illegitimacy and low access to information and communication technologies. Our results also point out that participants’ alliance with the project’s objectives and trust relationships with the project team are important drivers of participation in CS projects. Finally, we also highlight the need to think beyond participation as single actions and rather consider participation diversity in CS as functional diversity in ecosystems, with participants performing a diverse set of interconnected tasks or functions.
ISSN:0162-2439
1552-8251
DOI:10.1177/0162243920948110