Understanding Michigan's Electoral Competitiveness: Swing Counties 1976-2018

Considerable media attention was given to the so-called “pivot counties” in the U.S. and in Michigan that flipped from supporting Barack Obama twice to voting for Donald Trump in 2016. We first summarize theories of voting behavior and speculate about why Michigan has been consistently competitive o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Michigan academician 2021-01, Vol.47 (2), p.173-201
Main Authors: KLEMANSKI, JOHN S., DULIO, DAVID A., CARR, DOUGLAS A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Candidates
Election results
Obama, Barack
Partisanship
Political parties
Politics
Presidential elections
Trump, Donald J
Voter behavior
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1205-de4be4d783b7c936b0d9c0e1ed6fed1905a15249630ba2783428edf385d7863
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1205-de4be4d783b7c936b0d9c0e1ed6fed1905a15249630ba2783428edf385d7863
container_end_page 201
container_issue 2
container_start_page 173
container_title Michigan academician
container_volume 47
creator KLEMANSKI, JOHN S.
DULIO, DAVID A.
CARR, DOUGLAS A.
description Considerable media attention was given to the so-called “pivot counties” in the U.S. and in Michigan that flipped from supporting Barack Obama twice to voting for Donald Trump in 2016. We first summarize theories of voting behavior and speculate about why Michigan has been consistently competitive over the years. We explore 40 years' worth of county-level presidential and gubernatorial election results in Michigan to determine how frequently counties have flipped across a large number of elections. We find that a number of Michigan counties frequently flip between elections, but the number of competitive Michigan counties has substantially declined in recent decades. Turnout in larger counties can affect election outcomes, and large counties that swing have been key bellwethers in past elections, and should be a major focus of research on future elections in Michigan.
doi_str_mv 10.7245/0026-2005-47.2.173
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2537154975</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2537154975</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1205-de4be4d783b7c936b0d9c0e1ed6fed1905a15249630ba2783428edf385d7863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqHwB5giMTCl-NsJG4paQCpiKMyWE1-Kq9Qpdgri3-OoiOlueN73Tg9C1wTPFeXiDmMqC4qxKLia0zlR7ARllEhVlJLxU5T9A-foIsYtThumLEOrd28hxNF46_wmf3Hth9sYfxvzRQ_tOATT5_Ww28PoRvcFHmK8z9ffE1sPBz86iDmp1NRNykt01pk-wtXfnKH1cvFWPxWr18fn-mFVtISmFy3wBrhVJWtUWzHZYFu1GAhY2YElFRaGCMoryXBjaMI4LcF2rBQpI9kM3Rxb92H4PEAc9XY4BJ8OaiqYIoJXSiSKHqk2DDEG6PQ-uJ0JP5pgPTnTkxI9KdFcaaqTM_YLr9lc4A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2537154975</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Understanding Michigan's Electoral Competitiveness: Swing Counties 1976-2018</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><source>MLA International Bibliography with Full Text</source><creator>KLEMANSKI, JOHN S. ; DULIO, DAVID A. ; CARR, DOUGLAS A.</creator><creatorcontrib>KLEMANSKI, JOHN S. ; DULIO, DAVID A. ; CARR, DOUGLAS A.</creatorcontrib><description>Considerable media attention was given to the so-called “pivot counties” in the U.S. and in Michigan that flipped from supporting Barack Obama twice to voting for Donald Trump in 2016. We first summarize theories of voting behavior and speculate about why Michigan has been consistently competitive over the years. We explore 40 years' worth of county-level presidential and gubernatorial election results in Michigan to determine how frequently counties have flipped across a large number of elections. We find that a number of Michigan counties frequently flip between elections, but the number of competitive Michigan counties has substantially declined in recent decades. Turnout in larger counties can affect election outcomes, and large counties that swing have been key bellwethers in past elections, and should be a major focus of research on future elections in Michigan.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-2005</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2167-8634</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7245/0026-2005-47.2.173</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Alma: Michigan Academy of Science, Arts &amp; Letters</publisher><subject>Candidates ; Election results ; Obama, Barack ; Partisanship ; Political parties ; Politics ; Presidential elections ; Trump, Donald J ; Voter behavior</subject><ispartof>Michigan academician, 2021-01, Vol.47 (2), p.173-201</ispartof><rights>Copyright Michigan Academy of Science, Arts &amp; Letters 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1205-de4be4d783b7c936b0d9c0e1ed6fed1905a15249630ba2783428edf385d7863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1205-de4be4d783b7c936b0d9c0e1ed6fed1905a15249630ba2783428edf385d7863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2537154975/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2537154975?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,44363,62661,62662,62677,74068,74767</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>KLEMANSKI, JOHN S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DULIO, DAVID A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CARR, DOUGLAS A.</creatorcontrib><title>Understanding Michigan's Electoral Competitiveness: Swing Counties 1976-2018</title><title>Michigan academician</title><description>Considerable media attention was given to the so-called “pivot counties” in the U.S. and in Michigan that flipped from supporting Barack Obama twice to voting for Donald Trump in 2016. We first summarize theories of voting behavior and speculate about why Michigan has been consistently competitive over the years. We explore 40 years' worth of county-level presidential and gubernatorial election results in Michigan to determine how frequently counties have flipped across a large number of elections. We find that a number of Michigan counties frequently flip between elections, but the number of competitive Michigan counties has substantially declined in recent decades. Turnout in larger counties can affect election outcomes, and large counties that swing have been key bellwethers in past elections, and should be a major focus of research on future elections in Michigan.</description><subject>Candidates</subject><subject>Election results</subject><subject>Obama, Barack</subject><subject>Partisanship</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Presidential elections</subject><subject>Trump, Donald J</subject><subject>Voter behavior</subject><issn>0026-2005</issn><issn>2167-8634</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqHwB5giMTCl-NsJG4paQCpiKMyWE1-Kq9Qpdgri3-OoiOlueN73Tg9C1wTPFeXiDmMqC4qxKLia0zlR7ARllEhVlJLxU5T9A-foIsYtThumLEOrd28hxNF46_wmf3Hth9sYfxvzRQ_tOATT5_Ww28PoRvcFHmK8z9ffE1sPBz86iDmp1NRNykt01pk-wtXfnKH1cvFWPxWr18fn-mFVtISmFy3wBrhVJWtUWzHZYFu1GAhY2YElFRaGCMoryXBjaMI4LcF2rBQpI9kM3Rxb92H4PEAc9XY4BJ8OaiqYIoJXSiSKHqk2DDEG6PQ-uJ0JP5pgPTnTkxI9KdFcaaqTM_YLr9lc4A</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>KLEMANSKI, JOHN S.</creator><creator>DULIO, DAVID A.</creator><creator>CARR, DOUGLAS A.</creator><general>Michigan Academy of Science, Arts &amp; Letters</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Understanding Michigan's Electoral Competitiveness: Swing Counties 1976-2018</title><author>KLEMANSKI, JOHN S. ; DULIO, DAVID A. ; CARR, DOUGLAS A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1205-de4be4d783b7c936b0d9c0e1ed6fed1905a15249630ba2783428edf385d7863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Candidates</topic><topic>Election results</topic><topic>Obama, Barack</topic><topic>Partisanship</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Presidential elections</topic><topic>Trump, Donald J</topic><topic>Voter behavior</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KLEMANSKI, JOHN S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DULIO, DAVID A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CARR, DOUGLAS A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Michigan academician</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KLEMANSKI, JOHN S.</au><au>DULIO, DAVID A.</au><au>CARR, DOUGLAS A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Understanding Michigan's Electoral Competitiveness: Swing Counties 1976-2018</atitle><jtitle>Michigan academician</jtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>173</spage><epage>201</epage><pages>173-201</pages><issn>0026-2005</issn><eissn>2167-8634</eissn><abstract>Considerable media attention was given to the so-called “pivot counties” in the U.S. and in Michigan that flipped from supporting Barack Obama twice to voting for Donald Trump in 2016. We first summarize theories of voting behavior and speculate about why Michigan has been consistently competitive over the years. We explore 40 years' worth of county-level presidential and gubernatorial election results in Michigan to determine how frequently counties have flipped across a large number of elections. We find that a number of Michigan counties frequently flip between elections, but the number of competitive Michigan counties has substantially declined in recent decades. Turnout in larger counties can affect election outcomes, and large counties that swing have been key bellwethers in past elections, and should be a major focus of research on future elections in Michigan.</abstract><cop>Alma</cop><pub>Michigan Academy of Science, Arts &amp; Letters</pub><doi>10.7245/0026-2005-47.2.173</doi><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0026-2005
ispartof Michigan academician, 2021-01, Vol.47 (2), p.173-201
issn 0026-2005
2167-8634
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2537154975
source ABI/INFORM Global; ProQuest One Literature; MLA International Bibliography with Full Text
subjects Candidates
Election results
Obama, Barack
Partisanship
Political parties
Politics
Presidential elections
Trump, Donald J
Voter behavior
title Understanding Michigan's Electoral Competitiveness: Swing Counties 1976-2018
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T02%3A49%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understanding%20Michigan's%20Electoral%20Competitiveness:%20Swing%20Counties%201976-2018&rft.jtitle=Michigan%20academician&rft.au=KLEMANSKI,%20JOHN%20S.&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=173&rft.epage=201&rft.pages=173-201&rft.issn=0026-2005&rft.eissn=2167-8634&rft_id=info:doi/10.7245/0026-2005-47.2.173&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2537154975%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1205-de4be4d783b7c936b0d9c0e1ed6fed1905a15249630ba2783428edf385d7863%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2537154975&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true