Loading…

Toward a Low Noise Shock Tunnel Facility via Multiobjective Optimization of Hypersonic Nozzle

AbstractIn this paper, a systematic approach is considered for the development of a low noise shock tunnel facility. For this purpose, an optimal hypersonic nozzle and test section configuration is presented along with a previously developed low noise shock tube design. In hypersonic experimental st...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of aerospace engineering 2021-09, Vol.34 (5)
Main Authors: Malekipour, S, Mohammadi-Amin, M, Bahman-Jahromi, I, Ebrahimi, M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a267t-c54285c0f0798b1c106002487610d62ac230a23e0451ee68d4b73ed49ee43e653
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a267t-c54285c0f0798b1c106002487610d62ac230a23e0451ee68d4b73ed49ee43e653
container_end_page
container_issue 5
container_start_page
container_title Journal of aerospace engineering
container_volume 34
creator Malekipour, S
Mohammadi-Amin, M
Bahman-Jahromi, I
Ebrahimi, M
description AbstractIn this paper, a systematic approach is considered for the development of a low noise shock tunnel facility. For this purpose, an optimal hypersonic nozzle and test section configuration is presented along with a previously developed low noise shock tube design. In hypersonic experimental studies, one of the most important requirements is a low noise test section with a high-quality uniform flow. The main sources of perturbations are acoustic fluctuations that occur through the turbulent boundary layer and Mach line fluctuations with the passage of turbulent flow through the hypersonic nozzle. The fluctuations are correlated to wall boundary layer thickness, radiated disturbances, and their concentration on the nozzle axis. These parameters can be indirectly controlled via definition of three weighted objective functions—minimum total pressure loss, uniform Mach number distribution, and minimum axial flow deviation—combined to attain the final scalar objective function. Then, a modern optimization strategy is implemented based on a genetic algorithm, parallel CFD solver, and the requirements and constraints from conceptual and preliminary design. In this way, parameterization of the overall nozzle contour is performed with a few control points and Bezier curve that showed good flexibility for generating appropriate nozzle curves. Design objectives are evaluated using a Navier–Stokes solver with a k-ω turbulence model. Various geometrical and physical constraints such as nozzle length, throat area, inlet and outlet diameters, and inlet boundary conditions are considered. It is concluded that the proposed strategy for tuning the nozzle convergent-divergent contour minimizes the boundary layer effects and shows a significant improvement in the quality of test section flow and consequently a reduction in the noise level of shock tunnel test facility.
doi_str_mv 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0001296
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2539814917</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2539814917</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a267t-c54285c0f0798b1c106002487610d62ac230a23e0451ee68d4b73ed49ee43e653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9PwkAQxTdGExH9Dhu96KG4_7ptvRECYoJyAI9ms2yncbF2a7eFwKe3DagnLzPJy3tvMj-ErikZUCLp_e1wMRrfDRcDmggehCELB4QQyhJ5gnq_2inqkTjhAeWMnqML79etR8iE9dDb0m11lWKNZ26LX5z1gBfvznzgZVMUkOOJNja39Q5vrMbPTV5bt1qDqe0G8Lys7afd61YrsMvwdFdC5V1hTdu03-dwic4ynXu4Ou4-ep2Ml6NpMJs_Po2Gs0AzGdWBCQWLQ0MyEiXxipr2NUKYiCNJSSqZNowTzTgQEVIAGadiFXFIRQIgOMiQ99HNobes3FcDvlZr11RFe1KxkCcxFQmNWtfDwWUq530FmSor-6mrnaJEdTiV6nC2Q3XoVIdOHXG2YXkIa2_gr_4n-X_wGwtLeL8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2539814917</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Toward a Low Noise Shock Tunnel Facility via Multiobjective Optimization of Hypersonic Nozzle</title><source>ASCE_美国土木工程师学会期刊</source><creator>Malekipour, S ; Mohammadi-Amin, M ; Bahman-Jahromi, I ; Ebrahimi, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Malekipour, S ; Mohammadi-Amin, M ; Bahman-Jahromi, I ; Ebrahimi, M</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractIn this paper, a systematic approach is considered for the development of a low noise shock tunnel facility. For this purpose, an optimal hypersonic nozzle and test section configuration is presented along with a previously developed low noise shock tube design. In hypersonic experimental studies, one of the most important requirements is a low noise test section with a high-quality uniform flow. The main sources of perturbations are acoustic fluctuations that occur through the turbulent boundary layer and Mach line fluctuations with the passage of turbulent flow through the hypersonic nozzle. The fluctuations are correlated to wall boundary layer thickness, radiated disturbances, and their concentration on the nozzle axis. These parameters can be indirectly controlled via definition of three weighted objective functions—minimum total pressure loss, uniform Mach number distribution, and minimum axial flow deviation—combined to attain the final scalar objective function. Then, a modern optimization strategy is implemented based on a genetic algorithm, parallel CFD solver, and the requirements and constraints from conceptual and preliminary design. In this way, parameterization of the overall nozzle contour is performed with a few control points and Bezier curve that showed good flexibility for generating appropriate nozzle curves. Design objectives are evaluated using a Navier–Stokes solver with a k-ω turbulence model. Various geometrical and physical constraints such as nozzle length, throat area, inlet and outlet diameters, and inlet boundary conditions are considered. It is concluded that the proposed strategy for tuning the nozzle convergent-divergent contour minimizes the boundary layer effects and shows a significant improvement in the quality of test section flow and consequently a reduction in the noise level of shock tunnel test facility.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0893-1321</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5525</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0001296</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Axial flow ; Boundary conditions ; Boundary layer thickness ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Constraint modelling ; Contours ; Curves ; Design parameters ; Diameters ; Genetic algorithms ; Hypersonic nozzles ; K-omega turbulence model ; Low noise ; Mach number ; Multiple objective analysis ; Noise ; Noise reduction ; Optimization ; Parameterization ; Perturbation ; Shock tunnels ; Stress concentration ; Technical Papers ; Test facilities ; Turbulence models ; Turbulent boundary layer ; Turbulent flow ; Uniform flow</subject><ispartof>Journal of aerospace engineering, 2021-09, Vol.34 (5)</ispartof><rights>2021 American Society of Civil Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a267t-c54285c0f0798b1c106002487610d62ac230a23e0451ee68d4b73ed49ee43e653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a267t-c54285c0f0798b1c106002487610d62ac230a23e0451ee68d4b73ed49ee43e653</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4351-2749</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0001296$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0001296$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3251,10067,27923,27924,76062,76070</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Malekipour, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohammadi-Amin, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahman-Jahromi, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebrahimi, M</creatorcontrib><title>Toward a Low Noise Shock Tunnel Facility via Multiobjective Optimization of Hypersonic Nozzle</title><title>Journal of aerospace engineering</title><description>AbstractIn this paper, a systematic approach is considered for the development of a low noise shock tunnel facility. For this purpose, an optimal hypersonic nozzle and test section configuration is presented along with a previously developed low noise shock tube design. In hypersonic experimental studies, one of the most important requirements is a low noise test section with a high-quality uniform flow. The main sources of perturbations are acoustic fluctuations that occur through the turbulent boundary layer and Mach line fluctuations with the passage of turbulent flow through the hypersonic nozzle. The fluctuations are correlated to wall boundary layer thickness, radiated disturbances, and their concentration on the nozzle axis. These parameters can be indirectly controlled via definition of three weighted objective functions—minimum total pressure loss, uniform Mach number distribution, and minimum axial flow deviation—combined to attain the final scalar objective function. Then, a modern optimization strategy is implemented based on a genetic algorithm, parallel CFD solver, and the requirements and constraints from conceptual and preliminary design. In this way, parameterization of the overall nozzle contour is performed with a few control points and Bezier curve that showed good flexibility for generating appropriate nozzle curves. Design objectives are evaluated using a Navier–Stokes solver with a k-ω turbulence model. Various geometrical and physical constraints such as nozzle length, throat area, inlet and outlet diameters, and inlet boundary conditions are considered. It is concluded that the proposed strategy for tuning the nozzle convergent-divergent contour minimizes the boundary layer effects and shows a significant improvement in the quality of test section flow and consequently a reduction in the noise level of shock tunnel test facility.</description><subject>Axial flow</subject><subject>Boundary conditions</subject><subject>Boundary layer thickness</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Constraint modelling</subject><subject>Contours</subject><subject>Curves</subject><subject>Design parameters</subject><subject>Diameters</subject><subject>Genetic algorithms</subject><subject>Hypersonic nozzles</subject><subject>K-omega turbulence model</subject><subject>Low noise</subject><subject>Mach number</subject><subject>Multiple objective analysis</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Noise reduction</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Parameterization</subject><subject>Perturbation</subject><subject>Shock tunnels</subject><subject>Stress concentration</subject><subject>Technical Papers</subject><subject>Test facilities</subject><subject>Turbulence models</subject><subject>Turbulent boundary layer</subject><subject>Turbulent flow</subject><subject>Uniform flow</subject><issn>0893-1321</issn><issn>1943-5525</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE9PwkAQxTdGExH9Dhu96KG4_7ptvRECYoJyAI9ms2yncbF2a7eFwKe3DagnLzPJy3tvMj-ErikZUCLp_e1wMRrfDRcDmggehCELB4QQyhJ5gnq_2inqkTjhAeWMnqML79etR8iE9dDb0m11lWKNZ26LX5z1gBfvznzgZVMUkOOJNja39Q5vrMbPTV5bt1qDqe0G8Lys7afd61YrsMvwdFdC5V1hTdu03-dwic4ynXu4Ou4-ep2Ml6NpMJs_Po2Gs0AzGdWBCQWLQ0MyEiXxipr2NUKYiCNJSSqZNowTzTgQEVIAGadiFXFIRQIgOMiQ99HNobes3FcDvlZr11RFe1KxkCcxFQmNWtfDwWUq530FmSor-6mrnaJEdTiV6nC2Q3XoVIdOHXG2YXkIa2_gr_4n-X_wGwtLeL8</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Malekipour, S</creator><creator>Mohammadi-Amin, M</creator><creator>Bahman-Jahromi, I</creator><creator>Ebrahimi, M</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4351-2749</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>Toward a Low Noise Shock Tunnel Facility via Multiobjective Optimization of Hypersonic Nozzle</title><author>Malekipour, S ; Mohammadi-Amin, M ; Bahman-Jahromi, I ; Ebrahimi, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a267t-c54285c0f0798b1c106002487610d62ac230a23e0451ee68d4b73ed49ee43e653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Axial flow</topic><topic>Boundary conditions</topic><topic>Boundary layer thickness</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Constraint modelling</topic><topic>Contours</topic><topic>Curves</topic><topic>Design parameters</topic><topic>Diameters</topic><topic>Genetic algorithms</topic><topic>Hypersonic nozzles</topic><topic>K-omega turbulence model</topic><topic>Low noise</topic><topic>Mach number</topic><topic>Multiple objective analysis</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Noise reduction</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Parameterization</topic><topic>Perturbation</topic><topic>Shock tunnels</topic><topic>Stress concentration</topic><topic>Technical Papers</topic><topic>Test facilities</topic><topic>Turbulence models</topic><topic>Turbulent boundary layer</topic><topic>Turbulent flow</topic><topic>Uniform flow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Malekipour, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohammadi-Amin, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahman-Jahromi, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebrahimi, M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of aerospace engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Malekipour, S</au><au>Mohammadi-Amin, M</au><au>Bahman-Jahromi, I</au><au>Ebrahimi, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Toward a Low Noise Shock Tunnel Facility via Multiobjective Optimization of Hypersonic Nozzle</atitle><jtitle>Journal of aerospace engineering</jtitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>5</issue><issn>0893-1321</issn><eissn>1943-5525</eissn><abstract>AbstractIn this paper, a systematic approach is considered for the development of a low noise shock tunnel facility. For this purpose, an optimal hypersonic nozzle and test section configuration is presented along with a previously developed low noise shock tube design. In hypersonic experimental studies, one of the most important requirements is a low noise test section with a high-quality uniform flow. The main sources of perturbations are acoustic fluctuations that occur through the turbulent boundary layer and Mach line fluctuations with the passage of turbulent flow through the hypersonic nozzle. The fluctuations are correlated to wall boundary layer thickness, radiated disturbances, and their concentration on the nozzle axis. These parameters can be indirectly controlled via definition of three weighted objective functions—minimum total pressure loss, uniform Mach number distribution, and minimum axial flow deviation—combined to attain the final scalar objective function. Then, a modern optimization strategy is implemented based on a genetic algorithm, parallel CFD solver, and the requirements and constraints from conceptual and preliminary design. In this way, parameterization of the overall nozzle contour is performed with a few control points and Bezier curve that showed good flexibility for generating appropriate nozzle curves. Design objectives are evaluated using a Navier–Stokes solver with a k-ω turbulence model. Various geometrical and physical constraints such as nozzle length, throat area, inlet and outlet diameters, and inlet boundary conditions are considered. It is concluded that the proposed strategy for tuning the nozzle convergent-divergent contour minimizes the boundary layer effects and shows a significant improvement in the quality of test section flow and consequently a reduction in the noise level of shock tunnel test facility.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0001296</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4351-2749</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0893-1321
ispartof Journal of aerospace engineering, 2021-09, Vol.34 (5)
issn 0893-1321
1943-5525
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2539814917
source ASCE_美国土木工程师学会期刊
subjects Axial flow
Boundary conditions
Boundary layer thickness
Computational fluid dynamics
Constraint modelling
Contours
Curves
Design parameters
Diameters
Genetic algorithms
Hypersonic nozzles
K-omega turbulence model
Low noise
Mach number
Multiple objective analysis
Noise
Noise reduction
Optimization
Parameterization
Perturbation
Shock tunnels
Stress concentration
Technical Papers
Test facilities
Turbulence models
Turbulent boundary layer
Turbulent flow
Uniform flow
title Toward a Low Noise Shock Tunnel Facility via Multiobjective Optimization of Hypersonic Nozzle
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T02%3A40%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Toward%20a%20Low%20Noise%20Shock%20Tunnel%20Facility%20via%20Multiobjective%20Optimization%20of%20Hypersonic%20Nozzle&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20aerospace%20engineering&rft.au=Malekipour,%20S&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=5&rft.issn=0893-1321&rft.eissn=1943-5525&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0001296&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2539814917%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a267t-c54285c0f0798b1c106002487610d62ac230a23e0451ee68d4b73ed49ee43e653%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2539814917&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true