Loading…
Alternative Secondary Goals in Multiplicative Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis
Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a nonparametric method for evaluating the relative efficiency of a set of decision-making units (DMUs) with multiple inputs and outputs. As an extension of the DEA, a multiplicative two-stage DEA model has been widely used to measure the efficiencies of two-stage s...
Saved in:
Published in: | Mathematical problems in engineering 2021, Vol.2021, p.1-11 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-163521ba9932ee63798d6b1e57124d259ec5e68a3c7da711d14349ee7b762fcd3 |
container_end_page | 11 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Mathematical problems in engineering |
container_volume | 2021 |
creator | Lu, Chao Cheng, Haifang |
description | Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a nonparametric method for evaluating the relative efficiency of a set of decision-making units (DMUs) with multiple inputs and outputs. As an extension of the DEA, a multiplicative two-stage DEA model has been widely used to measure the efficiencies of two-stage systems, where the first stage uses inputs to produce the outputs, and the second stage then uses the first-stage outputs as inputs to generate its own outputs. The main deficiency of the multiplicative two-stage DEA model is that the decomposition of the overall efficiency may not be unique because of the presence of alternate optima. To remove the problem of the flexible decomposition, in this paper, we maximize the sum of the two-stage efficiencies and simultaneously maximize the two-stage efficiencies as secondary goals in the multiplicative two-stage DEA model to select the decomposition of the overall efficiency from the flexible decompositions, respectively. The proposed models are applied to evaluate the performance of 10 branches of China Construction Bank, and the results are compared with the results of the existing models. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1155/2021/9931796 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2543209791</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2543209791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-163521ba9932ee63798d6b1e57124d259ec5e68a3c7da711d14349ee7b762fcd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFOAjEQhhujiYjefIBNPOrKTrtt6ZEgognGGDDxtim7g5aU7botEN7ekuXsaebw_ZP5P0JuIXsE4HxAMwoDpRhIJc5ID7hgKYdcnsc9o3kKlH1dkivv11kkOQx75GNkA7a1DmaHyRxLV1e6PSRTp61PTJ28bW0wjTVlRyz2Lp0H_Y3Jkw46mdQ7tK7ZYB2SUa3twRt_TS5WMYw3p9knn8-Txfglnb1PX8ejWVqynIYUBOMUljq-SxEFk2pYiSUgl0DzinKFJUcx1KyUlZYAFeQsV4hyKQVdlRXrk7vubtO63y36UKzdNjaxvqA8ZzRTUkGkHjqqbJ33La6KpjWbWLGArDhKK47SipO0iN93-I-JIvbmf_oPRUJrTA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2543209791</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Alternative Secondary Goals in Multiplicative Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis</title><source>Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Lu, Chao ; Cheng, Haifang</creator><contributor>Mula, Josefa ; Josefa Mula</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lu, Chao ; Cheng, Haifang ; Mula, Josefa ; Josefa Mula</creatorcontrib><description>Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a nonparametric method for evaluating the relative efficiency of a set of decision-making units (DMUs) with multiple inputs and outputs. As an extension of the DEA, a multiplicative two-stage DEA model has been widely used to measure the efficiencies of two-stage systems, where the first stage uses inputs to produce the outputs, and the second stage then uses the first-stage outputs as inputs to generate its own outputs. The main deficiency of the multiplicative two-stage DEA model is that the decomposition of the overall efficiency may not be unique because of the presence of alternate optima. To remove the problem of the flexible decomposition, in this paper, we maximize the sum of the two-stage efficiencies and simultaneously maximize the two-stage efficiencies as secondary goals in the multiplicative two-stage DEA model to select the decomposition of the overall efficiency from the flexible decompositions, respectively. The proposed models are applied to evaluate the performance of 10 branches of China Construction Bank, and the results are compared with the results of the existing models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1024-123X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1563-5147</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2021/9931796</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Hindawi</publisher><subject>Data analysis ; Data envelopment analysis ; Decision making ; Decomposition ; Efficiency ; Engineering ; Performance evaluation ; Profitability ; Profits</subject><ispartof>Mathematical problems in engineering, 2021, Vol.2021, p.1-11</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021 Chao Lu and Haifang Cheng.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Chao Lu and Haifang Cheng. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-163521ba9932ee63798d6b1e57124d259ec5e68a3c7da711d14349ee7b762fcd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7754-6760 ; 0000-0002-3733-5651</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2543209791/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2543209791?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,25753,27923,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Mula, Josefa</contributor><contributor>Josefa Mula</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lu, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Haifang</creatorcontrib><title>Alternative Secondary Goals in Multiplicative Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis</title><title>Mathematical problems in engineering</title><description>Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a nonparametric method for evaluating the relative efficiency of a set of decision-making units (DMUs) with multiple inputs and outputs. As an extension of the DEA, a multiplicative two-stage DEA model has been widely used to measure the efficiencies of two-stage systems, where the first stage uses inputs to produce the outputs, and the second stage then uses the first-stage outputs as inputs to generate its own outputs. The main deficiency of the multiplicative two-stage DEA model is that the decomposition of the overall efficiency may not be unique because of the presence of alternate optima. To remove the problem of the flexible decomposition, in this paper, we maximize the sum of the two-stage efficiencies and simultaneously maximize the two-stage efficiencies as secondary goals in the multiplicative two-stage DEA model to select the decomposition of the overall efficiency from the flexible decompositions, respectively. The proposed models are applied to evaluate the performance of 10 branches of China Construction Bank, and the results are compared with the results of the existing models.</description><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Data envelopment analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decomposition</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Profitability</subject><subject>Profits</subject><issn>1024-123X</issn><issn>1563-5147</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFOAjEQhhujiYjefIBNPOrKTrtt6ZEgognGGDDxtim7g5aU7botEN7ekuXsaebw_ZP5P0JuIXsE4HxAMwoDpRhIJc5ID7hgKYdcnsc9o3kKlH1dkivv11kkOQx75GNkA7a1DmaHyRxLV1e6PSRTp61PTJ28bW0wjTVlRyz2Lp0H_Y3Jkw46mdQ7tK7ZYB2SUa3twRt_TS5WMYw3p9knn8-Txfglnb1PX8ejWVqynIYUBOMUljq-SxEFk2pYiSUgl0DzinKFJUcx1KyUlZYAFeQsV4hyKQVdlRXrk7vubtO63y36UKzdNjaxvqA8ZzRTUkGkHjqqbJ33La6KpjWbWLGArDhKK47SipO0iN93-I-JIvbmf_oPRUJrTA</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Lu, Chao</creator><creator>Cheng, Haifang</creator><general>Hindawi</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7754-6760</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3733-5651</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Alternative Secondary Goals in Multiplicative Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis</title><author>Lu, Chao ; Cheng, Haifang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-163521ba9932ee63798d6b1e57124d259ec5e68a3c7da711d14349ee7b762fcd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Data envelopment analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decomposition</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Profitability</topic><topic>Profits</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lu, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Haifang</creatorcontrib><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Middle East & Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer science database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><jtitle>Mathematical problems in engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lu, Chao</au><au>Cheng, Haifang</au><au>Mula, Josefa</au><au>Josefa Mula</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Alternative Secondary Goals in Multiplicative Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Mathematical problems in engineering</jtitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>2021</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>11</epage><pages>1-11</pages><issn>1024-123X</issn><eissn>1563-5147</eissn><abstract>Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a nonparametric method for evaluating the relative efficiency of a set of decision-making units (DMUs) with multiple inputs and outputs. As an extension of the DEA, a multiplicative two-stage DEA model has been widely used to measure the efficiencies of two-stage systems, where the first stage uses inputs to produce the outputs, and the second stage then uses the first-stage outputs as inputs to generate its own outputs. The main deficiency of the multiplicative two-stage DEA model is that the decomposition of the overall efficiency may not be unique because of the presence of alternate optima. To remove the problem of the flexible decomposition, in this paper, we maximize the sum of the two-stage efficiencies and simultaneously maximize the two-stage efficiencies as secondary goals in the multiplicative two-stage DEA model to select the decomposition of the overall efficiency from the flexible decompositions, respectively. The proposed models are applied to evaluate the performance of 10 branches of China Construction Bank, and the results are compared with the results of the existing models.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Hindawi</pub><doi>10.1155/2021/9931796</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7754-6760</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3733-5651</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1024-123X |
ispartof | Mathematical problems in engineering, 2021, Vol.2021, p.1-11 |
issn | 1024-123X 1563-5147 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2543209791 |
source | Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals; Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Data analysis Data envelopment analysis Decision making Decomposition Efficiency Engineering Performance evaluation Profitability Profits |
title | Alternative Secondary Goals in Multiplicative Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T07%3A00%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Alternative%20Secondary%20Goals%20in%20Multiplicative%20Two-Stage%20Data%20Envelopment%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Mathematical%20problems%20in%20engineering&rft.au=Lu,%20Chao&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=2021&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=11&rft.pages=1-11&rft.issn=1024-123X&rft.eissn=1563-5147&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2021/9931796&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2543209791%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-163521ba9932ee63798d6b1e57124d259ec5e68a3c7da711d14349ee7b762fcd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2543209791&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |