Loading…

An increasing gasoline price elasticity in the United States?

Drawing on the 2009 and 2017 waves of the National Household Transportation Survey, this paper is concerned with modeling the fuel price elasticity, allowing for differential estimates in its magnitude over time and across households. We find an elasticity close to zero for the year 2009, which incr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energy economics 2021-03, Vol.95, p.104982, Article 104982
Main Authors: Goetzke, Frank, Vance, Colin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-929627e3787e89d89d101ba2be9116f6e372babf84a62d645e1bed4d3d6da39b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-929627e3787e89d89d101ba2be9116f6e372babf84a62d645e1bed4d3d6da39b3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 104982
container_title Energy economics
container_volume 95
creator Goetzke, Frank
Vance, Colin
description Drawing on the 2009 and 2017 waves of the National Household Transportation Survey, this paper is concerned with modeling the fuel price elasticity, allowing for differential estimates in its magnitude over time and across households. We find an elasticity close to zero for the year 2009, which increases to upwards of −0.3 by the year 2017. We explore the robustness of this result to different model specifications and estimation techniques, including instrumental variable estimation to account for the possible endogeneity of fuel prices, as well as quantile regression to account for heterogeneity according to driving intensity. While a similar pattern of increasing elasticity over time emerges across all these models, the quantile model suggests an inverse relationship between the magnitude of the elasticity and miles driven in 2017. As demonstrated with a back of the envelope calculation, one implication of this pattern is a more muted effectiveness of fuel taxation than implied by the estimates of a standard mean regression. •We estimate the fuel price elasticity using the 2009 and 2017 waves of the NHTS.•The elasticity in 2009 is small – roughly −0.05 – but imprecisely estimated.•The elasticity in 2017 is statistically significant and larger in magnitude, −0.29.•The 2017 elasticity is further subject to heterogeneity by driving distance.•Those who drive the most are the least responsive to fuel prices.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104982
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2543861894</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0140988320303224</els_id><sourcerecordid>2543861894</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-929627e3787e89d89d101ba2be9116f6e372babf84a62d645e1bed4d3d6da39b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKufwMuC5635s5tNDkVKsSoUPGjPIZvM1iw1W5NU6Lc3dT0LgYHMezPzfgjdEjwjmPD7fgYezDCjmJ5-KinoGZoQ0bCSE0HO0QSTCpdSCHaJrmLsMcY1r8UEzRe-cN4E0NH5bbHVcdg5D8U-OAMF7HRMzrh0zKIifUCx8S6BLd6SThAfrtFFp3cRbv7qFG1Wj-_L53L9-vSyXKxLwyRPpaSS0wZYIxoQ0uaXr241bUESwjueO7TVbScqzanlVQ2kBVtZZrnVTLZsiu7GufswfB0gJtUPh-DzSkXriokcUlZZxUaVCUOMATqVU3zqcFQEqxMn1atfTurESY2csms-uiAH-HYQVDQOvAHrApik7OD-9f8AB0Bw8g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2543861894</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An increasing gasoline price elasticity in the United States?</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Goetzke, Frank ; Vance, Colin</creator><creatorcontrib>Goetzke, Frank ; Vance, Colin</creatorcontrib><description>Drawing on the 2009 and 2017 waves of the National Household Transportation Survey, this paper is concerned with modeling the fuel price elasticity, allowing for differential estimates in its magnitude over time and across households. We find an elasticity close to zero for the year 2009, which increases to upwards of −0.3 by the year 2017. We explore the robustness of this result to different model specifications and estimation techniques, including instrumental variable estimation to account for the possible endogeneity of fuel prices, as well as quantile regression to account for heterogeneity according to driving intensity. While a similar pattern of increasing elasticity over time emerges across all these models, the quantile model suggests an inverse relationship between the magnitude of the elasticity and miles driven in 2017. As demonstrated with a back of the envelope calculation, one implication of this pattern is a more muted effectiveness of fuel taxation than implied by the estimates of a standard mean regression. •We estimate the fuel price elasticity using the 2009 and 2017 waves of the NHTS.•The elasticity in 2009 is small – roughly −0.05 – but imprecisely estimated.•The elasticity in 2017 is statistically significant and larger in magnitude, −0.29.•The 2017 elasticity is further subject to heterogeneity by driving distance.•Those who drive the most are the least responsive to fuel prices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-9883</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6181</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104982</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Energy economics ; Estimates ; Estimation ; Fuel price elasticity ; Fuels ; Gasoline ; Heterogeneity ; Households ; Price elasticity ; Prices ; Robustness ; Taxation ; Vehicle miles traveled</subject><ispartof>Energy economics, 2021-03, Vol.95, p.104982, Article 104982</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Mar 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-929627e3787e89d89d101ba2be9116f6e372babf84a62d645e1bed4d3d6da39b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-929627e3787e89d89d101ba2be9116f6e372babf84a62d645e1bed4d3d6da39b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27842,27900,27901,33199</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goetzke, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vance, Colin</creatorcontrib><title>An increasing gasoline price elasticity in the United States?</title><title>Energy economics</title><description>Drawing on the 2009 and 2017 waves of the National Household Transportation Survey, this paper is concerned with modeling the fuel price elasticity, allowing for differential estimates in its magnitude over time and across households. We find an elasticity close to zero for the year 2009, which increases to upwards of −0.3 by the year 2017. We explore the robustness of this result to different model specifications and estimation techniques, including instrumental variable estimation to account for the possible endogeneity of fuel prices, as well as quantile regression to account for heterogeneity according to driving intensity. While a similar pattern of increasing elasticity over time emerges across all these models, the quantile model suggests an inverse relationship between the magnitude of the elasticity and miles driven in 2017. As demonstrated with a back of the envelope calculation, one implication of this pattern is a more muted effectiveness of fuel taxation than implied by the estimates of a standard mean regression. •We estimate the fuel price elasticity using the 2009 and 2017 waves of the NHTS.•The elasticity in 2009 is small – roughly −0.05 – but imprecisely estimated.•The elasticity in 2017 is statistically significant and larger in magnitude, −0.29.•The 2017 elasticity is further subject to heterogeneity by driving distance.•Those who drive the most are the least responsive to fuel prices.</description><subject>Energy economics</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Estimation</subject><subject>Fuel price elasticity</subject><subject>Fuels</subject><subject>Gasoline</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Price elasticity</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Robustness</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Vehicle miles traveled</subject><issn>0140-9883</issn><issn>1873-6181</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKufwMuC5635s5tNDkVKsSoUPGjPIZvM1iw1W5NU6Lc3dT0LgYHMezPzfgjdEjwjmPD7fgYezDCjmJ5-KinoGZoQ0bCSE0HO0QSTCpdSCHaJrmLsMcY1r8UEzRe-cN4E0NH5bbHVcdg5D8U-OAMF7HRMzrh0zKIifUCx8S6BLd6SThAfrtFFp3cRbv7qFG1Wj-_L53L9-vSyXKxLwyRPpaSS0wZYIxoQ0uaXr241bUESwjueO7TVbScqzanlVQ2kBVtZZrnVTLZsiu7GufswfB0gJtUPh-DzSkXriokcUlZZxUaVCUOMATqVU3zqcFQEqxMn1atfTurESY2csms-uiAH-HYQVDQOvAHrApik7OD-9f8AB0Bw8g</recordid><startdate>20210301</startdate><enddate>20210301</enddate><creator>Goetzke, Frank</creator><creator>Vance, Colin</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210301</creationdate><title>An increasing gasoline price elasticity in the United States?</title><author>Goetzke, Frank ; Vance, Colin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-929627e3787e89d89d101ba2be9116f6e372babf84a62d645e1bed4d3d6da39b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Energy economics</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Estimation</topic><topic>Fuel price elasticity</topic><topic>Fuels</topic><topic>Gasoline</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Price elasticity</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Robustness</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Vehicle miles traveled</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goetzke, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vance, Colin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goetzke, Frank</au><au>Vance, Colin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An increasing gasoline price elasticity in the United States?</atitle><jtitle>Energy economics</jtitle><date>2021-03-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>95</volume><spage>104982</spage><pages>104982-</pages><artnum>104982</artnum><issn>0140-9883</issn><eissn>1873-6181</eissn><abstract>Drawing on the 2009 and 2017 waves of the National Household Transportation Survey, this paper is concerned with modeling the fuel price elasticity, allowing for differential estimates in its magnitude over time and across households. We find an elasticity close to zero for the year 2009, which increases to upwards of −0.3 by the year 2017. We explore the robustness of this result to different model specifications and estimation techniques, including instrumental variable estimation to account for the possible endogeneity of fuel prices, as well as quantile regression to account for heterogeneity according to driving intensity. While a similar pattern of increasing elasticity over time emerges across all these models, the quantile model suggests an inverse relationship between the magnitude of the elasticity and miles driven in 2017. As demonstrated with a back of the envelope calculation, one implication of this pattern is a more muted effectiveness of fuel taxation than implied by the estimates of a standard mean regression. •We estimate the fuel price elasticity using the 2009 and 2017 waves of the NHTS.•The elasticity in 2009 is small – roughly −0.05 – but imprecisely estimated.•The elasticity in 2017 is statistically significant and larger in magnitude, −0.29.•The 2017 elasticity is further subject to heterogeneity by driving distance.•Those who drive the most are the least responsive to fuel prices.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104982</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0140-9883
ispartof Energy economics, 2021-03, Vol.95, p.104982, Article 104982
issn 0140-9883
1873-6181
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2543861894
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Freedom Collection; PAIS Index
subjects Energy economics
Estimates
Estimation
Fuel price elasticity
Fuels
Gasoline
Heterogeneity
Households
Price elasticity
Prices
Robustness
Taxation
Vehicle miles traveled
title An increasing gasoline price elasticity in the United States?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-24T17%3A18%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20increasing%20gasoline%20price%20elasticity%20in%20the%20United%20States?&rft.jtitle=Energy%20economics&rft.au=Goetzke,%20Frank&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.volume=95&rft.spage=104982&rft.pages=104982-&rft.artnum=104982&rft.issn=0140-9883&rft.eissn=1873-6181&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104982&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2543861894%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-929627e3787e89d89d101ba2be9116f6e372babf84a62d645e1bed4d3d6da39b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2543861894&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true