Loading…

Assessment of CHADFDM satellite‐based input dataset for the groundwater recharge estimation in arid and data scarce regions

Aquifer natural recharge estimations are a prerequisite for understanding hydrologic systems and sustainable water resources management. As meteorological data series collection is difficult in arid and semiarid areas, satellite products have recently become an alternative for water resources studie...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Hydrological processes 2021-06, Vol.35 (6), p.n/a
Main Authors: Salehi Siavashani, Nafiseh, Jimenez‐Martinez, Joaquin, Vaquero, Guillermo, Elorza, Francisco J., Sheffield, Justin, Candela, Lucila, Serrat‐Capdevila, Aleix
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3550-e102b806f9dfc754370ebdc0171e4f3e9d6c2835bf83bd9ebfd5bcc2fbc1fc673
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3550-e102b806f9dfc754370ebdc0171e4f3e9d6c2835bf83bd9ebfd5bcc2fbc1fc673
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 6
container_start_page
container_title Hydrological processes
container_volume 35
creator Salehi Siavashani, Nafiseh
Jimenez‐Martinez, Joaquin
Vaquero, Guillermo
Elorza, Francisco J.
Sheffield, Justin
Candela, Lucila
Serrat‐Capdevila, Aleix
description Aquifer natural recharge estimations are a prerequisite for understanding hydrologic systems and sustainable water resources management. As meteorological data series collection is difficult in arid and semiarid areas, satellite products have recently become an alternative for water resources studies. A daily groundwater recharge estimation in the NW part of the Lake Chad Basin, using a soil–plant‐atmosphere model (VisualBALAN), from ground‐ and satellite‐based meteorological input dataset for non‐irrigated and irrigated land and for the 2005–2014 period is presented. Average annual values were 284 mm and 30°C for precipitation and temperature in ground‐based gauge stations. For the satellite‐model‐based Lake Chad Basin Flood and Drought Monitor System platform (CHADFDM), average annual precipitation and temperature were 417 mm and 29°C, respectively. Uncertainties derived from satellite data measurement could account for the rainfall difference. The estimated mean annual aquifer recharge was always higher from satellite‐ than ground‐based data, with differences up to 46% for dryland and 23% in irrigated areas. Recharge response to rainfall events was very variable and results were very sensitive to: wilting point, field capacity and curve number for runoff estimation. Obtained results provide plausible recharge values beyond the uncertainty related to data input and modelling approach. This work prevents on the important deviations in recharge estimation from weighted‐ensemble satellite‐based data, informing in decision making to both stakeholders and policy makers. Estimation of diffuse recharge by precipitation is highly dependent on climatic data as well as pattern and soil characteristics. In arid and semi‐arid areas, meteorological ground‐based data collection is difficult and satellite products of climatic forcing functions constitute an alternative. For the Lake Chad area, rainfall from satellite overestimates the amount of ground‐based records and shows more variability over time. Recharge rate quantification provided evidence of results from satellite precipitation and allowed the comparison with ground data.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/hyp.14250
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2545823543</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2545823543</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3550-e102b806f9dfc754370ebdc0171e4f3e9d6c2835bf83bd9ebfd5bcc2fbc1fc673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLFOwzAQhi0EEqUw8AaWmBjSnpO4ccaqpRSpCAYYmCLHPrep0qTYrqoOSDwCz8iTYBpWptPpvv-_u5-QawYDBhAPV4ftgKUxhxPSY5DnEQPBT0kPhODRCER2Ti6cWwNACgJ65GPsHDq3wcbT1tDJfDydTR-pkx7ruvL4_flVSoeaVs1256mWPnSemtZSv0K6tO2u0ftAW2pRraRdIkXnq430VdsEFZW20lQ2-qilTkmrMLDLMHaX5MzI2uHVX-2T19ndy2QeLZ7uHybjRSQTziFCBnEpYGRybVTG0yQDLLUCljFMTYK5HqlYJLw0Iil1jqXRvFQqNqViRo2ypE9uOt-tbd934b5i3e5sE1YWMU-5iJNgGqjbjlK2dc6iKbY2PGIPBYPiN90ipFsc0w3ssGP3VY2H_8Fi_vbcKX4A5K9_EA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2545823543</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of CHADFDM satellite‐based input dataset for the groundwater recharge estimation in arid and data scarce regions</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Salehi Siavashani, Nafiseh ; Jimenez‐Martinez, Joaquin ; Vaquero, Guillermo ; Elorza, Francisco J. ; Sheffield, Justin ; Candela, Lucila ; Serrat‐Capdevila, Aleix</creator><creatorcontrib>Salehi Siavashani, Nafiseh ; Jimenez‐Martinez, Joaquin ; Vaquero, Guillermo ; Elorza, Francisco J. ; Sheffield, Justin ; Candela, Lucila ; Serrat‐Capdevila, Aleix</creatorcontrib><description>Aquifer natural recharge estimations are a prerequisite for understanding hydrologic systems and sustainable water resources management. As meteorological data series collection is difficult in arid and semiarid areas, satellite products have recently become an alternative for water resources studies. A daily groundwater recharge estimation in the NW part of the Lake Chad Basin, using a soil–plant‐atmosphere model (VisualBALAN), from ground‐ and satellite‐based meteorological input dataset for non‐irrigated and irrigated land and for the 2005–2014 period is presented. Average annual values were 284 mm and 30°C for precipitation and temperature in ground‐based gauge stations. For the satellite‐model‐based Lake Chad Basin Flood and Drought Monitor System platform (CHADFDM), average annual precipitation and temperature were 417 mm and 29°C, respectively. Uncertainties derived from satellite data measurement could account for the rainfall difference. The estimated mean annual aquifer recharge was always higher from satellite‐ than ground‐based data, with differences up to 46% for dryland and 23% in irrigated areas. Recharge response to rainfall events was very variable and results were very sensitive to: wilting point, field capacity and curve number for runoff estimation. Obtained results provide plausible recharge values beyond the uncertainty related to data input and modelling approach. This work prevents on the important deviations in recharge estimation from weighted‐ensemble satellite‐based data, informing in decision making to both stakeholders and policy makers. Estimation of diffuse recharge by precipitation is highly dependent on climatic data as well as pattern and soil characteristics. In arid and semi‐arid areas, meteorological ground‐based data collection is difficult and satellite products of climatic forcing functions constitute an alternative. For the Lake Chad area, rainfall from satellite overestimates the amount of ground‐based records and shows more variability over time. Recharge rate quantification provided evidence of results from satellite precipitation and allowed the comparison with ground data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-6087</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1085</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hyp.14250</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Annual precipitation ; Annual rainfall ; Aquifer recharge ; Aquifers ; Arid lands ; Arid regions ; Arid zones ; Atmospheric models ; Atmospheric precipitations ; CHADFDM data set ; Datasets ; Decision making ; Drought ; Field capacity ; Ground stations ; Groundwater ; Groundwater data ; Groundwater recharge ; Groundwater recharge estimation ; groundwater recharge modelling ; ground‐satellite meteorological data ; Hydrologic systems ; Hydrology ; Irrigated areas ; Irrigated lands ; Lake Chad Basin ; Lakes ; Mean annual precipitation ; Meteorological data ; Natural recharge ; Precipitation ; Precipitation-temperature relationships ; Rain ; Rainfall ; Runoff ; Runoff estimation ; Satellite data ; Satellites ; Semi arid areas ; Temperature ; Uncertainty ; Water resources ; Water resources management ; Wilting ; Wilting point</subject><ispartof>Hydrological processes, 2021-06, Vol.35 (6), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3550-e102b806f9dfc754370ebdc0171e4f3e9d6c2835bf83bd9ebfd5bcc2fbc1fc673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3550-e102b806f9dfc754370ebdc0171e4f3e9d6c2835bf83bd9ebfd5bcc2fbc1fc673</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5075-7317 ; 0000-0002-2063-6490 ; 0000-0002-1659-6334</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Salehi Siavashani, Nafiseh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimenez‐Martinez, Joaquin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaquero, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elorza, Francisco J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheffield, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Candela, Lucila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serrat‐Capdevila, Aleix</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of CHADFDM satellite‐based input dataset for the groundwater recharge estimation in arid and data scarce regions</title><title>Hydrological processes</title><description>Aquifer natural recharge estimations are a prerequisite for understanding hydrologic systems and sustainable water resources management. As meteorological data series collection is difficult in arid and semiarid areas, satellite products have recently become an alternative for water resources studies. A daily groundwater recharge estimation in the NW part of the Lake Chad Basin, using a soil–plant‐atmosphere model (VisualBALAN), from ground‐ and satellite‐based meteorological input dataset for non‐irrigated and irrigated land and for the 2005–2014 period is presented. Average annual values were 284 mm and 30°C for precipitation and temperature in ground‐based gauge stations. For the satellite‐model‐based Lake Chad Basin Flood and Drought Monitor System platform (CHADFDM), average annual precipitation and temperature were 417 mm and 29°C, respectively. Uncertainties derived from satellite data measurement could account for the rainfall difference. The estimated mean annual aquifer recharge was always higher from satellite‐ than ground‐based data, with differences up to 46% for dryland and 23% in irrigated areas. Recharge response to rainfall events was very variable and results were very sensitive to: wilting point, field capacity and curve number for runoff estimation. Obtained results provide plausible recharge values beyond the uncertainty related to data input and modelling approach. This work prevents on the important deviations in recharge estimation from weighted‐ensemble satellite‐based data, informing in decision making to both stakeholders and policy makers. Estimation of diffuse recharge by precipitation is highly dependent on climatic data as well as pattern and soil characteristics. In arid and semi‐arid areas, meteorological ground‐based data collection is difficult and satellite products of climatic forcing functions constitute an alternative. For the Lake Chad area, rainfall from satellite overestimates the amount of ground‐based records and shows more variability over time. Recharge rate quantification provided evidence of results from satellite precipitation and allowed the comparison with ground data.</description><subject>Annual precipitation</subject><subject>Annual rainfall</subject><subject>Aquifer recharge</subject><subject>Aquifers</subject><subject>Arid lands</subject><subject>Arid regions</subject><subject>Arid zones</subject><subject>Atmospheric models</subject><subject>Atmospheric precipitations</subject><subject>CHADFDM data set</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Field capacity</subject><subject>Ground stations</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Groundwater data</subject><subject>Groundwater recharge</subject><subject>Groundwater recharge estimation</subject><subject>groundwater recharge modelling</subject><subject>ground‐satellite meteorological data</subject><subject>Hydrologic systems</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Irrigated areas</subject><subject>Irrigated lands</subject><subject>Lake Chad Basin</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Mean annual precipitation</subject><subject>Meteorological data</subject><subject>Natural recharge</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Precipitation-temperature relationships</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>Runoff estimation</subject><subject>Satellite data</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>Semi arid areas</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><subject>Water resources management</subject><subject>Wilting</subject><subject>Wilting point</subject><issn>0885-6087</issn><issn>1099-1085</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kLFOwzAQhi0EEqUw8AaWmBjSnpO4ccaqpRSpCAYYmCLHPrep0qTYrqoOSDwCz8iTYBpWptPpvv-_u5-QawYDBhAPV4ftgKUxhxPSY5DnEQPBT0kPhODRCER2Ti6cWwNACgJ65GPsHDq3wcbT1tDJfDydTR-pkx7ruvL4_flVSoeaVs1256mWPnSemtZSv0K6tO2u0ftAW2pRraRdIkXnq430VdsEFZW20lQ2-qilTkmrMLDLMHaX5MzI2uHVX-2T19ndy2QeLZ7uHybjRSQTziFCBnEpYGRybVTG0yQDLLUCljFMTYK5HqlYJLw0Iil1jqXRvFQqNqViRo2ypE9uOt-tbd934b5i3e5sE1YWMU-5iJNgGqjbjlK2dc6iKbY2PGIPBYPiN90ipFsc0w3ssGP3VY2H_8Fi_vbcKX4A5K9_EA</recordid><startdate>202106</startdate><enddate>202106</enddate><creator>Salehi Siavashani, Nafiseh</creator><creator>Jimenez‐Martinez, Joaquin</creator><creator>Vaquero, Guillermo</creator><creator>Elorza, Francisco J.</creator><creator>Sheffield, Justin</creator><creator>Candela, Lucila</creator><creator>Serrat‐Capdevila, Aleix</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5075-7317</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2063-6490</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1659-6334</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202106</creationdate><title>Assessment of CHADFDM satellite‐based input dataset for the groundwater recharge estimation in arid and data scarce regions</title><author>Salehi Siavashani, Nafiseh ; Jimenez‐Martinez, Joaquin ; Vaquero, Guillermo ; Elorza, Francisco J. ; Sheffield, Justin ; Candela, Lucila ; Serrat‐Capdevila, Aleix</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3550-e102b806f9dfc754370ebdc0171e4f3e9d6c2835bf83bd9ebfd5bcc2fbc1fc673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Annual precipitation</topic><topic>Annual rainfall</topic><topic>Aquifer recharge</topic><topic>Aquifers</topic><topic>Arid lands</topic><topic>Arid regions</topic><topic>Arid zones</topic><topic>Atmospheric models</topic><topic>Atmospheric precipitations</topic><topic>CHADFDM data set</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Field capacity</topic><topic>Ground stations</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Groundwater data</topic><topic>Groundwater recharge</topic><topic>Groundwater recharge estimation</topic><topic>groundwater recharge modelling</topic><topic>ground‐satellite meteorological data</topic><topic>Hydrologic systems</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Irrigated areas</topic><topic>Irrigated lands</topic><topic>Lake Chad Basin</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Mean annual precipitation</topic><topic>Meteorological data</topic><topic>Natural recharge</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Precipitation-temperature relationships</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>Runoff estimation</topic><topic>Satellite data</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>Semi arid areas</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><topic>Water resources management</topic><topic>Wilting</topic><topic>Wilting point</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salehi Siavashani, Nafiseh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimenez‐Martinez, Joaquin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaquero, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elorza, Francisco J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheffield, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Candela, Lucila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serrat‐Capdevila, Aleix</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Backfiles (Open access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Hydrological processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salehi Siavashani, Nafiseh</au><au>Jimenez‐Martinez, Joaquin</au><au>Vaquero, Guillermo</au><au>Elorza, Francisco J.</au><au>Sheffield, Justin</au><au>Candela, Lucila</au><au>Serrat‐Capdevila, Aleix</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of CHADFDM satellite‐based input dataset for the groundwater recharge estimation in arid and data scarce regions</atitle><jtitle>Hydrological processes</jtitle><date>2021-06</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>6</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0885-6087</issn><eissn>1099-1085</eissn><abstract>Aquifer natural recharge estimations are a prerequisite for understanding hydrologic systems and sustainable water resources management. As meteorological data series collection is difficult in arid and semiarid areas, satellite products have recently become an alternative for water resources studies. A daily groundwater recharge estimation in the NW part of the Lake Chad Basin, using a soil–plant‐atmosphere model (VisualBALAN), from ground‐ and satellite‐based meteorological input dataset for non‐irrigated and irrigated land and for the 2005–2014 period is presented. Average annual values were 284 mm and 30°C for precipitation and temperature in ground‐based gauge stations. For the satellite‐model‐based Lake Chad Basin Flood and Drought Monitor System platform (CHADFDM), average annual precipitation and temperature were 417 mm and 29°C, respectively. Uncertainties derived from satellite data measurement could account for the rainfall difference. The estimated mean annual aquifer recharge was always higher from satellite‐ than ground‐based data, with differences up to 46% for dryland and 23% in irrigated areas. Recharge response to rainfall events was very variable and results were very sensitive to: wilting point, field capacity and curve number for runoff estimation. Obtained results provide plausible recharge values beyond the uncertainty related to data input and modelling approach. This work prevents on the important deviations in recharge estimation from weighted‐ensemble satellite‐based data, informing in decision making to both stakeholders and policy makers. Estimation of diffuse recharge by precipitation is highly dependent on climatic data as well as pattern and soil characteristics. In arid and semi‐arid areas, meteorological ground‐based data collection is difficult and satellite products of climatic forcing functions constitute an alternative. For the Lake Chad area, rainfall from satellite overestimates the amount of ground‐based records and shows more variability over time. Recharge rate quantification provided evidence of results from satellite precipitation and allowed the comparison with ground data.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/hyp.14250</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5075-7317</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2063-6490</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1659-6334</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0885-6087
ispartof Hydrological processes, 2021-06, Vol.35 (6), p.n/a
issn 0885-6087
1099-1085
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2545823543
source Wiley
subjects Annual precipitation
Annual rainfall
Aquifer recharge
Aquifers
Arid lands
Arid regions
Arid zones
Atmospheric models
Atmospheric precipitations
CHADFDM data set
Datasets
Decision making
Drought
Field capacity
Ground stations
Groundwater
Groundwater data
Groundwater recharge
Groundwater recharge estimation
groundwater recharge modelling
ground‐satellite meteorological data
Hydrologic systems
Hydrology
Irrigated areas
Irrigated lands
Lake Chad Basin
Lakes
Mean annual precipitation
Meteorological data
Natural recharge
Precipitation
Precipitation-temperature relationships
Rain
Rainfall
Runoff
Runoff estimation
Satellite data
Satellites
Semi arid areas
Temperature
Uncertainty
Water resources
Water resources management
Wilting
Wilting point
title Assessment of CHADFDM satellite‐based input dataset for the groundwater recharge estimation in arid and data scarce regions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T09%3A03%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20CHADFDM%20satellite%E2%80%90based%20input%20dataset%20for%20the%20groundwater%20recharge%20estimation%20in%20arid%20and%20data%20scarce%20regions&rft.jtitle=Hydrological%20processes&rft.au=Salehi%20Siavashani,%20Nafiseh&rft.date=2021-06&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=6&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0885-6087&rft.eissn=1099-1085&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hyp.14250&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2545823543%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3550-e102b806f9dfc754370ebdc0171e4f3e9d6c2835bf83bd9ebfd5bcc2fbc1fc673%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2545823543&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true