Loading…
Soil and ambient air mercury as an indicator of coal-fired power plant emissions: a case study in North China
Coal-fired power plants (CFPPs) are an important anthropogenic mercury (Hg) source in China, and it is crucial to understand the environmental impacts of this detrimental element emitted from this source. In the present study, field experiments were conducted for measuring Hg in ambient atmosphere a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Environmental science and pollution research international 2021-07, Vol.28 (25), p.33146-33157 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-85f4192851c8ac6476d7e2dac9b06a220340da778ae139ad9139626951841a73 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-85f4192851c8ac6476d7e2dac9b06a220340da778ae139ad9139626951841a73 |
container_end_page | 33157 |
container_issue | 25 |
container_start_page | 33146 |
container_title | Environmental science and pollution research international |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Li, Zhonggen Chen, Xufeng Liu, Wenli Li, Taishan Qiu, Guangle Yan, Haiyu Wang, Mingmeng Chen, Ji Sun, Guangyi Wang, Qingfeng Feng, Xinbin |
description | Coal-fired power plants (CFPPs) are an important anthropogenic mercury (Hg) source in China, and it is crucial to understand the environmental impacts of this detrimental element emitted from this source. In the present study, field experiments were conducted for measuring Hg in ambient atmosphere and upland agricultural soils within a radius of 10 km surrounding a large scale coal-fired power plant (1550 MW) in Tangshan, Hebei province. Short-term (20 min) average of gaseous elemental mercury (GEM or Hg
0
) in ambient air varying from 1.5 to 9.0 ng/m
3
and total Hg (THg) in surface agricultural soil (0–20 cm) varying from 9.2 to 43.5 μg/kg at different sites were observed. THg in two soil cores decreased with depth, with concentrations being 2–2.5 times higher in the surface layer than that in the deep layer (50–60 cm), indicating the possibility of the atmospheric input of Hg. Based on the information of the total atmospheric Hg emission since this CFPP’s operation in 1970s and the increased THg in nearby soils, it was estimated that about 3.9% discharged Hg has accumulated in the nearby agricultural soils. The low retention rate of the total emitted Hg by soils is a result of high proportion of Hg
0
(79.5%) in stack gas emission and potential loss of Hg from soil surface reemission. The positive shifting (~ 0.5‰) of Hg isotopic signature (δ
202
Hg) from deep soil to surface soil reflected Hg deposition from nearby CFPP emissions that are featured with much heavier Hg isotopic signatures inherited from feed coal (δ
202
Hg: –0.50‰) and different combustion products (δ
202
Hg: –0.95 to 3.71‰) compared with that in deep soil layer (δ
202
Hg: ca –1.50‰). Overall, this study demonstrated that this CFPP has a slight but distinguishable effect on the elevation of ambient GEM and agricultural soil THg in the local environment.
Graphical abstract |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11356-021-12842-9 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2546402558</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2546402558</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-85f4192851c8ac6476d7e2dac9b06a220340da778ae139ad9139626951841a73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PGzEQhq2KqoS0f6AHZImzW3973RuKgCIhODR3a2J7G6PsOti7Qvn3NQ2FWy8zh3k_NA9CXxn9xig13ytjQmlCOSOMd5IT-wEtmGaSGGntCVpQKyVhQspTdFbrI6WcWm4-oVMhtFBSqwUafuW0wzAGDMMmxXHCkAoeYvFzOWCo7YTTGJKHKRece-wz7EifSgx4n59jwfsdNFccUq0pj_UHBuyhRlynORyaF9_nMm3xaptG-Iw-9rCr8cvrXqL19dV69ZPcPdzcri7viBdGTaRTvWSWd4r5DryWRgcTeQBvN1QD51RIGsCYDiITFoJtU3NtFeskAyOW6OIYuy_5aY51co95LmNrdLy9LSlXqmsqflT5kmstsXf7kgYoB8eoewHsjoBdA-z-Ana2mc5fo-fNEMOb5R_RJhBHQW2n8Xcs793_if0DEp2E4g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2546402558</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Soil and ambient air mercury as an indicator of coal-fired power plant emissions: a case study in North China</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Li, Zhonggen ; Chen, Xufeng ; Liu, Wenli ; Li, Taishan ; Qiu, Guangle ; Yan, Haiyu ; Wang, Mingmeng ; Chen, Ji ; Sun, Guangyi ; Wang, Qingfeng ; Feng, Xinbin</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhonggen ; Chen, Xufeng ; Liu, Wenli ; Li, Taishan ; Qiu, Guangle ; Yan, Haiyu ; Wang, Mingmeng ; Chen, Ji ; Sun, Guangyi ; Wang, Qingfeng ; Feng, Xinbin</creatorcontrib><description>Coal-fired power plants (CFPPs) are an important anthropogenic mercury (Hg) source in China, and it is crucial to understand the environmental impacts of this detrimental element emitted from this source. In the present study, field experiments were conducted for measuring Hg in ambient atmosphere and upland agricultural soils within a radius of 10 km surrounding a large scale coal-fired power plant (1550 MW) in Tangshan, Hebei province. Short-term (20 min) average of gaseous elemental mercury (GEM or Hg
0
) in ambient air varying from 1.5 to 9.0 ng/m
3
and total Hg (THg) in surface agricultural soil (0–20 cm) varying from 9.2 to 43.5 μg/kg at different sites were observed. THg in two soil cores decreased with depth, with concentrations being 2–2.5 times higher in the surface layer than that in the deep layer (50–60 cm), indicating the possibility of the atmospheric input of Hg. Based on the information of the total atmospheric Hg emission since this CFPP’s operation in 1970s and the increased THg in nearby soils, it was estimated that about 3.9% discharged Hg has accumulated in the nearby agricultural soils. The low retention rate of the total emitted Hg by soils is a result of high proportion of Hg
0
(79.5%) in stack gas emission and potential loss of Hg from soil surface reemission. The positive shifting (~ 0.5‰) of Hg isotopic signature (δ
202
Hg) from deep soil to surface soil reflected Hg deposition from nearby CFPP emissions that are featured with much heavier Hg isotopic signatures inherited from feed coal (δ
202
Hg: –0.50‰) and different combustion products (δ
202
Hg: –0.95 to 3.71‰) compared with that in deep soil layer (δ
202
Hg: ca –1.50‰). Overall, this study demonstrated that this CFPP has a slight but distinguishable effect on the elevation of ambient GEM and agricultural soil THg in the local environment.
Graphical abstract</description><identifier>ISSN: 0944-1344</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1614-7499</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-12842-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33635465</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Anthropogenic factors ; Aquatic Pollution ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Coal ; Coal-fired power plants ; Combustion products ; Cores ; Depth indicators ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecotoxicology ; Elevation ; Emissions ; Environment ; Environmental Chemistry ; Environmental Health ; Environmental impact ; Environmental science ; Field tests ; Human influences ; Industrial plant emissions ; Mercury ; Mercury (metal) ; Power plants ; Research Article ; Soil layers ; Soil surfaces ; Soils ; Stack emissions ; Surface layers ; Waste Water Technology ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control</subject><ispartof>Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021-07, Vol.28 (25), p.33146-33157</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-85f4192851c8ac6476d7e2dac9b06a220340da778ae139ad9139626951841a73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-85f4192851c8ac6476d7e2dac9b06a220340da778ae139ad9139626951841a73</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7400-6294</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2546402558/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2546402558?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11668,27903,27904,36039,44342,74642</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33635465$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhonggen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xufeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Wenli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Taishan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Guangle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Haiyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Mingmeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Ji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Guangyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Qingfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Xinbin</creatorcontrib><title>Soil and ambient air mercury as an indicator of coal-fired power plant emissions: a case study in North China</title><title>Environmental science and pollution research international</title><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res Int</addtitle><description>Coal-fired power plants (CFPPs) are an important anthropogenic mercury (Hg) source in China, and it is crucial to understand the environmental impacts of this detrimental element emitted from this source. In the present study, field experiments were conducted for measuring Hg in ambient atmosphere and upland agricultural soils within a radius of 10 km surrounding a large scale coal-fired power plant (1550 MW) in Tangshan, Hebei province. Short-term (20 min) average of gaseous elemental mercury (GEM or Hg
0
) in ambient air varying from 1.5 to 9.0 ng/m
3
and total Hg (THg) in surface agricultural soil (0–20 cm) varying from 9.2 to 43.5 μg/kg at different sites were observed. THg in two soil cores decreased with depth, with concentrations being 2–2.5 times higher in the surface layer than that in the deep layer (50–60 cm), indicating the possibility of the atmospheric input of Hg. Based on the information of the total atmospheric Hg emission since this CFPP’s operation in 1970s and the increased THg in nearby soils, it was estimated that about 3.9% discharged Hg has accumulated in the nearby agricultural soils. The low retention rate of the total emitted Hg by soils is a result of high proportion of Hg
0
(79.5%) in stack gas emission and potential loss of Hg from soil surface reemission. The positive shifting (~ 0.5‰) of Hg isotopic signature (δ
202
Hg) from deep soil to surface soil reflected Hg deposition from nearby CFPP emissions that are featured with much heavier Hg isotopic signatures inherited from feed coal (δ
202
Hg: –0.50‰) and different combustion products (δ
202
Hg: –0.95 to 3.71‰) compared with that in deep soil layer (δ
202
Hg: ca –1.50‰). Overall, this study demonstrated that this CFPP has a slight but distinguishable effect on the elevation of ambient GEM and agricultural soil THg in the local environment.
Graphical abstract</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Coal</subject><subject>Coal-fired power plants</subject><subject>Combustion products</subject><subject>Cores</subject><subject>Depth indicators</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Elevation</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Environmental Health</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental science</subject><subject>Field tests</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>Industrial plant emissions</subject><subject>Mercury</subject><subject>Mercury (metal)</subject><subject>Power plants</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Soil layers</subject><subject>Soil surfaces</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Stack emissions</subject><subject>Surface layers</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><issn>0944-1344</issn><issn>1614-7499</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1PGzEQhq2KqoS0f6AHZImzW3973RuKgCIhODR3a2J7G6PsOti7Qvn3NQ2FWy8zh3k_NA9CXxn9xig13ytjQmlCOSOMd5IT-wEtmGaSGGntCVpQKyVhQspTdFbrI6WcWm4-oVMhtFBSqwUafuW0wzAGDMMmxXHCkAoeYvFzOWCo7YTTGJKHKRece-wz7EifSgx4n59jwfsdNFccUq0pj_UHBuyhRlynORyaF9_nMm3xaptG-Iw-9rCr8cvrXqL19dV69ZPcPdzcri7viBdGTaRTvWSWd4r5DryWRgcTeQBvN1QD51RIGsCYDiITFoJtU3NtFeskAyOW6OIYuy_5aY51co95LmNrdLy9LSlXqmsqflT5kmstsXf7kgYoB8eoewHsjoBdA-z-Ana2mc5fo-fNEMOb5R_RJhBHQW2n8Xcs793_if0DEp2E4g</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Li, Zhonggen</creator><creator>Chen, Xufeng</creator><creator>Liu, Wenli</creator><creator>Li, Taishan</creator><creator>Qiu, Guangle</creator><creator>Yan, Haiyu</creator><creator>Wang, Mingmeng</creator><creator>Chen, Ji</creator><creator>Sun, Guangyi</creator><creator>Wang, Qingfeng</creator><creator>Feng, Xinbin</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7400-6294</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>Soil and ambient air mercury as an indicator of coal-fired power plant emissions: a case study in North China</title><author>Li, Zhonggen ; Chen, Xufeng ; Liu, Wenli ; Li, Taishan ; Qiu, Guangle ; Yan, Haiyu ; Wang, Mingmeng ; Chen, Ji ; Sun, Guangyi ; Wang, Qingfeng ; Feng, Xinbin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-85f4192851c8ac6476d7e2dac9b06a220340da778ae139ad9139626951841a73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Coal</topic><topic>Coal-fired power plants</topic><topic>Combustion products</topic><topic>Cores</topic><topic>Depth indicators</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Elevation</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Environmental Health</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental science</topic><topic>Field tests</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>Industrial plant emissions</topic><topic>Mercury</topic><topic>Mercury (metal)</topic><topic>Power plants</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Soil layers</topic><topic>Soil surfaces</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Stack emissions</topic><topic>Surface layers</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhonggen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xufeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Wenli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Taishan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Guangle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Haiyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Mingmeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Ji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Guangyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Qingfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Xinbin</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Zhonggen</au><au>Chen, Xufeng</au><au>Liu, Wenli</au><au>Li, Taishan</au><au>Qiu, Guangle</au><au>Yan, Haiyu</au><au>Wang, Mingmeng</au><au>Chen, Ji</au><au>Sun, Guangyi</au><au>Wang, Qingfeng</au><au>Feng, Xinbin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Soil and ambient air mercury as an indicator of coal-fired power plant emissions: a case study in North China</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle><stitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</stitle><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res Int</addtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>25</issue><spage>33146</spage><epage>33157</epage><pages>33146-33157</pages><issn>0944-1344</issn><eissn>1614-7499</eissn><abstract>Coal-fired power plants (CFPPs) are an important anthropogenic mercury (Hg) source in China, and it is crucial to understand the environmental impacts of this detrimental element emitted from this source. In the present study, field experiments were conducted for measuring Hg in ambient atmosphere and upland agricultural soils within a radius of 10 km surrounding a large scale coal-fired power plant (1550 MW) in Tangshan, Hebei province. Short-term (20 min) average of gaseous elemental mercury (GEM or Hg
0
) in ambient air varying from 1.5 to 9.0 ng/m
3
and total Hg (THg) in surface agricultural soil (0–20 cm) varying from 9.2 to 43.5 μg/kg at different sites were observed. THg in two soil cores decreased with depth, with concentrations being 2–2.5 times higher in the surface layer than that in the deep layer (50–60 cm), indicating the possibility of the atmospheric input of Hg. Based on the information of the total atmospheric Hg emission since this CFPP’s operation in 1970s and the increased THg in nearby soils, it was estimated that about 3.9% discharged Hg has accumulated in the nearby agricultural soils. The low retention rate of the total emitted Hg by soils is a result of high proportion of Hg
0
(79.5%) in stack gas emission and potential loss of Hg from soil surface reemission. The positive shifting (~ 0.5‰) of Hg isotopic signature (δ
202
Hg) from deep soil to surface soil reflected Hg deposition from nearby CFPP emissions that are featured with much heavier Hg isotopic signatures inherited from feed coal (δ
202
Hg: –0.50‰) and different combustion products (δ
202
Hg: –0.95 to 3.71‰) compared with that in deep soil layer (δ
202
Hg: ca –1.50‰). Overall, this study demonstrated that this CFPP has a slight but distinguishable effect on the elevation of ambient GEM and agricultural soil THg in the local environment.
Graphical abstract</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>33635465</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11356-021-12842-9</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7400-6294</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0944-1344 |
ispartof | Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021-07, Vol.28 (25), p.33146-33157 |
issn | 0944-1344 1614-7499 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2546402558 |
source | ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Nature |
subjects | Agricultural land Anthropogenic factors Aquatic Pollution Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution Coal Coal-fired power plants Combustion products Cores Depth indicators Earth and Environmental Science Ecotoxicology Elevation Emissions Environment Environmental Chemistry Environmental Health Environmental impact Environmental science Field tests Human influences Industrial plant emissions Mercury Mercury (metal) Power plants Research Article Soil layers Soil surfaces Soils Stack emissions Surface layers Waste Water Technology Water Management Water Pollution Control |
title | Soil and ambient air mercury as an indicator of coal-fired power plant emissions: a case study in North China |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T17%3A27%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Soil%20and%20ambient%20air%20mercury%20as%20an%20indicator%20of%20coal-fired%20power%20plant%20emissions:%20a%20case%20study%20in%20North%20China&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20and%20pollution%20research%20international&rft.au=Li,%20Zhonggen&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=25&rft.spage=33146&rft.epage=33157&rft.pages=33146-33157&rft.issn=0944-1344&rft.eissn=1614-7499&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11356-021-12842-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2546402558%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-85f4192851c8ac6476d7e2dac9b06a220340da778ae139ad9139626951841a73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2546402558&rft_id=info:pmid/33635465&rfr_iscdi=true |