Loading…
Hydroprocessing of Oleic Acid for Production of Jet-Fuel Range Hydrocarbons over Cu and FeCu Catalysts
In the present study, a series of monometallic Cu/SiO2-Al2O3 catalysts exhibited immense potential in the hydroprocessing of oleic acid to produce jet-fuel range hydrocarbons. The synergistic effect of Fe on the monometallic Cu/SiO2-Al2O3 catalysts of variable Cu loadings (5–15 wt%) was ascertained...
Saved in:
Published in: | Catalysts 2019-12, Vol.9 (12), p.1051 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-b9679d10d3f7841b3d930e1d6b20894ba6fcb6648831d1b564f34b6ec65848383 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-b9679d10d3f7841b3d930e1d6b20894ba6fcb6648831d1b564f34b6ec65848383 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1051 |
container_title | Catalysts |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Ayandiran, Afees A. Boahene, Philip E. Dalai, Ajay K. Hu, Yongfeng |
description | In the present study, a series of monometallic Cu/SiO2-Al2O3 catalysts exhibited immense potential in the hydroprocessing of oleic acid to produce jet-fuel range hydrocarbons. The synergistic effect of Fe on the monometallic Cu/SiO2-Al2O3 catalysts of variable Cu loadings (5–15 wt%) was ascertained by varying Fe contents in the range of 1–5 wt% on the optimized 13% Cu/SiO2-Al2O3 catalyst. At 340 °C and 2.07 MPa H2 pressure, the jet-fuel range hydrocarbons yield and selectivities of 51.8% and 53.8%, respectively, were recorded for the Fe(3)-Cu(13)/SiO2-Al2O3 catalyst. To investigate the influence of acidity of support on the cracking of oleic acid, ZSM-5 (Zeolite Socony Mobil–5) and HZSM-5(Protonated Zeolite Socony Mobil–5)-supported 3% Fe-13% Cu were also evaluated at 300–340 °C and 2.07 MPa H2 pressure. Extensive techniques including N2 sorption analysis, pyridine- Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (Pyridine-FTIR), X-ray Diffraction (XRD), X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS), and H2-Temperature Programmed Reduction (H2-TPR) analyses were used to characterize the materials. XPS analysis revealed the existence of Cu1+ phase in the Fe(3)-Cu(13)/SiO2-Al2O3 catalyst, while Cu metal was predominant in both the ZSM-5 and HZSM-5-supported FeCu catalysts. The lowest crystallite size of Fe(3)-Cu(13)/SiO2-Al2O3 was confirmed by XRD, indicating high metal dispersion and corroborated by the weakest metal–support interaction revealed from the TPR profile of this catalyst. CO chemisorption also confirmed high metal dispersion (8.4%) for the Fe(3)-Cu(13)/SiO2-Al2O3 catalyst. The lowest and mildest Brønsted/Lewis acid sites ratio was recorded from the pyridine–FTIR analysis for this catalyst. The highest jet-fuel range hydrocarbons yield of 59.5% and 73.6% selectivity were recorded for the Fe(3)-Cu(13)/SiO2-Al2O3 catalyst evaluated at 300 °C and 2.07 MPa H2 pressure, which can be attributed to its desirable textural properties, high oxophilic iron content, high metal dispersion and mild Brønsted acid sites present in this catalyst. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/catal9121051 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2547609827</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2547609827</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-b9679d10d3f7841b3d930e1d6b20894ba6fcb6648831d1b564f34b6ec65848383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUF1LwzAUDaLgmHvzBwR8tZr0pmnyOIp1ymAi-lzyOTpqM5NW2L-3cz7svtwD59yPcxC6peQBQJJHowbVSZpTUtALNMtJCRkDxi7P8DVapLQjU0kKghYz5FcHG8M-BuNSavstDh5vOtcavDStxT5E_BaDHc3Qhv5Ivrohq0fX4XfVbx3-Gzcq6tAnHH5cxNWIVW9x7SZQHX86pCHdoCuvuuQW_32OPuunj2qVrTfPL9VynRkgdMi05KW0lFjwpWBUg5VAHLVc50RIphX3RnPOhABqqS4488A0d4YXggkQMEd3p72To-_RpaHZhTH208kmL1jJiRR5OanuTyoTQ0rR-WYf2y8VDw0lzTHM5jxM-AWHHGao</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2547609827</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hydroprocessing of Oleic Acid for Production of Jet-Fuel Range Hydrocarbons over Cu and FeCu Catalysts</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Ayandiran, Afees A. ; Boahene, Philip E. ; Dalai, Ajay K. ; Hu, Yongfeng</creator><creatorcontrib>Ayandiran, Afees A. ; Boahene, Philip E. ; Dalai, Ajay K. ; Hu, Yongfeng</creatorcontrib><description>In the present study, a series of monometallic Cu/SiO2-Al2O3 catalysts exhibited immense potential in the hydroprocessing of oleic acid to produce jet-fuel range hydrocarbons. The synergistic effect of Fe on the monometallic Cu/SiO2-Al2O3 catalysts of variable Cu loadings (5–15 wt%) was ascertained by varying Fe contents in the range of 1–5 wt% on the optimized 13% Cu/SiO2-Al2O3 catalyst. At 340 °C and 2.07 MPa H2 pressure, the jet-fuel range hydrocarbons yield and selectivities of 51.8% and 53.8%, respectively, were recorded for the Fe(3)-Cu(13)/SiO2-Al2O3 catalyst. To investigate the influence of acidity of support on the cracking of oleic acid, ZSM-5 (Zeolite Socony Mobil–5) and HZSM-5(Protonated Zeolite Socony Mobil–5)-supported 3% Fe-13% Cu were also evaluated at 300–340 °C and 2.07 MPa H2 pressure. Extensive techniques including N2 sorption analysis, pyridine- Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (Pyridine-FTIR), X-ray Diffraction (XRD), X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS), and H2-Temperature Programmed Reduction (H2-TPR) analyses were used to characterize the materials. XPS analysis revealed the existence of Cu1+ phase in the Fe(3)-Cu(13)/SiO2-Al2O3 catalyst, while Cu metal was predominant in both the ZSM-5 and HZSM-5-supported FeCu catalysts. The lowest crystallite size of Fe(3)-Cu(13)/SiO2-Al2O3 was confirmed by XRD, indicating high metal dispersion and corroborated by the weakest metal–support interaction revealed from the TPR profile of this catalyst. CO chemisorption also confirmed high metal dispersion (8.4%) for the Fe(3)-Cu(13)/SiO2-Al2O3 catalyst. The lowest and mildest Brønsted/Lewis acid sites ratio was recorded from the pyridine–FTIR analysis for this catalyst. The highest jet-fuel range hydrocarbons yield of 59.5% and 73.6% selectivity were recorded for the Fe(3)-Cu(13)/SiO2-Al2O3 catalyst evaluated at 300 °C and 2.07 MPa H2 pressure, which can be attributed to its desirable textural properties, high oxophilic iron content, high metal dispersion and mild Brønsted acid sites present in this catalyst.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-4344</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2073-4344</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/catal9121051</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Acids ; Adsorption ; Alumina ; Aluminum oxide ; Aviation ; Biodiesel fuels ; Biofuels ; Catalysts ; Chemical reactions ; Chemisorption ; Copper ; Crystallites ; Dispersion ; Emissions ; Fourier transforms ; Fuels ; Greenhouse gases ; Hydrocarbons ; Infrared analysis ; Infrared spectroscopy ; Iron ; Lewis acid ; Oleic acid ; Photoelectrons ; Selectivity ; Silicon dioxide ; Synergistic effect ; Vegetable oils ; X ray photoelectron spectroscopy ; X-ray diffraction ; Zeolites</subject><ispartof>Catalysts, 2019-12, Vol.9 (12), p.1051</ispartof><rights>2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-b9679d10d3f7841b3d930e1d6b20894ba6fcb6648831d1b564f34b6ec65848383</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-b9679d10d3f7841b3d930e1d6b20894ba6fcb6648831d1b564f34b6ec65848383</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8594-7321</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2547609827/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2547609827?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ayandiran, Afees A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boahene, Philip E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalai, Ajay K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Yongfeng</creatorcontrib><title>Hydroprocessing of Oleic Acid for Production of Jet-Fuel Range Hydrocarbons over Cu and FeCu Catalysts</title><title>Catalysts</title><description>In the present study, a series of monometallic Cu/SiO2-Al2O3 catalysts exhibited immense potential in the hydroprocessing of oleic acid to produce jet-fuel range hydrocarbons. The synergistic effect of Fe on the monometallic Cu/SiO2-Al2O3 catalysts of variable Cu loadings (5–15 wt%) was ascertained by varying Fe contents in the range of 1–5 wt% on the optimized 13% Cu/SiO2-Al2O3 catalyst. At 340 °C and 2.07 MPa H2 pressure, the jet-fuel range hydrocarbons yield and selectivities of 51.8% and 53.8%, respectively, were recorded for the Fe(3)-Cu(13)/SiO2-Al2O3 catalyst. To investigate the influence of acidity of support on the cracking of oleic acid, ZSM-5 (Zeolite Socony Mobil–5) and HZSM-5(Protonated Zeolite Socony Mobil–5)-supported 3% Fe-13% Cu were also evaluated at 300–340 °C and 2.07 MPa H2 pressure. Extensive techniques including N2 sorption analysis, pyridine- Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (Pyridine-FTIR), X-ray Diffraction (XRD), X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS), and H2-Temperature Programmed Reduction (H2-TPR) analyses were used to characterize the materials. XPS analysis revealed the existence of Cu1+ phase in the Fe(3)-Cu(13)/SiO2-Al2O3 catalyst, while Cu metal was predominant in both the ZSM-5 and HZSM-5-supported FeCu catalysts. The lowest crystallite size of Fe(3)-Cu(13)/SiO2-Al2O3 was confirmed by XRD, indicating high metal dispersion and corroborated by the weakest metal–support interaction revealed from the TPR profile of this catalyst. CO chemisorption also confirmed high metal dispersion (8.4%) for the Fe(3)-Cu(13)/SiO2-Al2O3 catalyst. The lowest and mildest Brønsted/Lewis acid sites ratio was recorded from the pyridine–FTIR analysis for this catalyst. The highest jet-fuel range hydrocarbons yield of 59.5% and 73.6% selectivity were recorded for the Fe(3)-Cu(13)/SiO2-Al2O3 catalyst evaluated at 300 °C and 2.07 MPa H2 pressure, which can be attributed to its desirable textural properties, high oxophilic iron content, high metal dispersion and mild Brønsted acid sites present in this catalyst.</description><subject>Acids</subject><subject>Adsorption</subject><subject>Alumina</subject><subject>Aluminum oxide</subject><subject>Aviation</subject><subject>Biodiesel fuels</subject><subject>Biofuels</subject><subject>Catalysts</subject><subject>Chemical reactions</subject><subject>Chemisorption</subject><subject>Copper</subject><subject>Crystallites</subject><subject>Dispersion</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Fourier transforms</subject><subject>Fuels</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Hydrocarbons</subject><subject>Infrared analysis</subject><subject>Infrared spectroscopy</subject><subject>Iron</subject><subject>Lewis acid</subject><subject>Oleic acid</subject><subject>Photoelectrons</subject><subject>Selectivity</subject><subject>Silicon dioxide</subject><subject>Synergistic effect</subject><subject>Vegetable oils</subject><subject>X ray photoelectron spectroscopy</subject><subject>X-ray diffraction</subject><subject>Zeolites</subject><issn>2073-4344</issn><issn>2073-4344</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUF1LwzAUDaLgmHvzBwR8tZr0pmnyOIp1ymAi-lzyOTpqM5NW2L-3cz7svtwD59yPcxC6peQBQJJHowbVSZpTUtALNMtJCRkDxi7P8DVapLQjU0kKghYz5FcHG8M-BuNSavstDh5vOtcavDStxT5E_BaDHc3Qhv5Ivrohq0fX4XfVbx3-Gzcq6tAnHH5cxNWIVW9x7SZQHX86pCHdoCuvuuQW_32OPuunj2qVrTfPL9VynRkgdMi05KW0lFjwpWBUg5VAHLVc50RIphX3RnPOhABqqS4488A0d4YXggkQMEd3p72To-_RpaHZhTH208kmL1jJiRR5OanuTyoTQ0rR-WYf2y8VDw0lzTHM5jxM-AWHHGao</recordid><startdate>20191201</startdate><enddate>20191201</enddate><creator>Ayandiran, Afees A.</creator><creator>Boahene, Philip E.</creator><creator>Dalai, Ajay K.</creator><creator>Hu, Yongfeng</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8594-7321</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191201</creationdate><title>Hydroprocessing of Oleic Acid for Production of Jet-Fuel Range Hydrocarbons over Cu and FeCu Catalysts</title><author>Ayandiran, Afees A. ; Boahene, Philip E. ; Dalai, Ajay K. ; Hu, Yongfeng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-b9679d10d3f7841b3d930e1d6b20894ba6fcb6648831d1b564f34b6ec65848383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Acids</topic><topic>Adsorption</topic><topic>Alumina</topic><topic>Aluminum oxide</topic><topic>Aviation</topic><topic>Biodiesel fuels</topic><topic>Biofuels</topic><topic>Catalysts</topic><topic>Chemical reactions</topic><topic>Chemisorption</topic><topic>Copper</topic><topic>Crystallites</topic><topic>Dispersion</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Fourier transforms</topic><topic>Fuels</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Hydrocarbons</topic><topic>Infrared analysis</topic><topic>Infrared spectroscopy</topic><topic>Iron</topic><topic>Lewis acid</topic><topic>Oleic acid</topic><topic>Photoelectrons</topic><topic>Selectivity</topic><topic>Silicon dioxide</topic><topic>Synergistic effect</topic><topic>Vegetable oils</topic><topic>X ray photoelectron spectroscopy</topic><topic>X-ray diffraction</topic><topic>Zeolites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ayandiran, Afees A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boahene, Philip E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalai, Ajay K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Yongfeng</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Catalysts</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ayandiran, Afees A.</au><au>Boahene, Philip E.</au><au>Dalai, Ajay K.</au><au>Hu, Yongfeng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hydroprocessing of Oleic Acid for Production of Jet-Fuel Range Hydrocarbons over Cu and FeCu Catalysts</atitle><jtitle>Catalysts</jtitle><date>2019-12-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1051</spage><pages>1051-</pages><issn>2073-4344</issn><eissn>2073-4344</eissn><abstract>In the present study, a series of monometallic Cu/SiO2-Al2O3 catalysts exhibited immense potential in the hydroprocessing of oleic acid to produce jet-fuel range hydrocarbons. The synergistic effect of Fe on the monometallic Cu/SiO2-Al2O3 catalysts of variable Cu loadings (5–15 wt%) was ascertained by varying Fe contents in the range of 1–5 wt% on the optimized 13% Cu/SiO2-Al2O3 catalyst. At 340 °C and 2.07 MPa H2 pressure, the jet-fuel range hydrocarbons yield and selectivities of 51.8% and 53.8%, respectively, were recorded for the Fe(3)-Cu(13)/SiO2-Al2O3 catalyst. To investigate the influence of acidity of support on the cracking of oleic acid, ZSM-5 (Zeolite Socony Mobil–5) and HZSM-5(Protonated Zeolite Socony Mobil–5)-supported 3% Fe-13% Cu were also evaluated at 300–340 °C and 2.07 MPa H2 pressure. Extensive techniques including N2 sorption analysis, pyridine- Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (Pyridine-FTIR), X-ray Diffraction (XRD), X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS), and H2-Temperature Programmed Reduction (H2-TPR) analyses were used to characterize the materials. XPS analysis revealed the existence of Cu1+ phase in the Fe(3)-Cu(13)/SiO2-Al2O3 catalyst, while Cu metal was predominant in both the ZSM-5 and HZSM-5-supported FeCu catalysts. The lowest crystallite size of Fe(3)-Cu(13)/SiO2-Al2O3 was confirmed by XRD, indicating high metal dispersion and corroborated by the weakest metal–support interaction revealed from the TPR profile of this catalyst. CO chemisorption also confirmed high metal dispersion (8.4%) for the Fe(3)-Cu(13)/SiO2-Al2O3 catalyst. The lowest and mildest Brønsted/Lewis acid sites ratio was recorded from the pyridine–FTIR analysis for this catalyst. The highest jet-fuel range hydrocarbons yield of 59.5% and 73.6% selectivity were recorded for the Fe(3)-Cu(13)/SiO2-Al2O3 catalyst evaluated at 300 °C and 2.07 MPa H2 pressure, which can be attributed to its desirable textural properties, high oxophilic iron content, high metal dispersion and mild Brønsted acid sites present in this catalyst.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/catal9121051</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8594-7321</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2073-4344 |
ispartof | Catalysts, 2019-12, Vol.9 (12), p.1051 |
issn | 2073-4344 2073-4344 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2547609827 |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | Acids Adsorption Alumina Aluminum oxide Aviation Biodiesel fuels Biofuels Catalysts Chemical reactions Chemisorption Copper Crystallites Dispersion Emissions Fourier transforms Fuels Greenhouse gases Hydrocarbons Infrared analysis Infrared spectroscopy Iron Lewis acid Oleic acid Photoelectrons Selectivity Silicon dioxide Synergistic effect Vegetable oils X ray photoelectron spectroscopy X-ray diffraction Zeolites |
title | Hydroprocessing of Oleic Acid for Production of Jet-Fuel Range Hydrocarbons over Cu and FeCu Catalysts |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T05%3A07%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hydroprocessing%20of%20Oleic%20Acid%20for%20Production%20of%20Jet-Fuel%20Range%20Hydrocarbons%20over%20Cu%20and%20FeCu%20Catalysts&rft.jtitle=Catalysts&rft.au=Ayandiran,%20Afees%20A.&rft.date=2019-12-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1051&rft.pages=1051-&rft.issn=2073-4344&rft.eissn=2073-4344&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/catal9121051&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2547609827%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-b9679d10d3f7841b3d930e1d6b20894ba6fcb6648831d1b564f34b6ec65848383%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2547609827&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |