Loading…
Fish Consumption Behaviour and Perception of Food Security of Low-Income Households in Urban Areas of Ghana
This paper assesses fish consumption behaviour and perception of fish food security of low-income households using three season survey data from 839 interviews in Ghana. The study profiles the types of fish consumed and employs a modified Cobb–Douglas function to examine the determinants of househol...
Saved in:
Published in: | Sustainability 2020-10, Vol.12 (19), p.7932 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-cea154af822bbaa20213942073d6bfebf8faf49b0f84325e8844251d7cba3c243 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-cea154af822bbaa20213942073d6bfebf8faf49b0f84325e8844251d7cba3c243 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 19 |
container_start_page | 7932 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Onumah, Edward E. Quaye, Elizabeth A. Ahwireng, Anderson K. Campion, Benjamin B. |
description | This paper assesses fish consumption behaviour and perception of fish food security of low-income households using three season survey data from 839 interviews in Ghana. The study profiles the types of fish consumed and employs a modified Cobb–Douglas function to examine the determinants of household expenditure on fish consumption, whilst adopting a 1–5 Likert scale to analyze the perception of fish food security. The results confirm that poor households prefer cheaper and small pelagic fish. The mean expenditure on fish consumption per week is estimated to be GHS 31.15 (Euro 4.94 ≅ 0.16). Additionally, it is demonstrated that marital status, religion, occupation, proximity to local market, and city of residence have a positive and significant influence, whilst level of income, seasonality of fish, and the interaction of religion and seasonality of fish demonstrate a negative and significant influence on fish expenditure. Finally, the paper reveals that the majority of households have the perception that fish is readily available and can be obtained throughout the year in good quality. However, households have varied opinions on accessibility of fish. The paper recommends that the government should support and enhance the value chains of small pelagic fish species since they are preferred by poor households. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su12197932 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2548872044</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2548872044</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-cea154af822bbaa20213942073d6bfebf8faf49b0f84325e8844251d7cba3c243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkFtLAzEQhYMoWGpf_AUB34TV3LabPNZiL1BQ0D4vk2zCbm2Tmuwq_ffuUkHnZYaZjzmcg9AtJQ-cK_KYOsqoKhRnF2jESEEzSnJy-W--RpOUdqQvzqmi0xH6WDSpxvPgU3c4tk3w-MnW8NWELmLwFX610djzITi8CKHCb9Z0sWlPw2ITvrO1N-Fg8Sp0ydZhXyXceLyNGjyeRQtp4JY1eLhBVw72yU5--xhtF8_v81W2eVmu57NNZpjK28xYoLkAJxnTGoARRrkSvQdeTbWz2kkHTihNnBSc5VZKIVhOq8Jo4IYJPkZ357_HGD47m9py19vxvWTJciFlwYgYqPszZWJIKVpXHmNzgHgqKSmHPMu_PPkPRvlnpw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2548872044</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fish Consumption Behaviour and Perception of Food Security of Low-Income Households in Urban Areas of Ghana</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Onumah, Edward E. ; Quaye, Elizabeth A. ; Ahwireng, Anderson K. ; Campion, Benjamin B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Onumah, Edward E. ; Quaye, Elizabeth A. ; Ahwireng, Anderson K. ; Campion, Benjamin B.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper assesses fish consumption behaviour and perception of fish food security of low-income households using three season survey data from 839 interviews in Ghana. The study profiles the types of fish consumed and employs a modified Cobb–Douglas function to examine the determinants of household expenditure on fish consumption, whilst adopting a 1–5 Likert scale to analyze the perception of fish food security. The results confirm that poor households prefer cheaper and small pelagic fish. The mean expenditure on fish consumption per week is estimated to be GHS 31.15 (Euro 4.94 ≅ 0.16). Additionally, it is demonstrated that marital status, religion, occupation, proximity to local market, and city of residence have a positive and significant influence, whilst level of income, seasonality of fish, and the interaction of religion and seasonality of fish demonstrate a negative and significant influence on fish expenditure. Finally, the paper reveals that the majority of households have the perception that fish is readily available and can be obtained throughout the year in good quality. However, households have varied opinions on accessibility of fish. The paper recommends that the government should support and enhance the value chains of small pelagic fish species since they are preferred by poor households.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su12197932</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Aquaculture ; Cities ; Consumers ; Consumption ; Data collection ; Demographics ; Fish ; Fish feeds ; Fisheries ; Food security ; Food supply ; Geography ; Households ; Low income groups ; Neighborhoods ; Nutrition ; Perception ; Religion ; Sampling techniques ; Seasonal variations ; Sustainability ; Urban areas</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2020-10, Vol.12 (19), p.7932</ispartof><rights>2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-cea154af822bbaa20213942073d6bfebf8faf49b0f84325e8844251d7cba3c243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-cea154af822bbaa20213942073d6bfebf8faf49b0f84325e8844251d7cba3c243</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7030-9930 ; 0000-0002-5161-3451 ; 0000-0001-7307-1270</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2548872044/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2548872044?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Onumah, Edward E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quaye, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahwireng, Anderson K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campion, Benjamin B.</creatorcontrib><title>Fish Consumption Behaviour and Perception of Food Security of Low-Income Households in Urban Areas of Ghana</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>This paper assesses fish consumption behaviour and perception of fish food security of low-income households using three season survey data from 839 interviews in Ghana. The study profiles the types of fish consumed and employs a modified Cobb–Douglas function to examine the determinants of household expenditure on fish consumption, whilst adopting a 1–5 Likert scale to analyze the perception of fish food security. The results confirm that poor households prefer cheaper and small pelagic fish. The mean expenditure on fish consumption per week is estimated to be GHS 31.15 (Euro 4.94 ≅ 0.16). Additionally, it is demonstrated that marital status, religion, occupation, proximity to local market, and city of residence have a positive and significant influence, whilst level of income, seasonality of fish, and the interaction of religion and seasonality of fish demonstrate a negative and significant influence on fish expenditure. Finally, the paper reveals that the majority of households have the perception that fish is readily available and can be obtained throughout the year in good quality. However, households have varied opinions on accessibility of fish. The paper recommends that the government should support and enhance the value chains of small pelagic fish species since they are preferred by poor households.</description><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fish feeds</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Food security</subject><subject>Food supply</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Neighborhoods</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Sampling techniques</subject><subject>Seasonal variations</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkFtLAzEQhYMoWGpf_AUB34TV3LabPNZiL1BQ0D4vk2zCbm2Tmuwq_ffuUkHnZYaZjzmcg9AtJQ-cK_KYOsqoKhRnF2jESEEzSnJy-W--RpOUdqQvzqmi0xH6WDSpxvPgU3c4tk3w-MnW8NWELmLwFX610djzITi8CKHCb9Z0sWlPw2ITvrO1N-Fg8Sp0ydZhXyXceLyNGjyeRQtp4JY1eLhBVw72yU5--xhtF8_v81W2eVmu57NNZpjK28xYoLkAJxnTGoARRrkSvQdeTbWz2kkHTihNnBSc5VZKIVhOq8Jo4IYJPkZ357_HGD47m9py19vxvWTJciFlwYgYqPszZWJIKVpXHmNzgHgqKSmHPMu_PPkPRvlnpw</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Onumah, Edward E.</creator><creator>Quaye, Elizabeth A.</creator><creator>Ahwireng, Anderson K.</creator><creator>Campion, Benjamin B.</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7030-9930</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5161-3451</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7307-1270</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>Fish Consumption Behaviour and Perception of Food Security of Low-Income Households in Urban Areas of Ghana</title><author>Onumah, Edward E. ; Quaye, Elizabeth A. ; Ahwireng, Anderson K. ; Campion, Benjamin B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-cea154af822bbaa20213942073d6bfebf8faf49b0f84325e8844251d7cba3c243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fish feeds</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Food security</topic><topic>Food supply</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Neighborhoods</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Sampling techniques</topic><topic>Seasonal variations</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Onumah, Edward E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quaye, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahwireng, Anderson K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campion, Benjamin B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Onumah, Edward E.</au><au>Quaye, Elizabeth A.</au><au>Ahwireng, Anderson K.</au><au>Campion, Benjamin B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fish Consumption Behaviour and Perception of Food Security of Low-Income Households in Urban Areas of Ghana</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>7932</spage><pages>7932-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>This paper assesses fish consumption behaviour and perception of fish food security of low-income households using three season survey data from 839 interviews in Ghana. The study profiles the types of fish consumed and employs a modified Cobb–Douglas function to examine the determinants of household expenditure on fish consumption, whilst adopting a 1–5 Likert scale to analyze the perception of fish food security. The results confirm that poor households prefer cheaper and small pelagic fish. The mean expenditure on fish consumption per week is estimated to be GHS 31.15 (Euro 4.94 ≅ 0.16). Additionally, it is demonstrated that marital status, religion, occupation, proximity to local market, and city of residence have a positive and significant influence, whilst level of income, seasonality of fish, and the interaction of religion and seasonality of fish demonstrate a negative and significant influence on fish expenditure. Finally, the paper reveals that the majority of households have the perception that fish is readily available and can be obtained throughout the year in good quality. However, households have varied opinions on accessibility of fish. The paper recommends that the government should support and enhance the value chains of small pelagic fish species since they are preferred by poor households.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su12197932</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7030-9930</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5161-3451</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7307-1270</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2020-10, Vol.12 (19), p.7932 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2548872044 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Aquaculture Cities Consumers Consumption Data collection Demographics Fish Fish feeds Fisheries Food security Food supply Geography Households Low income groups Neighborhoods Nutrition Perception Religion Sampling techniques Seasonal variations Sustainability Urban areas |
title | Fish Consumption Behaviour and Perception of Food Security of Low-Income Households in Urban Areas of Ghana |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T09%3A26%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fish%20Consumption%20Behaviour%20and%20Perception%20of%20Food%20Security%20of%20Low-Income%20Households%20in%20Urban%20Areas%20of%20Ghana&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Onumah,%20Edward%20E.&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=7932&rft.pages=7932-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su12197932&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2548872044%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-cea154af822bbaa20213942073d6bfebf8faf49b0f84325e8844251d7cba3c243%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2548872044&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |