Loading…

Approaches to Social Innovation in Positive Energy Districts (PEDs)—A Comparison of Norwegian Projects

The Positive Energy District (PED) concept is a localized city and district level response to the challenges of greenhouse gas emission reduction and energy transition. With the Strategic Energy Transition (SET) Plan aiming to establish 100 PEDs by 2025 in Europe, a number of PED projects are emergi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sustainability 2021-07, Vol.13 (13), p.7362
Main Authors: Baer, Daniela, Loewen, Bradley, Cheng, Caroline, Thomsen, Judith, Wyckmans, Annemie, Temeljotov-Salaj, Alenka, Ahlers, Dirk
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-189303bb78cef63362947817880568907cbbe25faf718a3703aa35bb3f1af8ec3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-189303bb78cef63362947817880568907cbbe25faf718a3703aa35bb3f1af8ec3
container_end_page
container_issue 13
container_start_page 7362
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 13
creator Baer, Daniela
Loewen, Bradley
Cheng, Caroline
Thomsen, Judith
Wyckmans, Annemie
Temeljotov-Salaj, Alenka
Ahlers, Dirk
description The Positive Energy District (PED) concept is a localized city and district level response to the challenges of greenhouse gas emission reduction and energy transition. With the Strategic Energy Transition (SET) Plan aiming to establish 100 PEDs by 2025 in Europe, a number of PED projects are emerging in the EU member states. While the energy transition is mainly focusing on technical innovations, social innovation is crucial to guarantee the uptake and deployment of PEDs in the built environment. We set the spotlight on Norway, which, to date, has three PED projects encompassing 12 PED demo sites in planning and early implementation stages, from which we extract approaches for social innovations and discuss how these learnings can contribute to further PED planning and implementation. We describe the respective approaches and learnings for social innovation of the three PED projects, ZEN, +CityxChange and syn.ikia, in a multiple case study approach. Through the comparison of these projects, we start to identify social innovation approaches with different scopes regarding citizen involvement, stakeholder interaction and capacity building. These insights are also expected to contribute to further planning and design of PED projects within local and regional networks (PEDs in Nordic countries) and contribute to international PED concept development.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su13137362
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2549705066</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2549705066</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-189303bb78cef63362947817880568907cbbe25faf718a3703aa35bb3f1af8ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMFKAzEURYMoWGo3fkHAjQqjybzOJFmWtmqhaEFdD5mQtCntZEwyle78CL_QLzFSQd_mvsW973EPQueU3AAIchs6ChQYlPkR6uWE0YySghz_20_RIIQ1SQNABS17aDVqW--kWumAo8PPTlm5wbOmcTsZrWuwbfDCBRvtTuNpo_1yjyc2RG9VDPhyMZ2Eq6-PzxEeu20rvQ0p4gx-dP5dL61MYe_WOnnP0ImRm6AHv9pHr3fTl_FDNn-6n41H80zloogZ5QII1DXjSpsSUhcxZJwyzklRckGYqmudF0YaRrkERkBKKOoaDJWGawV9dHG4m2q9dTrEau0636SXVV4MBUsUyjK5rg8u5V0IXpuq9XYr_b6ipPqBWf3BhG9jhmca</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2549705066</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Approaches to Social Innovation in Positive Energy Districts (PEDs)—A Comparison of Norwegian Projects</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Baer, Daniela ; Loewen, Bradley ; Cheng, Caroline ; Thomsen, Judith ; Wyckmans, Annemie ; Temeljotov-Salaj, Alenka ; Ahlers, Dirk</creator><creatorcontrib>Baer, Daniela ; Loewen, Bradley ; Cheng, Caroline ; Thomsen, Judith ; Wyckmans, Annemie ; Temeljotov-Salaj, Alenka ; Ahlers, Dirk</creatorcontrib><description>The Positive Energy District (PED) concept is a localized city and district level response to the challenges of greenhouse gas emission reduction and energy transition. With the Strategic Energy Transition (SET) Plan aiming to establish 100 PEDs by 2025 in Europe, a number of PED projects are emerging in the EU member states. While the energy transition is mainly focusing on technical innovations, social innovation is crucial to guarantee the uptake and deployment of PEDs in the built environment. We set the spotlight on Norway, which, to date, has three PED projects encompassing 12 PED demo sites in planning and early implementation stages, from which we extract approaches for social innovations and discuss how these learnings can contribute to further PED planning and implementation. We describe the respective approaches and learnings for social innovation of the three PED projects, ZEN, +CityxChange and syn.ikia, in a multiple case study approach. Through the comparison of these projects, we start to identify social innovation approaches with different scopes regarding citizen involvement, stakeholder interaction and capacity building. These insights are also expected to contribute to further planning and design of PED projects within local and regional networks (PEDs in Nordic countries) and contribute to international PED concept development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su13137362</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Alternative energy sources ; Citizen participation ; Civil society ; Emissions ; Empowerment ; Energy ; Energy efficiency ; Energy industry ; Green buildings ; Greenhouse gases ; Innovations ; Planning ; Regional planning ; Renewable resources ; Social innovation ; Stakeholders ; Sustainability ; Sustainable development ; Technological change ; Urban environments</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2021-07, Vol.13 (13), p.7362</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-189303bb78cef63362947817880568907cbbe25faf718a3703aa35bb3f1af8ec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-189303bb78cef63362947817880568907cbbe25faf718a3703aa35bb3f1af8ec3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1096-9774 ; 0000-0002-6508-8184 ; 0000-0002-4139-5278 ; 0000-0002-6726-5068 ; 0000-0003-2996-6901</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2549705066?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2549705066?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25752,27923,27924,37011,38515,43894,44589,74183,74897</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baer, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loewen, Bradley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomsen, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wyckmans, Annemie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Temeljotov-Salaj, Alenka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahlers, Dirk</creatorcontrib><title>Approaches to Social Innovation in Positive Energy Districts (PEDs)—A Comparison of Norwegian Projects</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>The Positive Energy District (PED) concept is a localized city and district level response to the challenges of greenhouse gas emission reduction and energy transition. With the Strategic Energy Transition (SET) Plan aiming to establish 100 PEDs by 2025 in Europe, a number of PED projects are emerging in the EU member states. While the energy transition is mainly focusing on technical innovations, social innovation is crucial to guarantee the uptake and deployment of PEDs in the built environment. We set the spotlight on Norway, which, to date, has three PED projects encompassing 12 PED demo sites in planning and early implementation stages, from which we extract approaches for social innovations and discuss how these learnings can contribute to further PED planning and implementation. We describe the respective approaches and learnings for social innovation of the three PED projects, ZEN, +CityxChange and syn.ikia, in a multiple case study approach. Through the comparison of these projects, we start to identify social innovation approaches with different scopes regarding citizen involvement, stakeholder interaction and capacity building. These insights are also expected to contribute to further planning and design of PED projects within local and regional networks (PEDs in Nordic countries) and contribute to international PED concept development.</description><subject>Alternative energy sources</subject><subject>Citizen participation</subject><subject>Civil society</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Empowerment</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Energy industry</subject><subject>Green buildings</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Regional planning</subject><subject>Renewable resources</subject><subject>Social innovation</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Technological change</subject><subject>Urban environments</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMFKAzEURYMoWGo3fkHAjQqjybzOJFmWtmqhaEFdD5mQtCntZEwyle78CL_QLzFSQd_mvsW973EPQueU3AAIchs6ChQYlPkR6uWE0YySghz_20_RIIQ1SQNABS17aDVqW--kWumAo8PPTlm5wbOmcTsZrWuwbfDCBRvtTuNpo_1yjyc2RG9VDPhyMZ2Eq6-PzxEeu20rvQ0p4gx-dP5dL61MYe_WOnnP0ImRm6AHv9pHr3fTl_FDNn-6n41H80zloogZ5QII1DXjSpsSUhcxZJwyzklRckGYqmudF0YaRrkERkBKKOoaDJWGawV9dHG4m2q9dTrEau0636SXVV4MBUsUyjK5rg8u5V0IXpuq9XYr_b6ipPqBWf3BhG9jhmca</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Baer, Daniela</creator><creator>Loewen, Bradley</creator><creator>Cheng, Caroline</creator><creator>Thomsen, Judith</creator><creator>Wyckmans, Annemie</creator><creator>Temeljotov-Salaj, Alenka</creator><creator>Ahlers, Dirk</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1096-9774</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6508-8184</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4139-5278</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6726-5068</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2996-6901</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>Approaches to Social Innovation in Positive Energy Districts (PEDs)—A Comparison of Norwegian Projects</title><author>Baer, Daniela ; Loewen, Bradley ; Cheng, Caroline ; Thomsen, Judith ; Wyckmans, Annemie ; Temeljotov-Salaj, Alenka ; Ahlers, Dirk</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-189303bb78cef63362947817880568907cbbe25faf718a3703aa35bb3f1af8ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Alternative energy sources</topic><topic>Citizen participation</topic><topic>Civil society</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Empowerment</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Energy industry</topic><topic>Green buildings</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Regional planning</topic><topic>Renewable resources</topic><topic>Social innovation</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Technological change</topic><topic>Urban environments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baer, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loewen, Bradley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomsen, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wyckmans, Annemie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Temeljotov-Salaj, Alenka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahlers, Dirk</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baer, Daniela</au><au>Loewen, Bradley</au><au>Cheng, Caroline</au><au>Thomsen, Judith</au><au>Wyckmans, Annemie</au><au>Temeljotov-Salaj, Alenka</au><au>Ahlers, Dirk</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Approaches to Social Innovation in Positive Energy Districts (PEDs)—A Comparison of Norwegian Projects</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>7362</spage><pages>7362-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>The Positive Energy District (PED) concept is a localized city and district level response to the challenges of greenhouse gas emission reduction and energy transition. With the Strategic Energy Transition (SET) Plan aiming to establish 100 PEDs by 2025 in Europe, a number of PED projects are emerging in the EU member states. While the energy transition is mainly focusing on technical innovations, social innovation is crucial to guarantee the uptake and deployment of PEDs in the built environment. We set the spotlight on Norway, which, to date, has three PED projects encompassing 12 PED demo sites in planning and early implementation stages, from which we extract approaches for social innovations and discuss how these learnings can contribute to further PED planning and implementation. We describe the respective approaches and learnings for social innovation of the three PED projects, ZEN, +CityxChange and syn.ikia, in a multiple case study approach. Through the comparison of these projects, we start to identify social innovation approaches with different scopes regarding citizen involvement, stakeholder interaction and capacity building. These insights are also expected to contribute to further planning and design of PED projects within local and regional networks (PEDs in Nordic countries) and contribute to international PED concept development.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su13137362</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1096-9774</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6508-8184</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4139-5278</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6726-5068</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2996-6901</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2021-07, Vol.13 (13), p.7362
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2549705066
source Publicly Available Content Database; Coronavirus Research Database
subjects Alternative energy sources
Citizen participation
Civil society
Emissions
Empowerment
Energy
Energy efficiency
Energy industry
Green buildings
Greenhouse gases
Innovations
Planning
Regional planning
Renewable resources
Social innovation
Stakeholders
Sustainability
Sustainable development
Technological change
Urban environments
title Approaches to Social Innovation in Positive Energy Districts (PEDs)—A Comparison of Norwegian Projects
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T15%3A39%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Approaches%20to%20Social%20Innovation%20in%20Positive%20Energy%20Districts%20(PEDs)%E2%80%94A%20Comparison%20of%20Norwegian%20Projects&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Baer,%20Daniela&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=7362&rft.pages=7362-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su13137362&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2549705066%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-189303bb78cef63362947817880568907cbbe25faf718a3703aa35bb3f1af8ec3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2549705066&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true