Loading…
A discussion on using quantitative or qualitative data for assessment of individual competencies
PurposeThis article presents an investigation of the suitability of using quantitative or qualitative data for individual competencies assessment. Specifically, the primary purpose of this article is to identify if the results provided by quantitative and qualitative instruments focused on individua...
Saved in:
Published in: | Personnel review 2021-07, Vol.50 (6), p.1460-1478 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-4c9f564ca98c00ff86d8865d809e90c4f4f85e6d634a39a32978e2581f3b78473 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-4c9f564ca98c00ff86d8865d809e90c4f4f85e6d634a39a32978e2581f3b78473 |
container_end_page | 1478 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1460 |
container_title | Personnel review |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Macchi Silva, Vítor Vasata Ribeiro, José Luis Duarte |
description | PurposeThis article presents an investigation of the suitability of using quantitative or qualitative data for individual competencies assessment. Specifically, the primary purpose of this article is to identify if the results provided by quantitative and qualitative instruments focused on individual competencies are convergent.Design/methodology/approachIn order to do the investigation proposed, a survey on individual competencies comprising a group of employees of the administrative area of a steel company was carried out. A total of 268 evaluations were collected and analyzed.FindingsThe analysis of the employee's performance appraisals provided by ratings and narrative comments indicates a low correlation between these assessments. The reasons for such low correlation include the qualitative assessments variability, the restricted list of competencies used in the quantitative assessments and the analytical format of quantitative assessments.Originality/valueThe study indicates that quantitative and qualitative assessments should be carried out jointly so that they can generate more comprehensive results. When the combined use is not possible, the quantitative approach is better suited for assessing performance, while the qualitative approach provides more valuable insights for boosting people development processes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/PR-08-2019-0444 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2550182325</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2550182325</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-4c9f564ca98c00ff86d8865d809e90c4f4f85e6d634a39a32978e2581f3b78473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM1LAzEQxYMoWKtnrwHPaZNNspscS_ELCpai5xjzISndbJtkC_737lI9CMIwwxvem4EfALcEzwjBYr7eICxQhYlEmDF2Biak4QLVktJzMMGYCUSZqC_BVc5bPGpaTcD7AtqQTZ9z6CIcqs8hfsJDr2MJRZdwdLBLo979SquLhn5Y6pxdzq2LBXYehmjDMdjBCE3X7l1x0QSXr8GF17vsbn7mFLw93L8un9Dq5fF5uVghQzkriBnpec2MlsJg7L2orRA1twJLJ7FhnnnBXW1ryjSVmlayEa7ignj60QjW0Cm4O93dp-7Qu1zUtutTHF6qinNMREUrPrjmJ5dJXc7JebVPodXpSxGsRoxqvVFDHzGqEeOQmJ0SrnVJ7-w_gT_c6TfF4HPe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2550182325</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A discussion on using quantitative or qualitative data for assessment of individual competencies</title><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><creator>Macchi Silva, Vítor Vasata ; Ribeiro, José Luis Duarte</creator><creatorcontrib>Macchi Silva, Vítor Vasata ; Ribeiro, José Luis Duarte</creatorcontrib><description>PurposeThis article presents an investigation of the suitability of using quantitative or qualitative data for individual competencies assessment. Specifically, the primary purpose of this article is to identify if the results provided by quantitative and qualitative instruments focused on individual competencies are convergent.Design/methodology/approachIn order to do the investigation proposed, a survey on individual competencies comprising a group of employees of the administrative area of a steel company was carried out. A total of 268 evaluations were collected and analyzed.FindingsThe analysis of the employee's performance appraisals provided by ratings and narrative comments indicates a low correlation between these assessments. The reasons for such low correlation include the qualitative assessments variability, the restricted list of competencies used in the quantitative assessments and the analytical format of quantitative assessments.Originality/valueThe study indicates that quantitative and qualitative assessments should be carried out jointly so that they can generate more comprehensive results. When the combined use is not possible, the quantitative approach is better suited for assessing performance, while the qualitative approach provides more valuable insights for boosting people development processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-3486</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-6933</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/PR-08-2019-0444</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Farnborough: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Employees ; Feedback ; Performance appraisal ; Performance management ; Task analysis</subject><ispartof>Personnel review, 2021-07, Vol.50 (6), p.1460-1478</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-4c9f564ca98c00ff86d8865d809e90c4f4f85e6d634a39a32978e2581f3b78473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-4c9f564ca98c00ff86d8865d809e90c4f4f85e6d634a39a32978e2581f3b78473</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5795-4468 ; 0000-0001-8921-9727</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2550182325/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2550182325?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11668,27903,27904,36039,44342,74641</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Macchi Silva, Vítor Vasata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, José Luis Duarte</creatorcontrib><title>A discussion on using quantitative or qualitative data for assessment of individual competencies</title><title>Personnel review</title><description>PurposeThis article presents an investigation of the suitability of using quantitative or qualitative data for individual competencies assessment. Specifically, the primary purpose of this article is to identify if the results provided by quantitative and qualitative instruments focused on individual competencies are convergent.Design/methodology/approachIn order to do the investigation proposed, a survey on individual competencies comprising a group of employees of the administrative area of a steel company was carried out. A total of 268 evaluations were collected and analyzed.FindingsThe analysis of the employee's performance appraisals provided by ratings and narrative comments indicates a low correlation between these assessments. The reasons for such low correlation include the qualitative assessments variability, the restricted list of competencies used in the quantitative assessments and the analytical format of quantitative assessments.Originality/valueThe study indicates that quantitative and qualitative assessments should be carried out jointly so that they can generate more comprehensive results. When the combined use is not possible, the quantitative approach is better suited for assessing performance, while the qualitative approach provides more valuable insights for boosting people development processes.</description><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Performance appraisal</subject><subject>Performance management</subject><subject>Task analysis</subject><issn>0048-3486</issn><issn>1758-6933</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNptkM1LAzEQxYMoWKtnrwHPaZNNspscS_ELCpai5xjzISndbJtkC_737lI9CMIwwxvem4EfALcEzwjBYr7eICxQhYlEmDF2Biak4QLVktJzMMGYCUSZqC_BVc5bPGpaTcD7AtqQTZ9z6CIcqs8hfsJDr2MJRZdwdLBLo979SquLhn5Y6pxdzq2LBXYehmjDMdjBCE3X7l1x0QSXr8GF17vsbn7mFLw93L8un9Dq5fF5uVghQzkriBnpec2MlsJg7L2orRA1twJLJ7FhnnnBXW1ryjSVmlayEa7ignj60QjW0Cm4O93dp-7Qu1zUtutTHF6qinNMREUrPrjmJ5dJXc7JebVPodXpSxGsRoxqvVFDHzGqEeOQmJ0SrnVJ7-w_gT_c6TfF4HPe</recordid><startdate>20210709</startdate><enddate>20210709</enddate><creator>Macchi Silva, Vítor Vasata</creator><creator>Ribeiro, José Luis Duarte</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5795-4468</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8921-9727</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210709</creationdate><title>A discussion on using quantitative or qualitative data for assessment of individual competencies</title><author>Macchi Silva, Vítor Vasata ; Ribeiro, José Luis Duarte</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-4c9f564ca98c00ff86d8865d809e90c4f4f85e6d634a39a32978e2581f3b78473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Performance appraisal</topic><topic>Performance management</topic><topic>Task analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Macchi Silva, Vítor Vasata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, José Luis Duarte</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Personnel review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Macchi Silva, Vítor Vasata</au><au>Ribeiro, José Luis Duarte</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A discussion on using quantitative or qualitative data for assessment of individual competencies</atitle><jtitle>Personnel review</jtitle><date>2021-07-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1460</spage><epage>1478</epage><pages>1460-1478</pages><issn>0048-3486</issn><eissn>1758-6933</eissn><abstract>PurposeThis article presents an investigation of the suitability of using quantitative or qualitative data for individual competencies assessment. Specifically, the primary purpose of this article is to identify if the results provided by quantitative and qualitative instruments focused on individual competencies are convergent.Design/methodology/approachIn order to do the investigation proposed, a survey on individual competencies comprising a group of employees of the administrative area of a steel company was carried out. A total of 268 evaluations were collected and analyzed.FindingsThe analysis of the employee's performance appraisals provided by ratings and narrative comments indicates a low correlation between these assessments. The reasons for such low correlation include the qualitative assessments variability, the restricted list of competencies used in the quantitative assessments and the analytical format of quantitative assessments.Originality/valueThe study indicates that quantitative and qualitative assessments should be carried out jointly so that they can generate more comprehensive results. When the combined use is not possible, the quantitative approach is better suited for assessing performance, while the qualitative approach provides more valuable insights for boosting people development processes.</abstract><cop>Farnborough</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/PR-08-2019-0444</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5795-4468</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8921-9727</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0048-3486 |
ispartof | Personnel review, 2021-07, Vol.50 (6), p.1460-1478 |
issn | 0048-3486 1758-6933 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2550182325 |
source | ABI/INFORM global; Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list) |
subjects | Employees Feedback Performance appraisal Performance management Task analysis |
title | A discussion on using quantitative or qualitative data for assessment of individual competencies |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T01%3A40%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20discussion%20on%20using%20quantitative%20or%20qualitative%20data%20for%20assessment%20of%20individual%20competencies&rft.jtitle=Personnel%20review&rft.au=Macchi%20Silva,%20V%C3%ADtor%20Vasata&rft.date=2021-07-09&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1460&rft.epage=1478&rft.pages=1460-1478&rft.issn=0048-3486&rft.eissn=1758-6933&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/PR-08-2019-0444&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2550182325%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-4c9f564ca98c00ff86d8865d809e90c4f4f85e6d634a39a32978e2581f3b78473%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2550182325&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |