Determination of Optimal Meshness of Sewer Network Based on a Cost—Benefit Analysis

Urban pluvial flooding occurs when the capacity of sewer networks is surcharged due to large amounts runoff produced during intense rain events. Rapid urbanization processes and changes in climate increase these events frequency. Effective and sustainable approaches for the reduction in urban floods...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Water (Basel) 2021-04, Vol.13 (8), p.1090
Main Authors: Reyes-Silva, Julian D., Frauches, Ana C.N.B., Rojas-Gómez, Karen L., Helm, Björn, Krebs, Peter
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Analysis
Case studies
Climate change
Costs
Drainage patterns
Economic aspects
Evaluation
Flood control
Flood damage
Flood management
Flooding
Floods
Mitigation
Runoff
Sewer systems
Simulation
Stormwater management
Topography
Urban drainage
Urbanization
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Urban pluvial flooding occurs when the capacity of sewer networks is surcharged due to large amounts runoff produced during intense rain events. Rapid urbanization processes and changes in climate increase these events frequency. Effective and sustainable approaches for the reduction in urban floods are necessary. Although several gray, green and hybrid measures have been studied, the influence of network structure on flood occurrence has not yet been systematically evaluated. This study focuses on evaluating how different structures of a single urban drainage network affect flood volumes and their associated damages. Furthermore, a cost–benefit analysis is used to determine the best network structure. As a case study, a sewer subnetwork in Dresden, Germany was selected. Scenarios corresponding to different layouts are developed and evaluated using event-wise hydrodynamic simulation. The results indicate that more meshed structures are associated with lower flood volumes and damage. Moreover, all analyzed scenarios were identified as cost-effective, i.e., the benefits in terms of flood damage reduction outweighed the costs related to pipe installation, operation and maintenance. However, a predominantly branched structure was identified as the best scenario. The present approach may provide a new cost-effective solution that can be integrated into the development of different mitigation strategies for flood management.
ISSN:2073-4441
2073-4441
DOI:10.3390/w13081090