Loading…

Safety climate strength: The negative effects of cliques and negative relationships in teams

•The current study uses network analysis to study safety climate in cliques.•Cliques were found to be a valid level of analysis for safety-climate research.•The number of cliques in a team was negatively related to the team's safety-climate strength. Safety climate is one of the most valid pred...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Safety science 2021-06, Vol.138, p.105224, Article 105224
Main Authors: Arizon Peretz, Renana, Luria, Gil, Kalish, Yuval, Zohar, Dov
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-e75b71b45826d833890d67389e08b1d1f51e06e3dfa9351de9e101d165f7ecac3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-e75b71b45826d833890d67389e08b1d1f51e06e3dfa9351de9e101d165f7ecac3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 105224
container_title Safety science
container_volume 138
creator Arizon Peretz, Renana
Luria, Gil
Kalish, Yuval
Zohar, Dov
description •The current study uses network analysis to study safety climate in cliques.•Cliques were found to be a valid level of analysis for safety-climate research.•The number of cliques in a team was negatively related to the team's safety-climate strength. Safety climate is one of the most valid predictors of safety outcomes in organizations. Safety climate studies usually refer to formal organizational units (the team/department) as the main level of analysis for predicting climate emergence and safety outcomes. The current research extends the traditional perspective toward safety climate by proposing a complementary framework based on social network theory. Specifically, this research aims to understand how two common features of formal units, namely (1) the presence of informal subgroups of friends (i.e. cliques), and (2) the prevalence of negative relationships between team members, affect the team’s safety climate strength. We hypothesized that employees who are members of cliques would exhibit high internal agreement, at the clique level, regarding the team’s safety climate, and that both the number of cliques and the prevalence of negative relationships in a team would be negatively related to team safety-climate strength. We sampled 568 workers in 118 cliques within 46 formal teams in nine organizations. Findings showed the cliques to be a valid meso level of analysis for safety-climate research. The number of cliques in a team was negatively related to the team's safety-climate strength. In addition, we found an interaction effect between the number of cliques and the prevalence of negative relationships in the team, such that the negative association between the number of cliques and climate strength grew stronger as the prevalence of negative relationships increased.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105224
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2550680816</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0925753521000692</els_id><sourcerecordid>2550680816</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-e75b71b45826d833890d67389e08b1d1f51e06e3dfa9351de9e101d165f7ecac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wFPA89Z8NNmseJHiFxQ8WG9CSJNJm6XdrUkq9N-bpYI3TzPMvO98PAhdUzKhhMrbdpKSDRNGGC0Fwdj0BI2oqpuKkik7RSPSMFHVgotzdJFSSwihXNIR-nw3HvIB203Ymgw45QjdKq_v8GINuIOVyeEbMHgPNifc-0H5tYeETef--hE2Jem7tA67hEOHM5htukRn3mwSXP3GMfp4elzMXqr52_Pr7GFeWc5UrqAWy5oup0Ix6RTnqiFO1iUAUUvqqBcUiATuvGm4oA4aKE87KoWvwRrLx-jmOHcX--G2rNt-H7uyUjMhiFREUVlU7KiysU8pgte7WJ6OB02JHijqVg8U9UBRHykW0_3RBOX-7wBRFwV0FlyIhYh2ffjP_gNjaXtS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2550680816</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safety climate strength: The negative effects of cliques and negative relationships in teams</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Arizon Peretz, Renana ; Luria, Gil ; Kalish, Yuval ; Zohar, Dov</creator><creatorcontrib>Arizon Peretz, Renana ; Luria, Gil ; Kalish, Yuval ; Zohar, Dov</creatorcontrib><description>•The current study uses network analysis to study safety climate in cliques.•Cliques were found to be a valid level of analysis for safety-climate research.•The number of cliques in a team was negatively related to the team's safety-climate strength. Safety climate is one of the most valid predictors of safety outcomes in organizations. Safety climate studies usually refer to formal organizational units (the team/department) as the main level of analysis for predicting climate emergence and safety outcomes. The current research extends the traditional perspective toward safety climate by proposing a complementary framework based on social network theory. Specifically, this research aims to understand how two common features of formal units, namely (1) the presence of informal subgroups of friends (i.e. cliques), and (2) the prevalence of negative relationships between team members, affect the team’s safety climate strength. We hypothesized that employees who are members of cliques would exhibit high internal agreement, at the clique level, regarding the team’s safety climate, and that both the number of cliques and the prevalence of negative relationships in a team would be negatively related to team safety-climate strength. We sampled 568 workers in 118 cliques within 46 formal teams in nine organizations. Findings showed the cliques to be a valid meso level of analysis for safety-climate research. The number of cliques in a team was negatively related to the team's safety-climate strength. In addition, we found an interaction effect between the number of cliques and the prevalence of negative relationships in the team, such that the negative association between the number of cliques and climate strength grew stronger as the prevalence of negative relationships increased.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0925-7535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1042</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105224</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Climate effects ; Climate prediction ; Climate strength ; Climate studies ; Friendship network ; Negative relationship ; Organizational behavior ; Organizations ; Personal relationships ; Safety ; Safety climate ; Safety management ; Social networks ; Social organization ; Subgroup ; Subgroups ; Teams ; Work environment</subject><ispartof>Safety science, 2021-06, Vol.138, p.105224, Article 105224</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Jun 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-e75b71b45826d833890d67389e08b1d1f51e06e3dfa9351de9e101d165f7ecac3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-e75b71b45826d833890d67389e08b1d1f51e06e3dfa9351de9e101d165f7ecac3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7983-2517</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arizon Peretz, Renana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luria, Gil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalish, Yuval</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zohar, Dov</creatorcontrib><title>Safety climate strength: The negative effects of cliques and negative relationships in teams</title><title>Safety science</title><description>•The current study uses network analysis to study safety climate in cliques.•Cliques were found to be a valid level of analysis for safety-climate research.•The number of cliques in a team was negatively related to the team's safety-climate strength. Safety climate is one of the most valid predictors of safety outcomes in organizations. Safety climate studies usually refer to formal organizational units (the team/department) as the main level of analysis for predicting climate emergence and safety outcomes. The current research extends the traditional perspective toward safety climate by proposing a complementary framework based on social network theory. Specifically, this research aims to understand how two common features of formal units, namely (1) the presence of informal subgroups of friends (i.e. cliques), and (2) the prevalence of negative relationships between team members, affect the team’s safety climate strength. We hypothesized that employees who are members of cliques would exhibit high internal agreement, at the clique level, regarding the team’s safety climate, and that both the number of cliques and the prevalence of negative relationships in a team would be negatively related to team safety-climate strength. We sampled 568 workers in 118 cliques within 46 formal teams in nine organizations. Findings showed the cliques to be a valid meso level of analysis for safety-climate research. The number of cliques in a team was negatively related to the team's safety-climate strength. In addition, we found an interaction effect between the number of cliques and the prevalence of negative relationships in the team, such that the negative association between the number of cliques and climate strength grew stronger as the prevalence of negative relationships increased.</description><subject>Climate effects</subject><subject>Climate prediction</subject><subject>Climate strength</subject><subject>Climate studies</subject><subject>Friendship network</subject><subject>Negative relationship</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Personal relationships</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Safety climate</subject><subject>Safety management</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social organization</subject><subject>Subgroup</subject><subject>Subgroups</subject><subject>Teams</subject><subject>Work environment</subject><issn>0925-7535</issn><issn>1879-1042</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wFPA89Z8NNmseJHiFxQ8WG9CSJNJm6XdrUkq9N-bpYI3TzPMvO98PAhdUzKhhMrbdpKSDRNGGC0Fwdj0BI2oqpuKkik7RSPSMFHVgotzdJFSSwihXNIR-nw3HvIB203Ymgw45QjdKq_v8GINuIOVyeEbMHgPNifc-0H5tYeETef--hE2Jem7tA67hEOHM5htukRn3mwSXP3GMfp4elzMXqr52_Pr7GFeWc5UrqAWy5oup0Ix6RTnqiFO1iUAUUvqqBcUiATuvGm4oA4aKE87KoWvwRrLx-jmOHcX--G2rNt-H7uyUjMhiFREUVlU7KiysU8pgte7WJ6OB02JHijqVg8U9UBRHykW0_3RBOX-7wBRFwV0FlyIhYh2ffjP_gNjaXtS</recordid><startdate>202106</startdate><enddate>202106</enddate><creator>Arizon Peretz, Renana</creator><creator>Luria, Gil</creator><creator>Kalish, Yuval</creator><creator>Zohar, Dov</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7983-2517</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202106</creationdate><title>Safety climate strength: The negative effects of cliques and negative relationships in teams</title><author>Arizon Peretz, Renana ; Luria, Gil ; Kalish, Yuval ; Zohar, Dov</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-e75b71b45826d833890d67389e08b1d1f51e06e3dfa9351de9e101d165f7ecac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Climate effects</topic><topic>Climate prediction</topic><topic>Climate strength</topic><topic>Climate studies</topic><topic>Friendship network</topic><topic>Negative relationship</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Personal relationships</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Safety climate</topic><topic>Safety management</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social organization</topic><topic>Subgroup</topic><topic>Subgroups</topic><topic>Teams</topic><topic>Work environment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arizon Peretz, Renana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luria, Gil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalish, Yuval</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zohar, Dov</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Safety science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arizon Peretz, Renana</au><au>Luria, Gil</au><au>Kalish, Yuval</au><au>Zohar, Dov</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safety climate strength: The negative effects of cliques and negative relationships in teams</atitle><jtitle>Safety science</jtitle><date>2021-06</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>138</volume><spage>105224</spage><pages>105224-</pages><artnum>105224</artnum><issn>0925-7535</issn><eissn>1879-1042</eissn><abstract>•The current study uses network analysis to study safety climate in cliques.•Cliques were found to be a valid level of analysis for safety-climate research.•The number of cliques in a team was negatively related to the team's safety-climate strength. Safety climate is one of the most valid predictors of safety outcomes in organizations. Safety climate studies usually refer to formal organizational units (the team/department) as the main level of analysis for predicting climate emergence and safety outcomes. The current research extends the traditional perspective toward safety climate by proposing a complementary framework based on social network theory. Specifically, this research aims to understand how two common features of formal units, namely (1) the presence of informal subgroups of friends (i.e. cliques), and (2) the prevalence of negative relationships between team members, affect the team’s safety climate strength. We hypothesized that employees who are members of cliques would exhibit high internal agreement, at the clique level, regarding the team’s safety climate, and that both the number of cliques and the prevalence of negative relationships in a team would be negatively related to team safety-climate strength. We sampled 568 workers in 118 cliques within 46 formal teams in nine organizations. Findings showed the cliques to be a valid meso level of analysis for safety-climate research. The number of cliques in a team was negatively related to the team's safety-climate strength. In addition, we found an interaction effect between the number of cliques and the prevalence of negative relationships in the team, such that the negative association between the number of cliques and climate strength grew stronger as the prevalence of negative relationships increased.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105224</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7983-2517</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0925-7535
ispartof Safety science, 2021-06, Vol.138, p.105224, Article 105224
issn 0925-7535
1879-1042
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2550680816
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Climate effects
Climate prediction
Climate strength
Climate studies
Friendship network
Negative relationship
Organizational behavior
Organizations
Personal relationships
Safety
Safety climate
Safety management
Social networks
Social organization
Subgroup
Subgroups
Teams
Work environment
title Safety climate strength: The negative effects of cliques and negative relationships in teams
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T07%3A54%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety%20climate%20strength:%20The%20negative%20effects%20of%20cliques%20and%20negative%20relationships%20in%20teams&rft.jtitle=Safety%20science&rft.au=Arizon%20Peretz,%20Renana&rft.date=2021-06&rft.volume=138&rft.spage=105224&rft.pages=105224-&rft.artnum=105224&rft.issn=0925-7535&rft.eissn=1879-1042&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105224&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2550680816%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-e75b71b45826d833890d67389e08b1d1f51e06e3dfa9351de9e101d165f7ecac3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2550680816&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true