Loading…

External stakeholder engagement: Complementary and substitutive effects on firms' eco‐innovation

In this paper, we investigate whether firms' engagements in collaboration agreements with different types of external stakeholders produce complementary effects on the likelihood of eco‐innovation. Although collaboration network and open eco‐innovation theories affirm that the combination of ex...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Business strategy and the environment 2021-07, Vol.30 (5), p.2671-2687
Main Authors: Acebo, Enrique, Miguel‐Dávila, José‐Ángel, Nieto, Mariano
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3260-f1b2428f0aa4a8db85128ceba3d9af3dc624f084cad1ffeee2457509dc9d21f53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3260-f1b2428f0aa4a8db85128ceba3d9af3dc624f084cad1ffeee2457509dc9d21f53
container_end_page 2687
container_issue 5
container_start_page 2671
container_title Business strategy and the environment
container_volume 30
creator Acebo, Enrique
Miguel‐Dávila, José‐Ángel
Nieto, Mariano
description In this paper, we investigate whether firms' engagements in collaboration agreements with different types of external stakeholders produce complementary effects on the likelihood of eco‐innovation. Although collaboration network and open eco‐innovation theories affirm that the combination of external partners such as scientific partners, suppliers and customers produces complementary effects on the firm's likelihood of eco‐innovation, several empirical studies found the existence of substitutive effects between them. To bridge this gap in the literature, we shape the nature of the interaction between different external partners, analysing an unbalanced panel sample of 10,918 innovative Spanish firms, covering the period 2008–2016. Consequently, we can show how firms benefit the most from collaboration with external partners. Our results show that firms that simultaneously collaborate with scientific partners, suppliers and customers generate partial complementary effects, which increase the firm's likelihood to eco‐innovate the most, and that the combination of customer‐collaboration with scientific partners, or supplier‐collaboration, produces partial substitutive effects. Taking this in account, our results also confirm that engaging with scientific partners, suppliers or customers, independent of one another, increases firms' likelihood of eco‐innovation more than noncollaboration. These results have important implications for managers, researchers and policy designers. For managers, this study provides a correct understanding of the benefits that they can expect to obtain from multi‐partner external collaboration. For researchers, it introduces the marginal analysis to estimate interaction on nonlinear models. Finally, for policy designers, it shows the need for sponsored R&D collaboration to encourage coordinated ecosystems in which sustainability goals are pursued together.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/bse.2770
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2551385511</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2551385511</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3260-f1b2428f0aa4a8db85128ceba3d9af3dc624f084cad1ffeee2457509dc9d21f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtOwzAQhi0EEqUgcQRLLGCT4kceDjuoykOqxAJYW449LilpXGyn0B1H4IychLRly2ZmNPo0o_9D6JSSESWEXVYBRqwoyB4aUFKWCRE830cDUuZpkhacH6KjEOaE9AsmBqiafEbwrWpwiOoNXl1jwGNoZ2oGC2jjFR67xbLZzsqvsWoNDl0VYh27WK8Ag7WgY8Cuxbb2i3COQbufr--6bd1Kxdq1x-jAqibAyV8fopfbyfP4Ppk-3j2Mr6eJ5iwniaUVS5mwRKlUCVOJjDKhoVLclMpyo3OWWiJSrQztfwKwNCsyUhpdGkZtxofobHd36d17ByHKues20YJkWUa56AvtqYsdpb0LwYOVS18v-miSErkxKHuDcmOwR5Md-lE3sP6XkzdPky3_C6m6dSk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2551385511</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>External stakeholder engagement: Complementary and substitutive effects on firms' eco‐innovation</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)</source><creator>Acebo, Enrique ; Miguel‐Dávila, José‐Ángel ; Nieto, Mariano</creator><creatorcontrib>Acebo, Enrique ; Miguel‐Dávila, José‐Ángel ; Nieto, Mariano</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, we investigate whether firms' engagements in collaboration agreements with different types of external stakeholders produce complementary effects on the likelihood of eco‐innovation. Although collaboration network and open eco‐innovation theories affirm that the combination of external partners such as scientific partners, suppliers and customers produces complementary effects on the firm's likelihood of eco‐innovation, several empirical studies found the existence of substitutive effects between them. To bridge this gap in the literature, we shape the nature of the interaction between different external partners, analysing an unbalanced panel sample of 10,918 innovative Spanish firms, covering the period 2008–2016. Consequently, we can show how firms benefit the most from collaboration with external partners. Our results show that firms that simultaneously collaborate with scientific partners, suppliers and customers generate partial complementary effects, which increase the firm's likelihood to eco‐innovate the most, and that the combination of customer‐collaboration with scientific partners, or supplier‐collaboration, produces partial substitutive effects. Taking this in account, our results also confirm that engaging with scientific partners, suppliers or customers, independent of one another, increases firms' likelihood of eco‐innovation more than noncollaboration. These results have important implications for managers, researchers and policy designers. For managers, this study provides a correct understanding of the benefits that they can expect to obtain from multi‐partner external collaboration. For researchers, it introduces the marginal analysis to estimate interaction on nonlinear models. Finally, for policy designers, it shows the need for sponsored R&amp;D collaboration to encourage coordinated ecosystems in which sustainability goals are pursued together.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-4733</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0836</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/bse.2770</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Wiley Periodicals Inc</publisher><subject>Collaboration ; collaboration agreements ; Companies ; complementarity ; Customers ; Designers ; eco‐innovation ; Empirical analysis ; external partners ; Innovations ; Nonlinear analysis ; R&amp;D ; Research &amp; development ; stakeholder engagement ; Stakeholders</subject><ispartof>Business strategy and the environment, 2021-07, Vol.30 (5), p.2671-2687</ispartof><rights>2021 ERP Environment and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3260-f1b2428f0aa4a8db85128ceba3d9af3dc624f084cad1ffeee2457509dc9d21f53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3260-f1b2428f0aa4a8db85128ceba3d9af3dc624f084cad1ffeee2457509dc9d21f53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5191-0528 ; 0000-0001-9022-5614 ; 0000-0002-3991-2416</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Acebo, Enrique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miguel‐Dávila, José‐Ángel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieto, Mariano</creatorcontrib><title>External stakeholder engagement: Complementary and substitutive effects on firms' eco‐innovation</title><title>Business strategy and the environment</title><description>In this paper, we investigate whether firms' engagements in collaboration agreements with different types of external stakeholders produce complementary effects on the likelihood of eco‐innovation. Although collaboration network and open eco‐innovation theories affirm that the combination of external partners such as scientific partners, suppliers and customers produces complementary effects on the firm's likelihood of eco‐innovation, several empirical studies found the existence of substitutive effects between them. To bridge this gap in the literature, we shape the nature of the interaction between different external partners, analysing an unbalanced panel sample of 10,918 innovative Spanish firms, covering the period 2008–2016. Consequently, we can show how firms benefit the most from collaboration with external partners. Our results show that firms that simultaneously collaborate with scientific partners, suppliers and customers generate partial complementary effects, which increase the firm's likelihood to eco‐innovate the most, and that the combination of customer‐collaboration with scientific partners, or supplier‐collaboration, produces partial substitutive effects. Taking this in account, our results also confirm that engaging with scientific partners, suppliers or customers, independent of one another, increases firms' likelihood of eco‐innovation more than noncollaboration. These results have important implications for managers, researchers and policy designers. For managers, this study provides a correct understanding of the benefits that they can expect to obtain from multi‐partner external collaboration. For researchers, it introduces the marginal analysis to estimate interaction on nonlinear models. Finally, for policy designers, it shows the need for sponsored R&amp;D collaboration to encourage coordinated ecosystems in which sustainability goals are pursued together.</description><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>collaboration agreements</subject><subject>Companies</subject><subject>complementarity</subject><subject>Customers</subject><subject>Designers</subject><subject>eco‐innovation</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>external partners</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Nonlinear analysis</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><subject>stakeholder engagement</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><issn>0964-4733</issn><issn>1099-0836</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtOwzAQhi0EEqUgcQRLLGCT4kceDjuoykOqxAJYW449LilpXGyn0B1H4IychLRly2ZmNPo0o_9D6JSSESWEXVYBRqwoyB4aUFKWCRE830cDUuZpkhacH6KjEOaE9AsmBqiafEbwrWpwiOoNXl1jwGNoZ2oGC2jjFR67xbLZzsqvsWoNDl0VYh27WK8Ag7WgY8Cuxbb2i3COQbufr--6bd1Kxdq1x-jAqibAyV8fopfbyfP4Ppk-3j2Mr6eJ5iwniaUVS5mwRKlUCVOJjDKhoVLclMpyo3OWWiJSrQztfwKwNCsyUhpdGkZtxofobHd36d17ByHKues20YJkWUa56AvtqYsdpb0LwYOVS18v-miSErkxKHuDcmOwR5Md-lE3sP6XkzdPky3_C6m6dSk</recordid><startdate>202107</startdate><enddate>202107</enddate><creator>Acebo, Enrique</creator><creator>Miguel‐Dávila, José‐Ángel</creator><creator>Nieto, Mariano</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5191-0528</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9022-5614</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3991-2416</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202107</creationdate><title>External stakeholder engagement: Complementary and substitutive effects on firms' eco‐innovation</title><author>Acebo, Enrique ; Miguel‐Dávila, José‐Ángel ; Nieto, Mariano</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3260-f1b2428f0aa4a8db85128ceba3d9af3dc624f084cad1ffeee2457509dc9d21f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>collaboration agreements</topic><topic>Companies</topic><topic>complementarity</topic><topic>Customers</topic><topic>Designers</topic><topic>eco‐innovation</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>external partners</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Nonlinear analysis</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><topic>stakeholder engagement</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Acebo, Enrique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miguel‐Dávila, José‐Ángel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieto, Mariano</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Business strategy and the environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Acebo, Enrique</au><au>Miguel‐Dávila, José‐Ángel</au><au>Nieto, Mariano</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>External stakeholder engagement: Complementary and substitutive effects on firms' eco‐innovation</atitle><jtitle>Business strategy and the environment</jtitle><date>2021-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2671</spage><epage>2687</epage><pages>2671-2687</pages><issn>0964-4733</issn><eissn>1099-0836</eissn><abstract>In this paper, we investigate whether firms' engagements in collaboration agreements with different types of external stakeholders produce complementary effects on the likelihood of eco‐innovation. Although collaboration network and open eco‐innovation theories affirm that the combination of external partners such as scientific partners, suppliers and customers produces complementary effects on the firm's likelihood of eco‐innovation, several empirical studies found the existence of substitutive effects between them. To bridge this gap in the literature, we shape the nature of the interaction between different external partners, analysing an unbalanced panel sample of 10,918 innovative Spanish firms, covering the period 2008–2016. Consequently, we can show how firms benefit the most from collaboration with external partners. Our results show that firms that simultaneously collaborate with scientific partners, suppliers and customers generate partial complementary effects, which increase the firm's likelihood to eco‐innovate the most, and that the combination of customer‐collaboration with scientific partners, or supplier‐collaboration, produces partial substitutive effects. Taking this in account, our results also confirm that engaging with scientific partners, suppliers or customers, independent of one another, increases firms' likelihood of eco‐innovation more than noncollaboration. These results have important implications for managers, researchers and policy designers. For managers, this study provides a correct understanding of the benefits that they can expect to obtain from multi‐partner external collaboration. For researchers, it introduces the marginal analysis to estimate interaction on nonlinear models. Finally, for policy designers, it shows the need for sponsored R&amp;D collaboration to encourage coordinated ecosystems in which sustainability goals are pursued together.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/bse.2770</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5191-0528</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9022-5614</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3991-2416</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0964-4733
ispartof Business strategy and the environment, 2021-07, Vol.30 (5), p.2671-2687
issn 0964-4733
1099-0836
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2551385511
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)
subjects Collaboration
collaboration agreements
Companies
complementarity
Customers
Designers
eco‐innovation
Empirical analysis
external partners
Innovations
Nonlinear analysis
R&D
Research & development
stakeholder engagement
Stakeholders
title External stakeholder engagement: Complementary and substitutive effects on firms' eco‐innovation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T03%3A29%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=External%20stakeholder%20engagement:%20Complementary%20and%20substitutive%20effects%20on%20firms'%20eco%E2%80%90innovation&rft.jtitle=Business%20strategy%20and%20the%20environment&rft.au=Acebo,%20Enrique&rft.date=2021-07&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2671&rft.epage=2687&rft.pages=2671-2687&rft.issn=0964-4733&rft.eissn=1099-0836&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/bse.2770&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2551385511%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3260-f1b2428f0aa4a8db85128ceba3d9af3dc624f084cad1ffeee2457509dc9d21f53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2551385511&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true