Loading…

PS-101 Analysis of potentially inappropriate medicines according to evolution of beers criteria

BackgroundBeers criteria (BC) were developed in 1997 and updated in 2003, 2012 and 2015.PurposeTo evaluate the impact of BC updates in detection of potentially inappropriate medicines (PIM).Material and methodsThis was a prospective study (February–March 2016) in patients ≥65 years admitted to the i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice 2017-03, Vol.24 (Suppl 1), p.A271-A272
Main Authors: Galindo-Allueva, M, Lagranja, P Casajús, Navarro, R Arrieta, Pueyo, A Escolano, Bernad, M Comet, Pardo, I Navarro, Abad-Sazatornil, R
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page A272
container_issue Suppl 1
container_start_page A271
container_title European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice
container_volume 24
creator Galindo-Allueva, M
Lagranja, P Casajús
Navarro, R Arrieta
Pueyo, A Escolano
Bernad, M Comet
Pardo, I Navarro
Abad-Sazatornil, R
description BackgroundBeers criteria (BC) were developed in 1997 and updated in 2003, 2012 and 2015.PurposeTo evaluate the impact of BC updates in detection of potentially inappropriate medicines (PIM).Material and methodsThis was a prospective study (February–March 2016) in patients ≥65 years admitted to the internal medicine unit. Studied variables: sex, age and prescribed drugs. PIM frequency was analysed according to 2003, 2012 and 2015 BC classified as: avoid drug (AD), avoid in specific pathology (ASP), use with caution (UC), interaction (I) and avoid according to renal function (ARF). Data sources: emergency reports and electronic prescription.Results60 patients were included (56.7% men), mean age 83.3 years, mean drugs per patient 8.58. According to 2003 BC, 20% of patients had PIM compared with 71.7% and 91.7% according to 2012 and 2015 BC. Mean PIM per patient: 0.25 (range 0–2), 1.67 (range 0–7) and 3.05 (range 0–10) according to 2003, 2012 and 2015 BC, respectively (p=0.00). 2003 BC: 15 PIM, 67% AD and 33% ASP. Most common 2003 BC was use of amiodarone (20% of PIM), followed by long term benzodiazepine use (13.3%), and use of antiplatelets or NSAIDs in anticoagulated patients (13.3%). 2012 BC: 100 PIM, 49% AD, 26% ASP and 25% UC. Most common 2012 BC was benzodiazepine use (22%), followed by use of drugs to avoid in dementia or cognitive impairment (12%) and antipsychotic use (10%). 2015 BC: 182 PIM, 47% AD, 35% UC, 14% ASP, 2% I and 2% ARF. Most common 2015 BC was diuretic use (22%), followed by proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use without indication (21%), and benzodiazepine use (12%).ConclusionNumber of PIM and mean PIM per patient increased with each update of BC, suggesting that sensitivity has increased and become more applicable to our environment. The withdrawal of some criteria, according to evidence updates, means that frequent PIM according to 2003 BC, such as the use of amiodarone or antiplatelet therapy in anticoagulated patients, are not present in subsequent revisions. Likewise, other PPIs that were not present in 2003 and 2012 BC, became habitual, such as the use of PPIs without indication, added in 2015, with widespread use in our environment.References and/or acknowledgementsBeers criteria.No conflict of interest
doi_str_mv 10.1136/ejhpharm-2017-000640.607
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_bmj_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2552763814</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2552763814</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1004-bcb0470fc56503c16ad70d5ef5dbbcea0b89712dc6a1cefa6ecd57f6df5d43713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWGrfIeB66slkkswsS_EGBQV1HXIbmzKdjMlU6M6NL-qTmFJ16eqcxfcf_vMhhAnMCaH8ym3Ww1rFbVECEQUA8ArmHMQJmpRQiaJpeHX6tzN-jmYpeQ2M0rqpaDNB6vGpIEC-Pj4Xver2ySccWjyE0fWjV123x75XwxDDEL0aHd46643vXcLKmBCt71_xGLB7D91u9KE_pLVzMWET_ehy6AKdtapLbvYzp-jl5vp5eVesHm7vl4tVoQlAVWijc0toDeMMqCFcWQGWuZZZrY1ToOtGkNIarohxreLOWCZabjNQUUHoFF0e7-aybzuXRrkJu5ifSrJkrBSc1qT6jyK1oJSWnDWZokdKbzcyf75VcS8JyIN0-StdHqTLo3SZpdNvthZ5Og</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1873332659</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PS-101 Analysis of potentially inappropriate medicines according to evolution of beers criteria</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><creator>Galindo-Allueva, M ; Lagranja, P Casajús ; Navarro, R Arrieta ; Pueyo, A Escolano ; Bernad, M Comet ; Pardo, I Navarro ; Abad-Sazatornil, R</creator><creatorcontrib>Galindo-Allueva, M ; Lagranja, P Casajús ; Navarro, R Arrieta ; Pueyo, A Escolano ; Bernad, M Comet ; Pardo, I Navarro ; Abad-Sazatornil, R</creatorcontrib><description>BackgroundBeers criteria (BC) were developed in 1997 and updated in 2003, 2012 and 2015.PurposeTo evaluate the impact of BC updates in detection of potentially inappropriate medicines (PIM).Material and methodsThis was a prospective study (February–March 2016) in patients ≥65 years admitted to the internal medicine unit. Studied variables: sex, age and prescribed drugs. PIM frequency was analysed according to 2003, 2012 and 2015 BC classified as: avoid drug (AD), avoid in specific pathology (ASP), use with caution (UC), interaction (I) and avoid according to renal function (ARF). Data sources: emergency reports and electronic prescription.Results60 patients were included (56.7% men), mean age 83.3 years, mean drugs per patient 8.58. According to 2003 BC, 20% of patients had PIM compared with 71.7% and 91.7% according to 2012 and 2015 BC. Mean PIM per patient: 0.25 (range 0–2), 1.67 (range 0–7) and 3.05 (range 0–10) according to 2003, 2012 and 2015 BC, respectively (p=0.00). 2003 BC: 15 PIM, 67% AD and 33% ASP. Most common 2003 BC was use of amiodarone (20% of PIM), followed by long term benzodiazepine use (13.3%), and use of antiplatelets or NSAIDs in anticoagulated patients (13.3%). 2012 BC: 100 PIM, 49% AD, 26% ASP and 25% UC. Most common 2012 BC was benzodiazepine use (22%), followed by use of drugs to avoid in dementia or cognitive impairment (12%) and antipsychotic use (10%). 2015 BC: 182 PIM, 47% AD, 35% UC, 14% ASP, 2% I and 2% ARF. Most common 2015 BC was diuretic use (22%), followed by proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use without indication (21%), and benzodiazepine use (12%).ConclusionNumber of PIM and mean PIM per patient increased with each update of BC, suggesting that sensitivity has increased and become more applicable to our environment. The withdrawal of some criteria, according to evidence updates, means that frequent PIM according to 2003 BC, such as the use of amiodarone or antiplatelet therapy in anticoagulated patients, are not present in subsequent revisions. Likewise, other PPIs that were not present in 2003 and 2012 BC, became habitual, such as the use of PPIs without indication, added in 2015, with widespread use in our environment.References and/or acknowledgementsBeers criteria.No conflict of interest</description><identifier>ISSN: 2047-9956</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2047-9964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2017-000640.607</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Benzodiazepines ; Patients</subject><ispartof>European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice, 2017-03, Vol.24 (Suppl 1), p.A271-A272</ispartof><rights>2017, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Copyright: 2017 (c) 2017, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>2017 2017, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Galindo-Allueva, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lagranja, P Casajús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navarro, R Arrieta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pueyo, A Escolano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernad, M Comet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pardo, I Navarro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abad-Sazatornil, R</creatorcontrib><title>PS-101 Analysis of potentially inappropriate medicines according to evolution of beers criteria</title><title>European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice</title><description>BackgroundBeers criteria (BC) were developed in 1997 and updated in 2003, 2012 and 2015.PurposeTo evaluate the impact of BC updates in detection of potentially inappropriate medicines (PIM).Material and methodsThis was a prospective study (February–March 2016) in patients ≥65 years admitted to the internal medicine unit. Studied variables: sex, age and prescribed drugs. PIM frequency was analysed according to 2003, 2012 and 2015 BC classified as: avoid drug (AD), avoid in specific pathology (ASP), use with caution (UC), interaction (I) and avoid according to renal function (ARF). Data sources: emergency reports and electronic prescription.Results60 patients were included (56.7% men), mean age 83.3 years, mean drugs per patient 8.58. According to 2003 BC, 20% of patients had PIM compared with 71.7% and 91.7% according to 2012 and 2015 BC. Mean PIM per patient: 0.25 (range 0–2), 1.67 (range 0–7) and 3.05 (range 0–10) according to 2003, 2012 and 2015 BC, respectively (p=0.00). 2003 BC: 15 PIM, 67% AD and 33% ASP. Most common 2003 BC was use of amiodarone (20% of PIM), followed by long term benzodiazepine use (13.3%), and use of antiplatelets or NSAIDs in anticoagulated patients (13.3%). 2012 BC: 100 PIM, 49% AD, 26% ASP and 25% UC. Most common 2012 BC was benzodiazepine use (22%), followed by use of drugs to avoid in dementia or cognitive impairment (12%) and antipsychotic use (10%). 2015 BC: 182 PIM, 47% AD, 35% UC, 14% ASP, 2% I and 2% ARF. Most common 2015 BC was diuretic use (22%), followed by proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use without indication (21%), and benzodiazepine use (12%).ConclusionNumber of PIM and mean PIM per patient increased with each update of BC, suggesting that sensitivity has increased and become more applicable to our environment. The withdrawal of some criteria, according to evidence updates, means that frequent PIM according to 2003 BC, such as the use of amiodarone or antiplatelet therapy in anticoagulated patients, are not present in subsequent revisions. Likewise, other PPIs that were not present in 2003 and 2012 BC, became habitual, such as the use of PPIs without indication, added in 2015, with widespread use in our environment.References and/or acknowledgementsBeers criteria.No conflict of interest</description><subject>Benzodiazepines</subject><subject>Patients</subject><issn>2047-9956</issn><issn>2047-9964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWGrfIeB66slkkswsS_EGBQV1HXIbmzKdjMlU6M6NL-qTmFJ16eqcxfcf_vMhhAnMCaH8ym3Ww1rFbVECEQUA8ArmHMQJmpRQiaJpeHX6tzN-jmYpeQ2M0rqpaDNB6vGpIEC-Pj4Xver2ySccWjyE0fWjV123x75XwxDDEL0aHd46643vXcLKmBCt71_xGLB7D91u9KE_pLVzMWET_ehy6AKdtapLbvYzp-jl5vp5eVesHm7vl4tVoQlAVWijc0toDeMMqCFcWQGWuZZZrY1ToOtGkNIarohxreLOWCZabjNQUUHoFF0e7-aybzuXRrkJu5ifSrJkrBSc1qT6jyK1oJSWnDWZokdKbzcyf75VcS8JyIN0-StdHqTLo3SZpdNvthZ5Og</recordid><startdate>201703</startdate><enddate>201703</enddate><creator>Galindo-Allueva, M</creator><creator>Lagranja, P Casajús</creator><creator>Navarro, R Arrieta</creator><creator>Pueyo, A Escolano</creator><creator>Bernad, M Comet</creator><creator>Pardo, I Navarro</creator><creator>Abad-Sazatornil, R</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201703</creationdate><title>PS-101 Analysis of potentially inappropriate medicines according to evolution of beers criteria</title><author>Galindo-Allueva, M ; Lagranja, P Casajús ; Navarro, R Arrieta ; Pueyo, A Escolano ; Bernad, M Comet ; Pardo, I Navarro ; Abad-Sazatornil, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1004-bcb0470fc56503c16ad70d5ef5dbbcea0b89712dc6a1cefa6ecd57f6df5d43713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Benzodiazepines</topic><topic>Patients</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Galindo-Allueva, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lagranja, P Casajús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navarro, R Arrieta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pueyo, A Escolano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernad, M Comet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pardo, I Navarro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abad-Sazatornil, R</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Galindo-Allueva, M</au><au>Lagranja, P Casajús</au><au>Navarro, R Arrieta</au><au>Pueyo, A Escolano</au><au>Bernad, M Comet</au><au>Pardo, I Navarro</au><au>Abad-Sazatornil, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PS-101 Analysis of potentially inappropriate medicines according to evolution of beers criteria</atitle><jtitle>European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice</jtitle><date>2017-03</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>A271</spage><epage>A272</epage><pages>A271-A272</pages><issn>2047-9956</issn><eissn>2047-9964</eissn><abstract>BackgroundBeers criteria (BC) were developed in 1997 and updated in 2003, 2012 and 2015.PurposeTo evaluate the impact of BC updates in detection of potentially inappropriate medicines (PIM).Material and methodsThis was a prospective study (February–March 2016) in patients ≥65 years admitted to the internal medicine unit. Studied variables: sex, age and prescribed drugs. PIM frequency was analysed according to 2003, 2012 and 2015 BC classified as: avoid drug (AD), avoid in specific pathology (ASP), use with caution (UC), interaction (I) and avoid according to renal function (ARF). Data sources: emergency reports and electronic prescription.Results60 patients were included (56.7% men), mean age 83.3 years, mean drugs per patient 8.58. According to 2003 BC, 20% of patients had PIM compared with 71.7% and 91.7% according to 2012 and 2015 BC. Mean PIM per patient: 0.25 (range 0–2), 1.67 (range 0–7) and 3.05 (range 0–10) according to 2003, 2012 and 2015 BC, respectively (p=0.00). 2003 BC: 15 PIM, 67% AD and 33% ASP. Most common 2003 BC was use of amiodarone (20% of PIM), followed by long term benzodiazepine use (13.3%), and use of antiplatelets or NSAIDs in anticoagulated patients (13.3%). 2012 BC: 100 PIM, 49% AD, 26% ASP and 25% UC. Most common 2012 BC was benzodiazepine use (22%), followed by use of drugs to avoid in dementia or cognitive impairment (12%) and antipsychotic use (10%). 2015 BC: 182 PIM, 47% AD, 35% UC, 14% ASP, 2% I and 2% ARF. Most common 2015 BC was diuretic use (22%), followed by proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use without indication (21%), and benzodiazepine use (12%).ConclusionNumber of PIM and mean PIM per patient increased with each update of BC, suggesting that sensitivity has increased and become more applicable to our environment. The withdrawal of some criteria, according to evidence updates, means that frequent PIM according to 2003 BC, such as the use of amiodarone or antiplatelet therapy in anticoagulated patients, are not present in subsequent revisions. Likewise, other PPIs that were not present in 2003 and 2012 BC, became habitual, such as the use of PPIs without indication, added in 2015, with widespread use in our environment.References and/or acknowledgementsBeers criteria.No conflict of interest</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><doi>10.1136/ejhpharm-2017-000640.607</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2047-9956
ispartof European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice, 2017-03, Vol.24 (Suppl 1), p.A271-A272
issn 2047-9956
2047-9964
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2552763814
source Open Access: PubMed Central
subjects Benzodiazepines
Patients
title PS-101 Analysis of potentially inappropriate medicines according to evolution of beers criteria
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T05%3A10%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_bmj_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PS-101%E2%80%85Analysis%20of%20potentially%20inappropriate%20medicines%20according%20to%20evolution%20of%20beers%20criteria&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20hospital%20pharmacy.%20Science%20and%20practice&rft.au=Galindo-Allueva,%20M&rft.date=2017-03&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=A271&rft.epage=A272&rft.pages=A271-A272&rft.issn=2047-9956&rft.eissn=2047-9964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2017-000640.607&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_bmj_p%3E2552763814%3C/proquest_bmj_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1004-bcb0470fc56503c16ad70d5ef5dbbcea0b89712dc6a1cefa6ecd57f6df5d43713%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1873332659&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true