Loading…

Accounting and accountability practices in times of crisis: a Foucauldian perspective on the UK government's response to COVID-19 for England

PurposeThis paper considers the accounting and accountability practices of the UK government’s response to COVID-19 for England, focussing on the first wave of the pandemic in 2020.Design/methodology/approachBased on a close reading of the news media and official reports from government departments,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Accounting, auditing & accountability journal auditing & accountability journal, 2021-07, Vol.34 (6), p.1332-1344
Main Authors: Ahrens, Thomas, Ferry, Laurence
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-2fa3ab4c9e6a56c1ba2bf53c1d7cdaa89df190252dd4df96c821bea0e3baa6c73
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-2fa3ab4c9e6a56c1ba2bf53c1d7cdaa89df190252dd4df96c821bea0e3baa6c73
container_end_page 1344
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1332
container_title Accounting, auditing & accountability journal
container_volume 34
creator Ahrens, Thomas
Ferry, Laurence
description PurposeThis paper considers the accounting and accountability practices of the UK government’s response to COVID-19 for England, focussing on the first wave of the pandemic in 2020.Design/methodology/approachBased on a close reading of the news media and official reports from government departments, Parliament select committees and the National Audit Office, among others, this paper frames the UK government's uses of accounting and accountability in its response to COVID-19. This is by using the categories of “apparatuses of security”, Foucault's schematic of government for economising on the uses of state power.FindingsThe paper shows that an important role for accounting is in the process of enabling the government to gauge the extent of the crisis and produce calculations to underpin its response, what Foucault called “normalisation”. This role was unlike statistics and economics. The government relied most on monthly statistical reporting and budgeting flexibilities. By contrast, the multi-year Spending Review and financial reporting were not timely enough. That said, financial reporting fed into financial sustainability projections and enabled audit that could provide potential accountability regarding regularity, probity, value for money and fairness. The authors’ findings suggest that, conceptually, accountability should be added to the object–subject element of Foucault's apparatuses of security because of its significance for governments' ability to pursue crisis objectives that require popular assent.Practical implicationsIn view of the ongoing uncertainty, with the crisis extending over longer budget and financial reporting periods, a Spending Review is becoming ever more necessary for better planning, without limiting, however, the budget flexibilities that have proven so useful for rapid government responses. Moreover, the government should continue its accounting reforms post COVID-19 so that improved accountability and audit can contribute to enhanced future financial resilience.Originality/valueThis is the first paper to apply Foucault's notion of apparatuses of security to an analysis of government accounting and accountability practices.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/AAAJ-07-2020-4659
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2553648244</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2553648244</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-2fa3ab4c9e6a56c1ba2bf53c1d7cdaa89df190252dd4df96c821bea0e3baa6c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkc9u1DAQxi0EEkvhAbiNxIGTwXbi_OEWLS0UKvVCuVoTe7K4ytrBTir1IfrOeLVckDjNjPT75tN8w9hbKT5IKbqPwzB846LlSijB60b3z9hOtrrjtRL6OduJXkte6bZ-yV7lfC-EKKpux54Ga-MWVh8OgMEBnkcc_ezXR1gS2tVbyuADrP5YmjiBTT77_AkQruJmcZudxwALpbxQwR8IYqF_Edx9h0N8oBSOFNb3GRLlJYZMsEbY3_68_sxlD1NMcBkOc7F_zV5MOGd687desLuryx_7r_zm9sv1frjhtpywcjVhhWNte2pQN1aOqMZJV1a61jrErneT7IXSyrnaTX1jOyVHQkHViNjYtrpg7857lxR_b5RXcx-3FIqlUVpXTd2pui6UPFM2xZwTTWZJ_ojp0UhhTqmbU-pGtOaUujmlXjTirKEjJZzdfyX_PKr6A3brheU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2553648244</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accounting and accountability practices in times of crisis: a Foucauldian perspective on the UK government's response to COVID-19 for England</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ABI/INFORM Collection</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Ahrens, Thomas ; Ferry, Laurence</creator><creatorcontrib>Ahrens, Thomas ; Ferry, Laurence</creatorcontrib><description>PurposeThis paper considers the accounting and accountability practices of the UK government’s response to COVID-19 for England, focussing on the first wave of the pandemic in 2020.Design/methodology/approachBased on a close reading of the news media and official reports from government departments, Parliament select committees and the National Audit Office, among others, this paper frames the UK government's uses of accounting and accountability in its response to COVID-19. This is by using the categories of “apparatuses of security”, Foucault's schematic of government for economising on the uses of state power.FindingsThe paper shows that an important role for accounting is in the process of enabling the government to gauge the extent of the crisis and produce calculations to underpin its response, what Foucault called “normalisation”. This role was unlike statistics and economics. The government relied most on monthly statistical reporting and budgeting flexibilities. By contrast, the multi-year Spending Review and financial reporting were not timely enough. That said, financial reporting fed into financial sustainability projections and enabled audit that could provide potential accountability regarding regularity, probity, value for money and fairness. The authors’ findings suggest that, conceptually, accountability should be added to the object–subject element of Foucault's apparatuses of security because of its significance for governments' ability to pursue crisis objectives that require popular assent.Practical implicationsIn view of the ongoing uncertainty, with the crisis extending over longer budget and financial reporting periods, a Spending Review is becoming ever more necessary for better planning, without limiting, however, the budget flexibilities that have proven so useful for rapid government responses. Moreover, the government should continue its accounting reforms post COVID-19 so that improved accountability and audit can contribute to enhanced future financial resilience.Originality/valueThis is the first paper to apply Foucault's notion of apparatuses of security to an analysis of government accounting and accountability practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0951-3574</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-4205</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-07-2020-4659</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Accounting ; Audit committees ; Audits ; Budgets ; Committees ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Crises ; Departments ; Epidemics ; Expenditures ; Financial reporting ; Financial sustainability ; Foucauldian analysis ; Government agencies ; Governmental accounting ; Legislatures ; Money ; News media ; Pandemics ; Parliamentary systems ; Population ; Projections ; Public health ; Resilience ; Security ; Select committees ; Smallpox ; State power ; Statistics ; Uncertainty ; Value</subject><ispartof>Accounting, auditing &amp; accountability journal, 2021-07, Vol.34 (6), p.1332-1344</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-2fa3ab4c9e6a56c1ba2bf53c1d7cdaa89df190252dd4df96c821bea0e3baa6c73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-2fa3ab4c9e6a56c1ba2bf53c1d7cdaa89df190252dd4df96c821bea0e3baa6c73</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0080-8512 ; 0000-0002-6686-4528</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12843,12845,27922,27923,33221</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ahrens, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferry, Laurence</creatorcontrib><title>Accounting and accountability practices in times of crisis: a Foucauldian perspective on the UK government's response to COVID-19 for England</title><title>Accounting, auditing &amp; accountability journal</title><description>PurposeThis paper considers the accounting and accountability practices of the UK government’s response to COVID-19 for England, focussing on the first wave of the pandemic in 2020.Design/methodology/approachBased on a close reading of the news media and official reports from government departments, Parliament select committees and the National Audit Office, among others, this paper frames the UK government's uses of accounting and accountability in its response to COVID-19. This is by using the categories of “apparatuses of security”, Foucault's schematic of government for economising on the uses of state power.FindingsThe paper shows that an important role for accounting is in the process of enabling the government to gauge the extent of the crisis and produce calculations to underpin its response, what Foucault called “normalisation”. This role was unlike statistics and economics. The government relied most on monthly statistical reporting and budgeting flexibilities. By contrast, the multi-year Spending Review and financial reporting were not timely enough. That said, financial reporting fed into financial sustainability projections and enabled audit that could provide potential accountability regarding regularity, probity, value for money and fairness. The authors’ findings suggest that, conceptually, accountability should be added to the object–subject element of Foucault's apparatuses of security because of its significance for governments' ability to pursue crisis objectives that require popular assent.Practical implicationsIn view of the ongoing uncertainty, with the crisis extending over longer budget and financial reporting periods, a Spending Review is becoming ever more necessary for better planning, without limiting, however, the budget flexibilities that have proven so useful for rapid government responses. Moreover, the government should continue its accounting reforms post COVID-19 so that improved accountability and audit can contribute to enhanced future financial resilience.Originality/valueThis is the first paper to apply Foucault's notion of apparatuses of security to an analysis of government accounting and accountability practices.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Audit committees</subject><subject>Audits</subject><subject>Budgets</subject><subject>Committees</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Crises</subject><subject>Departments</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Financial reporting</subject><subject>Financial sustainability</subject><subject>Foucauldian analysis</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Governmental accounting</subject><subject>Legislatures</subject><subject>Money</subject><subject>News media</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Parliamentary systems</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Projections</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>Select committees</subject><subject>Smallpox</subject><subject>State power</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Value</subject><issn>0951-3574</issn><issn>1758-4205</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNptkc9u1DAQxi0EEkvhAbiNxIGTwXbi_OEWLS0UKvVCuVoTe7K4ytrBTir1IfrOeLVckDjNjPT75tN8w9hbKT5IKbqPwzB846LlSijB60b3z9hOtrrjtRL6OduJXkte6bZ-yV7lfC-EKKpux54Ga-MWVh8OgMEBnkcc_ezXR1gS2tVbyuADrP5YmjiBTT77_AkQruJmcZudxwALpbxQwR8IYqF_Edx9h0N8oBSOFNb3GRLlJYZMsEbY3_68_sxlD1NMcBkOc7F_zV5MOGd687desLuryx_7r_zm9sv1frjhtpywcjVhhWNte2pQN1aOqMZJV1a61jrErneT7IXSyrnaTX1jOyVHQkHViNjYtrpg7857lxR_b5RXcx-3FIqlUVpXTd2pui6UPFM2xZwTTWZJ_ojp0UhhTqmbU-pGtOaUujmlXjTirKEjJZzdfyX_PKr6A3brheU</recordid><startdate>20210723</startdate><enddate>20210723</enddate><creator>Ahrens, Thomas</creator><creator>Ferry, Laurence</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0080-8512</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6686-4528</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210723</creationdate><title>Accounting and accountability practices in times of crisis: a Foucauldian perspective on the UK government's response to COVID-19 for England</title><author>Ahrens, Thomas ; Ferry, Laurence</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-2fa3ab4c9e6a56c1ba2bf53c1d7cdaa89df190252dd4df96c821bea0e3baa6c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Audit committees</topic><topic>Audits</topic><topic>Budgets</topic><topic>Committees</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Crises</topic><topic>Departments</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Financial reporting</topic><topic>Financial sustainability</topic><topic>Foucauldian analysis</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Governmental accounting</topic><topic>Legislatures</topic><topic>Money</topic><topic>News media</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Parliamentary systems</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Projections</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>Select committees</topic><topic>Smallpox</topic><topic>State power</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Value</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ahrens, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferry, Laurence</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting &amp; Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Accounting, auditing &amp; accountability journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ahrens, Thomas</au><au>Ferry, Laurence</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accounting and accountability practices in times of crisis: a Foucauldian perspective on the UK government's response to COVID-19 for England</atitle><jtitle>Accounting, auditing &amp; accountability journal</jtitle><date>2021-07-23</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1332</spage><epage>1344</epage><pages>1332-1344</pages><issn>0951-3574</issn><eissn>1758-4205</eissn><abstract>PurposeThis paper considers the accounting and accountability practices of the UK government’s response to COVID-19 for England, focussing on the first wave of the pandemic in 2020.Design/methodology/approachBased on a close reading of the news media and official reports from government departments, Parliament select committees and the National Audit Office, among others, this paper frames the UK government's uses of accounting and accountability in its response to COVID-19. This is by using the categories of “apparatuses of security”, Foucault's schematic of government for economising on the uses of state power.FindingsThe paper shows that an important role for accounting is in the process of enabling the government to gauge the extent of the crisis and produce calculations to underpin its response, what Foucault called “normalisation”. This role was unlike statistics and economics. The government relied most on monthly statistical reporting and budgeting flexibilities. By contrast, the multi-year Spending Review and financial reporting were not timely enough. That said, financial reporting fed into financial sustainability projections and enabled audit that could provide potential accountability regarding regularity, probity, value for money and fairness. The authors’ findings suggest that, conceptually, accountability should be added to the object–subject element of Foucault's apparatuses of security because of its significance for governments' ability to pursue crisis objectives that require popular assent.Practical implicationsIn view of the ongoing uncertainty, with the crisis extending over longer budget and financial reporting periods, a Spending Review is becoming ever more necessary for better planning, without limiting, however, the budget flexibilities that have proven so useful for rapid government responses. Moreover, the government should continue its accounting reforms post COVID-19 so that improved accountability and audit can contribute to enhanced future financial resilience.Originality/valueThis is the first paper to apply Foucault's notion of apparatuses of security to an analysis of government accounting and accountability practices.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/AAAJ-07-2020-4659</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0080-8512</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6686-4528</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0951-3574
ispartof Accounting, auditing & accountability journal, 2021-07, Vol.34 (6), p.1332-1344
issn 0951-3574
1758-4205
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2553648244
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ABI/INFORM Collection; Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list); Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
subjects Accountability
Accounting
Audit committees
Audits
Budgets
Committees
Coronaviruses
COVID-19
Crises
Departments
Epidemics
Expenditures
Financial reporting
Financial sustainability
Foucauldian analysis
Government agencies
Governmental accounting
Legislatures
Money
News media
Pandemics
Parliamentary systems
Population
Projections
Public health
Resilience
Security
Select committees
Smallpox
State power
Statistics
Uncertainty
Value
title Accounting and accountability practices in times of crisis: a Foucauldian perspective on the UK government's response to COVID-19 for England
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T13%3A33%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accounting%20and%20accountability%20practices%20in%20times%20of%20crisis:%20a%20Foucauldian%20perspective%20on%20the%20UK%20government's%20response%20to%20COVID-19%20for%20England&rft.jtitle=Accounting,%20auditing%20&%20accountability%20journal&rft.au=Ahrens,%20Thomas&rft.date=2021-07-23&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1332&rft.epage=1344&rft.pages=1332-1344&rft.issn=0951-3574&rft.eissn=1758-4205&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/AAAJ-07-2020-4659&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2553648244%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-2fa3ab4c9e6a56c1ba2bf53c1d7cdaa89df190252dd4df96c821bea0e3baa6c73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2553648244&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true