Loading…
Accounting and accountability practices in times of crisis: a Foucauldian perspective on the UK government's response to COVID-19 for England
PurposeThis paper considers the accounting and accountability practices of the UK government’s response to COVID-19 for England, focussing on the first wave of the pandemic in 2020.Design/methodology/approachBased on a close reading of the news media and official reports from government departments,...
Saved in:
Published in: | Accounting, auditing & accountability journal auditing & accountability journal, 2021-07, Vol.34 (6), p.1332-1344 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-2fa3ab4c9e6a56c1ba2bf53c1d7cdaa89df190252dd4df96c821bea0e3baa6c73 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-2fa3ab4c9e6a56c1ba2bf53c1d7cdaa89df190252dd4df96c821bea0e3baa6c73 |
container_end_page | 1344 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1332 |
container_title | Accounting, auditing & accountability journal |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Ahrens, Thomas Ferry, Laurence |
description | PurposeThis paper considers the accounting and accountability practices of the UK government’s response to COVID-19 for England, focussing on the first wave of the pandemic in 2020.Design/methodology/approachBased on a close reading of the news media and official reports from government departments, Parliament select committees and the National Audit Office, among others, this paper frames the UK government's uses of accounting and accountability in its response to COVID-19. This is by using the categories of “apparatuses of security”, Foucault's schematic of government for economising on the uses of state power.FindingsThe paper shows that an important role for accounting is in the process of enabling the government to gauge the extent of the crisis and produce calculations to underpin its response, what Foucault called “normalisation”. This role was unlike statistics and economics. The government relied most on monthly statistical reporting and budgeting flexibilities. By contrast, the multi-year Spending Review and financial reporting were not timely enough. That said, financial reporting fed into financial sustainability projections and enabled audit that could provide potential accountability regarding regularity, probity, value for money and fairness. The authors’ findings suggest that, conceptually, accountability should be added to the object–subject element of Foucault's apparatuses of security because of its significance for governments' ability to pursue crisis objectives that require popular assent.Practical implicationsIn view of the ongoing uncertainty, with the crisis extending over longer budget and financial reporting periods, a Spending Review is becoming ever more necessary for better planning, without limiting, however, the budget flexibilities that have proven so useful for rapid government responses. Moreover, the government should continue its accounting reforms post COVID-19 so that improved accountability and audit can contribute to enhanced future financial resilience.Originality/valueThis is the first paper to apply Foucault's notion of apparatuses of security to an analysis of government accounting and accountability practices. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/AAAJ-07-2020-4659 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2553648244</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2553648244</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-2fa3ab4c9e6a56c1ba2bf53c1d7cdaa89df190252dd4df96c821bea0e3baa6c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkc9u1DAQxi0EEkvhAbiNxIGTwXbi_OEWLS0UKvVCuVoTe7K4ytrBTir1IfrOeLVckDjNjPT75tN8w9hbKT5IKbqPwzB846LlSijB60b3z9hOtrrjtRL6OduJXkte6bZ-yV7lfC-EKKpux54Ga-MWVh8OgMEBnkcc_ezXR1gS2tVbyuADrP5YmjiBTT77_AkQruJmcZudxwALpbxQwR8IYqF_Edx9h0N8oBSOFNb3GRLlJYZMsEbY3_68_sxlD1NMcBkOc7F_zV5MOGd687desLuryx_7r_zm9sv1frjhtpywcjVhhWNte2pQN1aOqMZJV1a61jrErneT7IXSyrnaTX1jOyVHQkHViNjYtrpg7857lxR_b5RXcx-3FIqlUVpXTd2pui6UPFM2xZwTTWZJ_ojp0UhhTqmbU-pGtOaUujmlXjTirKEjJZzdfyX_PKr6A3brheU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2553648244</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accounting and accountability practices in times of crisis: a Foucauldian perspective on the UK government's response to COVID-19 for England</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ABI/INFORM Collection</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Ahrens, Thomas ; Ferry, Laurence</creator><creatorcontrib>Ahrens, Thomas ; Ferry, Laurence</creatorcontrib><description>PurposeThis paper considers the accounting and accountability practices of the UK government’s response to COVID-19 for England, focussing on the first wave of the pandemic in 2020.Design/methodology/approachBased on a close reading of the news media and official reports from government departments, Parliament select committees and the National Audit Office, among others, this paper frames the UK government's uses of accounting and accountability in its response to COVID-19. This is by using the categories of “apparatuses of security”, Foucault's schematic of government for economising on the uses of state power.FindingsThe paper shows that an important role for accounting is in the process of enabling the government to gauge the extent of the crisis and produce calculations to underpin its response, what Foucault called “normalisation”. This role was unlike statistics and economics. The government relied most on monthly statistical reporting and budgeting flexibilities. By contrast, the multi-year Spending Review and financial reporting were not timely enough. That said, financial reporting fed into financial sustainability projections and enabled audit that could provide potential accountability regarding regularity, probity, value for money and fairness. The authors’ findings suggest that, conceptually, accountability should be added to the object–subject element of Foucault's apparatuses of security because of its significance for governments' ability to pursue crisis objectives that require popular assent.Practical implicationsIn view of the ongoing uncertainty, with the crisis extending over longer budget and financial reporting periods, a Spending Review is becoming ever more necessary for better planning, without limiting, however, the budget flexibilities that have proven so useful for rapid government responses. Moreover, the government should continue its accounting reforms post COVID-19 so that improved accountability and audit can contribute to enhanced future financial resilience.Originality/valueThis is the first paper to apply Foucault's notion of apparatuses of security to an analysis of government accounting and accountability practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0951-3574</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-4205</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-07-2020-4659</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Accounting ; Audit committees ; Audits ; Budgets ; Committees ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Crises ; Departments ; Epidemics ; Expenditures ; Financial reporting ; Financial sustainability ; Foucauldian analysis ; Government agencies ; Governmental accounting ; Legislatures ; Money ; News media ; Pandemics ; Parliamentary systems ; Population ; Projections ; Public health ; Resilience ; Security ; Select committees ; Smallpox ; State power ; Statistics ; Uncertainty ; Value</subject><ispartof>Accounting, auditing & accountability journal, 2021-07, Vol.34 (6), p.1332-1344</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-2fa3ab4c9e6a56c1ba2bf53c1d7cdaa89df190252dd4df96c821bea0e3baa6c73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-2fa3ab4c9e6a56c1ba2bf53c1d7cdaa89df190252dd4df96c821bea0e3baa6c73</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0080-8512 ; 0000-0002-6686-4528</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12843,12845,27922,27923,33221</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ahrens, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferry, Laurence</creatorcontrib><title>Accounting and accountability practices in times of crisis: a Foucauldian perspective on the UK government's response to COVID-19 for England</title><title>Accounting, auditing & accountability journal</title><description>PurposeThis paper considers the accounting and accountability practices of the UK government’s response to COVID-19 for England, focussing on the first wave of the pandemic in 2020.Design/methodology/approachBased on a close reading of the news media and official reports from government departments, Parliament select committees and the National Audit Office, among others, this paper frames the UK government's uses of accounting and accountability in its response to COVID-19. This is by using the categories of “apparatuses of security”, Foucault's schematic of government for economising on the uses of state power.FindingsThe paper shows that an important role for accounting is in the process of enabling the government to gauge the extent of the crisis and produce calculations to underpin its response, what Foucault called “normalisation”. This role was unlike statistics and economics. The government relied most on monthly statistical reporting and budgeting flexibilities. By contrast, the multi-year Spending Review and financial reporting were not timely enough. That said, financial reporting fed into financial sustainability projections and enabled audit that could provide potential accountability regarding regularity, probity, value for money and fairness. The authors’ findings suggest that, conceptually, accountability should be added to the object–subject element of Foucault's apparatuses of security because of its significance for governments' ability to pursue crisis objectives that require popular assent.Practical implicationsIn view of the ongoing uncertainty, with the crisis extending over longer budget and financial reporting periods, a Spending Review is becoming ever more necessary for better planning, without limiting, however, the budget flexibilities that have proven so useful for rapid government responses. Moreover, the government should continue its accounting reforms post COVID-19 so that improved accountability and audit can contribute to enhanced future financial resilience.Originality/valueThis is the first paper to apply Foucault's notion of apparatuses of security to an analysis of government accounting and accountability practices.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Audit committees</subject><subject>Audits</subject><subject>Budgets</subject><subject>Committees</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Crises</subject><subject>Departments</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Financial reporting</subject><subject>Financial sustainability</subject><subject>Foucauldian analysis</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Governmental accounting</subject><subject>Legislatures</subject><subject>Money</subject><subject>News media</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Parliamentary systems</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Projections</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>Select committees</subject><subject>Smallpox</subject><subject>State power</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Value</subject><issn>0951-3574</issn><issn>1758-4205</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNptkc9u1DAQxi0EEkvhAbiNxIGTwXbi_OEWLS0UKvVCuVoTe7K4ytrBTir1IfrOeLVckDjNjPT75tN8w9hbKT5IKbqPwzB846LlSijB60b3z9hOtrrjtRL6OduJXkte6bZ-yV7lfC-EKKpux54Ga-MWVh8OgMEBnkcc_ezXR1gS2tVbyuADrP5YmjiBTT77_AkQruJmcZudxwALpbxQwR8IYqF_Edx9h0N8oBSOFNb3GRLlJYZMsEbY3_68_sxlD1NMcBkOc7F_zV5MOGd687desLuryx_7r_zm9sv1frjhtpywcjVhhWNte2pQN1aOqMZJV1a61jrErneT7IXSyrnaTX1jOyVHQkHViNjYtrpg7857lxR_b5RXcx-3FIqlUVpXTd2pui6UPFM2xZwTTWZJ_ojp0UhhTqmbU-pGtOaUujmlXjTirKEjJZzdfyX_PKr6A3brheU</recordid><startdate>20210723</startdate><enddate>20210723</enddate><creator>Ahrens, Thomas</creator><creator>Ferry, Laurence</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0080-8512</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6686-4528</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210723</creationdate><title>Accounting and accountability practices in times of crisis: a Foucauldian perspective on the UK government's response to COVID-19 for England</title><author>Ahrens, Thomas ; Ferry, Laurence</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-2fa3ab4c9e6a56c1ba2bf53c1d7cdaa89df190252dd4df96c821bea0e3baa6c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Audit committees</topic><topic>Audits</topic><topic>Budgets</topic><topic>Committees</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Crises</topic><topic>Departments</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Financial reporting</topic><topic>Financial sustainability</topic><topic>Foucauldian analysis</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Governmental accounting</topic><topic>Legislatures</topic><topic>Money</topic><topic>News media</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Parliamentary systems</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Projections</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>Select committees</topic><topic>Smallpox</topic><topic>State power</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Value</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ahrens, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferry, Laurence</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Accounting, auditing & accountability journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ahrens, Thomas</au><au>Ferry, Laurence</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accounting and accountability practices in times of crisis: a Foucauldian perspective on the UK government's response to COVID-19 for England</atitle><jtitle>Accounting, auditing & accountability journal</jtitle><date>2021-07-23</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1332</spage><epage>1344</epage><pages>1332-1344</pages><issn>0951-3574</issn><eissn>1758-4205</eissn><abstract>PurposeThis paper considers the accounting and accountability practices of the UK government’s response to COVID-19 for England, focussing on the first wave of the pandemic in 2020.Design/methodology/approachBased on a close reading of the news media and official reports from government departments, Parliament select committees and the National Audit Office, among others, this paper frames the UK government's uses of accounting and accountability in its response to COVID-19. This is by using the categories of “apparatuses of security”, Foucault's schematic of government for economising on the uses of state power.FindingsThe paper shows that an important role for accounting is in the process of enabling the government to gauge the extent of the crisis and produce calculations to underpin its response, what Foucault called “normalisation”. This role was unlike statistics and economics. The government relied most on monthly statistical reporting and budgeting flexibilities. By contrast, the multi-year Spending Review and financial reporting were not timely enough. That said, financial reporting fed into financial sustainability projections and enabled audit that could provide potential accountability regarding regularity, probity, value for money and fairness. The authors’ findings suggest that, conceptually, accountability should be added to the object–subject element of Foucault's apparatuses of security because of its significance for governments' ability to pursue crisis objectives that require popular assent.Practical implicationsIn view of the ongoing uncertainty, with the crisis extending over longer budget and financial reporting periods, a Spending Review is becoming ever more necessary for better planning, without limiting, however, the budget flexibilities that have proven so useful for rapid government responses. Moreover, the government should continue its accounting reforms post COVID-19 so that improved accountability and audit can contribute to enhanced future financial resilience.Originality/valueThis is the first paper to apply Foucault's notion of apparatuses of security to an analysis of government accounting and accountability practices.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/AAAJ-07-2020-4659</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0080-8512</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6686-4528</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0951-3574 |
ispartof | Accounting, auditing & accountability journal, 2021-07, Vol.34 (6), p.1332-1344 |
issn | 0951-3574 1758-4205 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2553648244 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ABI/INFORM Collection; Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list); Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
subjects | Accountability Accounting Audit committees Audits Budgets Committees Coronaviruses COVID-19 Crises Departments Epidemics Expenditures Financial reporting Financial sustainability Foucauldian analysis Government agencies Governmental accounting Legislatures Money News media Pandemics Parliamentary systems Population Projections Public health Resilience Security Select committees Smallpox State power Statistics Uncertainty Value |
title | Accounting and accountability practices in times of crisis: a Foucauldian perspective on the UK government's response to COVID-19 for England |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T13%3A33%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accounting%20and%20accountability%20practices%20in%20times%20of%20crisis:%20a%20Foucauldian%20perspective%20on%20the%20UK%20government's%20response%20to%20COVID-19%20for%20England&rft.jtitle=Accounting,%20auditing%20&%20accountability%20journal&rft.au=Ahrens,%20Thomas&rft.date=2021-07-23&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1332&rft.epage=1344&rft.pages=1332-1344&rft.issn=0951-3574&rft.eissn=1758-4205&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/AAAJ-07-2020-4659&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2553648244%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-2fa3ab4c9e6a56c1ba2bf53c1d7cdaa89df190252dd4df96c821bea0e3baa6c73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2553648244&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |