Loading…
Influence of hard water on 2,4-D formulations for the control of dandelion
The herbicide 2,4-D is used in a variety of cropping systems, especially in grasses because it is a selective postemergence broadleaf herbicide. However, the most common formulation (2,4-D dimethylamine) is antagonized when mixed in hard water. The objective of this research was to determine which f...
Saved in:
Published in: | Weed technology 2021-06, Vol.35 (3), p.371-379 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b298t-7035d1ded9e589b0c9155dfe7bfb299059ddf21af42dd1ef208862c8c93e3d6f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b298t-7035d1ded9e589b0c9155dfe7bfb299059ddf21af42dd1ef208862c8c93e3d6f3 |
container_end_page | 379 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 371 |
container_title | Weed technology |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Schortgen, Geoffrey P. Patton, Aaron J. |
description | The herbicide 2,4-D is used in a variety of cropping systems, especially in grasses because it is a selective postemergence broadleaf herbicide. However, the most common formulation (2,4-D dimethylamine) is antagonized when mixed in hard water. The objective of this research was to determine which formulations of 2,4-D or premixes of various formulations of synthetic auxin herbicides are subject to hard water antagonism. Formulations surveyed for hard water antagonism in the first experiment included 2,4-D dimethylamine, 2,4-D diethanolamine, 2,4-D monomethylamine, 2,4-D isopropylamine salt, 2,4-D choline salt, 2,4-D isooctyl ester, and 2,4-D ethylhexyl ester. Synthetic auxin formulation types in the second experiment included water-soluble, emulsifiable concentrates and emulsion-in-water. All formulations were mixed with both soft and hard water (600 mg CaCO3 L-1) and applied to dandelions to determine whether antagonism occurred in hard water. Water-soluble (amine and choline) 2,4-D formulations were antagonized by hard water, but water-insoluble (ester) 2,4-D formulations were not antagonized. Similar results were found by formulation type with water-soluble synthetic auxin premixes antagonized but emulsifiable concentrates not antagonized. Furthermore, water-soluble salt formulations were not antagonized when formulated in premixes with other synthetic auxin herbicides as an emulsion-in-water. This research demonstrates that all 2,4-D water-soluble formulations and water-soluble premixes with phenoxycarboxylic acid herbicides are subject to hard water antagonism. Formulations of 2,4-D containing emulsifying agents protect against antagonism by the water-insoluble nature of ingredients in their formulation. Nomenclature: 2,4-D; dandelion; Taraxacum officinale G.H. Weber ex Wiggers; MCPP; MCPA |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/wet.2020.135 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2553822274</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2553822274</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b298t-7035d1ded9e589b0c9155dfe7bfb299059ddf21af42dd1ef208862c8c93e3d6f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQQIMoWKs3f0DAm3TrJGm6m6PUqpWCFwVvYXczoS3bpCZZiv_eLPXsaRjmzdcj5JbBlAErH46Yphx4zoQ8IyMmJRS8nME5GUGloABRfl2Sqxh3AGzOOYzI28rZrkfXIvWWbupg6LFOGKh3lE9mxRO1Puz7rk5b7-KQ0LRB2nqXgu-GHlM7g12uXpMLW3cRb_7imHw-Lz8Wr8X6_WW1eFwXDVdVKkoQ0jCDRqGsVAOtyncai2VjM6BAKmMsZ7WdcWMYWg5VNedt1SqBwsytGJO709xD8N89xqR3vg8ur9RcSlFxnn_O1OREtcHHGNDqQ9ju6_CjGejBls629GBLZ1sZvz_hzdZ7h__Dv8RJajw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2553822274</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of hard water on 2,4-D formulations for the control of dandelion</title><source>Cambridge University Press</source><creator>Schortgen, Geoffrey P. ; Patton, Aaron J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schortgen, Geoffrey P. ; Patton, Aaron J.</creatorcontrib><description>The herbicide 2,4-D is used in a variety of cropping systems, especially in grasses because it is a selective postemergence broadleaf herbicide. However, the most common formulation (2,4-D dimethylamine) is antagonized when mixed in hard water. The objective of this research was to determine which formulations of 2,4-D or premixes of various formulations of synthetic auxin herbicides are subject to hard water antagonism. Formulations surveyed for hard water antagonism in the first experiment included 2,4-D dimethylamine, 2,4-D diethanolamine, 2,4-D monomethylamine, 2,4-D isopropylamine salt, 2,4-D choline salt, 2,4-D isooctyl ester, and 2,4-D ethylhexyl ester. Synthetic auxin formulation types in the second experiment included water-soluble, emulsifiable concentrates and emulsion-in-water. All formulations were mixed with both soft and hard water (600 mg CaCO3 L-1) and applied to dandelions to determine whether antagonism occurred in hard water. Water-soluble (amine and choline) 2,4-D formulations were antagonized by hard water, but water-insoluble (ester) 2,4-D formulations were not antagonized. Similar results were found by formulation type with water-soluble synthetic auxin premixes antagonized but emulsifiable concentrates not antagonized. Furthermore, water-soluble salt formulations were not antagonized when formulated in premixes with other synthetic auxin herbicides as an emulsion-in-water. This research demonstrates that all 2,4-D water-soluble formulations and water-soluble premixes with phenoxycarboxylic acid herbicides are subject to hard water antagonism. Formulations of 2,4-D containing emulsifying agents protect against antagonism by the water-insoluble nature of ingredients in their formulation. Nomenclature: 2,4-D; dandelion; Taraxacum officinale G.H. Weber ex Wiggers; MCPP; MCPA</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/wet.2020.135</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>2,4-D ; Acids ; amine ; antagonism ; Auxins ; Calcium carbonate ; Choline ; Cropping systems ; Diethanolamine ; emulsifiable concentrate ; Emulsifying agents ; emulsion ; Emulsions ; ester ; Experiments ; Formulations ; Greenhouses ; hard water ; Herbicides ; Horticulture ; Ingredients ; Isooctyl ester ; Loam soils ; Proprietary ; Salt ; Salts ; Water chemistry ; Water hardness ; water-insoluble ; water-soluble</subject><ispartof>Weed technology, 2021-06, Vol.35 (3), p.371-379</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America.</rights><rights>The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b298t-7035d1ded9e589b0c9155dfe7bfb299059ddf21af42dd1ef208862c8c93e3d6f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b298t-7035d1ded9e589b0c9155dfe7bfb299059ddf21af42dd1ef208862c8c93e3d6f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3870-7709</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schortgen, Geoffrey P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patton, Aaron J.</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of hard water on 2,4-D formulations for the control of dandelion</title><title>Weed technology</title><addtitle>Weed Technol</addtitle><description>The herbicide 2,4-D is used in a variety of cropping systems, especially in grasses because it is a selective postemergence broadleaf herbicide. However, the most common formulation (2,4-D dimethylamine) is antagonized when mixed in hard water. The objective of this research was to determine which formulations of 2,4-D or premixes of various formulations of synthetic auxin herbicides are subject to hard water antagonism. Formulations surveyed for hard water antagonism in the first experiment included 2,4-D dimethylamine, 2,4-D diethanolamine, 2,4-D monomethylamine, 2,4-D isopropylamine salt, 2,4-D choline salt, 2,4-D isooctyl ester, and 2,4-D ethylhexyl ester. Synthetic auxin formulation types in the second experiment included water-soluble, emulsifiable concentrates and emulsion-in-water. All formulations were mixed with both soft and hard water (600 mg CaCO3 L-1) and applied to dandelions to determine whether antagonism occurred in hard water. Water-soluble (amine and choline) 2,4-D formulations were antagonized by hard water, but water-insoluble (ester) 2,4-D formulations were not antagonized. Similar results were found by formulation type with water-soluble synthetic auxin premixes antagonized but emulsifiable concentrates not antagonized. Furthermore, water-soluble salt formulations were not antagonized when formulated in premixes with other synthetic auxin herbicides as an emulsion-in-water. This research demonstrates that all 2,4-D water-soluble formulations and water-soluble premixes with phenoxycarboxylic acid herbicides are subject to hard water antagonism. Formulations of 2,4-D containing emulsifying agents protect against antagonism by the water-insoluble nature of ingredients in their formulation. Nomenclature: 2,4-D; dandelion; Taraxacum officinale G.H. Weber ex Wiggers; MCPP; MCPA</description><subject>2,4-D</subject><subject>Acids</subject><subject>amine</subject><subject>antagonism</subject><subject>Auxins</subject><subject>Calcium carbonate</subject><subject>Choline</subject><subject>Cropping systems</subject><subject>Diethanolamine</subject><subject>emulsifiable concentrate</subject><subject>Emulsifying agents</subject><subject>emulsion</subject><subject>Emulsions</subject><subject>ester</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Formulations</subject><subject>Greenhouses</subject><subject>hard water</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Horticulture</subject><subject>Ingredients</subject><subject>Isooctyl ester</subject><subject>Loam soils</subject><subject>Proprietary</subject><subject>Salt</subject><subject>Salts</subject><subject>Water chemistry</subject><subject>Water hardness</subject><subject>water-insoluble</subject><subject>water-soluble</subject><issn>0890-037X</issn><issn>1550-2740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQQIMoWKs3f0DAm3TrJGm6m6PUqpWCFwVvYXczoS3bpCZZiv_eLPXsaRjmzdcj5JbBlAErH46Yphx4zoQ8IyMmJRS8nME5GUGloABRfl2Sqxh3AGzOOYzI28rZrkfXIvWWbupg6LFOGKh3lE9mxRO1Puz7rk5b7-KQ0LRB2nqXgu-GHlM7g12uXpMLW3cRb_7imHw-Lz8Wr8X6_WW1eFwXDVdVKkoQ0jCDRqGsVAOtyncai2VjM6BAKmMsZ7WdcWMYWg5VNedt1SqBwsytGJO709xD8N89xqR3vg8ur9RcSlFxnn_O1OREtcHHGNDqQ9ju6_CjGejBls629GBLZ1sZvz_hzdZ7h__Dv8RJajw</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Schortgen, Geoffrey P.</creator><creator>Patton, Aaron J.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3870-7709</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Influence of hard water on 2,4-D formulations for the control of dandelion</title><author>Schortgen, Geoffrey P. ; Patton, Aaron J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b298t-7035d1ded9e589b0c9155dfe7bfb299059ddf21af42dd1ef208862c8c93e3d6f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>2,4-D</topic><topic>Acids</topic><topic>amine</topic><topic>antagonism</topic><topic>Auxins</topic><topic>Calcium carbonate</topic><topic>Choline</topic><topic>Cropping systems</topic><topic>Diethanolamine</topic><topic>emulsifiable concentrate</topic><topic>Emulsifying agents</topic><topic>emulsion</topic><topic>Emulsions</topic><topic>ester</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Formulations</topic><topic>Greenhouses</topic><topic>hard water</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Horticulture</topic><topic>Ingredients</topic><topic>Isooctyl ester</topic><topic>Loam soils</topic><topic>Proprietary</topic><topic>Salt</topic><topic>Salts</topic><topic>Water chemistry</topic><topic>Water hardness</topic><topic>water-insoluble</topic><topic>water-soluble</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schortgen, Geoffrey P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patton, Aaron J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Proquest Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schortgen, Geoffrey P.</au><au>Patton, Aaron J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of hard water on 2,4-D formulations for the control of dandelion</atitle><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle><stitle>Weed Technol</stitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>371</spage><epage>379</epage><pages>371-379</pages><issn>0890-037X</issn><eissn>1550-2740</eissn><abstract>The herbicide 2,4-D is used in a variety of cropping systems, especially in grasses because it is a selective postemergence broadleaf herbicide. However, the most common formulation (2,4-D dimethylamine) is antagonized when mixed in hard water. The objective of this research was to determine which formulations of 2,4-D or premixes of various formulations of synthetic auxin herbicides are subject to hard water antagonism. Formulations surveyed for hard water antagonism in the first experiment included 2,4-D dimethylamine, 2,4-D diethanolamine, 2,4-D monomethylamine, 2,4-D isopropylamine salt, 2,4-D choline salt, 2,4-D isooctyl ester, and 2,4-D ethylhexyl ester. Synthetic auxin formulation types in the second experiment included water-soluble, emulsifiable concentrates and emulsion-in-water. All formulations were mixed with both soft and hard water (600 mg CaCO3 L-1) and applied to dandelions to determine whether antagonism occurred in hard water. Water-soluble (amine and choline) 2,4-D formulations were antagonized by hard water, but water-insoluble (ester) 2,4-D formulations were not antagonized. Similar results were found by formulation type with water-soluble synthetic auxin premixes antagonized but emulsifiable concentrates not antagonized. Furthermore, water-soluble salt formulations were not antagonized when formulated in premixes with other synthetic auxin herbicides as an emulsion-in-water. This research demonstrates that all 2,4-D water-soluble formulations and water-soluble premixes with phenoxycarboxylic acid herbicides are subject to hard water antagonism. Formulations of 2,4-D containing emulsifying agents protect against antagonism by the water-insoluble nature of ingredients in their formulation. Nomenclature: 2,4-D; dandelion; Taraxacum officinale G.H. Weber ex Wiggers; MCPP; MCPA</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/wet.2020.135</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3870-7709</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0890-037X |
ispartof | Weed technology, 2021-06, Vol.35 (3), p.371-379 |
issn | 0890-037X 1550-2740 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2553822274 |
source | Cambridge University Press |
subjects | 2,4-D Acids amine antagonism Auxins Calcium carbonate Choline Cropping systems Diethanolamine emulsifiable concentrate Emulsifying agents emulsion Emulsions ester Experiments Formulations Greenhouses hard water Herbicides Horticulture Ingredients Isooctyl ester Loam soils Proprietary Salt Salts Water chemistry Water hardness water-insoluble water-soluble |
title | Influence of hard water on 2,4-D formulations for the control of dandelion |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T21%3A40%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20hard%20water%20on%202,4-D%20formulations%20for%20the%20control%20of%20dandelion&rft.jtitle=Weed%20technology&rft.au=Schortgen,%20Geoffrey%20P.&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=371&rft.epage=379&rft.pages=371-379&rft.issn=0890-037X&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/wet.2020.135&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2553822274%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b298t-7035d1ded9e589b0c9155dfe7bfb299059ddf21af42dd1ef208862c8c93e3d6f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2553822274&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |